/LING
|
Update: February 24, 2023 The new version of Termout.org is now online, so this web site is now obsolete and will soon be dismantled. |
Lista de candidatos sometidos a examen:
1) brain (*)
(*) Términos presentes en el nuestro glosario de lingüística
1) Candidate: brain
Is in goldstandard
1
paper corpusSignosTxtLongLines124 - : 1: Investigations into the neural basis of language center around how the brain processes language .
2
paper corpusSignosTxtLongLines124 - : Text 1 Investigations into the neural basis of language center around how the brain processes language .
3
paper corpusSignosTxtLongLines124 - : Text 1 Investigations into the neural basis of language center around how the brain processes language .
4
paper corpusSignosTxtLongLines170 - : Language, embodiment, and brain: Critical review
5
paper corpusSignosTxtLongLines192 - : (13vi) ob0 is more delicately conceptualized by U2-U5 as a question (question) posed by other researchers (ob3) on whether there are differences (differ) in the brain morphology of schizophrenic patients (ob5) which are correlated with these patients sex differences (ob6): question (ob3, differ (ob5, ob6 )).
6
paper corpusSignosTxtLongLines337 - : By manipulating the spatiotemporal contiguities of direct causal events, Fugelsang, Roser, Corballis, Gazzaniga and Dunbar (2005) devised a task to contrast brain activity during three conditions: direct events (i .e., Michottean launching), spatial discontiguity, and temporal discontiguity. The spatial discontiguity included a spatial gap between the two colliding objects while keeping the temporal succession between the objects. The temporal discontiguity consisted in a delay in the movement onset of the second object while maintaining spatial contiguity. Using fMRI, Fugelsang et al. (2005) observed lateralized right posterior regions involved in detecting the spatiotemporal contiguities of direct causal events (e.g., during the Michottean launching). Specifically, the right inferior parietal lobule (RIPL) was hypothesized to be involved in processing the temporal properties of the causal event, whereas the right middle temporal gyrus (RMTG) was hypothesized to process the spatial
7
paper corpusSignosTxtLongLines400 - : “Indeed, it is probably time for linguists to reconsider our traditional assumptions about what makes a model ‘elegant’ […] [I]t may be that we should not condemn as ‘inelegant’ or ‘uneconomical’ rules that the conscious human mind finds somewhat difficult to implement, but which can be performed by a computer in a moment –and also, some might wish to add, whose analogues in human brain can similarly be performed in a trice and, moreover, without requiring conscious attention” (Fawcett, 2003: 13 ).
8
paper corpusSignosTxtLongLines545 - : Chertkow, H., Bub, D., Murtha, S., Beauregard, M., Gold, D., Hosein, C., et al. & Evans, A. (1996). Variability of brain regions in word processing: Evidence for dissociation of processing levels . Ponencia presentada en the Third Annual Meeting of the Cognitive Neuroscience Society, San Francisco, Estados Unidos. [ [137]Links ]
Evaluando al candidato brain:
1) temporal: 5
3) spatial: 4 (*)
4) processes: 3
5) causal: 3 (*)
10) language. : 3
11) processing: 3 (*)
13) neural: 3 (*)
15) investigations: 3
17) discontiguity: 3
brain
Lengua: eng
Frec: 148
Docs: 47
Nombre propio: / 148 = 0%
Coocurrencias con glosario: 4
Frec. en corpus ref. en eng: 135
Puntaje: 4.724 = (4 + (1+4.95419631038688) / (1+7.21916852046216)));
Rechazado: muy común;
Referencias bibliográficas encontradas sobre cada término
(Que existan referencias dedicadas a un término es también indicio de terminologicidad.)| brain |
