Update: February 24, 2023
The new version of
Termout.org is now online,
so this web site is now obsolete and will soon be dismantled.
|
Lista de candidatos sometidos a examen:
1)
audience (*)
(*) Términos presentes en el nuestro glosario de lingüística
Is in goldstandard
1
paper corpusSignosTxtLongLines175 -
: The interpersonal relation with the audience: The case of Venezuelan president Hugo Chávez' discourse
2
paper corpusSignosTxtLongLines252 - : Based on the same criterion, Hammerich and Harrison (2002) differentiates between explicit links, i.e., obvious to the user, or implicit links, i.e., built in as part of the structure of the hypertext design model. However, she points out that the underlying basic feature of all systems is the difference between strongly authored links -manually made- and weakly authored links-built through computational models. To put it in other words, this means that in the processes of developing web sites professional writers may decide to design a link exclusively written for his/her particular hypertext or may create one between his/her hypertext and another page that contains related informatio
n. In order to make decisions, writers and designers on the web "imagine the audience and draw on their internal representation of the possible reader as a guide to writing and designing" (Dotto, 2006:3 ).
3
paper corpusSignosTxtLongLines278 -
: Como se desprende de las líneas anteriores, la sentencia es un género cuya redacción se encuentra condicionada por el 'dilema de la doble audiencia' (two audience dilemma): se trata de un texto con un doble destinatario, especialista (juristas ) y no especialista (las partes afectadas). El dilema consiste en que si el juez intenta acercar su lenguaje a las partes -que constituyen, en teoría, el alocutor o destinatario directo de la sentencia-, pierde credibilidad profesional entre sus colegas de profesión, que participan también en la comunicación en tanto que destinatarios indirectos o participantes ratificados^[28]3. Por el contrario, si opta por mantener su discurso especializado, falla la comunicación con las partes afectadas (Gibbons, 2003).
4
paper corpusSignosTxtLongLines313 - : Some women who work in an all-female company or institution may feel offended if they are addressed by a masculine for
m. For example, in a farewell message, we can see that the sender of the message was aware of the fact that his audience was made up exclusively of women and he chose a relevant form of address:
5
paper corpusSignosTxtLongLines364 - : A. Relevance and Materiality v
s. Maxim of Quantity: information can only really be regarded as useful if it is relevant in meeting the needs of the audience, enabling them to draw on it in order to form an opinion or arrive at a decision, through the evaluation of past, present or future events (GCRIAR, 2008: 11 ).
6
paper corpusSignosTxtLongLines364 - : B. Comparability v
s. Maxim of Manner: the audience of the report should be able to "compare the indicators over time and between enterprises to enable them to identify and analyse the outcome of changes in policy and management" (GCRIAR, 2008: 11 ).
7
paper corpusSignosTxtLongLines382 - : This goes on for approximately half of the speech, i.e. 1980 words out of the total 3600, where the discourse stays in the serious frame. This first half, conceived in the serious frame, reinforces qualities such as ‘seeker of justice, vigilant guardian of national wealth, culture and values, honest, tough, and vehement
. The second part goes on as if to allow the audience to take a glimpse of the man behind the official role: a relaxed, benevolent and full of humour conversationalist who can elegantly rise above differences outside the political debate, which rounds up the politician’s image . In Fairclough’s terms (2006), this is a case of interdiscursive hybridity, a characteristic feature of the Senator’s unique style, i.e. his brand.
8
paper corpusSignosTxtLongLines421 - : The photograph is the most salient element of the composition due to its size and to the message it conveys: the politician appears foregrounded, the background is blurred but lighter than the one in the previous poster; the fact that he is the only social actor represented contributes to emphasizing the candidat
e. Ahern looks directly at the audience, which is a clear way of interacting with them and requesting an answer or rather an action from them: their vote for Fianna Fáil . This can be considered a demand image (Kress & van Leeuwen, 2006), which contrasts with the one presented in the previous poster. Ahern looks less serious and more relaxed and sure than in the last poster. Moreover, the posture of his hands shows that he is a confident leader who is willing to continue doing things for Ireland. In this sense it is outstanding that, although he is also wearing smart clothes (a shirt and a tie), on this occasion he has taken off his jacket, making thus his image as a politician more
9
paper corpusSignosTxtLongLines421 -
: The written language of the posters analysed shows the characteristics of political discourse, whose main purpose is to persuade the audience to vote for Fianna Fáil: use of ellipsis, positive language, repetitions, and short phrases are the main features of the slogans found in the posters . In this sense, the different slogans and the visual representation of Bertie Ahern and Micheál Martin as secure political leaders suggest the idea of Ireland as a European country that was in a process of socio-economic development in Europe and whose expansion was progressively growing.
10
paper corpusSignosTxtLongLines426 - : Later on, in 1990, Wilson in his study of the United States presidential debates between Gerald Ford and Jimmy Carter in 1976 analyzes the shifting status of I and w
e. His conclusion anchores it “on self-positioning the desire to spread the load of responsibility, and the fear of being misinterpreted, by the audience or co-debater” (Adentunji, 2006: 182 ).
11
paper corpusSignosTxtLongLines426 - : The results demonstrated in Table 4 reveal a quantitative prevalence of the proximal deictic items over the distal ones, which appeal to the earlier and later images in the addressee’s working memory respectivel
y. In doing so, from the cognitive perspective, Bachelet creates the shared mental space with her audience, “in which the speaker and the addressee are co-present at a given point in time” (Yang, 2011: 130 ). Yang (idem.) further claims that this cognitive dimension of time-space deictic references “is based on linguistic representation of a physical act performed by a human being in the presence of another human being”, which further favors positive associations with an action here and now, than with something happening there and then (Cramer, 2010).
