/LING
|
Update: February 24, 2023 The new version of Termout.org is now online, so this web site is now obsolete and will soon be dismantled. |
Lista de candidatos sometidos a examen:
1) conventional (*)
(*) Términos presentes en el nuestro glosario de lingüística
1) Candidate: conventional
Is in goldstandard
1
paper CH_corpusRLAtxt234 - : In essence, it can be concluded that human society distinguishes various types of texts as products of different "discourse practices". In accordance with this criterion, a conventional classification of texts has been established: scientific texts, administrative texts, legal texts, journalistic texts, humanistic texts, literary texts, advertising texts and digital texts . An attempt has also been made to characterise texts based on the function they fulfil in communication, or the intention of the speaker/s (informative, directive and expressive texts) and, at the same time, in accordance with their textual sequences (narration, description, argument and presentation).
2
paper CH_corpusRLAtxt188 - : Let us thus start with the semantic level. For the purpose of systematically depicting an information range involved in the complex idiom semantics, ^[54]Telija (Telija et al., 1990; Telija, 1996; ^[55]Kabakova, 2002) proposes a macro-componential model which revolves around six informational blocks, each of which embraces one of the conventional meaning parameters: denotation, motivation, rational assessment, emotional and attitudinal assessment, stylistics and grammar . Later revised by ^[56]Timofeeva-Timofeev (2008; 2012: 205-244) in Spanish, this model represents an attempt to consistently isolate and systematically describe different kinds of knowledge entwined in idiom meaning, although such 'chunking' abides by exclusively metalinguistic aims.
3
paper CH_corpusSignostxt400 - : “se lo is easier to process than le lo, for the diversification of the references allows the two 3rd ps participants to be identified in the cognitively most economic order, i.e. first the Central, and then the Peripheral participant […] It is neither conventional use nor morpho-phonological dissimilation that makes *le lo yield to se lo: se lo is preferable to le lo for essentially the same reasons that me presentaste a ella is preferable to me le presentaste in conveying ‘You introduced me to her’”(García, 2009: 142 ).
4
paper CH_corpusSignostxt453 - : offers. There are several conventional ways in which this combination of stipulations (iv) and (v) can be exploited linguistically:
5
paper CL_LiteraturayLingüísticatxt71 - : [28]Crystal, D. (1987:100) argues that «...only in certain fields such as literature do we tolerate personal deviations from the semantic norms of the language.... He states one of the favorite quotations of semanticists from Lewis Carroll's book Through the Looking Glass (1872, Chapter 6), in which Humpty Dumpty turns our conventional understanding of meaning on his head, and makes us see more clearly what it has to be about:
6
paper VE_BoletindeLinguisticatxt64 - : 4. TE: A construction is described as a conventional pattern of linguistic structure which is paired with features of interpretation. A construction may thus be specified with respect to lexical, morphological, or syntactic properties, but it will also be provided with semantic and/or pragmatic features of interpretation. The structural part of a construction may involve an assembly of patterns found elsewhere in the language, but in any particular construction the selected patterns are associated with special meaning (semantic, pragmatic, or both). The way in which constructions receive their interpretation is not fully compositional, but the non-predictable semantic and pragmatic information is in fact associated with the formal features of the construction in a conventional way (Dancygier 1998: 5 ).
Evaluando al candidato conventional:
1) texts: 11 (*)
3) semantic: 5 (*)
6) pragmatic: 3 (*)
7) telija: 3
conventional
Lengua: eng
Frec: 114
Docs: 75
Nombre propio: / 114 = 0%
Coocurrencias con glosario: 3
Frec. en corpus ref. en eng: 107
Puntaje: 3.704 = (3 + (1+4.52356195605701) / (1+6.84549005094438)));
Rechazado: muy común;
Referencias bibliográficas encontradas sobre cada término
(Que existan referencias dedicadas a un término es también indicio de terminologicidad.)| conventional |
: 38. Márquez Reiter, R. (2002). A contrastive study of conventional indirectness in Spanish: Evidence from Peninsular and Uruguayan Spanish. Pragmatics, 12, 135151. : Ahrens, K., Liu, H., Lee, C., Gong, S., Fang, S. & Hsu, S. (2007). Functional MRI of conventional and anomalous metaphors in Mandarin Chinese. Brain and Language, 100, 163-171. : Fréris, Georges (2009). "Du genre conventional au texte multigénérique". Caitele Echinox 16. 61-66. : Lai, V. T., Curran, T. & Menn, L. (2009). Comprehending conventional and novel metaphors: An ERP study. Brain Research, 1284, 145-155. : Lee, I., Mak, P. & Burns, A. (2015). Bringing innovation to conventional feedback approaches in EFL secondary writing classrooms: A Hong Kong case study. English Teaching: Practice & Critique, 14(2), 140-163. : Thibodeau, P. & Durgin, F. H. (2008). Productive figurative communication: Conventional metaphors facilitate the comprehension of related novel metaphors. Journal of Memory and Language, 58, 521-540. : Vallée, R. (2008). Conventional implicature revisited. Journal of Pragmatics, 40, 407-430. : Widdowson, H.G. «Significance in Conventional and Literary Discourse», in Smith, L. (ed.), 1987. Discourse Across Culture. New York: Prentice Hall, (pp. 9-21). |