Update: February 24, 2023 The new version of Termout.org is now online, so this web site is now obsolete and will soon be dismantled. |
knowledge |
: “To our knowledge, the current study is the first in the oncology informed consent literature that sought to apply readability measures designed for the written word to the transcribed spoken word”. [Cancer 2016, 122(3), p.467] : 6. the originator: as the person who indicates “the writer’s conception of the ideas or knowledge claims which are advanced in the essay”, which “calls for the writer to present or signal these as new” (^[117]Tang & John, 1999: 29). : (i) The 'conceptual level' is language-independent and is therefore shared by all the languages currently supported in the knowledge base. This level is made up of three sub-modules, all of which employ the same formal language (i.e. COREL; ^[57]Periñán & Mairal, 2010) to codify knowledge: : Alderson, J. C., Clapham, C. & Steel, D. (1997). Metalinguistic knowledge, language aptitude and language proficiency. Language Teaching Research, 1(2), 93-121. : Allen, J. F. (1983). Maintaining knowledge about temporal intervals. Communications of the ACM, 26(11), 832-843. : Alongside knowledge, this brings knowers back in and returns us to seminal remarks by Bernstein (2000) on the importance in horizontal knowledge structures of acquiring the right gaze: : Amadieu, F. & Salmerón, L. (2014). Concept maps for comprehension and navigation of hypertexts. En R. Hanewald & D. Ifenthaler (Eds.), Digital Knowledge Maps in Education (pp. 41-59). Nueva York: Springer. : Anderson, V. & Freeboy, P. (1980). Vocabulary knowledge and reading. Reading Education Report Nº11. Cambridge: Illinois University Urbana. : Anick, P. & Bergler, S. (1991). Lexical structures for linguistic inference. En J.Pustejovsky & S. Bergler (Eds.), Lexical Semantics and Knowledge Representation. Proceedings of the First SIGLEX Workshop (pp. 121-135). Berlín / Heidelberg: Springer-Verlag. : Ausubel, D. P. (2012). The acquisition and retention of knowledge: A cognitive view. New York: Springer Science & Business Media. : Baker, C. (2014). FrameNet: A knowledge base for natural language processing. In Proceedings of Frame Semantics in NLP: A workshop in honor of Chuck Fillmore (1929-2014) (pp. 1-5). Baltimore, Maryland. : Balaban, V. (1999). Self and agency in religious discourse. Perceptual metaphors for knowledge at a Marian apparition site. En L. Boeve & K. Feyaerts (Eds.), Metaphor and God-talk. Religions and Discourse (pp. 125-144). Nueva York: Peter Lang. : Bazerman, C. (1988) Shaping written knowledge. Madison, WI: University of Wisconsin Press. : Bazerman, C. (1988). Shaping written knowledge: The genre and activity of the experimental article in science. Madison: The University of Wisconsin Press. : Beijaard D., Verloop N. & Vermunt J. D. (2000). Teachers’ perceptions of professional identity: An exploratory study from a personal knowledge perspective. Teaching and Teacher Education, 16(7), 749-64. : Bell, P. & Volckmann, D. (2011). Knowledge surveys in general chemistry: Confidence, overconfidence, and performance. Journal of Chemical Education, 88(11), 1469-1476. : Benjamins, V., Contreras, J., Casanovas, P., Ayuso, M., Becue, M., Lemus, L. & Urios, C. (2004). Ontologies of professional legal knowledge as the basis for intelligent IT support for judges. Artificial Intelligence and Law, 12(4), 359-378. : Berkenkotter, C. & Huckin T. (1995). Genre knowledge in disciplinary communication-cognition/culture/power. London: Erlbaum. : Berkenkotter, C., & Huckin, T.N. (1995). Genre Knowledge in Disciplinary Communication: Cognition/Culture/Power. Hillsdale, New Jersey: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Publishers. : Besner, C. & Hobbs, B. (2008). A contextual assessment of project management practice: Variation by knowledge area, project type and phase. Project Perspectives, 29, 10-15. : Bielaczyc, K., Pirolli, P. L., & Brown, A. L. (1995). Training in self-explanation and regulation strategies: Investigating the effects of knowledge aquisition activities on problem solving. Cognition and Instruction, 13, 221-252. : Bowers, N., Brandon, M. & Hill, C. D. (2005). The use of a knowledge survey as an indicator of student learning in an introductory biology course. Cell biology education, 4(4), 311-322. : Brent, D. (1995). Knowledge received/knowledge constructed: Principles of active learning in the disciplines [En línea]. Disponible en [44]http:// www.acs.ucalgary.ca/%7Edabrent/art/active.html : Bruffee, K. (1998). Collaborative learning: Higher education, interdependence, and