Update: February 24, 2023 The new version of Termout.org is now online, so this web site is now obsolete and will soon be dismantled. |
computational |
: According to the degree of coherence established by lexical repetition among the different levels of a computational hypertext, Puebla and Puchmüller (2006) classify links from a corpus made up of hyper-biographies into: : Agirre, E., de Lacalle, O. L. & Soroa, A. (2014). Random walks for knowledge-based word sense disambiguation. Computational Linguistics, 40(1), 57-84. : Altmann, G. (1988). Ambiguity, parsing strategies, and computational models. Language and Cognitive Processes, 3(2), 73-97. : Ananiadou, S. (1994). A methodology for automatic term recognition. Ponencia presentada en el 15th International Conference on Computational Linguistics, Kyoto, Japón. : Ando, R. K. (2006). Applying alternating structure optimization to word sense disambiguation. Proceedings of the Tenth Conference on Computational Natural Language Learning (pp. 77-84). Association for Computational Linguistics. : Barzilay, R. & McKeown, K. R. (2005). Sentence fusion for multidocument news summarization. Computational Linguistics, 31(3), 297-328. : Basile, P., Caputo, A. & Semeraro, G. (2014). An enhanced lesk word sense disambiguation algorithm through a distributional semantic model. Proceedings of COLING 2014, the 25th International Conference on Computational Linguistics: Technical Papers (pp. 1591-1600). : Berger, A., Della Pietra S. & Della Pietra, S. (1996). A maximum entropy approach to natural language processing, Computational Linguistics, 22(1), 39-71. : Biber, D. (1993). Using register-diversified corpora for general language studies. Computational Linguistics, 19, 243-258. : Bolshakov, I.A. & Miranda-Jiménez S. (2004). A small system storing Spanish collocations. In A. Gelbukh (Ed.), Lecture notes in computer science: Computational linguistics and intelligent text processing (pp. 248–252). Berlin: Springer-Verlag. : Bordag, S. (2006). Word sense induction: Triplet-based clustering and automatic evaluation. Proceedings of the 11th Conference of the European Chapter of the Association for Computational Linguistics (EACL) (pp. 137-144). : Bourigault, D. (1992). Surface grammatical analysis for the extraction of terminological noun phrases. Ponencia presentada en el 14th International Conference on Computational Linguistics. Nantes, Francia. : Bourigault, D., Jacquemin, C. & L´Homme, M. C. (2001). Recent advances in computational terminology. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. : Brill, E. (1995). Transformation-based error-driven learning and natural language processing: A case study in part-of-speech tagging. Computational Linguistics, 21, 543-566. : Britton, B. K., & Gulgoz, S. (1991). Using Kintsch's computational model to improve instructional text: Effects of repairing inference calls on recall and cognitive structures. Journal of Educational Psychology, 83, 329-345. : Buchholz, S. & Marsi, E. (2006). CoNLL-X shared task on multilingual dependency parsing. En L. Màrquez & D. Klein (Eds.), Proceedings of the 10th Conference on Computational Natural Language Learning (CoNLL-X) (pp. 149-164). ACL: Nueva York. : Burstein, J., Kukich, K., Wolff, S., Lu, C., Chodorow, M., Bradenharder, L. & Harris, M. (1998). Automated scoring using a hybrid feature identification technique. Proceedings of the Annual Meeting of the Association of Computational Linguistics, Montreal, Canada. : Cabré, M. T., Estopà, R. & Vivaldi., J. (2001). Automatic term detection: A review of current systems. En D. Bourigault, C. Jacquemin & M. C. L´Homme (Eds.), Recent Advances in Computational Terminology (pp. 1-28). Amsterdam: John Benjamins. : Carletta, J. (1996). Assessing agreement on classification tasks: The Kappa statistic. Computational Linguistics, 22, 250-254. : Carpuat, M. & Wu, D. (2007). Improving statistical machine translation using word sense disambiguation. Proceedings of the 2007 Joint Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing and Computational Natural Language Learnin (pp. 61-72). : Castel, V. (2006a). A computer implementation of the Cardiff grammar generator. Computational Linguistics Unit, University of Cardiff, Wales, United Kingdom. [For access