: Ahmed, S., Haigh, A. H., Jager, C. A. & Garrard, P. (2013). Connected speech as a marker of disease progression in autopsy-proven Alzheimer´s disease. Brain, 136, 3727-3737. : Ahrens, K., Liu, H., Lee, C., Gong, S., Fang, S. & Hsu, S. (2007). Functional MRI of conventional and anomalous metaphors in Mandarin Chinese. Brain and Language, 100, 163-171. : Amanzio, M., Geminiani, G., Leotta, D. & Cappa, S. (2008). Metaphor comprehension in Alzheimer’s disease: Novelty matters. Brain and Language, 107, 1-10. : Athanasopoulos, P., Dering, B., Wiggett, A., Kuipers, J.-R. & Thierry, G. (2010). Perceptual shift in bilingualism: Brain potentials reveal plasticity in pre-attentive colour perception. Cognition, 116, 437-443. : Bara, B., Cutica, I. & Tirassa, M. (2000). Neuropragmatics: Extralinguistic communication alters closed head injury. Brain and Language, 77, 72-94. : Barsalou, L. (1999). Perceptual symbol systems. Behavioral & Brain Sciences, 22, 577-660. : Beretta, A., Fiorentino, R. & Poeppel, D. (2005). The effects of homonymy and polysemy on lexical access: An MEG study. Cognitive Brain Research, 24, 57-65. : Bishop, D., Adams, C. & Norbury, C. (2006). Distinct genetic influences on grammar and phonological short-term memory deficits: evidence from 6-year-old twins. Genes, brain and behavior, 5(2), 158-169. : Blakemore, S., Fonlupt, P., Pachot-Clouard, M., Darmon, C., Boyer, P. & Meltzoff, A. (2001). How the brain perceives causality: An event-related fMRI study. Neuroreport, 12(17), 3741- 3746. : Bornkessel-Schlesewsky, I. & Schlesewsky, M. (2008). An alternative perspective on “semantic P600” effects in language comprehension. Brain Research Reviews, 59, 55-73. : Brouwer, H., Fitz, H. & Hoeks, J. (2012). Getting real about semantic illusions: Rethinking the functional role of the P600 in language comprehension. Brain Research, 1446, 127-143. : Burianova, H., Mcintosh, A. & Grady, C. (2010). A common functional brain network for autobiographical, episodic, and semantic Memory retrieval. Neuroimage, 49, 865-874. : Carreiras, M. & Perea, M. (2004). Naming pseudowords in Spanish: Effects of syllable frequency. Brain and Language, 90(1-3), 393-400. : Casado, P., Martín-Loeches, M., Muñoz, F. & Fernández-Frías, C. (2005). Are semantic and syntactic cues inducing the same processes in the identification of word order? Cognitive Brain Research, 24, 526–543. : Catricalà, E., Della Rosa, P. A., Plebani, V., Garrard, P. & Cappa, S. F. (2015). Semantic feature degradation and naming performance. Evidence from neurodegenerative disorders. Brain and Language, 147, 58-65. : Cepeda, G., Khebian, M., Miranda, J. & Brain, A. (1988). El habla de Valdivia urbano: Primera etapa de una investigación. Valdivia: Fondecyt, Universidad Austral de Chile. : Chaika, E. (1974). A linguist looks at ‘schizophrenic’ language. Brain and Language, 1, 257-276. : Chwilla, D. J. & Kolk, H. H. (2005). Accessing world knowledge: Evidence from N400 and reaction time priming. Cognitive Brain Research, 25(3), 589-606. : Chwilla, D. J., Kolk, H. H. & Vissers, C. T. (2007). Immediate integration of novel meanings: N400 support for an embodied view of language comprehension. Brain Research, 1183, 109-123. doi: 10.1016/j.brainres.2007.09.014 : Corbetta, M. & Shullman, G. (2002). Control of goal-directed and stimulus-driven attention in the brain. Neuroscience, 3, 201-215. : Cornejo, C., Simonetti, F., Ibáñez, A., Aldunate, N., Ceric, F., López, V. & Núñez, R. (2009). Gestures and metaphorical comprehension: Electrophysiological evidence of the influence of gestures on metaphorical processing. Brain and Cognition, 70, 42-52. : Coulson, S. & Van Petten, C. (2007). A special role for the right hemisphere in metaphor comprehension? ERP evidence from hemifield presentation. Brain Research, 1146, 128-145. doi: 10.1016/j.brainres.2007.03.008 : Damasio, A. (2010). Self comes to mind. Constructing the conscious brain. New York: Pantheon Books. : DeLong, K. A., Urbach, T. P. & Kutas, M. (2005). Probabilistic word pre-activation during language comprehension inferred from electrical brain activity. Nature neuroscience, 8(8), 1117-1121. doi: 10.1038/nn1504 : Dehaene, S. (2014). Consciousness and the Brain: Deciphering how the Brain Code our thoughts. Nueva York: Penguin. : Dessalles, J. L. (2011). Reasoning as a lie detection device. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 34(2), 76-77. : Dienes, Z. & Perner, J. (1999). A theory of implicit and explicit knowledge. