Termout.org logo/LING


Update: February 24, 2023 The new version of Termout.org is now online, so this web site is now obsolete and will soon be dismantled.

Lista de candidatos sometidos a examen:
1) conversation (*)
(*) Términos presentes en el nuestro glosario de lingüística

1) Candidate: conversation


Is in goldstandard

1
paper corpusSignosTxtLongLines207 - : Biber, D. (2004). Conversation text types: A multi-dimensional analysis [en línea] . Disponible en [27]http://www.cavi.univ-paris3.fr/lexicometrica/jadt/jadt2004/pdf/JADT_000.pdf [ [28]Links ]

2
paper corpusSignosTxtLongLines254 - : En el siguiente artículo, Negotiating regional identity in conversation: A Chilean case study, Bettina Kluge observa un caso diferente . La autora se centra en identidades regionales, en procesos monolingües de migración internos a un país, en este caso, Chile. El estudio apunta al proceso de reinvención de la identidad regional de inmigrantes debido a razones laborales. Este grupo está compuesto por mujeres que migran desde ciudades al sur de la capital para trabajar como empleadas domésticas en Santiago. El análisis del corpus de treinta y tres entrevistas autobiográficas se centró en los procedimientos léxicos de categorización utilizados por las propias inmigrantes y por personas de la capital para referirse a ellas. En el análisis, la autora describe el uso de diversas categorías como sureño, gente del sur, campesina, provinciana, huasa, etc. y el modo en que cada uno de estos colabora en forma singular a la construcción de la identidad regional. Estas categorías configuran estereotipos

3
paper corpusSignosTxtLongLines328 - : Hidalgo, R. (2002). Establishing topic in conversation: A contrastive study of left-dislocation in English and Spanish . En A. Downing, J. Moya & J. I. Albentosa (Coord.), Circle of linguistics applied to Communication 11 (pp. 31-50). Cuenca: Ediciones de la Universidad de Castilla-La Mancha. [ [65]Links ]

4
paper corpusSignosTxtLongLines577 - : The present study also sheds light on the situational (register) and contextual (genre) constraints that shape digital texts. In TED Talks, presenters use a conversational style to tell issues of science and the use of linguistic resources such as first and second person pronouns reduces distance “to breach the expert/non expert barrier” (^[178]Scotto di Carlo, 2014: 201 ). In research blogs, conversational features construct proximity (^[179]Luzón, 2013), and in online medical campaigns language resources help scientists to construct credible identities (^[180]Paulus & Roberts, 2018). In analysing science popularisation genres, ^[181]Motta Roth and Scotti Scherer (2016: 173) also underline the “interdiscursivity between discourses from scientific, pedagogic and media spheres”. In the crowdfunding proposals analysed in this study, the situational and contextual constraints easily explain why these texts rely on both grammatical features that are typical of conversation and features

5
paper corpusSignosTxtLongLines594 - : During the in-class discussion of their own comparison-and-contrast essays on university and high school life (the third expository essay), the students well displayed their enhanced alignment with the SFL-based perspective on meaning making. The following is an excerpt of the conversation:

Evaluando al candidato conversation:



conversation
Lengua:
Frec: 189
Docs: 80
Nombre propio: 1 / 189 = 0%
Coocurrencias con glosario:
Puntaje: 0.117 = ( + (1+0) / (1+7.56985560833095)));
Candidato aceptado

