/LING
|
Update: February 24, 2023 The new version of Termout.org is now online, so this web site is now obsolete and will soon be dismantled. |
Lista de candidatos sometidos a examen:
1) constituents (*)
(*) Términos presentes en el nuestro glosario de lingüística
1) Candidate: constituents
Is in goldstandard
1
paper corpusSignosTxtLongLines203 - : The most relevant issue has been that Linguistics has gone beyond the sentence bound-ary. We now know a lot more about the ways in which sentences can be connected into text or discourse than in the year when the first issue of Revista Signos was published. It has to be said that in the beginning we were too optimistic about text grammars (a misleading metaphor). There is much more freedom in combining sentences than in link-ing constituents: coherence is not only semantically based, but also pragmatically . The most important issue nowadays is how to combine referential cohesion, like phoricity and nymic relations, and relational coherence, like elaboration, causation and presenta-tional relations. A major step forward can be made if we succeed in articulating a theory that leads to a classification model with descriptive adequacy, that explains why readers interpret discourse relations as they do, and that predicts at any point in a discourse the most plausible discourse
2
paper corpusSignosTxtLongLines295 - : According to Lock (1996), in terms of language education, the systemic functional perspective does not focus on the distinction between grammatical and ungrammatical linguistic forms, but rather on the appropriateness of each lexico-gramatical choice for a particular communicative purpose in a particular social context. As the author points out, "the primary concern [of systemic functional linguistics] is with the functions of structures and their constituents and with their meanings in context" (Lock, 1996: 1 ).
3
paper corpusSignosTxtLongLines336 - : It can be noted that the collocational semantics in [32]Table 2 are complex lexical functions. [33]Table 3 presents the meanings from [34]Table 2 through the instrumentality of the lexical function formalism. The meanings are accompanied by sample collocations taken from [35]Table 2 as well. The notation includes the names of lexical functions and the syntactic information concerning grammatical functions of lexicalized semantic roles encoded in subscripts. For the sake of preserving the complete notation, we use the name of the function and the subscripts, but since we are interested in the semantic aspect of collocations, here we leave the subscripts unexplained. However, a detailed description of subscripts and their meanings can be obtained from (Mel’čuk, 1996). Complex lexical functions in [36]Table 3 include the following simple lexical functions as their constituents: Caus, Func, Plus, Minus, Incep, Cont, Oper . All of them, except for Plus and Minus, were introduced earlier in this
Evaluando al candidato constituents:
1) lexical: 5 (*)
4) meanings: 4
7) subscripts: 3
8) discourse: 3 (*)
constituents
Lengua: eng
Frec: 22
Docs: 10
Nombre propio: / 22 = 0%
Coocurrencias con glosario: 2
Puntaje: 2.905 = (2 + (1+4) / (1+4.52356195605701)));
Candidato aceptado
Referencias bibliográficas encontradas sobre cada término
(Que existan referencias dedicadas a un término es también indicio de terminologicidad.)| constituents |
: Cortés-Rodríguez, F. & Rodríguez-Juárez, C. (2018a). Parsing phrasal constituents in ASD-STE100 with ARTEMIS. Voprosy Kognitivnoy Lingvistiki, 3, 97-109. : In SFL, a clause is considered a figure representing a quantum of change, an abstraction of human experience into meaning (Halliday & Matthiessen, 1999). Its main constituents are: |