Termout.org logo/LING


Update: February 24, 2023 The new version of Termout.org is now online, so this web site is now obsolete and will soon be dismantled.

Lista de candidatos sometidos a examen:
1) diatopic (*)
(*) Términos presentes en el nuestro glosario de lingüística

1) Candidate: diatopic


Is in goldstandard

1
paper CH_corpusRLAtxt177 - : The above-mentioned scheme is quite evident in segmental speech studies, but can be applied to suprasegmental studies, too. In fact, intonational diatopic variation of Romance languages has been approached from all four the disciplin ary standpoints we have previously mentioned (articulatory phonetics, acoustic phonetics, auditory phonetics, phonology). This notwithstanding, it has not been paid the same attention in all four branches. As a matter of fact, diatopic intona-tional variation in Romance languages has hardly been studied from an articula-tory point of view: to the best of our knowledge, Vanrell, Stella, ^[28]Gili-Fivela and Prieto (2013 ) experiment represents, as of today, the only attempt to describe pos sible geographic differences in F0 movements among Romance languages basing on articulatory analyses.

2
paper CH_corpusRLAtxt177 - : Last but not least, the above-mentioned databases of diatopic variation in Ro mance languages share another characteristic, that it also common to all other big linguistic atlases: the analysis of their huge amount of data becomes problematic because it is very difficult, for a human being, to cope with such an enormous amount of information (just to give an idea of the quantity of data, the Cata lan AMPER database contains data about 2 .610 acted speech sentences form 30 speakers, and the IARI-family atlas for Catalan contains 3.332 DCT sentences from 71 speakers). In order to overcome this problem, intonational dialectologists have developed a set of specific statistical tools, which will be discussed in the fol lowing sections.

3
paper CH_corpusRLAtxt141 - : DIATOPIC VARIATION IN THE SPEECH OF CHILEAN PROFESSIONALS: SUBJECTIVE ASSESSMENT

Evaluando al candidato diatopic:


2) variation: 4 (*)
4) phonetics: 3 (*)
5) speech: 3 (*)
6) romance: 3

diatopic
Lengua: eng
Frec: 34
Docs: 15
Nombre propio: / 34 = 0%
Coocurrencias con glosario: 3
Puntaje: 3.784 = (3 + (1+3.8073549220576) / (1+5.12928301694497)));
Candidato aceptado

No se encontraron referencias bibliográficas sociadas al/ alos término(s)

(Que existan referencias dedicadas a un término es también indicio de terminologicidad.)