/LING
|
Update: February 24, 2023 The new version of Termout.org is now online, so this web site is now obsolete and will soon be dismantled. |
Lista de candidatos sometidos a examen:
1) coherence (*)
(*) Términos presentes en el nuestro glosario de lingüística
1) Candidate: coherence
Is in goldstandard
1
paper corpusSignosTxtLongLines406 - : Van den Broek et al. (2002) use the term ‘standards of coherence’ to designate a kind of metacognitive knowledge/activity involved in reading comprehension. ‘Standards of coherence’ refers to a readers’ idea of what good comprehension is (a kind of declarative knowledge) and what it necessitates (a kind of procedural and perhaps also conditional knowledge) for a specific reading task. For example, a reader holding a low standard of coherence for a specific reading task may think that good comprehension involves understanding a few keywords in a document’s title .
2
paper corpusSignosTxtLongLines524 - : A fundamental issue in LSP education that must be adequately addressed to achieve curricular coherence is what ^[45]Doyle calls a “tripartite integrated curricular structure” (Doyle, 2012: 108 ). Unlike courses in language, linguistics, or literature, LSP courses must find a balance between focusing instruction on topical knowledge--which may be quite technical--content-specific linguistic resources unique to the field, and cultural norms adhered to by a particular discourse community. Many of the curricular and programmatic difficulties, especially the identification of competent staff and the seamless integration into departmental/programmatic intellectual culture, derive from the ‘tripartite’ nature of LSP, regardless of the department or program offering the courses. These considerations come in addition to the obstacles presented by many students’ deficits in overall language proficiency; those who undertake LSP study without a solid foundation in the L2.
3
paper corpusSignosTxtLongLines601 - : Crossley, S. A. & McNamara, D. S. (2011). Text coherence and judgments of essay quality: Models of quality and coherence . In L. Carlson, C. Hoelscher & T. F. Shipley (Eds.), Proceedings of the 29^th annual conference of the cognitive science society (pp. 1236-1241). Austin, TX: Cognitive Science Society . [ [150]Links ]
Evaluando al candidato coherence:
2) reading: 3 (*)
3) curricular: 3
coherence
Lengua: eng
Frec: 120
Docs: 43
Nombre propio: / 120 = 0%
Coocurrencias con glosario: 1
Puntaje: 1.481 = (1 + (1+2.8073549220576) / (1+6.9188632372746)));
Candidato aceptado
Referencias bibliográficas encontradas sobre cada término
(Que existan referencias dedicadas a un término es también indicio de terminologicidad.)| coherence |
: According to the degree of coherence established by lexical repetition among the different levels of a computational hypertext, Puebla and Puchmüller (2006) classify links from a corpus made up of hyper-biographies into: : Bateman, J. & Rondhuis, K. (1997). Coherence relations: Towards a general specification. Discourse Processes, 24, 3-49. : Brandão, L., Lima, T. M., Parente, M. & Peña-Casanova, J. (2017). Discourse coherence and its relation with cognition in Alzheimer’s disease. Revista Psicologia em Pesquisa, 7(1), 99-107. : Chafe, W. (1987). Cognitive contrasts on information flow. En R. Tomlin (Ed.), Coherence and grounding in discourse. Typological studies in language (pp. 21-51). Ámsterdam: Jonh Benjamins. : Concha, S. & Paratore, J. (2011). Local coherence in persuasive writing: An exploration of Chilean students’ metalinguistic knowledge, writing process, and writing products. Written Communication, 28(1), 34-69. : Conte, M. (1996). Anaphoric encapsulation. En N. de Mulder & L. Tasmowski (Eds.), Coherence & Anaphora (pp. 1-33). Belgian Journal of Linguistics, 10. