/LING
|
Update: February 24, 2023 The new version of Termout.org is now online, so this web site is now obsolete and will soon be dismantled. |
Lista de candidatos sometidos a examen:
1) essay (*)
(*) Términos presentes en el nuestro glosario de lingüística
1) Candidate: essay
Is in goldstandard
1
paper corpusSignosTxtLongLines177 - : Foltz, P., Laham, D. & Landauer, T. (1999). The intelligent essay assessor: Applications to educational technology . Interactive Multimedia Electronic Journal of Computer-Enhanced Learning, 1(2). [on line]. Retrieved from: [51]http://imej.wfu.edu/articles/1999/2/04/index.asp [ [52]Links ]
2
paper corpusSignosTxtLongLines594 - : Over time in the first semester, the students’ alignment with the SFL-based perspective on writing increased through their writing practices, where they experienced the analytic power of deconstructing texts and realized the usefulness of SFL in helping them improve their writing by making them focus on matters beyond what they had been taught to value (i.e., grammar). In other words, the students gained a more in-depth understanding of English discourse in general. For example, Elizabeth had the following realization after she deconstructed a sample essay in the expository writing class:
3
paper corpusSignosTxtLongLines601 - : ^[61]Crossley et al. (2011: 303), they create less sophisticated texts with “more explicit cohesive devices to guide the reader”. From this age on, the use of connectives would stabilise and then decrease (^[62]Freedman & Pringle, 1980; ^[63]Haswell, 1986; in ^[64]Crossley et al., 2011). This way, more skilled writers would create texts that are more sophisticated and less cohesive (^[65]Crossley et al., 2011). In fact, the use of local cohesive devices by mature L1 writers has been found to be negatively correlated to essay quality: the more they use, the lower mark they are awarded by expert evaluators (^[66]Evola, Mamer & Lentz, 1980 ; ^[67]McCulley, 1985; ^[68]Crossley & McNamara, 2010, ^[69]2011).
4
paper corpusSignosTxtLongLines601 - : Crossley, S. A. & McNamara, D. S. (2011). Text coherence and judgments of essay quality: Models of quality and coherence . In L. Carlson, C. Hoelscher & T. F. Shipley (Eds.), Proceedings of the 29^th annual conference of the cognitive science society (pp. 1236-1241). Austin, TX: Cognitive Science Society . [ [150]Links ]
Evaluando al candidato essay:
1) crossley: 5
3) texts: 3 (*)
5) cohesive: 3
essay
Lengua: eng
Frec: 75
Docs: 38
Nombre propio: / 75 = 0%
Coocurrencias con glosario: 1
Puntaje: 1.633 = (1 + (1+3.58496250072116) / (1+6.24792751344359)));
Candidato aceptado
Referencias bibliográficas encontradas sobre cada término
(Que existan referencias dedicadas a un término es también indicio de terminologicidad.)| essay |
: 2. the ‘guide’ or the person who “shows the reader through the essay (…) draws the reader’s attention to points which are plainly visible or obvious within the essay” (^[112]Tang & John, 1999: 27). : Attali, Y. & Burstein, J. (2006). Automated Essay Scoring With e-rater® V.2. The Journal of Technology, Learning and Assessment, 4(3) [on line]. Retrieved from: [71]https://ejournals.bc.edu/index.php/jtla/article/view/1650 : Batten, E. (2003). Project Essay Grade: PEG. En M. Shermis & J. Burstein (Eds.), Automated essay scoring: A cross-disciplinary perspective (pp. 39-50). Mahwah, NJ.: Erlbaum. : Bernstein, B. (1999). Vertical and horizontal discourse: An essay. British Journal of Sociology of Education, 20(2), 157-173. : Bower, G. (1987). Commentary on mood and memory. Invited essay. Behavior Research and Therapy, 25, 443-455. : Christie, J.R. (1999). Automated essay marking - for both style and content. Proceedings of the 3^rd Computer Assisted Assessment International Conference, Loughborough, U.K. : Crossley, S. A., Kyle, K. & McNamara, D.S. (2016). The development and use of cohesive devices in L2 writing and their relations to judgments of essay quality. Journal of Second Language Writing, 32, 1-16. : Davis, J. & Liss, R. (2006). Effective academic writing 3: The essay. USA: Oxford University Press. : Fodor, J. (1983) The modularity of mind: An essay on Faculty Psychology. Massachusetts: Bradford Books. : Gierl, M., Latifi, S., Lai, H., Boulais, A.P. & De Champlain, A. (2014). Automated essay scoring and the future of educational assessment in medical education. Medical Education, 48(10), 950-962. : Goffman, E. (1974). Frame analysis: An essay on the organization of experience. Londres: Harper and Row. : HALLORAN, S. M. (1997). "The Birth of molecular Biology: An Essay in the Rhetorical Criticism of Scientific Discourse", en R. A. Harris (ed.), Landmark Essays on Rhetoric of Science. Case Studies. New Jersey: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc. pp 39-50. : Hyland, K. (1990). A genre description of the argumentative essay. RELC Journal, 21(1), 66-78. : Lakoff, G. (1983). Categories: An essay in cognitive linguistics. En Linguistic Society of Korea (Ed.), Linguistics in the Morning Calm. Seúl: Hanshin Publishing Co. : Landauer, T. K., Laham, D. & Foltz, P. W. (2003). Automated essay scoring: A cross disciplinary perspective. En M. Shermis & J. Burstein (Eds.), Automated essay scoring and annotation of essays with the Intelligent Essay Assessor (pp.87-112). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum. : Larkey, L. (1998). Automatic essay grading using text categorization techniques. Proceedings of the 21^st Annual International ACM SIGIR Conference on Research and Development in Information Retrieval, New York, U.S.A. : MacIntyre, P. & Gardner, R. (1991). Investigating language class anxiety using the focused essay technique. Modern Language Journal, 75, 296-304. : Miller, T. (2003). Essay Assessment with Latent Semantic Analysis. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 29(4), 495-512. : Ming, Y., Mikhailov, A. & Kuan, T. (2000). Intelligent essay marking system [on line]. Retrieved from: [60]http://ipdweb.np.edu.sg/lt/feb00/intelligent_essay_marking.pdf : Rudner, L. & Liang, T. (2002). Automated essay scoring using bayes' theorem. Journal of Technology, Learning, and Assessment, 1(2). [on line]. Retrieved from: [68]http://www.bc.edu/research/intasc/jtla/journal/v1n2.shtml : Searle, J. (1969). Speech Acts: An Essay on the Philosophy of Language. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press . : Valenti, S., Neri, F. & Cucchiarelli, A. (2003). An overview of current research on automated essay grading. Journal of Information Technology Education, 2, 319-330. : Venables, A. & Summit, R. (2003). Enhancing scientific essay writing using peer assessment. Innovations in Education and Teaching International, 40(3), 281-291. : Wingate, U. (2012). ‘Argument!’helping students understand what essay writing is about. Journal of English for Academic Purposes, 11(2), 145-154. |