Update: February 24, 2023 The new version of Termout.org is now online, so this web site is now obsolete and will soon be dismantled. |
interactive |
: Brown, A.L., Palincsar, A.S. & Armbruster, B.B. (1994) "Instructing comprehension-fostering activities in interactive learning situations", en M. Ruddell, R. Ruddell y H. Singer (Eds. ) Theoretical Models and Processes of Reading, Newark, Delaware: I.R.A. : Brown, H. D. (2007). Teaching by principles: An interactive approach to language pedagogy (3^rd ed.). New York: Pearson ESL. : Brown-Schmidt, S. (2009). Partner-specific interpretation of maintained referential precedents during interactive dialog. Journal of memory and language, 61(2), 171-190. : Carrió-Pastor, M. L. (2016). A contrastive study of interactive metadiscourse in academic papers written in English and in Spanish. In F. Almeida, L. Cruz García & V. González Ruiz (Eds.), Corpus-based studies on language varieties. Bern: Peter Lang. : Foltz, P., Gilliam, S. & Kendall, S. (2000). Supporting content-based feedback in on-line writing evaluation with LSA. Interactive Learning Environments, 8, 111-128. : Graesser, A., Wiemer-Hastings, P., Wiemer-Hastings, K., Harter, D., Person, N. & Tutoring Research Group (2000). Using latent semantic analysis to evaluate the contributions of students in AutoTutor. Interactive Learning Environments, 8, 129-148. : Gumperz, J. (1991). Contextualization and understanding. En A. Duranti & Ch. Goodwin (Eds.) Rethinking Context: Language as an interactive phenomenon (pp. 229-252). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. : Herring, S. C. (2015). New frontiers in interactive multimodal communication. En A. Georgopolou & T. Spilloti (Eds.), The Routledege handbook of language and digital communication (en prensa). Londres: Routledge . : Hewett, B. (2000). Characteristics of interactive oral and computer-mediated peer group talk and its influence on revision. Computers & Composition, 17, 265-88. : Jacoby, L. L. (1983). Remembering the data: Analyzing interactive processes in reading. Journal of Verbal Learning & Verbal Behavior, 22, 485-508. : Kintsch, E., Steinhart, D., Stahl, G. & LSA research group (2000). Developing summarization skills through the use of LSA-Based feedback. Interactive Learning Environments, 8(2), 87-109. : Landauer, T. K. & Psotka, J. (2000). Simulating text understanding for educational applications with latent semantic analysis: Introduction to LSA. Interactive Learning Environments, 8(2), 73-86. : Nystrand, M. (1989). A social interactive model of writing. Written Communication, 6, 6685. : Ochs, E. (1992). Indexing gender.Rethinking context: Language as an interactive phenomenon, 11, 335-358. : O’Halloran, K. L., Tan, S., Smith, B. A. & Podlasov, A. (2011). Multimodal analysis within an interactive software environment: Critical discourse perspectives. Critical Discourse Studies, 8, 109-25. : RUMELHART, D. (1977), Toward an Interactive Model of Reading, en Attention and performance NY, Academy Press. : Rumelhart, D. & McClelland, J. (1981). An interactive activation model of context effects in letter perception. Psychological Review, 88, 375-407. : Stanovich, K. (1993). Toward and interactive compensatory model of individual differences in the development of reading fluency. Reading Research Quarterly, 16, 32-71. : Turkstra, L., Ciccia, A. & Seaton, C. (2003). Interactive behaviors in adolescent conversation dyads. Language, Speech and Hearing Services in Schools, 34(2), 117-142. : VanLehn, K, Graesser, A., Jackson, G., Jordan, P., Olney, A. & Rose, C. (2005). When is reading just as effective as one-on-one interactive human tutoring? Actas de the Annual Cognitive Science Society. Stressa, Italia. : Wade-Stein, D. & Kintsch, E. (2004). Summary Street: Interactive computer support for writing. Cognition and Instruction, 22, 333-362. : Zimmerman, C. B. (1997). Do reading and interactive vocabulary instruction make a difference? An empirical study. TESOL Quarterly, 31(1), 121-140. |