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. : Crossley, S. A. & McNamara, D. S. (2010). Cohesion, coherence, and expert evaluations of writing proficiency. In S. Ohlsson & R. Catrambone (Eds.), Proceedings of the 32 ^nd annual conference of the cognitive science society (pp. 984-989). Austin, TX: Cognitive Science Society. : Dijkstra, K., Bourgeois, M. S., Allen, R. S. & Burgio, L. D. (2004). Conversational coherence: Discourse analysis of older adults with and without dementia. Journal of Neurolinguistics, 17(4), 263-283. : Dopkins, S. y Nordlie, J. (1995) Processes of anaphoric resolution. En R. Lorch y E. O'Brien (Eds.) Sources of coherence in reading. Mahwah, LEA. 145-158. : Duque, E. (2014). Signaling casual coherence relations. Discourse Studies, 16(1), 25-46. : Foltz, P. (1996). Comprehension, coherence and strategies in hypertext and linear text [on line]. Available in: [32]http://www-psych.nmsu.edu/-pfoltz/reprints/Ht-Cognition.html : Foltz, P. , Kintsch, W. & Landauer, T. (1998). The measurement of textual coherence with latent semantic analysis. Discourse Processes, 25, 285-307. : Garnham, A., Oakhill, J. V., & Johnson-Laird, P. N. (1982). Referential continuity and the coherence of discourse. Cognition, 11, 29-46. : Gernsbacher, M. (1997) Coherence cues mapping during comprehension. En J. Costermans y M. Fayol (Eds.) Processing interclausal relationships. Studies in the production and comprehension of text. Mahwah, LEA. 3-23. : Givón, T. (1995). Coherence in the text and coherence in the mind. En M.A. Gernsbacher & T. Givón (Eds.), Coherence in spontaneous text (pp.59-115). Amsterdam: Benjamins. : Gordon, P. y Scearce, K. (1995) Pronominalization and discourse coherence, discourse structure and pronoun interpretation. Memory & Cognition. 23 (3): 313-323. : Graesser, A. & Wiemer-Hasting, W. (1999). Situation models and concepts in story comprehension. En S. Goldman, A. Graesser & P. van den Broek (Eds.), Narrative comprehension, causality, and coherence (pp. 77-92). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum. : Graesser, A. C., McNamara, D. S. & Louwerse, M. M. (2003). What do readers need to learn in order to process coherence relations in narrative and expository text? En A. P. Sweet & C. E. Snow (Eds.), Rethinking reading comprehension (pp. 82-98). Nueva York: Guilford. : Graesser, A., E Bertus y J. Magliano. 1995. Inference generation during the comprehension of narrative text, en Lorch, R. y E. O'Brien (eds.), Source of coherence in reading. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum. : Hobbs, J. (1979). Coherence and coreference. Cognitive science, 3(1), 67-90. : Kehler, A., Kertz, L., Rohde, H. & Elman, J. L. (2008). Coherence and coreference revisited. Journal of Semantics, 25(1), 1-44. : Kintsch, W. (1995). How readers construct situation models for stories: the role of syntactic cues and causal inferences. En M.A. Gernsbacher & T. Givón (Eds.), Coherence in spontaneous text (pp.139-160). Amsterdam: Benjamins. : Kong, A. P. H., Linnik, A., Law, S. P. & Shum, W. W. M. (2017). Measuring discourse coherence in anomic aphasia using Rhetorical Structure Theory. International journal of speech-language pathology, 20(4), 406-421. : Koornneef, A.W. & Sanders, T. (2012). Establishing coherence relations in discourse: The influence on implicit causality and connectives on pronoun resolution. Language and cognitive processes, 28, 1169-1206. : Kuperberg, G., Paczynski, M. & Ditman, T. (2011). Establishing casual coherence across sentences: An ERP Study. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 23(5), 1230-1246. : Laine, M., Laakso, M., Vuorinen, E. & Rinne, J. (1998). Coherence and informativeness of discourse in two dementia types. Journal of Neurolinguistics, 11(1-2), 79-87. : Long, D. & Chong, J. (2001). Comprehension skill and global coherence: A paradoxical picture of poor comprehender`s abilities. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory and Cognition, 6, 1424-1429. : Louwerse, M. & Graesser, A.C. (2004). Coherence in discourse. En Strazny, P. (Ed.), Encyclopedia of linguistics. Chicago: Fitzroy Dearborn. [En Prensa]. : Louwerse, M. (2000). From cohesion in text to coherence in comprehension. Ph.D. Dissertation, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, United Kingdom. : Louwerse, M. (2001). An analytic and cognitive parameterization of coherence relations. Cognitive Linguistics, 12, 291-315. : Louwerse, M.M. & Graesser, A.C. (2004). Coherence in discourse. In P. Strazny (Ed.), Encyclopedia of linguistics. Chicago: Fitzroy Dearborn. : Louwerse, M.M. (2002a). An analytic and cognitive parameterization of coherence relations. Cognitive Linguistics, 12, 291–315. : Lundquist, L. (1989). Coherence in scientific texts. En W. Heydrich, F. Neubauer, J. Petöfi & E. Sözer (Eds.), Connexity and coherence (pp. 122-149). Berlin: W. de Gruyter. : McCulley, G. A. (1985). Writing quality, coherence, and cohesion. Research in the Teaching of English, 19, 269-282. : McCutchen, D. & Perfetti, C. A. (1982). Coherence and connectedness in the development of discourse production. Text-Interdisciplinary Journal for the Study of Discourse, 2(1-3), 113-140. : McNamara, D. & Kintsch, W. (1996). Learning from texts: Effects of prior knowledge and text coherence. Discourse Processes, 22, 247-288. : McNamara, D. S. (2001). Reading both high-coherence and low coherence texts: Effects of text sequence and prior knowledge. Canadian Journal of Experimental Psychology, 55, 51-62. : McNamara, D. S., & Kintsch, W. (1996). Learning from texts: Effects of prior knowledge and text coherence. Discourse Processes, 22, 247-288. : McNamara, D. S., Kintsch, E., Butler-Songer, N. & Kintsch, W. (1996). Are good texts always better? Interactions of text coherence, background knowledge, and levels of understanding in learning from text. Cognition and Instruction, 14(1), 1-43. : McNamara, D., Lowerse, M. & Graesser, A. (2004). Coh-metrics: Automated cohesion and coherence scores to predict text readability and facilitate comprehension [en línea]. Disponible en: [55]http://cohmetrix.memphis.edu/cohmetrixpr/archive/Coh-metrixGrant.pdf : McNamara, D.S. & Kintsch, W. (1996). Learning from text: Effects of prior knowledge and text coherence. Discourse Processes, 22, 247-287. : McNamara, D.S. (2001). Reading both high and low coherence texts: Effects of text sequence and prior knowledge. Canadian Journal of Experimental Psychology, 55, 51-62. : McNamara, D.S., & Kintsch, W. (1996). Learning from text: Effects of prior knowledge and text coherence. Discourse Processes, 22, 247-287. : McNamara, D.S., Kintsch, E., Songer, N.B., & Kintsch, W. (1996). Are good texts always better? Text coherence, background knowledge, and levels of understanding in learning from text. Cognition and Instruction, 14, 1-43. : McNamara, D.S., Louwerse, M. & Graesser, A.C. (2002). Coh-Metrix: Automated cohesion and coherence scores to predict text readability and facilitate comprehension. Technical report, Institute for Intelligent Systems, University of Memphis, Memphis, TN. : Murphy, G. &Medin, D. (1985). The role of theories in conceptual coherence. Psychological Review, 97(3), 289-316. : O'Reilly, T., & McNamara, D. S. (2002a). Text coherence effects: Interactions of prior knowledge and reading skill. Ponencia presentada en the 43rd annual meeting of the Psychonomic Society Inc., Kansas City, MO. : Ripich, D. N. & Terrell, B. Y. (1988). Patterns