permission contact [96]rp.fawcett@virgin.net]. : Chan, Y. S., Ng, H. T. & Chiang, D. (2007). Word sense disambiguation improves statistical machine translation. Annual Meeting-Association for Computational Linguistics, 45(1), 33. : Chein, M. & Mugnier, M. L. (2009). Graph-based knowledge representation: Computational foundations of conceptual graphs. Londres: Springer-Verlag. : Chen, H. & Lee, J. (1996). Identification and classification of proper nouns in Chinese texts. En T. Seely (Ed.), Proceedings of 16th International Conference on Computational Linguistics, Copenhagen, Denmark (pp. 222-229). Copenhagen: Ministry of Research Denmark. : Chen, H.-J. (2009). Evaluating two web-based grammar checkers - Microsoft ESL Assistant and NTNU Statistical Grammar Checker. Computational Linguistics and Chinese Language Processing, : Chen, W. (2008). Dimensions of subjectivity in natural languages. Ponencia presentada en el 46th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics on Human Language Technologies, 13-16. : Chodorow, M. & Leacock, C. (2000). An unsupervised method for detecting grammatical errors. Proceedings of the 1st North American chapter of the Association for Computational Linguistics conference. Association for Computational Linguistics, 140-147 [en línea]. Disponible en: : Church, K. & Hanks, P. (1990). Word association norms, mutual information, and lexicography. Computational Linguistics, 16(1), 22-29. : Church, K., & Mercer, R. (1993). Introduction to the special issue on computational linguistics. Using large corpora. Computational Linguistics, 9(1), 124. : Ciaramita, M. & Altun, Y. (2006). Broad-coverage sense disambiguation and information extraction with a supersense sequence tagger. Proceedings of the 2006 Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing (pp. 594-602). Association for Computational Linguistics. : Copestake, A. (1995). The representation of group denoting nouns in a lexical knowledge base. En P. Saint-Dizier & E. Viegas (Eds.), Computational lexical semantics (pp. 217-230). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. : Crossley, S., Muldner, K. & McNamara, D. (2016). Idea generation in student writing: Computational assessments and links to successful writing. Written Communication, 33(3), 328-354. : Datar, M. & Indyk, P. (2004). Locality-sensitive hashing scheme basedon p-stable distributions. En Annual symposium on computational geometry. Brooklyn, Nueva York, USA. : De Bruin, J. & Sha, R. (1988). The interpretation of relational nouns. En el 26 th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics: Proceedings of the Conference (pp. 25-32). Morristown: Association of Computational Linguistics. : Dunning, T. (1994). Accurate methods for the statistics of surprise and coincidence. Computational Linguistics, 19(1), 61-74. : Díaz, A. & Martín, M. A. (2018). Computational treatment of clausal units in a controlled natural language: The ARTEMIS parser for ASD-STE100. Paper presented at the 36^th International Conference of the Spanish Association of Applied Linguistics, University of Cádiz, Spain. : Fawcett, R. P. (2003). A generative systemic functional micro-grammar for some central elements of the English Clause. Cardiff UK: Computational Linguistics Unit, Cardiff University. : Fernando, S. & Stevenson, M. (2008). A semantic similarity approach to paraphrase detection. Ponencia presentada en el 11th Annual Research Colloquium of the UK Special Interest Group for Computational Linguistics, Oxford, United Kingdom. : Gamallo, P. & González, I. (2012). DepPattern: A multilingual dependency parser. Sesión de demos. Ponencia presentada en el 10 ^t ^h International Conference on Computational Processing of the Portuguese Language (PROPOR’ 2012), Coimbra, Portugal. : Gelbukh, A. & Sidorov, G. (2001). Zipf and Heaps Laws’ coefficients depend on language. Proceedings of the second CICLing Conference, Intelligent Text Processing and Computational Linguistics. Ciudad de México, México. : Genest, P. E. & Lapalme, G. (2012). Fully abstractive approach to guided summarization. Ponencia presentada en el 50th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics, Jeju, Corea. : Gildea, D. & Jurafsky, D. (2002). Automatic labeling of semantic roles. Computational