Referencias bibliográficas encontradas sobre cada término

(Que existan referencias dedicadas a un término es también indicio de terminologicidad.)
conversation
: Biber, D. & Conrad, S. (1999). Lexical bundles in conversation and academic prose. En H. Hasselgard & S. Oksefjell (Eds.), Out of corpora: Studies in honor of Stig Johansson (pp. 181–189). Amsterdam: Rodopi.
: Brennan, S. E. & Clark, H. H. (1996). Conceptual pacts and lexical choice in conversation. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 22(6), 1482.
: Brumark, Å. (2008). Eat your hamburger! - No, I don’t want to! Argumentation and argumentative development in the context of dinner conversation in twenty Swedish families. Argumentation, 22(2), 251-271.
: Cathcart, R. & Olsen, J. (1976). Teachers’ and students’ preferences for correction of classroom conversation errors. En J. Fanselow & R. Crymes (Eds.), On TESOL ‘76 (pp. 41-53). Washington, DC.: TESOL.
: Chafe, W. (1986). Evidentiality in English Conversation and Academic Writing. En W. Chafe & J. Nichols (Eds.), Evidentiality: The Linguistic Coding of Epistemolog y (pp. 261-272). Norwood: Ablex.
: Cornillie, B. (2010). On conceptual semantics and discourse function. the case of spanish modal adverbs in informal conversation. Review of Cognitive Linguistics, 8(2), 300-320.
: Couper-Kuhlen, E. & Thompson, S. (2000). Concessive patterns in conversation. En E. Couper-Kuhlen & B. Kortmann (Eds.), Cause, condition, concession, contrast: Cognitive and discourse perspectives (pp. 381-410). Berlin/Nueva York: Mouton/De Gruyter.
: Couper-Kuhlen, E. & Thompson, S. (2008). On assessing situations and events in conversation: ‘Extraposition’ and its relatives. Discourse Studies, 10, 443-467.
: Duff, P. (1986). Another look at interlanguage talk: Taking task to task. In R. R. Day (Ed.), Talking to Learn: Conversation in Second Language Acquisition (pp. 147-181). Rowley MA: Newbury House.
: Duranti, A. & Ochs, E. (1979). Left dislocation in Italian conversation. En T. Givón (Ed.), syntax and semantics 12. Discourse and syntax (pp. 337-416). New York: Academic Press.
: Eggins, S. & Slade, D. (1997). Analysing casual conversation. London: Cassel.
: Enfield, N. J., Stivers, T. & Levinson, S. C. (2010). Question-response sequences in conversation across ten languages: An introduction. Journal of Pragmatics, 42(10), 2615-2619.
: Fox, B. & Thompson, S. (1990). A discourse explanation of the grammar of relative clauses in English conversation. Language, 66, 297-316.
: Francis, G. y Hunston, S. (1992). Analysing Everyday Conversation. Coulthard, M. (ed) Advances in Spoken Discourse Analysis. London: Routledge.
: Fujie, S. (2004). A conversation Robot with Bach-channel Feedback Function based on Linguistic and Nonlinguistic Information. Ponencia presentada en el 2nd International Conference on Autonomous Robots and Agents. Palmerston North, Nueva Zelanda.
: Garvey, C. (1977). The contingent query and dependent act in conversation. En M. Lewis & L. Rosenblum (Eds.), Interaction Conversation and the Development of Language (pp. 63-93). New York: Wiley.
: Grice, H. (1975). Logic and conversation. En J. Cole & J. Morgan (Eds.), Speech acts (pp. 41-58). New York: Academic Press.
: Grice, H. (1979). Logique et conversation. Communications, 30, 57-72.
: Grice, H. P. (1975). Logic and conversation. En P. Cole & J. L. Morgan (Eds.), Sintax and Semantics (pp. 41-59). Nueva York: Academic Press.
: Heinze, A. & Heinze, B. (2009). Blended e-learning skeleton of conversation: Improving formative assessment in undergraduate dissertation supervision. British Journal of Educational Technology, 40(2), 294-305.
: Heritage, J. (2013b). Epistemics in Conversation. En T. Stivers & J. Sidnell (Eds.), The Handbook of Conversation Analysis (pp. 370-394). Londres: Wiley-Blackwell.
: Herring, S. C. (2010). Computer mediated conversation: Introduction and overview. Languange@ Internet, 7(2), 1-12.
: Honeycutt, C. & Herring, S. C. (2009). Beyond microblogging: Conversation and collaboration via Twitter. Proceedings of the Forty-Second Hawai’i International Conference on System Sciences (HICSS-42). Los Alamitos, CA: IEEE Press.
