/LING
|
Update: February 24, 2023 The new version of Termout.org is now online, so this web site is now obsolete and will soon be dismantled. |
Lista de candidatos sometidos a examen:
1) assignment (*)
(*) Términos presentes en el nuestro glosario de lingüística
1) Candidate: assignment
Is in goldstandard
1
paper corpusSignosTxtLongLines602 - : The WI content was designed to anticipate difficulties that students could encounter when carrying out the preparatory assignments. To prepare for the final assignment, a comparison of a socio-cultural topic from two different countries’ points of view, students first had to:
2
paper corpusSignosTxtLongLines602 - : Finally, students had to select another country experiencing/dealing with the issue, find relevant sources, evaluate these and compare the issue in the two countries -this was the final assignment. For further detail on each assignment and evaluation criteria, please go to: https://englishpolyu .wixsite.com/renialopez/academic-writing.
3
paper corpusSignosTxtLongLines602 - : Students assignments were evaluated according to the rubrics (see https://englishpolyu .wixsite.com/renialopez/academic-writing) and given a percentage grade (based on the institution conversion tables). For this study we only took into account the grades obtained for the final assignment, in order to be able to compare the grades to those from the 2017 group. All assignments were first evaluated on the writing by the project officers, then the PI re-evaluated the writing and the content relating to the subject, giving a final grade, achieving evaluators agreement on grades in 91% of cases (the remaining 8% was discussed with the second teacher for the subject). An independent, external evaluator, assessed 20% of randomly selected assignments, in all cases giving the same or higher grades (5% higher on average). We believe the internal evaluation team might have been grading lower as they were taking into account students’ responses to previous feedback (if the feedback had not been
4
paper corpusSignosTxtLongLines602 - : 3.2. Assignment Grades: 2018 versus 2017 results
5
paper corpusSignosTxtLongLines602 - : Assignment grades: 2018 versus 2017 results
Evaluando al candidato assignment:
1) grades: 6
assignment
Lengua: eng
Frec: 82
Docs: 17
Nombre propio: 2 / 82 = 2%
Coocurrencias con glosario:
Puntaje: 0.516 = ( + (1+2.8073549220576) / (1+6.37503943134693)));
Candidato aceptado
Referencias bibliográficas encontradas sobre cada término
(Que existan referencias dedicadas a un término es también indicio de terminologicidad.)| assignment |
: Branigan, H., Pickering, M. & Tanaka, M. (2008). Contributions of animacy to grammatical function assignment and word order during production. Lingua, 118, 172–189. : Clegg, J. H. (2010). Native Spanish speaker intuition in noun gender assignment. Language Design, 12, 5-18. : Franco, K., Zenner, E. & Speelman, D. (2018). Let’s agree to disagree. (Variation in) the assignment of gender to nominal anglicisms in Dutch. Journal of Germanic Linguistics, 30(1), 43-87. : Henderson, L. & Buising, C. (2000). A peer-reviewed research assignment for large classes. Journal of College Science Teaching, 30(2), 109-114. : Kilarski, M. (2004). Gender assignment of English loanwords in Danish, Swedish and Norwegian. PhD dissertation, Adam Mickiewicz University, Poznań [on line]. Retrieved from: [200]http://www.staff.amu.edu.pl/~kilarski/research/download/ book_gender.pdf : Morin, R. (2010). Terminal letters, phonemes, and morphemes in Spanish gender assignment. Linguistics, 48(1), 143-169. : Smead, R. (2000). On the assignment of gender to Chicano anglicisms: Processes and results. Bilingual Review, 25(3), 277-297. : Thornton, A. M. (2009). Constraining gender assignment rules. Language Sciences, 31(1), 14-32. : Walster, E. (1966). Assignment of responsibility for an accident. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 3, 73-79. |