Linguistics, 28, 245-288. : Girju, R., Badulescu, A. & Moldovan, D. (2006). Automatic discovery of part-whole relations. Computational Linguistics, 32(1), 83-135. : Grosz, B. & Sidner, C. L. (1986). Attention, intentions, and the structure of discourse. Computational linguistics, 12(3), 175-204. : Ha, L., Stewart, D., Hanna P. & Smith, F. (2006). Zipf and Type-Token rules for the English, Spanish, Irish and Latin languages. Web Journal of Formal, Computational and Cognitive Linguistics, 1(8), 1-12. : Harvey, A. & Horsella, M. (1988). Exploring and exploting the structure of computational abstracts. The Specialist, 9, 229-247. : Hausser, R. (2001). Foundations of computational linguistics. Berlin: Springer-Verlag. : Hearts, M. (1992). Automatic acquisition of hyponyms from large text corpora. En Proceedings of Conference COLING. Nantes: Association for Computational Linguistics. : Heylen, D. (1995). Lexical functions, generative lexicons and the world. En P. Saint-Dizier & E. Viegas (Eds.). Computational lexical semantics (pp. 125-140). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press . : Hovy, E. (2005). Automated text summarization. En R. MitKov (Ed.), The Oxford Handbook of Computational (pp. 583-598). Oxford: Oxford University Press. : Indyk, P. (2004). Nearest neighbors in high-dimensional spaces. En J. Goodman & J. ORourke (Eds.), Handbook of discrete and computational geometry (pp. 877-892). Nueva York: Chapman and Hall/CRC Press. : Jiang, J. & Conrath, D. (1997). Semantic similarity based on corpus statistics and lexical taxonomy. Ponencia presentada en el International Conference on Research in Computational Linguistics. Taiwán. : Jin, P., Sun, X., Wu,Y. & Yu, S. (2007). Word clustering for collocation-based word sense disambiguation. In P. Jin, X. Sun,Y.Wu & S.Yu (Eds.), Lecture notes in computer science: Computational linguistics and intelligent text processing (pp. 267–274). Berlin: Springer-Verlag. : Jones, B. (1996). Towards texting the syntax of punctuation. En Proceedings of the 16th International Conference on Computational Linguistics (COLING-96) (pp. 363-365). Copenhagen: COLING. : Jones, M. N., Willits, J. & Dennis, S. (2015). Models of semantic memory. Oxford handbook of Mathematical and Computational Psychology (pp. 232-254). Oxford: Oxford University Press. : Jones, S. & Sinclair, J. (1974). English lexical collocations. A study in computational linguistics. Cahiers de Lexicology, 24(1), 15-61. : Joshi, A. (1999). Computational linguistics. En R. Wilson & F. Keil (Eds.), The MIT Encyclopedia of the Cognitive Sciences (pp. 162-164). Masachussets: MIT Press. : Jurafsky, D. & Martin, J. (2000). An introduction to natural language processing, computational linguistics and speech processing, Prentice Hall. : Kenneth, W. C. & Hanks, P. (1989). Word association norms, mutual information, and lexicography. En Proceedings of the 27th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics (pp. 76-83). Association for Computational Linguistics. : Kintsch, W. (2000). A computational theory of metaphor comprehension. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 7,257266. : Kintsch, W. (2003). Metaphor comprehension: A computational theory. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review. [En línea]. Disponible en: [70]http://lsa.colorado.edu/papers/metaphor.kintsch.pdf : Landauer, T. (2002). On the computational basis of learning and cognition: Arguments from LSA. Psychology of Learning and Motivation, 41, 43-84. : Langston, M., Trabasso, T. & Magliano, J. (1999). A connectionist model of narrative comprehension. En A. Ram & K. Moorman (Eds.), Understanding language understanding: Computational models of reading, (pp. 181-226). Cambridge: MA.: MIT Press. : Lascarides, A. & Asher, N. (1991). Discourse relations and defeasible knowledge. En Proceedings of the 29^th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics (pp. 55-63). Morris-ton, N.J.: Association for Computational Linguistics. : Lavid, J. & Arús, J. (1998). Exploring transitivity/ergativity in English and Spanish: A computational approach. En M. Martínez (Ed.) Transitivity revisited (pp. 259-276). Huelva: Universidad de Huelva. : Louwerse, M. & Jeuniaux, P. (2009). Computational psycholinguistic