/LING
|
Update: February 24, 2023 The new version of Termout.org is now online, so this web site is now obsolete and will soon be dismantled. |
Lista de candidatos sometidos a examen:
1) domains (*)
(*) Términos presentes en el nuestro glosario de lingüística
1) Candidate: domains
Is in goldstandard
1
paper corpusSignosTxtLongLines173 - : Specialized written discourse comprehension in technical-professional domains: ¿Learning from text ?
2
paper corpusSignosTxtLongLines209 - : Specialized written discourse at university and professional domains: Composition of a corpus
3
paper corpusSignosTxtLongLines209 - : It could be said that the specialized discourse literacy (academic and professional) has just began to be explored recently in Chile. Advances in this line must start from a deep and empirical analysis of real data. Thus, one way to access to the specialized written genres employed by the academia is to begin from the tenant that all materials read by students in university training reveal relevant data about disciplinary discourse and knowledge. This article gives information about a research Project, in its first steps, at Pontificia Universidad Católica de Valparaiso, Chile, focused on the collection, construction and description of an academia corpus based on texts collected in the academic and professional areas of four disciplinary domains of knowledge: Industrial Chemistry, Construction Engineering, Social Work, and Psychology . So, a revision of the concepts of specialized, academic, and professional discourse is presented. Then, the procedures of collecting and organizing the
4
paper corpusSignosTxtLongLines485 - : and surveillance. From these six domains, we have selected three of them for our research: healthcare is crucial for the lives of all citizens ; legal and economic affairs are of great importance in light of the current financial crisis and the frequent interactions between citizens and the public administration, so the attention to the citizen is a priority; and the services industry (especially tourism) is a key economic pillar upon which the Spanish economy is based.
5
paper corpusSignosTxtLongLines582 - : This work intends to explore how certain process types in Spanish are related to the expression of appraisal in academic texts, our objective is to analyze verbal transitivity and evaluative aspects of student academic writing on history. Our study draws on Systemic Functional Linguistics and, in particular, on the Appraisal System, which explores evaluative meanings in language, here we shall analyze only one of its subsystems, attitude. The analysis is based on student texts belonging to two genres (question-answer and essay), but to only one discipline (history). Within the ideational analysis we explored three types of processes in academic texts: verbal, mental and relational while within the interpersonal framework we classified the clauses that express appraisal according to the three domains of the attitude system: affect, judgment and appreciation . The preliminary results show certain similarities between the two genres, for example, the prevalence of relational processes and the
Evaluando al candidato domains:
1) academic: 6
2) specialized: 5 (*)
3) discourse: 5 (*)
4) professional: 4
5) texts: 4 (*)
6) appraisal: 3 (*)
10) genres: 3 (*)
domains
Lengua: eng
Frec: 84
Docs: 40
Nombre propio: / 84 = 0%
Coocurrencias con glosario: 5
Puntaje: 5.804 = (5 + (1+4.95419631038688) / (1+6.4093909361377)));
Candidato aceptado
Referencias bibliográficas encontradas sobre cada término
(Que existan referencias dedicadas a un término es también indicio de terminologicidad.)| domains |
: Fredericks, J. A. & Eccles, J. S. (2002). Children’s competence and value beliefs from childhood through adolescence: Growth trajectories in two male-sex-typed domains. Developmental Psychology, 38(4), 519-533. : Hanna, J. E., Tanenhaus, M. K. & Trueswell, J. C. (2003). The effects of common ground and perspective on domains of referential interpretation. Journal of Memory and Language, 49(1), 43-61. : Harris, Z. (1982). Discourse and sublanguage. En R. Kittredge & J. Lehrberger (Eds.), Sublanguages: Studies on language in restricted semantic domains (pp. 231-236). Berlín: W. de Gruyter. : Hynd, C. (Ed.) (1998). Learning from text across conceptual domains. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum. : Jewitt, C. (2011). The changing pedagogic landscape of subject English in UK classrooms. En K. OHalloran & B. Smith (Eds.), Multimodal studies: Exploring issues and domains (pp.184-201). Nueva York: Routledge. : León, J.A., Otero, J., Escudero, I., Campanario, J.M. & Pérez, O. (1999). Levels of causal explanations in psychology and physics domains. An expert/novice study. Ponencia presentada en el VI European Congress of Psychology. Roma, Italia. : Morris, M., Nisbett, R. & Peng, K. (1995). Causal attribution across domains and cultures. En D. Sperber, D. Premack & A. Premack (Eds.), Causal cognition: A multidisciplinary debate (pp. 577-614). New York: Clarendon Press/Oxford University Press. : O'Halloran, K. & Smith, B. (Eds.). (2011). Multimodal studies. Exploring issues and domains. London: Routledge. : Sanders, T. & Spooren, W. (2001). Modeling causal and contrastive connectives: On domains, subjectivity and mental spaces. International Cognitive Linguistics Conference. Santa Barbara, CA: USA. : Taghipour, K. & Ng, H. T. (2015). Semi-supervised word sense disambiguation using word embeddings in general and specific domains. Proceedings of NAACL HLT 2015, 314-323. : Van der Lely, H., Rosen, S. & Adlard, A. (2004). Grammatical language impairment and the specificity of cognitive domains: Relations between auditory and language abilities. Cognition, 94(2), 167-183. : Zukerman, I., Albrecht, D., Nicholson, A. & Doktor, K. (2000). Trading off granularity against complexity in predictive models for complex domains. Proc. 6^th Int'l Pacific Rim Conf. Artificial Intelligence, Springer-Verlag, pp. 1274-1279. |