/LING
|
Update: February 24, 2023 The new version of Termout.org is now online, so this web site is now obsolete and will soon be dismantled. |
Lista de candidatos sometidos a examen:
1) grammars (*)
(*) Términos presentes en el nuestro glosario de lingüística
1) Candidate: grammars
Is in goldstandard
1
paper CH_corpusSignostxt453 - : The family of Construction Grammars (CxG(s)) comprises a number of compatible approaches, among which we find the following (^[25]Hoffmann & Trousdale, 2013): 'Cognitive CxG' (^[26]Goldberg, 2006 ); 'Frame-Semantic CxG' (^[27]Boas, 2011); and 'Cognitive Grammar' (^[28]Langacker, 1987). In general, even though these accounts differ in their theoretical orientation towards particular issues, most of them share important underlying assumptions (Goldberg, 2013). One point of consensus among the above-listed proposals revolves around the understanding of the notion of linguistic 'construction' as an entrenched form-meaning pairing, which, for any language, is part of a network of form-function correspondences (the so-called 'constructicon') featuring diverse construction-types at different levels of complexity and abstraction. A non-exhaustive inventory includes widely studied argument-structure constructions like the ditransitive (e.g. Scott sent Mary a book), resultative (e.g. The river froze
2
paper CH_corpusSignostxt453 - : Luzondo, A. & Jiménez, R. (2014). FrameNet and FunGramKB: A comparison of two computational resources for semantic knowledge representation. In B. Nolan & C. Periñán (Eds.), Language processing and grammars: The role of functionally oriented computational models (pp . 197-232). Amsterdam: John Benjamins. [ [136]Links ]
3
paper CH_corpusSignostxt500 - : Bergen, B. K. & Chang, N. (2005). Embodied construction grammar in simulation-based language understanding. In J. Östman & M. Fried (Eds.), Construction grammars: Cognitive groundings and theoretical extensions (Constructional approaches to language 3 ) (pp. 147-190). Amsterdam: John Benjamins. [ [99]Links ]
4
paper VE_BoletindeLinguisticatxt105 - : 40. White, Lydia. 2002. Morphological variability in end-state L2 grammars: The question of L1 influence . En Stella Skarabella, Sarah Fish y Anna Do (eds.), Proceedings of the 26th Boston University Conference on Language Development, 758-768. Somerville, MA: Cascadilla Press. [ [59]Links ]
Evaluando al candidato grammars:
3) cognitive: 3 (*)
grammars
Lengua: eng
Frec: 93
Docs: 68
Nombre propio: 1 / 93 = 1%
Coocurrencias con glosario: 1
Puntaje: 1.397 = (1 + (1+2) / (1+6.55458885167764)));
Candidato aceptado
Referencias bibliográficas encontradas sobre cada término
(Que existan referencias dedicadas a un término es también indicio de terminologicidad.)| grammars |
: 20. Radford, Andrew. 1990. Syntactic theory and the acquisition of English syntax: The nature of early child grammars of English. Oxford: Basil Black well. : 2008 "Dictionaries, Vocabularies, and Grammars of Andean Indigenous Languages". En Guide to Documentary Sources for Andean Studies, 1530-1900. Ed., Joanne Pillsbury. Oklahoma: University of Oklahoma Press. : 3. Clahsen, Harald y Monika Rothweiler. 1992. Inflectional rules in children´s grammars: Evidence from German participles. Yearbook of Morphology 5. 1-34. : 30. Santoro, Maurizio. 2008. The development of Italian accusative and dative clitics in interlanguage grammars. Munich: Lincom-Europa. : 9. Francescina, Florencia. 2002. Case and φ-features agreement in advanced L2 Spanish grammars. En Susan Foster-Cohen, Tania Ruthenberg y Marie Louise Poschen (eds.), EUROSLA Yearbook 2, 71-86. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. : Aarts, J. (1991). Intuitionbased and observationbased grammars. En K. Aijmer & A. Bengt (Eds.), English Corpus Linguistics. Studies in honor of Jan Svartvik (pp. 4462). London: Longman. : Adelaar, Willem F.H. (2006) “The Quechua Impact in Amuesha, an Arawak Language of the Peruvian Amazon”. En Grammars in contact: A cross-linguistic typology. Eds., Alexandra Aikhenwald y Robert Dixon. Oxford/ New York: Oxford University Press, 290-312. : Aikhenvald, A. (2004). Grammars in Contact: A Cross Linguistic Perspective. En: A. Aikhenvald & R. Dixon (Eds.), Grammars in Contact: A Cross Linguistic Typology. Nueva York: Oxford University Press. : Bloom, Loïs. 1970. Language development: Form and function in emerging grammars, Cambridge, MIT Press. : Chomsky, N. (1959). On certain formal properties of grammars. Information and Control, 2, 137-167. : Domínguez, L. & Arche, M. (2008). Optionality in L2 grammars: The acquisition of SV/VS contrast in Spanish [on line]. Retrieved from: [134]http://www.southampton.ac.uk/~ldo/dominguez_arche_BUCLD%2032.pdf : Epps, Patience 2006 "The Vaupe’s Melting Pot: Tucanoan Influence on Hup". En Grammars in Contact: A Cross- Linguistic Typology. A. Y. Aikhenvald y R. M. W. Dixon. