/LING

Update: February 24, 2023 The new version of Termout.org is now online, so this web site is now obsolete and will soon be dismantled.

Lista de candidatos sometidos a examen:
1) comprehenders (*)
(*) Términos presentes en el nuestro glosario de lingüística

---

1) Candidate: comprehenders

Is in goldstandard

Evaluando al candidato comprehenders:

comprehenders
Lengua:
Frec: 18
Docs: 13
Nombre propio: / 18 = 0%
Coocurrencias con glosario:
Puntaje: 0.191 = ( + (1+0) / (1+4.24792751344359)));
Candidato aceptado

Referencias bibliográficas encontradas sobre cada término

(Que existan referencias dedicadas a un término es también indicio de terminologicidad.)

comprehenders

: Cataldo, M. & Oakhill, J. (2000). Why are poor comprehenders inefficient searchers? An investigation into the effects of text representation and spatial memory on the ability to locate information in text. Journal of Educational Psychology, 20, 791-799. : Ehrlich, M. F. (1996). Metacognitive monitoring in the processing of anaphoric devices in skilled and less skilled comprehenders. En C. Cornoldi & J. Oakhill (Eds.), Reading comprehension difficulties: Processes and remediation (pp. 221-249). Malwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum. : Kletzien, Sharon. 1991. "Strategy use by good and poor comprehenders reading expository text of differing levels", en Reading Research Quarterly 26(1), 67-84. : Nation, K. & Snowling, M. J. (2000). Factors influencing syntactic awareness skills in normal readers and poor comprehenders. Applied Psycholinguistics, 21, 229-241. : Oakhill, J. (1983). Instantiation in skilled and less skilled comprehenders. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 35, 441-450. : Oakhill, J., Yuill, N., & Donaldson, M. (1990). Understanding of causal expressions in skilled and less skilled text comprehenders. British-Journal-of-Developmental-Psychology, 8, 401-410. : Yuill, N. (2009). The Relation Between Ambiguity Understanding and Metalinguistic Discussion of Joking in Good and Poor Comprehenders: Potential for Intervention and Possible Processes of Change. First Language, 29(1), 65-79. : Yuill, N., & Oakhill, J. (1988). Understanding of anaphoric relations in skilled and less skilled comprehenders. British Journal of Psychology, 79, 173-186. : Zwaan, R. A., Stanfield, R. A. y Yaxley, R. H. 2002. "Language comprehenders mentally represent the shape of objects", en Psychological Science 13, pp.168-171.