/LING

Update: February 24, 2023 The new version of Termout.org is now online, so this web site is now obsolete and will soon be dismantled.

Lista de candidatos sometidos a examen:
1) connotation (*)
(*) Términos presentes en el nuestro glosario de lingüística

---

1) Candidate: connotation

Is in goldstandard

---

1
paper corpusSignosTxtLongLines417 - : Louw (2000) amplifies his definition of semantic prosody as ‘aura of meaning’ and considers it as something distinguishable from connotation. In the context of semantic prosody, connotation is understood as evaluative meaning. Connotation is frequently identified as semantic prosody (Sinclair, 2003). Thus, connotation and semantic prosody can be closely related but they should be considered different phenomena. Connotation is more obvious and consistent, as well as related to individual items, whereas semantic prosody is less evident and more prone to changing with context:

Evaluando al candidato connotation:

1) semantic: 5 (*)
2) prosody: 5 (*)

connotation
Lengua:
Frec: 5
Docs: 1
Nombre propio: 1 / 5 = 20%
Coocurrencias con glosario: 2
Puntaje: 3.244 = (2 + (1+3.4594316186373) / (1+2.58496250072116)));
Rechazado: baja disp.;

Referencias bibliográficas encontradas sobre cada término

(Que existan referencias dedicadas a un término es también indicio de terminologicidad.)

connotation

: In order to distinguish these two linguistic phenomena, Morley and Partington (2009: 151) define connotation in terms of prototypicality: : Louw (2000) claims that while semantic prosody depends on the co-text and thus can be explored in a corpus through regular co-occurrences of an item, connotation is related to instinctive semantic associations that are often made of an item, regardless of the collocates.