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 22, 735-808. : Donald, M. (1993). Précis of Origins of the modern mind: Three stages in the evolution of culture and cognition. Behavioural and Brain Sciences, 15, 737-791. : Duarte, L. R., Marquié, L., Marquié, J. C., Terrier, P. & Ousset, P. J. (2009). Analyzing feature distinctiveness in the processing of living and non-living concepts in Alzheimer’s disease. Brain and Cognition, 71, 108-117. : Evans, J. (2010). Thinking twice. Two minds in one brain. Nueva York: Oxford University Press. : Ferreira, R. A., Göbel, S., Hymers, M. & Ellis, A. W. (en prensa). The neural correlates of semantic richness: Evidence from an f MRI study of word learning. Brain and Language. : Fischler, I., Bloom, P., Childers, D., Roucos, S. & Perry, N. (1983). Brain potentials related to stages of sentence verification. Psychophysiology, 20(4), 400-409. : Fonlupt, P. (2003). Perception and judgment of physical causality involve different brain structures. Cognitive Brain Research, 17, 248-254. : Friederici, A. D. (2017). Language in our brain. The origins of a uniquely human capacity. Cambridge: The MIT Press. : Fugelsang, J., Roser, M., Corballis, P., Gazzaniga, M. & Dunbar, K. (2005). Brain mechanisms underlying perceptual causality. Cognitive Brain Research, 24(1), 41-47. : Geiger, O. (1999). Metaphors and the mental lexicon. Brain and Language, 68, 190-198. : Glenberg, A. (1997). What memory is for. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 1(20), 1-55. : Gomez, C., Flores, A. & Ledesma, A. (2007). Fronto-parietal networks activation during the contingent negative variation period. Brain Research Bulletin, 73(1-3), 40-47. : Grill-Spector, K., Henson, R. & Martin, A. (2006). Repetition and the brain: Neural models of stimulus-specific effects. Trends Cogn Sci, 10(1), 14-23. : Henry, J. D. & Crawford, J. R. (2004). A meta-analytic review of verbal fluency performance in traumatic brain injured patients. Neuropsychology, 18, 621-628. : Hoffman, P., Sajjadi, S. A., Patterson, K. & Nestor, P. J. (2017). Data-driven classification of patients with primary progressive aphasia. Brain and Language, 174, 86-93. : Huber, W. & Gleber, H. (1982). Linguistic and nonlinguistic processing of narratives in aphasia. Brain and Language, 16, 1-18. : Iverson, J. M. & Thelen, E. (1999). Hand, mouth and brain: The dynamic emergence of speech and gesture. Journal of Consciousness Studies, 6, 19-40 : Josephs, K. A., Duffy, J. R., Strand, E. A., Machulda, M. M., Senjem, M. L., Master, A. V., Lowe, V. J., Jack Jr, C. R. & Whitwell, J. L. (2012). Characterizing a neurodegenerative syndrome: Primary progressive apraxia of speech. Brain, 135(5), 1522-1536. : Just, M., Cherkassky, V., Keller, T. & Minshew, N. (2004). Cortical activation and synchronization during sentence comprehension in highfunctioning autism: Evidence of underconnectivity. Brain, 127, 18111821. : Kiefer, M. & Pulvermüller, F. (2012). Conceptual representations in mind and brain: theoretical developments, current evidence and future directions. Cortex, 48(7), 805-825. : Kounios, J. & Holcomb, P. J. (1992). Structure and process in semantic memory: Evidence from event-related brain potentials and reaction times. Journal of experimental psychology: General, 121(4), 459. : Kuperberg, G. R. (2007). Neural mechanisms of language comprehension: Challenges to syntax. Brain Research, 1146, 23-49. : Kuperberg, G. R., Sitnikova, T., Caplan, D. & Holcomb, P. J. (2003). Electrophysiological distinctions in processing conceptual relationships within simple sentences. Cognitive Brain Research, 17, 117-129. : Kutas, M. & Federmeier, K. D. (2011). Thirty years and counting: Finding meaning in the N400 component of the Event-Related Brain Potential (ERP). Annual Review of Psychology, 62, 621-647. doi: 10.1146/annurev.psych.093008.131123 : Kutas, M. & Hillyard, S. A. (1980). Reading senseless sentences: Brain potentials reflect semantic incongruity. Science, 207, 203-205. : Kutas, M. & Hillyard, S. A. (1980a). Event-related brain potentials to semantically inappropriate and surprisingly large words. Biological Psychology, 11(2), 99-116. doi: 10.1016/0301-0511(80)90046-0 : Kutas, M. & Hillyard, S. A. (1980b). Reading senseless sentences: Brain potentials reflect semantic incongruity. Science, 207, 203-205. : Kutas, M. y van Petten, C. (1994) Psycholinguistics electrified: event-related brain potential investigations. En M. Gernsbacher (Ed.) Psycholinguistics. San Diego, Academic Press. 