/LING
|
Update: February 24, 2023 The new version of Termout.org is now online, so this web site is now obsolete and will soon be dismantled. |
Lista de candidatos sometidos a examen:
1) introductions (*)
(*) Términos presentes en el nuestro glosario de lingüística
1) Candidate: introductions
Is in goldstandard
1
paper corpusSignosTxtLongLines579 - : The analysis of the rhetorical organization of lecture introductions can provide models of their structure that students non-native to English can be familiarized with, resulting in their creation of “mental maps” which can assist the listeners in processing the lecture content (^[26]Lee, 2009: 43 ). Four genre analyses of lecture introductions have been produced to date - ^[27]Thompson (1994), ^[28]Lee (2009), ^[29]Shamsudin and Ebrahimi (2012) and ^[30]Yaakob (2013). The former three used relatively small corpora, consisting of 18, 10 and 6 lectures respectively, and the only study employing a more sizeable corpus was that of ^[31]Yaakob (2013), who analyzed 89 lecture introductions from the BASE corpus . Just one of these studies - that of ^[32]Shamsudin and Ebrahimi (2012), used a discipline-specific corpus (engineering), but, as noted above, consisting of just 6 lectures.
2
paper corpusSignosTxtLongLines579 - : Following ^[81]Thompson (1994) in his analysis of the impact of class size on the rhetorical organization of 10 lecture introductions from various disciplines taken from MICASE, ^[82]Lee (2009: 46) identified another move - WARMING UP, in which lecturers:
3
paper corpusSignosTxtLongLines579 - : Compared to previous studies, ^[89]Yaakob (2013) used a larger corpus, including 89 lecture introductions taken from the BASE, and introduced two main orientations: CONTENT ORIENTATION and LISTENER ORIENTATION, taken from the study of ^[90]Dubois (1980 ). The content orientation realizes ^[91]Thompson’s two functions (1994) - SETTING UP THE LECTURE FRAMEWORK and PUTTING TOPIC IN CONTEXT, whereas the listener orientation, realised through seven subfunctions: ‘greeting’, ‘announcement’, ‘check comprehension’, ‘check comprehension feedback’, ‘refer to handout’ and ‘refer to visual’, was identified and added by ^[92]Yaakob (2013). As stated earlier, ^[93]Yaakob (2013) explored a mixed corpus of arts and humanities, social, physical and life science.
4
paper corpusSignosTxtLongLines579 - : As for the procedure for separating lecture introductions from the body of the lectures, the following were used:
5
paper corpusSignosTxtLongLines579 - : and similar). Below is one of the lecture introductions (L42), which we will use for an illustration of this procedure:
6
paper corpusSignosTxtLongLines598 - : According to evidence in earlier literature, the use of will in introductions indicates expectation, as shown in (11):
Evaluando al candidato introductions:
1) lecture: 9
2) corpus: 5 (*)
3) yaakob: 5
4) orientation: 4 (*)
6) thompson: 3
introductions
Lengua: eng
Frec: 110
Docs: 19
Nombre propio: / 110 = 0%
Coocurrencias con glosario: 2
Puntaje: 2.738 = (2 + (1+4.75488750216347) / (1+6.79441586635011)));
Candidato aceptado
Referencias bibliográficas encontradas sobre cada término
(Que existan referencias dedicadas a un término es también indicio de terminologicidad.)| introductions |
: Alsop, S. & Nesi, H. (2015). Introductions in engineering lectures. In F. Formato & A. Hardie (Eds.) Proceedings of the 8th International Corpus Linguistics conference (CL2015) (pp. 19-22). Lancaster: UCREL. : Bhatia, V. (1997). Genre-mixing in academic introductions. English for Specific Purposes, 16(3), 181-195. : Bondi, M. (2010). Metadiscursive practices in Introductions: Phraseology and Semantic Sequences across Genres. Nordic Journal of English Studies, 9(2), 99-123. : Bunton, D. (2002). Generic moves in Ph.D. thesis introductions. En J. Flowerdew (Ed.), Academic discourse (pp. 57-75). Essex: Pearson Education. : Feak, C. B. & Swales, J. M. (2011). Creating contexts: Writing introductions across genres. Ann Arbor, MI: University of Michigan Press. : Hood, S. (2004b). Managing attitude in undergraduate academic writing: A focus on the introductions to research reports. En L. Ravelli & R. Ellis (Eds.), Analysing academic writing: Contextualised frameworks (pp. 2444). London: Continuum. : Lee, J. J. (2009). Size matters: An exploratory comparison of small- and large-class university lecture introductions. English for Specific Purposes, 28, 42-57. : Purdue Online Writing Lab (2013). Introductions, body paragraphs, and conclusions for an argument paper [on line]. Retrieved from: [88]https://owl.english.purdue.edu/owl/owlprint/659/ : Rowley-Jolivet, E. & Carter-Thomas, S. (2005). The rhetoric of conference presentation introductions: context, argument and interaction. International Journal of Applied Linguistics, 15(1), 45-70. : Samraj, B. (2002). Introductions in research articles: Variations across disciplines. English for Specific Purposes, 21, 1-17. : Samraj, B. (2005). An exploration of a genre set: Research article abstracts and introductions in two disciplines. English for Specific Purposes, 24, 141-156. : Samraj, B. (2008). A discourse analysis of master's theses across disciplines with a focus on introductions. Journal of English for academic purposes, 7(1), 55-67. : Shamsudin, S. & Ebrahimi, S. J. (2012). Analysis of the moves of engineering lecture introductions. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 70, 1303-1311. : Soler, C., Carbonell, M. & Gil, L. (2011). A contrastive study of the rhetorical organization of English and Spanish PhD thesis introductions. English for Specific Purposes, 30, 4-17. : Swales, J. (1981). Aspects of Article Introductions. Birmingham: Aston University Languages Study. : Swales, J. (1981). Aspects of article introductions. Reporte de investigación Aston LPE, Unidad de Estudios del Lenguaje, Universidad de Aston, Birmingham, Inglaterra. : Thompson, S. (1994). Frameworks and contexts: A genre-based approach to analysing lecture introductions. English for Specific Purposes, 13(2), 171-186. : Yaakob, S. (2013). A genre analysis and corpus based study of university lecture introductions. Unpublished Doctoral thesis, The University of Birmingham, Birmingham, England. |