techniques to measure cohesion in discourse. En J. Renkema (Ed.), Discourse of course (pp.213-226). Amsterdam: Benjamins. : Louwerse, M. (2002). Computational retrieval of themes. En M. Louwerse & W. van Peer (Eds.), Thematics: Interdisciplinary Studies (pp. 189-212). Amsterdam: Benjamins. : Mairal, R. (2017). A computational implementation of idiomatic and non-idiomatic constructions. Revista Signos. Estudios de Lingüística, 50(94), 241-264. : Matsumoto, Y. (2003). Lexical knowledge acquisition. En R. Mitkov (Ed.), The Oxford handbook of computational linguistics (pp. 396-409). New York: Oxford University Press. : Matthiessen, C. & Canzhong, W. (1998). Working systemically with SysAm: Computational resources for systemic research. MS: Macquarie University. : Mausam, Schmitz, M., Bart, R., Soderland, S. & Etzioni, O. (2012). Open language learning for Information Extraction. Proceedings of the 2012 Joint Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing and Computational Natural Language Learning (EMNLP-CoNLL ‘12), 523-534. : Mitkov, R. (2009). Anaphora resolution. En R. Mitkov (Ed.), The Oxford Handbook of Computational Linguistics (pp. 266-283). Oxford: Oxford University Press . : Moore, J. & Pollack, M. (1992). A problem for RST: The need for multi-level discourse analysis. Computational Linguistics, 18, 537-544. : Moreno, J. (1990). Impersonal constructions in Spanish. En M. Hannay & E. Vesters (Eds.) Working with functional grammar: Descriptive and computational applications (pp. 31-40). Dordrecht: Foris. : Naskar, S. K. & Bandyopadhyay, S. (2007). JU-SKNSB: Extended WordNet based WSD on the English all-words task at SemEval-1. Proceedings of the 4th International Workshop on Semantic Evaluations (pp. 203-206). Association for Computational Linguistics. : Nazar, R. & Renau, I. (2012). Google Books N-gram corpus used as a grammar checker. Proceedings of EACL 2012: Second Workshop on Computational Linguistics and Writing. Avignon, France [en línea]. Disponible en: : Nolan, B. (2014). Theoretical and computational considerations of linking constructions in Role and Reference Grammar. Review of Cognitive Linguistics 12(2), 410-442. : Palmer, M., Fellbaum, C., Cotton, S., Delfs, L. & Dang, H. T. (2001). English tasks: All-words and verb lexical sample. The Proceedings of the Second International Workshop on Evaluating Word Sense Disambiguation Systems (pp. 21-24). Association for Computational Linguistics. : Palmer, M., Gildea, D. & Kingsbury, P. (2005). The proposition bank: An annotated corpus of semantic roles. Computational linguistics, 31(1), 71-106. : Pantel, P. & Lin, D. (2001). A statistical corpus-based term extractor. Ponencia presentada en el 14th Biennial Conference of the Canadian Society on Computational Studies of Intelligence, Londres, Inglaterra. : Pantel, P. & Pennacchiotti, M. (2006). Espresso: Leveraging generic patterns for automatically harvesting semantic relations. En Proceedings of Conference on Computational Linguistics Association for Computational Linguistics. Sydney: ACL. : Patwardhan, S., Banerjee, S. & Pedersen, T. (2003). Using measures of semantic relatedness for word sense disambiguation. International Conference on Intelligent Text Processing and Computational Linguistics (pp. 241-257). Springer Berlin Heidelberg. : Periñán, C. & Arcas, F. (2014). The implementation of the CLS constructor in ARTEMIS. In B. Nolan & C. Periñán (Eds.), Language processing and grammars. The role of functionally oriented computational models (pp. 165-196). Amsterdam: John Benjamins. : Pradhan, S. S., Loper, E., Dligach, D. & Palmer, M. (2007). SemEval-2007 task 17: English lexical sample, SRL and all words. Proceedings of the 4th International Workshop on Semantic Evaluations (pp. 87-92). Association for Computational Linguistics. : Pustejovsky, J. & Anick, P. (1988). On the semantic interpretation of nominal. Ponencia presentada en el 12 th International Conference On Computational Linguistics, Budapest, Hungría. : Pustejovsky, J. (1991). The generative lexicon. Computational Linguistics, 17(4), 409-441. : Pustejovsky, J. (1995). Linguistic constraints on type coercion. En P. Saint-Dizier & E. Viegas (Eds.), Computational Lexical Semantics (pp. 71-97). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press . : Reisinger, D., Rudinger, R., Ferraro, F., Harman, C., Rawlins, K. & Van Durme, B. (2015). Semantic proto-roles. Transactions of the Association for Computational Linguistics, 3, 475-488. : Reitter, E. & Moore, J. (2007). Predicting success in dialogue. En Proceedings of 44th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics, 1 (45), 808-815. : Rosenbaum, D. & Collyer, C. (Eds.) (1998). Timing of behavior: Neural, psychological, and computational perspectives. Cambridge, MA.: The MIT Press. : Ruimy, N. (2006b). A computational multi-layered italian lexicon for hlt applications. En Proceedings XII EURALEX International Congress, Atti del Congresso Internazionale di Lessicografia,1, 221-227. : Schneider, K. (2005) Techniques for improving the performance of naive Bayes for text classification. En International conference on computational linguistics and intelligent text processing. Ciudad de México, México. : Sidorov, G. (2014). Should syntactic N-grams contain names of syntactic relations? International Journal of Computational Linguistics and Applications, 5(1), 139-158. : Snow, R., Jurafsky, D. & Ng, A. (2006). Semantic taxonomy induction from heterogeneous evidence. En Proceedings of the 21st International Conference on Computational Linguistics. Sydney: Association for Computational Linguistics. : Sowa, J. (1999). Knowledge representation: Logical, Philosophical, and Computational Foundations. Pacific Grove, CA: Brooks Cole. : Steels, L. (2012). Design methods for Fluid Construction Grammar. In L. Steels (Ed.), Computational issues in Fluid Construction Grammar (pp. 3-36). Berlin: Springer. : Sukkarieh, J., Pulman, S. & Raikes, N. (2003). Auto-marking: Using computational linguistics to score short, free text responses. Proceedings of the 29^th Annual Conference of the International Association for Educational Assessment, Manchester, U.K. : Sun, R. (1999). Accounting for the computational basis of consciousness: A connectionist approach. Consciousness and Cognition, 8, 529-565. : Szarvas, G. (2008). Hedge classification in biomedical texts with a weakly supervised selection of keywords. Ponencia presentada en el 46th Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics, Ohio, USA. : Tsatsaronis, G., Varlamis, I. & NørvÃ¥g, K. (2010). SemanticRank: Ranking keywords and sentences using semantic graphs. Ponencia presentada en el 23rd International Conference on Computational Linguistics, Beijing, China. : Tzoukermann, E., Klavans, J. & Strzalkowski, T. (2003). Information retrieval. En R. Mitkov (Ed.), The Oxford handbook of computational linguistics (pp. 530-544). New York: Oxford University Press. : Velardi, P., Pazienza, M. T. & Fasolo, M. (1991). How to encode semantic knowledge: A method for meaning representation and computer-aided acquisition. Computational Linguistics, 17(2), 153-170. : Vickrey, D., Biewald, L., Teyssier, M. & Koller, D. (2005). Word-sense disambiguation for machine translation. Proceedings of the conference on Human Language Technology and Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing (pp. 771-778). Association for Computational Linguistics. : Wang, T. & Hirst, G. (2014). Applying a Naive Bayes Similarity Measure to Word Sense Disambiguation. Proceedings of the 52nd Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics (Short Papers) (pp. 531-537). Association for Computational Linguistics. : Wenger, E. (1987). Artificial Intelligence and Tutoring Systems: Computational and Cognitive Approaches to the Communication of Knowledge. Los Altos, CA: Morgan Kaufmann. : Zhila, A. & Gelbukh, A. (2013). Comparison of Open Information Extraction for Spanish and English. Computational Linguistics and Intellectual Technologies 12(1), 794-802. : Zhong, Z. & Ng, H. T. (2012). Word sense disambiguation improves information retrieval. Proceedings of the 50th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics: Long Papers -Volume 1 (pp. 273-282). Association for Computational Linguistics. : da Cunha, I., Montané, M. A. & Hysa, L. (2017). The arText prototype: An automatic system for writing specialized texts. Proceedings of the 15th Conference of the European Chapter of the Association for Computational Linguistics. Software Demonstrations, 57-60. |