Update: February 24, 2023
The new version of
Termout.org is now online,
so this web site is now obsolete and will soon be dismantled.
|
Lista de candidatos sometidos a examen:
1)
diagram (*)
(*) Términos presentes en el nuestro glosario de lingüística
Is in goldstandard
1
paper corpusSignosTxtLongLines192 -
: There are three types of category and three types of relationship between categories in Diagram 3: units (the linguistic unit sign, the semantic unit entity heading SE, and the syntactic units Cl and ngp )^[27]3, elements (the genre element S, and the syntactic elements S, C, M, dd, h, and E, and the participant roles Ag, Af), and items (she, wash, s, the, glass, and .). The linguistic unit sign fills (___) higher level elements, a semantic unit SE along with a syntactic unit (Cl or ngp) compose (|) signs, elements compose (S) syntactic units, and items expound (D) elements.
Diagram 3 can thus be read in the following manner. The genre element S is filled with the sign composed by the selection expression [entity, situation, ..., information, ..., present trp, ..., washing, ..., count sth, singular sth, ...], and the syntactic unit Cl. This unit in turn is composed of the following elements:
2
paper corpusSignosTxtLongLines192 -
: CLG rules involved in the generation of representations like Diagram 3 are all implications which can be represented as in (4i), read as in (4ii), and interpreted as in (4iii):
3
paper corpusSignosTxtLongLines192 - : As pointed out in the Introduction, RedACTe enhances CLG by incorporating a new category with the status of unit, namely, the (linguistic) sign. Now it is the unit sign, not the unit cl or ngp, etc., which fills higher level elements, either terminal genre features (Σ) or elements such as Ag, Af, etc. (cf. operation sign fills tml_gnr_ft in cc_lp1
). The sign is a unit with two places, in the sense of the CLG theory of unit potential structures, as represented in Diagram 9^[49]18:
4
paper corpusSignosTxtLongLines192 - : Castel (2004) proposes a text grammar which (a) treats field properties as belonging to a stratum lower than the genre stratum but higher than the lexicogrammatical stratum, and (b) defines field preferences that alter semantic feature probabilities in SNR
s. This text grammar associates, with each terminal genre feature, a pair made up of a selection expression headed by the feature [field_entity], and a linguistic structure as in Diagram 10, where SU is a variable ranging over syntactic units:
5
paper corpusSignosTxtLongLines192 -
: By elaborating on this higher stratum system network rule treatment of field properties, RedACTe could add tenor and mode systems so that Diagram 11 would be generated instead of Diagram 10, where [register_entity] heads a selection expression composed of field, tenor and mode features:
6
paper corpusSignosTxtLongLines192 - : In CLG, however, tenor and mode properties are treated not as part of a separate stratum from the lexicogrammar but as part of tenor and mode systems which interact with semantic systems within SNR
s. Tenor and mode features are thus embedded in various and complex ways within paths of the feature structure headed by [entity] in Diagram 12:
Evaluando al candidato diagram:
1) unit: 11
3) syntactic: 6 (*)
4) s: 5
5) tenor: 5
6) stratum: 5
7) mode: 5
8) genre: 5 (*)
10) feature: 4
11) linguistic: 4 (*)
12) semantic: 4 (*)
16) sign: 3
17) fills: 3
18) sign: 3
19) cl: 3
diagram
Lengua: eng
Frec: 26
Docs: 8
Nombre propio: 6 / 26 = 23%
Coocurrencias con glosario: 4
Puntaje: 5.228 = (4 + (1+6.06608919045777) / (1+4.75488750216347)));
Candidato aceptado
No se encontraron referencias bibliográficas sociadas al/ alos término(s)
(Que existan referencias dedicadas a un término es también indicio de
terminologicidad.)