83-144. : Lai, V. T., Curran, T. & Menn, L. (2009). Comprehending conventional and novel metaphors: An ERP study. Brain Research, 1284, 145-155. : Lakoff, G. (2008). The political mind: Why you can’t understand 21st-century politics with an 18th-century brain. Nueva York: Penguin Books. : Lamb, S. (1999). Pathways of the brain. The neurocognitive basis of language. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins. : Lebel, C. & Beaulieu, C. (2011). Longitudinal development of human brain wiring continues from childhood into adulthood. Journal of Neuroscience, 31(30), 10937. : Lezak, M. D. (1987). Relationship between personality disorders, social disturbances and physical disability following traumatic brain injury. J Head Trauma Rehabilitation, 2, 57-69. : Martin, A. & Fedio, P. (1983). Word production and comprehension in Alzheimer’s disease: The breakdown of semantic knowledge. Brain Language, 19, 124-141. : Mashal, N., Faust, M., Hendler, T. & Jung-Beeman, M. (2007). An fMRI investigation of the neural correlates underlying processing of novel metaphoric expressions. Brain and Language, 100, 115-126. : Mason, R. A. & Just, M. A. (2007). Lexical ambiguity in sentence comprehension. Brain Research, 1146, 115-127. : Mercier, H. & Sperber, D. (2011). Why do human reason? Arguments for an argumentative theory. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 34(2), 57-74. : Miceli, G. & Caramazza, A. (1988). Dissociation of inflectional and derivational morphology. Brain and Language, 35, 24-65. : Migliaccio, R., Boutet, C., Valabregue, R., Ferrieux, S., Nogues, M., Lehéricy, S., Dormont, D., Levy, R., Dubois, B. & Teichmann, M. (2016). The brain network of naming: A lesson from primary progressive aphasia. PloS one, 11(2). : Moss, H. E., Tyler, L. K. & Devlin, J. (2002). The emergence of category specific deficits in a distributed semantic system. En E. Forde & G. Humphreys (Eds.),Category-specificity in brain and mind (pp. 115-148). Sussex: Psychology Press. : Newcombe, F. (1969). Missle wounds of the brain. A study of psychological deficits. Londres: Oxford University Press. : Nieuwland, M. S. & van Berkum, J. J. (2008). The interplay between semantic and referential aspects of anaphoric noun phrase resolution: Evidence from ERPs. Brain and Language, 106(2), 119-131. : Nieuwland, M. S. (2015b). The truth before and after: Brain potentials reveal automatic activation of event knowledge during sentence comprehension. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 27(11), 2215-2228. doi: 10.1162/jocn_a_00856 : Norris, D., McQueen, J. & Cutler, A. (2000). Merging information in speech recognition: Feedback is never necessary. Brain and Behavioral Sciences, 23, 299-335. : Noveck, I. A. & Posada, A. (2003). Characterizing the time course of an implicature: An evoked potentials study. Brain and language, 85(2), 203-210. : Ortega, R., López, V., Carrasco, X., Anllo-Vento, L. & Aboitiz, F. (2013). Exogenous orienting of visual-spatial attention in ADHD children. Brain Research, 1493, 68-79. doi: 10.1016/j.brainres.2012.11.036 : Osterhout, L. & Mobley, L. A. (1995). Event-related brain potentials elicited by failure to agree. Journal of Memory and language, 34(6), 739-773. : Papagno, C. (2001). Comprehension of metaphors and idioms in patients with Alzheimer's disease: A longitudinal study. Brain, 124(7), 1450-1460. : Penn, D. C., Holyoak, K. J. & Povinelli, D. J. (2008). Darwin's mistake: Explaining the discontinuity between human and nonhuman minds. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 31(02), 109-178. : Pievani, M., Filippini, N., Van Den Heuvel, M. P., Cappa, S. F. & Frisoni, G. B. (2014). Brain connectivity in neurodegenerative diseases from phenotype to proteinopathy. Nature Reviews: Neurology, 10(11), 620-33. : Premack, D. & Woodruff, G. (1978) Does the chimpanzee have a theory of mind? Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 4, 515-526. : Pulvermuller, F. (2005). Brain mechanisms linking language and action. Nature. (En prensa). : Pulvermüller, F. (1999). Words in the brains language. