/LING
|
Update: February 24, 2023 The new version of Termout.org is now online, so this web site is now obsolete and will soon be dismantled. |
Lista de candidatos sometidos a examen:
1) analogy (*)
(*) Términos presentes en el nuestro glosario de lingüística
1) Candidate: analogy
Is in goldstandard
1
paper corpusSignosTxtLongLines400 - : Lastly, the relational networks presented in this paper –as well as any other relational network– include no symbols or static objects in their structure. In RNT terms, the individual cognitive system consists only of relationships. The labels placed next to the networks’ lines are mere visual aids for model builders or readers to know which part of the system is being described. It would be a mistake to think of such labels as part of cognitive structure proper. It would also be wrong to conceive of nodes as the iconic correlate of an analytic symbol. Lamb (1999) sheds light on this point with the following analogy: symbols are to a cognitive system what road signs are to a highway . The road sign reading “New York 80 miles” is not part of the highway system proper. The sign (i.e., the symbolic label) can be removed without the highway (i.e., the system of connections) suffering any change in its structure. Symbols are nothing but signaling epiphenomena. The only elements which are part of
2
paper corpusSignosTxtLongLines487 - : Arguing by analogy: The emotion in the analysis of a socio-scientific issue
Evaluando al candidato analogy:
3) cognitive: 3 (*)
4) symbols: 3
analogy
Lengua: eng
Frec: 18
Docs: 8
Nombre propio: / 18 = 0%
Coocurrencias con glosario: 1
Puntaje: 1.725 = (1 + (1+2.8073549220576) / (1+4.24792751344359)));
Candidato aceptado
Referencias bibliográficas encontradas sobre cada término
(Que existan referencias dedicadas a un término es también indicio de terminologicidad.)| analogy |
: Dwyer, S., Huebner, B. & Hauser, M. D. (2010). The linguistic analogy: Motivations, results, and speculations. Topics in Cognitive Science, 2(3), 486-510. : Mcdonald, E., Zembal-Saul, S. & Strauss, S.G. (2014). Inviting argument by analogy: Analogical‐mapping‐based comparison activities as a scaffold for small‐group argumentation. Science Education, 98(2), 243-268. : Shelley, C. (2002). Analogy counterarguments and the acceptability of analogical hypotheses. The British Journal for the Philosophy of Science, 53(4), 477-496. : Walton, D. (2014). Argumentation schemes for argument from analogy. En H. Ribeiro (Ed.), Systematic Approaches to Argument by Analogy (pp. 23-40). Dordrecht: Springer. |