of discourse cohesion and coherence in Alzheimer’s disease. Journal of Speech and Hearing Disorders, 53(1), 8-15. : Sanders, T. & Maat, H. P. (2006). Cohesion and coherence: Linguistic approaches. En K. Brown, (Ed.), Encyclopedia of Language & Linguistics (pp. 591-595). Ámsterdam: Elsevier. : Sanders, T. (2005). Coherence, causality and cognitive complexity in discourse. En D. Aurnague, M. Bras, A. Le Draoulec & L. Vieu (Eds.), Proceedings/Actes SEM-05, First International Symposium on the exploration and modelling of meaning (pp. 105-114). : Sanders, T. J. M. & Noordman, L. G. M. (2000). The role of coherence relations and their linguistic markers in processing. Discourse Processes, 29(1), 37-60. : Sanders, T., Spooren, W. & Noordman, L. (1992). Toward a taxonomy of coherence relations. Discourse processes, 15(1), 1-35. : Sanford, A.J. & Moxey, L.M. (1995). Aspects of coherence in written language: A psychological perspective. In M.A. Gernsbacher & T. Givon (Eds.), Coherence in spontaneous text. Typological studies in language 31 (pp. 161-187). Amsterdam: Benjamins. : Shapiro, L.R. & Hudson, J.A. (1997). Coherence and cohesion in childrens stories. En J. Costermans & M. Fayol (Eds.), Processing interclausal relationships. Studies in the production and comprehension of text (pp. 95-119). Mahwah, N.J.: Erlbaum. : Spooren, W. & Sanders, T. (2008). The acquisition order of coherence relations: On cognitive complexity in discourse. Journal of pragmatics, 40(12), 2003-2026. : Sundermeier, B., van den Broek, P. & Zwaan, R. (en prensa). Causal coherence and the availability of locations and objects during narrative comprehension. Memory and Cognition. : TOMLIN, R.S. (Eds.) (1987) Coherence and grounding in discourse. Amsterdam: Benjamin. : Taboada, M. (2004). Building coherence and cohesion: Task-oriented dialogue in English and Spanish. Amsterdam: Benjamins. : Tannen, D. (1984). Spoken and written narrative in English and Greek. En D. Tannen (Ed.), Coherence in spoken and written discourse (pp. 21-41). Norwood, N.J.: Ablex Publishing Company. : Tanskanen, S. (2006). Collaborating towards coherence: Lexical cohesion in English discourse. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. : Tapiero, I. & Otero, J. (2002). Situation models as retrieval structures: Effects on the global coherence of science texts. En J. Otero, J. León & A. Graesser (Eds.), The psychology of science text comprehension (pp. 179-198). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum. : Trabasso, T. & Suh, S. (1993). Understanding text: Achieving explanatory coherence through on-line inferences and mental operations in working memory. Discourse Processes, 16, 3-34. : Trabasso, T. , Secco, T. & van den Broek, P. (1984). Causal cohesion and story coherence. En H. Mandl, N. Stein & T. Trabasso (Eds.), Learning and comprehension of text (pp. 83-111). Hillsdale, N.J.: Erlbaum. : Wolf, F. & Gibson, E. (2006). Coherence in natural language. Data structures and applications. Cambridge: MIT Press. : Zwaan, R. (1999). Five dimensions of narrative comprehension. The event indexing model. En S. Goldman, A. Graesser & P. van den Broek (Eds.), Narrative comprehension, causality and coherence. Essays in honor of Tom Trabasso (pp. 324-347). Mahwah, N.J.: Erlbaum. : van den Broek, P. (1994). Comprehension and memory of narrative texts: Inferences and coherence. En M.A. Gernsbacher (Ed.), Handbook of Psycholinguistics (pp.539-588). New York: Academic Press. : van den Broek, P. , Risden, K. & Husebye-Hartman, E. (1995). The role of readers’ standards for coherence in the generation of inferences during reading. En R. Lorch, Jr. & E. O’Brien (Eds.), Sources of coherence in text comprehension (pp. 353-373). Hillsdale, N.J.: Erlbaum. |