/LING
|
Update: February 24, 2023 The new version of Termout.org is now online, so this web site is now obsolete and will soon be dismantled. |
Lista de candidatos sometidos a examen:
1) argue (*)
(*) Términos presentes en el nuestro glosario de lingüística
1) Candidate: argue
Is in goldstandard
1
paper corpusSignosTxtLongLines353 - : It is a central tenet of the SFL model that language has ‘evolved in the service of certain functions’ (Halliday, 2003), and that this evolutionary process has left its mark on the organisation of language, so that its inner character is a function of what humans have needed to do with it. One of these functions of language provides speakers with the means to organise the complexity of human experience, both the world around and inside us. As Halliday and Matthiessen (2004: 170) argue:
2
paper corpusSignosTxtLongLines453 - : with Infinitive construction, which, like the resultative, is not circumscribed to any given verb class. These authors show that, when trying to annotate sentences with verbs that may occur in such a construction (e.g. 'buy', which evokes the ‘Commerce_buy’ frame, or 'have', which evokes the ‘Possession’ frame), constituents that can receive a label in one frame, cannot in another frame. This is so because there is no frame element that can be assigned to such a constituent. To account for unlabeled constituents, one could create specific frame elements in each of the frames in which this situation occurs. However, ^[72]Torrent et al. (2014: 41) argue that:
3
paper corpusSignosTxtLongLines485 - : Many studies have analyzed the textual genres that are generated in specific specialized domains. The scientific field, and specially the medical domain, is one of the most formalized and studied specialized fields internationally. Related to the medical domain, ^[37]Piqué-Angordans and Posteguillo (2006: 651) argue that:
4
paper corpusSignosTxtLongLines531 - : moments for the future teacher to test the waters, learn from mistakes, and evolve. We acknowledge that this is easier said than done, especially since CTs are the ones to be held accountable should anything affect their students’ well-being and learning. Nonetheless, as ^[87]Epstein and Ratner (2015: 116) argue, this type of project benefits the classroom teacher:
Evaluando al candidato argue:
1) frame: 5 (*)
argue
Lengua: eng
Frec: 47
Docs: 34
Nombre propio: / 47 = 0%
Coocurrencias con glosario: 1
Puntaje: 1.544 = (1 + (1+2.58496250072116) / (1+5.58496250072116)));
Candidato aceptado
Referencias bibliográficas encontradas sobre cada término
(Que existan referencias dedicadas a un término es también indicio de terminologicidad.)| argue |
: Eisenberg, A. (1987). Learning to argue with parents and peers. Argumentation, 1(2), 113-125. : Kelly, G. & Bazerman, C. (2003). How students argue scientific claims: A rhetorical-semantic analysis. Applied Linguistics, 24(1), 28-55. : Thompson, G. (2001). Interaction in academic writing: Learning to argue with the reader. Applied Linguistics, 22, 5878. |