: Hutchby, I. & Wooffitt, R. (2008). Conversation Analysis. Cambridge: Polity Press.
: Hutchby, I. (2006). Media talk. Conversation analysis and the study of broadcasting. Glasgow: Open University Press.
: Iida, S. (2005). Overlapping in Japanese conversation. Tesis doctoral, University of New South Gales, Gales.
: Ishida, H. (2006). Learners’ perception and interpretation of contextualization cues in spontaneous Japanese conversation: Back-channel cue Uun. Journal of Pragmatics, 38(11), 1943-1981.
: Jefferson, G. (1983). On exposed and embedded correction in conversation. En G. Button & J. Lee (Eds.), Talk and Social organization (pp. 86-100). Clevedon: Multilingual Matters.
: Jefferson, G. (1988). On the sequential organization of troubles talk in ordinary conversation. Social Problems, 35(4), 418-442.
: Jefferson, G. (2004). Glossary of transcript symbols with an Introduction. En G. Lerner (Ed.), Conversation Analysis: Studies from the first generation (pp.13-23). Philadelphia: John Benjamins.
: Keysar, B., Barr, D. J., Balin, J. A. & Brauner, J. S. (2000). Taking perspective in conversation: The role of mutual knowledge in comprehension. Psychological Science, 11(1), 32-38.
: Kita, S. & Ide, S. (2007). Nodding, aizuchi, and final particles in Japanese conversation: How conversation reflects the ideology of communication and social relationships. Journal of Pragmatics, 39(7), 1242-1254.
: Labov, W. & Fanshel, D. (1977). Therapeutic discourse: Psichotherapy as conversation. Nueva York: Academic Press.
: Lamboy, E. M. & Thompson, G. (2012). Integrating classroom and community: Service-learning in the Spanish conversation class. MIFLC Review, 18, 113-132.
: Liddicoat, A.J. (2007). An introduction to conversation analysis. Londres: Continuum.
: Lindström, A. & Sorjonen, M.-L. (2013). Affiliation in conversation. En J. Sidnell & T. Stivers (Eds.), The handbook of conversation analysis (pp. 350-369). Chichester: Wiley-Blackwell.
: McCarthy, M. (2003). Talking back: Small interactional response tokens in everyday conversation. Research on Language and Social Interaction, 36(1), 33-63.
: Moeschler, J. (1992). Theorie pragmatique, actes de langage et conversation. Cahiers de Linguistique Francaise 13. Geneve: Universite de Geneve.
: Moeschler, J. (2001). Speech act theory and the analysis of conversation. En D. Vanderverken & S. Kubo (Eds.), Essays in speech act theory (pp. 239-262). Amsterdam: Benjamins.
: Norton, B. (2013). Identity and language learning: Extending the conversation. Bristol: Multilingual Matters .
: Oliver, R. (1995). Negative feedback in child NSNNS conversation. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 17(4), 459-482.
: Ono, T. & Thompson, S. (1995). What can conversation tell us about syntax? En P. Davis (Ed.), Descriptive and theoretical modes in alternative linguistics (pp. 213-271). Amsterdam & Philadelphia: John Benjamins.
: Oreström, B. (1983). Turn-taking in English Conversation. Lund: LiberFörlag Lund.
: Panther, K. & Thornburg, L. (1997). A cognitive approach to inferencing in conversation. Journal of Pragmatics, 30, 755-769.
: Perkins, L., Whitworth, A. & Lesser, R. (1997). Conversation analysis profile for people with cognitive impairment. Londres: Whurr.
: Pomerantz, A. & Mandelbaum, J. (2005). Conversation analytic approaches to the relevance and uses of relationship categories in interaction. In K.L. Fitch. & R.E. Sanders (Eds.), Handbook of Language and Social Interaction (pp. 149-171). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
: Ponterotto, D. (2000). The cohesive role of cognitive metaphor in discourse and conversation. En A. Barcelona (Ed.), Metaphor and metonymy at the crossroads (pp. 283-298). Berlin: Gruyter.
: Reitter, E., Moore, J. & Keller, F. (2006). Priming of syntactic rules in task-oriented dialogue and spontaneous conversation. En Proceedings of the 28th Annual Conference of the Cognitive Science Society, pp. 685-690.
: Rousseaux, M., Sève, A., Vallet, M., Pasquier, F. & Mackowiak-Cordoliani, M. A. (2010). An analysis of communication in conversation in patients with dementia. Neuropsychologia, 48(13), 3884-3890.