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 267289. : Frazier, L. (2015). Do null Subjects (mis-)Trigger Pro-drop Grammars. Journal of Psycholinguistics, 44, 669-674. doi: [158]https://doi.org/10.1007/s10936-014-9312-8 : Frey, W., & Gärtner, H. M. (2002). On the Treatment of Scrambling and Adjunction in Minimalist Grammars. En G. Jäger, P. Monachesi, G. Penn & S. Wintner (Eds.), Proceedings of Formal Grammar 2002 (pp. 41-52). : Givón, T. (1975). Promotion, NP accessibility, and case marking: T understanding grammars. Working Papers on Language Universals, Universidad de Stanford, USA. : Gross, M. 1993. Local grammars and their representation by finite automata. En M. Hoey (ed.), Data, Description, Discourse: Papers on the English Language in Honour of John McH. Sinclair (26-38). Londres, Reino Unido: Harper Collins. : Halliday, M. (1991). Corpus studies and probabilistic grammars. En K. Aijmer & Altenberg, B. (Eds.), English corpus linguistics. Studies in honour of Jan Svartvik (pp. 31-43). London: Longman. : Halliday, M. A. K. (1977). Text as semantic choice in social contexts. En T. van Dijk & J. S. Petöfi (Eds.), Grammars and Descriptions (pp.176-225). Berlín: Mouton de Gruyter. : Hartwell, Patrick. "Grammar, Grammars and the Teaching of Grammar." A Sourcebook for Basic Writing Teachers. Ed. Theresa Enos. New York: Random House, 1987: 348-372. : Hawkins, J. (2004). Efficiency and Complexity in Grammars. Oxford: Oxford University Press. : Joshi, A. K. & Schabes, Y. (1992). Tree-adjoining grammars and lexicalized grammars. En M. Nivat & A. Podelski (Eds.), Tree Automata and Languages (pp. 409-431). Amsterdam: Elsevier Science. : Klein, Wolfgang y Perdue, Clive. (1992). Utterance Structure. Developing grammars again. Studies in Bilingualism 5. Amsterdam: John Benjamins . : Labov, William e Peter Cohen. 1967. Systematic relations of standard and non-standard rules in the grammars of Negro speakers, Project Literacy Reports N. 8, Ithaca NY: Cornell University: 66-84. : Levinson, S. C. y Wilkins, D. (2006). Grammars of Space. Explorations in Cognitive Diversity (1^ra edic). Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press . : Levinson, Stephen C y David P. Wilkins. 2006. The background to the study of the language of space, en S. C. Levinson y D. P. Wilkins (eds.), Grammars of space: Explorations in cognitive diversity, Cambridge, Cambridge University Press: 1-23. : Periñán, C. & Arcas, F. (2014). The implementation of the CLS constructor in ARTEMIS. In B. Nolan & C. Periñán (Eds.), Language processing and grammars. The role of functionally oriented computational models (pp. 165-196). Amsterdam: John Benjamins. : Rice, Keren 2006 A typology of good grammars. En Perspectives on Grammar Writing. Eds., Thomas Payne y David Weber. Ámsterdam: John Benjamins, 143-172. : Steels, L. & van Trijp, R. (2011). How to make Construction Grammars fluid and robust. In L. Steels (Ed.), Design patterns in Fluid Construction Grammar (pp. 301-330). Amsterdam: John Benjamins. : Sánchez, L. (2006). Bilingual Grammars and Creoles: Similarities between Functional Convergence and Morphological Elaboration. l2 Acquisition and Creole Genesis: Dialogues (pp. 277-294). Amsterdam: John Benjamins. : Torres-Cacoullos, R., & Travis, C. (2018). Bilingualism in the Community: Code-switching and Grammars in Contact. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press . doi: [207]https://doi.org/10.1017/9781108235259 : Watts, R. J. (2008). Grammar writers in eighteenth-century Britain: A community of practice or a discourse community? En I. Tieken-Boon van Ostade (ed.), Grammars, Grammarians and Grammar-Writing in Eighteenth-Century England (pp. 37-56). Berlin & New York: Mouton de Gruyter. : White, L. (2003). Fossilization in steady state L2 grammars: Persistent problems with inflectional morphology. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition, 6(2), 129- 141. : [105]Bhatt, Rakesh. 1997. Code-switching, constraints, and optimal grammars, Lingua, 102:223-251. : [116]Aikhenvald, Alexandra Y. 2006a. Grammars in contact. A cross-Linguistic perspective, en Aikhenvald, A. y M.W. Dixon (eds.), Grammars in contact, Oxford, Oxford University Press: 1-66. : [166]McWhorter, John. 2001. The world’s simplest grammars are creole grammars, Linguistic Typology, 5 (2/3): 125-166. : van Dijk, T. (1972). Some aspects of text grammars. A study in theoretical linguistics and poetics. The Hague/Paris: Mouton. |