Termout.org logo/LING


Update: February 24, 2023 The new version of Termout.org is now online, so this web site is now obsolete and will soon be dismantled.

Lista de candidatos sometidos a examen:
1) generic (*)
(*) Términos presentes en el nuestro glosario de lingüística

1) Candidate: generic


Is in goldstandard

1
paper corpusSignosTxtLongLines158 - : "He (Halliday) employs "genre" in a more limited sense, in the sense which has been common in literary discussions in the past. He sees "generic structure" not as the embodiment of the text as social process, but as a single characteristic of a text, its organizational structure, "outside the linguistic system". It is one of three factors, generic structure, textual structure and cohesion, which distinguish text from non text, and as such can be brought within the general framework of the concept of register (Halliday, 1978: 145 ). (...) In other words, for Halliday, genre is a lower order semiotic concept: register the higher order semiotic concept, thus subsuming genre".

2
paper corpusSignosTxtLongLines158 - : Un GSP (Potential Generic Structure) es una afirmación condensada de las condiciones bajo las cuales un texto se considera apropiado para determinada configuración contextual . Se trata de un dispositivo poderoso, en la medida que permite realizar predicciones acerca de las posibles estructuras que pueden realizarlo en textos concretos. Por otra parte, muestra cómo la unidad estructural de un texto se vincula directamente con los valores de las categorías de contexto. Puede observarse en esta caracterización la concepción de Halliday sobre los géneros, como estructuras organizativas características de determinados textos. Sin embargo, Hasan (1989) lleva a cabo un paso adicional: procura vincular el concepto de género con la noción más global de la teoría: el contexto cultural. En efecto, las configuraciones contextuales específicas derivan su significación en última instancia de sus relaciones con la cultura a la que pertenecen. La relación no es directa y se explica a partir del siguiente

3
paper corpusSignosTxtLongLines250 - : El análisis presentado en este artículo se basa en los resultados de un proyecto de investigación denominado Generic integrity in legislative discourse in multilingual and multicultural contexts ([28]http://roweb .cityu.edu.hk/researchreport/2002-2003/project/9040474P.htm). En su marco, se ha indagado respecto de la integridad genérica del discurso legislativo, analizando las propiedades lingüísticas y discursivas de un corpus multilingüe de leyes de arbitraje internacional obtenido de varios países, culturas y trasfondos sociopolíticos, escritas en diferentes lenguas, usadas ahora dentro y entre una variedad de sistemas jurídicos^[29]2. Para ilustrar los diversos fenómenos, se sacarán ejemplos de la legislatura sobre el arbitraje internacional basados en la Ley Modélica sobre el Arbitraje Comercial Internacional (LM) y las Reglas de Arbitraje de la CLCINU (RA) elaborada por las Naciones Unidas y, posteriormente, integradas en las leyes de varios países con diversas condiciones

4
paper corpusSignosTxtLongLines319 - : The predicate ´intelligent´ in Carlson´s (1977) terminology is an ILP because ´intelligent´ is a permanent property that applies to individuals, while the predicate ´tired´ is a SLP because it denotes a transitory property that applies to stages of an individual. He also observes that bare plural subjects with ILPs cannot have an existential reading while SPLs admit both generic and existential readings:

5
paper corpusSignosTxtLongLines319 - : an overt operator present, a generic null operator can be inserted giving rise to the only possible reading: generic . Since the subject of an SLP is generated inside the VP, it can either raise to Spec IP or stay in the VP, and therefore can receive both interpretations. In ILPs the subject is generated in IP and cannot reconstruct to VP. Therefore it only receives a generic reading. For Kratzer (1995) SLPs have a Davidsonian argument that locates in space and time the property or event that is predicated. This argument has the form of a variable that can be bound by an adverbial or by existential closure. The presence of this extra argument in SLPs but not in ILPs would explain why SLPs but not ILPs can appear with certain kinds of adverbials:

6
paper corpusSignosTxtLongLines498 - : Generic Structure Potential in electric engineering dissertations: Contrasts between languages and educational stages

Evaluando al candidato generic:


2) arbitraje: 4
3) halliday: 4
4) ilps: 4
6) existential: 3
7) slps: 3
10) genre: 3 (*)
11) argument: 3 (*)

generic
Lengua: eng
Frec: 69
Docs: 36
Nombre propio: 3 / 69 = 4%
Coocurrencias con glosario: 2
Puntaje: 2.792 = (2 + (1+4.64385618977472) / (1+6.12928301694497)));
Candidato aceptado

Referencias bibliográficas encontradas sobre cada término

(Que existan referencias dedicadas a un término es también indicio de terminologicidad.)
generic
: 1. the representative: “a generic first-person pronoun, usually realized as the plural ‘we’ or ‘us’, that writers use as a proxy for a larger group of people” (^[111]Tang & John, 1999: 27).
: Ansary, H. & Babaii, E. (2005). The generic integrity of newspaper editorials: A systemic functional perspective. Regional Language Centre Journal, 36(3), 271-295.
: Bathia, V. (2002). A generic view of academic discourse. En J. Flowerdew (Ed.), Academic discourse (pp. 21-39). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
: Beebe, T. (1994). The ideology of genre: A comparative study of generic instability. University Park: Pennsylvania State University Press.
: Belotti, U. (2003). Generic integrity in italian arbitration rules. En V. Bhatia, C. Candlin & M. Gotti (Eds.), Legal discourse in multilingual and multicultural contexts: Arbitration texts in Europe (pp. 19-40). Bern: Peter Lang.
: Bhatia, V. (1999). Generic integrity in document design. Journal of Research and Problem Solving in Organizational Communication: Document Design, 1(3), 151-163.
: Bhatia, V. (2002). A generic view of academic discourse. En J. Flowerdew (Ed.), Academic discourse (pp. 21-39). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
: Bhatia, V. K. (2005). Generic patterns in promotional discourse. En H. Halmari & T. Virtanen (Eds.), Persuasion Across Genres (pp. 213-225). The Netherlands: John Benjamins.
: Borik, O. & Espinal, M. T. (2015). Reference to kinds and to other generic expressions in Spanish: Definiteness and number. The Linguistic Review, 32(2), 167-225.
: Bunton, D. (2002). Generic moves in Ph.D. thesis introductions. En J. Flowerdew (Ed.), Academic discourse (pp. 57-75). Essex: Pearson Education.
: Devitt, A. (1991). Intertextuality in tax accounting: Generic, referential, and functional. In Textual dynamics of the professions, edited by C. Bazerman & J. Paradis, pp. 336-380. Madison: University of Wisconsin Press.
: Kratzer, A. (1995). Stage-Level and Individual-Level Predicates. In G. Carlson & F. Pelletier (Eds.), The Generic Book (pp. 125-175). Chicago, University of Chicago Press.
: Pantel, P. & Pennacchiotti, M. (2006). Espresso: Leveraging generic patterns for automatically harvesting semantic relations. En Proceedings of Conference on Computational Linguistics Association for Computational Linguistics. Sydney: ACL.
: Redl, T., Eerland, A. & Sanders, T. J. (2018). The processing of the Dutch masculine generic zijn ‘his’ across stereotype contexts: An eye-tracking study. PloS one, 13(10), 1-22.
: Tessuto, G. (2015). Generic structure and rhetorical moves in English-language empirical law research articles: Sites of disciplinary and interdicursive cross-over. English for Specific Purposes, 37, 13-26.