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 22, 253-270. : Pulvermüller, F. (2003). The neuroscience of language: On brain circuits of words and serial order. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press. : Pulvermüller, F. (2013). How neurons make meaning: Brain mechanisms for embodied and abstract-symbolic semantics. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 17, 458-470. : Pynte, J., Besson, M., Robichon, F. & Poli, J. (1996). The time-course of metaphor comprehension: An event-related potential study. Brain and Language, 55, 293-316. : Reichle, E., Rayner, K. & Pollatsek, A. (2003). The E-Z Model of eye-movements control in reading. Comparison to other models. Behavioral and brain sciences, 26, 445-476. : Roeper, T., Ramos, E., Seymour, H. & Abdul-Karim, L. (2001). Language disorders as a window on universal grammar: An abstract theory or agreement for IP, DP, and V-PP. Brain and Language, 77(3), 378-397. : Rolls, E. (2000). Memory systems in the brain. Annual Review of Psychology, 51, 599-630. : Schacter, D. (1996). Searching for memory: The brain, the mind and the past. Nueva York: Basic Books. : Schmidt, G., DeBuse, C. & Seger, C. (2005). Right hemisphere metaphor processing. Characterizing the lateralization of semantic processes. Brain and Language, 100, 127-141. : Searle, J. (1980). Mind, brain and programs. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 3(21), 417-457. : Shibata, M., Abe, J. I., Terao, A. & Miyamoto, T. (2007). Neural mechanisms involved in the comprehension of metaphoric and literal sentences: An fMRI study. Brain Research, 1166, 92-10. doi: 10.1016/j.brainres.2007.06.040 : Squire, L. (1987). Memory and brain. Nueva York: Oxford University Press. : Streb, J., Hennighausen, E. & Rösler, F. (2004). Different anaphoric expressions are investigated by event-related brain potentials. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research, 33(3), 175-201. : Streb, J., Rösler, F. y Hennighaussen, E. (1999) Event-related responses to pronoun and proper names anaphors in parallel and nonparallel discourse structures. Brain and Language. 70: 273-286. : Talairach, J. & Tournoux, P. (1988). Co-planar stereotaxic atlas of the human brain. New York: Thieme. : Tirassa, M. (1999). Communicative competence and the architecture of the mind / brain. Brain and Language, 68, 419 - 441. : Tomasello, M., Carpenter, M., Call, J., Behne, T. & Moll, H. (2005). Understanding and sharing intentions: The origins of cultural cognition. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 28(5), 675-735. : Tsimpli, I. (2001). LF-Interpretability and language development: A study of verbal and nominal features in Greek normally developing and SLI children. Brain and Language, 77(3), 432-448. : Tyler L. & Marslen-Wilson, W. (1997). Disorders of combination: Processing of complex words. Brain and Language, 60, 40-48. : Vannest, J. & Boland, J. (1999). Lexical morphology and lexical access. Brain and Language, 68, 324-332. : Waksler, R. (1999). Cross-linguistic evidence for morphological representation in the mental lexicon. Brain and Language, 68, 68-74. : Walter, W. G., Cooper, R., Aldridge, V. J., McCallum, W. C. & Winter, A. L. (1964). Contingent negative variation: an electric sign of sensorimotor association and expectancy in the human brain. Nature, 203, 384-384. doi: 10.1038/203380a0 : Whatmough, C., Chertkow, H., Murtha, S., Templeman, D., Babins, L. & Kelner, N. (2003). The semantic category effect increases with worsening anomia in Alzheimer's type dementia. Brain and Language, 84(1), 1, 134-147. : Wu, Y. & Coulson, S. (2007). How iconic gestures enhance communication: An ERP study. Brain and language, 101(3), 234-245. doi: 10.1016/j.bandl.2006.12.003 : Yagoubi, R., Lemaire, P. & Besson, M. (2003). Different brain mechanisms mediate two strategies in arithmetic: Evidence from Event-Related brain Potentials. Neuropsychologia, 41(855-862). : van Herten, M., Kolk, H. H. & Chwilla, D. J. (2005). An ERP study of P600 effects elicited by semantic anomalies. Cognitive Brain Research, 22, 241-255. |