Termout.org logo/LING


Update: February 24, 2023 The new version of Termout.org is now online, so this web site is now obsolete and will soon be dismantled.

Lista de candidatos sometidos a examen:
1) authorial (*)
(*) Términos presentes en el nuestro glosario de lingüística

1) Candidate: authorial


Is in goldstandard

1
paper corpusSignosTxtLongLines323 - : Authorial voice in academic writing: A methodological proposal for its analysis

2
paper corpusSignosTxtLongLines433 - : In this article we approach the construction of authorial voice in doctorate theses of a humanistic discipline: philosophy . Our purpose is to illustrate, based on an exploratory study focused on the identification of marks of the first person and attribution, the way in which doctorate candidates construct an identity as writers/researchers according to the requirements of the discourse genre in this area. The results show that dissertation writers have a strong tendency to construct their identity as specialists who master the disciplinary content; however, the times, when they incorporate the role of author-researchers, are rare. This fact leads us to open discussion as regards the training of researchers in the area of Humanities, and the need to propose intervention plans concerning academic and scientific literacy, which allow graduates of these programs to become writers who raise the visibility of the field in local and international academic contexts.

3
paper corpusSignosTxtLongLines600 - : First of all, ^[108]Tang and John’s study (1999) explore the notion of writer identity in academic essays by looking at person pronouns. They set up a typology of six identities drawing on ^[109]Ivanic’s previous work (1994, 1995, 1998) in order to examine essays written by first-year undergraduates. ^[110]Tang and John’s (1999) taxonomy identifies the different roles that students can bring into their writing through the use of person pronouns. They also place such roles along a continuum in terms of the degree of authorial power enacted; that is, some of the roles point to a more or less powerful authorial presence:

4
paper corpusSignosTxtLongLines600 - : The identification of the different functions performed by the authorial devices under analysis was somehow determined or guided by the rhetorical function of the specific section where they were used . The findings obtained here are only extendable to similar RAs in the field.

Evaluando al candidato authorial:


1) academic: 4
3) roles: 3
4) identity: 3

authorial
Lengua: eng
Frec: 113
Docs: 28
Nombre propio: 1 / 113 = 0%
Coocurrencias con glosario:
Puntaje: 0.569 = ( + (1+3.4594316186373) / (1+6.83289001416474)));
Candidato aceptado

Referencias bibliográficas encontradas sobre cada término

(Que existan referencias dedicadas a un término es también indicio de terminologicidad.)
authorial
: Abdollahzadeh, E. (2010). Poring over the findings: Interpersonal authorial engagement in applied linguistics papers. Journal of Pragmatics, 43, 288-297.
: Alonso-Almeida, F. (2012). Sentential evidential adverbs and authorial stance in a corpus of English computing articles. Revista de Lingüística y Lenguas Aplicadas 7, 9-21.
: Bondi, M. (2017). What came to be called: Evaluative what and authorial voice in the discourse of history. Text & Talk, 37, 25-46.
: Carrió-Pastor, M. L. (2019). Authorial engagement in business emails. Engagement in professional genres. In C. Sancho-Guinda (Ed.), Engagement in Professional Genres (pp 48-65). Pragmatics and Beyond New Series.
: Chang, P. & Schleppegrell, M. (2011). Taking an effective authorial stance in academic writing: Making the linguistic resources explicit for L2 writers in the social sciencies. Journal of English for Academic Purposes, 10, 140-151.
: Channell, J. (1999). Corpus-based analysis of evaluative lexis. In S. Hunston & G. Thompson (Eds.), Evaluation in Text: Authorial Stance and the Construction of Discourse (pp. 38-55). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
: Hyland, K. (2002). Authority and invisibility: Authorial identity in academic writing. Journal of Pragmatics, 34, 1091-1112.
: Lorés-Sanz, R. (2008). Authorial visibility in research article and research article abstracts: The intergeneric perspective. In S. Burgess & P. Martín Martín (Eds.), English as an additional language in research publication and communication (pp. 105-122). Bern: Peter Lang .
: Lorés-Sanz, R. (2011a). The study of authorial voice: Using a Spanish-English corpus to explore linguistic transference. Corpora 6(1), 1-24.
: Martin, J. (2000). Beyond Exchange: APPRAISAL Systems in English. Em S. Hunston & G. Thompson (Eds.), Evaluation in Text: Authorial Stance and the Construction of Discourse (pp. 142-175). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
: Montemayor-Borsinger, A. (2005a). Authorial development in research writing: Coding changes in grammatical subject. The ESPecialist, 26(2), 82-104.
: Nelson, N. & Castelló, M. (en prensa). Academic writing and authorial voice. En M. Castelló & C. Donahue (Eds.), University writing: Selves and texts in academic societes. London: Emerald Group Publishing Limited.
: Pho, P. (2008). Research article abstracts in applied linguistics and educational technology: A study of linguistic realizations of rhetorical structure and authorial stance. Discourse Studies, 10, 231-250.
: Thompson, G. & Hunston, S. (2000). Evaluation in text: Authorial stance and the construction of discourse. Oxford, Nueva York: Oxford University Press.
: Vassileva, I. (1998). Who am I/who are we in academic writing? A contrastive analysis of authorial presence in English, German, French, Russian and Bulgarian. International Journal of Applied Linguistics, 8(2), 163-190.