: Sacks, H. (1992). Lectures on Conversation. Londres: Blackwell.
: Sacks, H., Schegloff, E. & Jefferson, G. (1974). A simplest systematics for the organization of turn-taking for conversation. Language, 50(4), 696-735.
: Sayer, P. (2005). An intensive approach to building conversation skills. English Language Teacher Journal, 59(1), 14-22.
: Schegloff, E. A. (1979). Identification and recognition in telephone conversation openings. In G. Psathas (Ed.), Everyday Language: Studies in Ethnomethodology (pp. 23-78). New York: Irvington Publishers.
: Schegloff, E., Jefferson, G. & Sacks, H. (1977). The preference for self-correction in the organization of repair in conversation. Language, 53, 361-382.
: Schegloff, J. (1992). To Searle on Conversation: A Note in Return. En H. Parret & J. Verschueren (Eds.), (On) Searle on Conversation (pp. 113-128). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
: Scheibman, J. (2001). Local patterns of subjectivity in person and verb type in American English conversation. En J. Bybee & P. Hopper (Eds.), Frequency and the Emergence of Linguistic Structure (pp.61-89). Ámsterdam: John Benjamins.
: Scheibman, J. (2007). Subjective and intersubjective uses of generalizations in English conversation. En R. Englebretson (Ed.), Stancetaking in Discourse Subjectivity, Interaction, Evaluation (pp. 111-138). Ámsterdam: John Benjamins.
: Schmidt, R. & Frota, S. (1986). Developing basic conversational ability in a second language: A case study of an adult learner of Portuguese. In R. Day (Ed.), Talking to learn: Conversation in second language acquisition (pp. 237-326). Rowley, MA: Newbury House.
: Searle, J. (1992). Conversation. En H. Parret & J. Verschueren (Eds.), (On) Searle on Conversation (pp. 7-30). Amsterdam: John Benjamins .
: Seedhouse, P. (2004). The interactional architecture of the language classroom: A conversation analysis perspective. Malden, MA: Blackwell.
: Sidnell, J. (2010). Conversation Analysis. An Introduction. Londres: Wiley-Blackwell .
: Sidnell, J. (2012). Who knows best? Evidentiality and epistemic asymmetry in conversation. Pragmatics and Society, 3(2), 294-320.
: Sidnell, J. (2013). Basic conversation analytic methods. En T. Stivers & J. Sidnell (Eds.), The Handbook of Conversation Analysis (pp. 77-100). Londres: Wiley-Blackwell .
: Slade, D. (1996). The texture of casual conversation in English. University of Sydney: Ph.D. thesis.
: Steensig, J. (2012). Conversation analysis and affiliation and alignment. En C. A. Chapelle (Ed.), The Encyclopedia of Applied Linguistics. Oxford, Blackwell Publishing. [191]https://doi.org/10.1002/9781405198431.wbeal0196
: Stivers, T. (2011). Morality and question design: “of course” as contesting a presupposition of askability. EnT. Stivers , L. Mondada & J. Steensig (Eds.), The morality of knowledge in conversation (pp. 82-106). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press .
: Stokoe, E. H. & Smithson, J. (2001). Making gender relevant: Conversation analysis and gender categories in interaction.Discourse & Society,12(2), 217-244.
: Tabensky, A. (2001b). Gesture and speech rephrasings in conversation. Gesture, 1(2), 213-235.
: Tannen, D. (1988). Hearing voices in conversation, fiction, and mixed genres. En D. Tannen (Ed.), Linguistics in contexts: Connecting observation and understanding (pp. 89-113). Norwood, N.J.: Ablex Publishing Company.
: Tannen, D. (1990). You just don’t understand: Men and women in conversation. Nueva York: William Morrow.
: Turkstra, L., Ciccia, A. & Seaton, C. (2003). Interactive behaviors in adolescent conversation dyads. Language, Speech and Hearing Services in Schools, 34(2), 117-142.
: Walton, D. (1992). Plausible argument in everyday conversation. Albany: State University of New York Press.
: Wooffit, R. (1996). Conversation analysis and discourse analysis. A comparative and critical study. Londres: Sage.
: ten Have, P. (1999). Doing Conversation Analysis: A practical guide. Londres: SAGE.
: van Dijk, T. (1984). Prejudice in discourse. An analysis of ethnic prejudice in cognition and conversation. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: Benjamins.