12
paper corpusSignosTxtLongLines579 - : ^[80]Thompson (1994) examined the rhetorical structure of a mixed corpus of 18 lecture introductions in applied linguistics, engineering and medicine. She used the terms ‘functions’ and ‘subfunctions’ for Swalesian ‘moves’ and ‘steps’. Not aiming to differentiate between the rhetorical models in the mentioned disciplines, Thompson introduced a model composed of two main functions -SETTING UP THE LECTURE FRAMEWORK and PUTTING TOPIC IN CONTEXT. The first function is metalinguistic, giving the
audience information on the lecture discourse. Hence, it is realized through four subfunctions: ‘announce the topic’, ‘indicate scope’, ‘outline the structure’ and ‘present aims
. The second function, PUTTING TOPIC IN CONTEXT, provides the audience with the information on the lecture content through the following subfunctions: ‘show importance/relevance of topic, relate ‘new’ to ‘given’ and refer to earlier lectures’ .
13
paper corpusSignosTxtLongLines599 - : According to ^[71]Peacock (2006), expressing accepted truth is similar to conveying evidential or implicit truth. Modals (e.g. ‘will’ or ‘must’) or certain phrases (e.g. ‘of course’, ‘clearly’ or ‘obviously’) are often used to express accepted truth, that is, when a claim made is already widely accepted in a particular disciplin
e. Even though the author’s viewpoint is not meant to be involved in such cases, the boosters mentioned “mark involvement and solidarity with an audience, stressing shared information, group membership, and direct engagement with readers” (^[72]Hyland, 1998a: 350 ). The term “solidarity boosters”, introduced by ^[73]Vassileva (2001: 97), reflects more specifically the inclusion of the reader in a scientific or discourse community and his knowledge of the field (^[74]Myers, 1989; ^[75]Harwood, 2005). The examples mentioned previously could also be considered as solidarity boosters depending on the context in which they have been used. Peacock (^[76]2006: 65
14
paper corpusSignosTxtLongLines86 - : This paper is about the burlesque comedy of the "Siglo de Oro" (Golden Century) in Spain. This is a sub-genre to wish the critics had given very little consideration till very recently. The paper (Discusses, examines) a corpus of about 50 comedies wich either parody other serious comedies or some topics and dramatic structures of the new comed
y. These comedies, wich were performed during carnival and in the royal palace for a courtly audience, make use of the carnival's "mundo al revés" techniques: the inversion of values, the breaking of propierty (decorum ) and scenic and verbal comicalness. In the second part of this paper, there is an analysis of the parodical resources of the burlesque comedy based on examples taken from "La mayor hazaña de Carlos VI", a comedy written by the convert Manuel de Pina.
Evaluando al candidato audience:
2) lecture: 4
4) topic: 4 (*)
5) discourse: 3 (*)
10) politician: 3
17) mentioned: 3
18) comedy: 3
19) message: 3 (*)
20) paper: 3
audience
Lengua: eng
Frec: 112
Docs: 34
Nombre propio: / 112 = 0%
Coocurrencias con glosario: 3
Frec. en corpus ref. en eng: 154
Puntaje: 3.736 = (3 + (1+4.75488750216347) / (1+6.82017896241519)));
Rechazado: muy común;
Referencias bibliográficas encontradas sobre cada término
(Que existan referencias dedicadas a un término es también indicio de
terminologicidad.)
audience |
: "to silence, marginalize and even eliminate political opponents, to divert audience attention from significant political issues, and for political branding" (Tsakona & Popa, 2011: 14).
: Alamargot, D., Caporossi, G., Chesnet, D. & Ros, C. (2011). What makes a skilled writer? Working memory and audience awareness during text composition.Learning and Individual Differences,21(5), 505-516.
: Bell, A. (1984). Language style as audience design. Language in Society, 13(2), 145-204.
: EDE, L. y LUNSFORD, A. (1988) "Audience addressed/audience invoked: The role of audience in composition theory and pedagogy", en G. Tate y E. P. J. Corbett (Eds.), The writing teacher's sourcebook, Nueva York: Oxford University Press.
: Ede, L. & Lunsford, A. (1984). Audience addressed/audience invoked: The role of audience in composition theory and pedagogy. College Composition and Communication, 35, 155-171.
: Hood, S. & Forey, G. (2005). Introducing a conference paper: Getting interpersonal with your audience. JEAP Journal of English for Academic Purposes, 4(4), 291-306.
: Luzón, M. J. (2013). Public communication of science in blogs: Recontextualizing scientific discourse for a diversified audience. Written Communication, 30(4), 428-457. [216]https://doi.org/10.1177/0741088313493610
: ONG, W. (1975) "The writer's audience is always a fiction", PMLA, 90, 9-21.
: Porter, J. (1992). Audience and rhetoric. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice.
: The deictic 3^rd person pronominal reference is characterized by its exclusive character, i.e., it does not explicitly include possible audience of Bachelet’s speech, and it is directed to, or speak about, ‘third parties’ or ‘others’ (Nikitina, 2012).
: Varttala, T. (2001). Hedging in scientifically oriented discourse. Exploring variation according to discipline and intended audience. Tesis doctoral, Universidad de Tampere, Tampere, Finlandia.
: Ward, M. (2009). Squaring the learning circle: Cross-classroom collaborations and the impact of audience on student outcomes in professional writing. Journal of Business and Technical Communication, 23(1), 61-82.
|