/LING
|
Update: February 24, 2023 The new version of Termout.org is now online, so this web site is now obsolete and will soon be dismantled. |
Lista de candidatos sometidos a examen:
1) arousal (*)
(*) Términos presentes en el nuestro glosario de lingüística
1) Candidate: arousal
Is in goldstandard
1
paper CL_LiteraturayLingüísticatxt591 - : raters has probably to do with cultural issues, since in the Domini can world moro is a very appreciated food. If a Dominican speaker had rated this word it would have probably had a very high score. This would be so because food is a rich sensorial experience linked to culture (Fa- ber & Vidal Claramonte, “Food terminology.” 155). Regarding arousal there are more negative terms (7) than positive: 5 out of 12 . As the data were not illuminating the situation about Yunior's emotional identity, we got the mean for positive and negative emotional terms as much for valence (6.94 / 3.50) as for arousal (5.74 / 4.41). The means depicted a clear pattern in the use of code-switches when compared in the three stories (see Graphic 1 at the end of this section).
2
paper CL_LiteraturayLingüísticatxt591 - : The analyses in the longest story, “The Pura Principie’,' revealed that almost all inter / intra-sentential and tag-switches are produced by Yunior (approximately two thirds). The terms with a rating in the list by Stadhagen-González et al. (“Norms of valence...” 111) are emotionally- charged to a greater or lesser extent (22 out of 22 exceeding the mid- point score: 5). Valence scores had a wider range than arousal in that the former ranged from 3.20 to 8.40 while the latter ranged from 3.50 to 6.70. Once again the data supported the positivity bias towards pleas- ant words (Warriner et al., “Norms of valence, arousal.” 1191; Warriner & Kuperman, “Affective biases in.” 1147), specifically, 18 out of 22 terms (e.g., pura, favor, indiecita, etc.) are given a positive score. It can be observed that as in “Invierno” there are more negative terms for arousal: 14 out of 22 . We also got the mean for positive and nega tive emotional terms for valence (6.77 / 4.09) and arousal (5.69 / 4.30), whi
3
paper CL_LiteraturayLingüísticatxt591 - : All these instances of Cs in the three stories have to do with emotions, and they collaborate in our understanding of Yunior's identity and his affective attachment and detachment to Latin people. Almost all of the words in the code-switches with a rating in the list by Stadhagen-González et al. (“Norms of valence...” 111) are emotionally- charged to a greater or lesser extent, 7 out of 8 exceeding the mid-point score: 5. Valence scores had a wider range than arousal in that the former ranged from 5.0 to 8.40 while the latter ranged from 4.20 to 6.90. The data supported the positivity bias towards pleasant words, specifi- cally, 7 out of 8 terms (e.g. enamorao, novias, moreno) are given a positive score, something well-established in research for several other languages (Warriner et al., “Norms of valence, arousal...” 1191; Warriner & Kuperman, “Affective biases in.” 1147). It can be observed that, as in “Invierno” there are more negative terms for arousal: 5 out of 8 . Again, as this data
Evaluando al candidato arousal:
2) valence: 6
3) positive: 5 (*)
4) ranged: 4
5) norms: 4 (*)
6) warriner: 4
7) negative: 4
8) affective: 3
10) score: 3
11) emotional: 3
12) yunior: 3
arousal
Lengua: eng
Frec: 19
Docs: 7
Nombre propio: / 19 = 0%
Coocurrencias con glosario: 2
Puntaje: 3.188 = (2 + (1+5.32192809488736) / (1+4.32192809488736)));
Candidato aceptado
Referencias bibliográficas encontradas sobre cada término
(Que existan referencias dedicadas a un término es también indicio de terminologicidad.)| arousal |
: Stadthagen-González, Hans, Imbault, Constance, Pérez Sánchez, Miguel A., & Marc Brysbaert. “Norms of valence and arousal for 14,031 Spanish words" Behavior Research Methods, no. 49, 2017, pp. 111-123. : Warriner, Amy Beth, Kuperman, Victor & Marc Brysbaert . “Norms of valence, arousal, and dominance for 13,915 English lemmas” Behavior Research Methods, no. 45, 2013, pp. 1191-1207. |