Termout.org logo/LING


Update: February 24, 2023 The new version of Termout.org is now online, so this web site is now obsolete and will soon be dismantled.

Lista de candidatos sometidos a examen:
1) corel (*)
(*) Términos presentes en el nuestro glosario de lingüística

1) Candidate: corel


Is in goldstandard

1
paper corpusSignosTxtLongLines453 - : In turn, MPs are sets of one or more logically connected predications (e[1], e[2], e[3], etc.) that carry the generic features of concepts. Consider the MP of the concept +TEAR_01, which inherits from its superordinate concept +BREAK_00. The semantics of the lexical units 'tear', 'tear off', 'rip', Spanish rasgar, despedazar, Italian strappare, etc., are related to +TEAR_01, or to put in other words, +TEAR_01 is lexicalized by one sense of each of these lexical items. The formalized representation of +TEAR_01 via the COREL metalanguage is given in (2):

2
paper corpusSignosTxtLongLines453 - : * d. COREL schema: +(e1: (f1: (e2: +DO_00 (x1: x)Theme (x2: (e3: +BECOME_00 (x3: y)Theme (x4: z )Attribute))Referent))Result)

3
paper corpusSignosTxtLongLines453 - : These meaning implications are preserved in the COREL schema in [107]Figure 4, which we here repeat for the reader’s convenience, together with a translation into natural language:

4
paper corpusSignosTxtLongLines453 - : Similarly, the COREL schema in (10) below captures the cognitive content of the following related constructional realizations: 'It wouldn’t kill you to X', 'It wouldn’t harm you to X', and 'It wouldn’t do you harm to X':

5
paper corpusSignosTxtLongLines453 - : The semantic description of these realizations in terms of COREL can be literally paraphrased as follows: ‘The hearer is not doing something in a given situation or scene . As a result, the speaker tells the hearer to do (this) something (that he is not doing) because the speaker thinks that this could be beneficial for the hearer’.

6
paper corpusSignosTxtLongLines453 - : This brief discussion should be enough to help the reader become aware of the inherent complexity of illocutionary meaning, which is nonetheless susceptible to a computational treatment. To illustrate this, let us consider how the ‘offering’ scenario has been handled in the L3-construction. This illocutionary scenario, which comprises eleven constructions related through family resemblance (e.g. 'May I Offer You (NP)', 'Is There Anything I Can (VP)?', 'Do You Need Help With NP?', etc.), has been divided into three constructional dimensions, i.e. ‘Offering-type 1’, ‘Offering-type 2’ and ‘Offering-type 3’. Each of these dimensions comprises several constructions that have been grouped on the basis of their semantic affinity, following the analyses made in ^[111]Del Campo (2013). Therefore, all the constructions participating in a given dimension share the same COREL schema, as shown in (12)-(14) below:

7
paper corpusSignosTxtLongLines453 - : * c. COREL schema: +((e1: +THINK_00 (x1: )Theme (x2: (e2: pos +DO_00 (x1)Theme (x3)Referent))Referent)(e3: +BE_01 (x3)Theme (x5: +GOOD_00)Attribute (f1: x4 )Beneficiary))

8
paper corpusSignosTxtLongLines453 - : * c. COREL schema: +((e1: +SAY_00 (x1: )Theme (x2: (e2: pos +DO_00 (x1)Theme (x3)Referent))Referent (x4: )Goal)(e3: +BE_01 (x3)Theme (x5: +GOOD_00)Attribute (f1: x4)Beneficiary (f2: (e4: +HELP_00 (x1 )Theme (x4)Referent))Purpose))

9
paper corpusSignosTxtLongLines453 - : * c. COREL schema: +((e1: +THINK_00 (x1: )Theme (x2: (e2: pos +DO_00 (x1)Theme (x3)Referent))Referent)(e3: +BE_01 (x3)Theme (x4: +GOOD_00)Attribute (f1: )Beneficiary))

10
paper corpusSignosTxtLongLines500 - : In the last step in the parsing process, the CLS has to be automatically transduced into “a purely semantic conceptual representation in COREL” (^[61]Fumero & Díaz, 2017: 37 ). COREL (Conceptual Representation Language) is the machine-readable metalanguage that is used in the conceptual semantic representation of CLSs “that serves as the input for the reasoning engine” (^[62]Van Valin & Mairal 2014: 217), as shown below in the COREL scheme for the L1-locative construction that appears in the Grammaticon module in FunGramKB:

11
paper corpusSignosTxtLongLines500 - : The intransitive locative construction allows the locative argument (adjunct) to be the subject of the structure as a result of marked macrorole assignment following the Actor-Undergoer Macrorole Assignment Hierarchy (^[89]Van Valin, 2005). The fact that there is a case of marked macrorole assignment triggers the realization of the other non-selected potential macrorole argument (the original Theme) as a non-macrorole argument encoded as a ‘with’-phrase. In [90]Figure 3 below, you can see the CLS and the COREL scheme for this construction in FunGramKB:

12
paper corpusSignosTxtLongLines500 - : The image impression construction, illustrated in (12), will upgrade the location adjunct by adding it to the construction as a core argument (‘the shells’) (criterion (b)) with a direct object function and an Undergoer value, which implies the shift of the status of the original core argument (‘questions’) that is now realised as an oblique ‘with’ prepositional phrase, signalling it as a possible (though unrealised) candidate for Undergoer status. [92]Figure 4 shows the CLS and the COREL scheme for this construction:

Evaluando al candidato corel:


1) theme: 13 (*)
2) referent: 8 (*)
3) schema: 7 (*)
5) speaker: 5 (*)
6) hearer: 5 (*)
7) argument: 5 (*)
8) representation: 4 (*)
9) macrorole: 4 (*)
10) attribute: 4
11) semantic: 4 (*)
16) beneficiary: 3
17) constructions: 3 (*)
18) assignment: 3 (*)
19) conceptual: 3
20) figure: 3 (*)

corel
Lengua: eng
Frec: 22
Docs: 3
Nombre propio: / 22 = 0%
Coocurrencias con glosario: 12
Puntaje: 13.309 = (12 + (1+6.22881869049588) / (1+4.52356195605701)));
Candidato aceptado

Referencias bibliográficas encontradas sobre cada término

(Que existan referencias dedicadas a un término es también indicio de terminologicidad.)
corel
: (i) The 'conceptual level' is language-independent and is therefore shared by all the languages currently supported in the knowledge base. This level is made up of three sub-modules, all of which employ the same formal language (i.e. COREL; ^[57]Periñán & Mairal, 2010) to codify knowledge:
: Periñán, C. & Mairal, R. (2010). La gramática de COREL: Un lenguaje de representación conceptual. Onomázein, 21, 11-45.