the authority of knowledge. Londres: The John Hopkins University Press. : Buendía, M. (2013). Phraseology in specialized language and its representation in environmental knowledge resources. Tesis doctoral, Universidad de Granada, España. : CARREL, P. (1983) "Some issues in studying the role of schemata or background knowledge in SLC", en Reading in a foreing language pp: 81-92. : CARREL, P. (1983) "Three components if background knowledge in reading comprehension" Language Learning, vol. 33 (2):183-207. : Carey, J. (2006a). Significance of case reports in the advancement of medical scientific knowledge. American Journal of Medical Genetics, 140A, 2131-2134. : Carey, S. & Spelke, E. (1993). Domain specific knowledge and conceptual change. En S. Goldman & L. Hirschfeld (Eds.), Cultural knowledge and domain specificity. New York: Cambridge University Press. : Cassar, M. & Treiman, R. (1997). The beginnings of orthographic knowledge: Children’s knowledge of double letters in words. Journal of Educational Psychology, 89(4), 631-644. : Chee, Y. S. 1996. MIND BRIDGES: A distributed, multimedia learning environment for collaborative knowledge building. International Journal of Educational Telecommunications, 2 (2/3), 137-153. : Chein, M. & Mugnier, M. L. (2009). Graph-based knowledge representation: Computational foundations of conceptual graphs. Londres: Springer-Verlag. : Chi, M. (1987) "Representing knowledge and metaknowledge: implications for interpreting metamemory research" en Weinert, F. y Klowe, R. (Eds.) Metacognition, Motivation and Understanding. Broadway: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc. (pp.239-264). : Chien,Y. & Wexler, K. (1990). Childrens knowledge of locality conditions in binding as evidence for the modularity of syntax and pragmatics. Language Acquisition, 1(3), 225-295. : Chiesi, H. I., Spilich, G. J., & Voss, J. F. (1979). Acquisition of domain-related information in relation to high and low domain knowledge. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 18, 275-290. : Chinn, C. A. & Brewer, W. F. (1993). The role of anomalous data in knowledge acquisition: A theoretical framework and implications for science instruction. Review of Educational Research, 63(1), 1-49. : Chomsky, N. (1985). Knowledge of language: Its nature, origins, and use. New York: praeger. : Chomsky, N. (1988). Language and problems of knowledge. The managua lectures. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press. : Christie, F. & Macken-Horarik, M. (2007). Building verticality in subject English. In F. Christie & J. R. Martin (Eds.), Language, knowledge and pedagogy: Functional linguistic and sociological perspectives (pp. 156-183). London: Continuum. : Christie, F. & Martin, J. R. (2007). Language, knowledge and pedagogy: Functional linguistic and sociological perspectives. London: Cassell. : Chwilla, D. J. & Kolk, H. H. (2005). Accessing world knowledge: Evidence from N400 and reaction time priming. Cognitive Brain Research, 25(3), 589-606. : Clark, H. H. & Marshall, C. R. (1981). Definite reference and mutual knowledge. En A. H. Joshe, B. Webber & I. A. Sag (Eds.), Elements of discourse understanding (pp. 10-63). Cambridge, Inglaterra: Cambridge University Press. : Clauss, J. M. & Geedey, C. K. (2012). Knowledge surveys: Students ability to self-assess. Journal of the Scholarship of Teaching and Learning, 10(2), 14-24. : Concha, S. & Paratore, J. (2011). Local coherence in persuasive writing: An exploration of Chilean students’ metalinguistic knowledge, writing process, and writing products. Written Communication, 28(1), 34-69. : Cook, A. & Guéraud, S. (2005). What have we been missing? The role of general world knowledge in discourse processing. Discourse Processes, 39(2&3), 265-278. : Cook, C. P. (2010). Exploiting linguistic knowledge to infer properties of neologisms. Tesis doctoral, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canadá. : Copestake, A. (1995). The representation of group denoting nouns in a lexical knowledge base. En P. Saint-Dizier & E. Viegas (Eds.), Computational lexical semantics (pp. 217-230). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. : Cortés-Rodríguez, F. & Rodríguez-Juárez, C. (2018b). The syntactic parsing of ASD-STE100 adverbials in ARTEMIS. Paper presented at the 7^th International Conference on Meaning and Knowledge Representation, Institute of Technology Blanchardstown, Dublin, Germany. : Dacygier, B. (1998). Conditionals and prediction: Time, knowledge and causation in conditional constructions. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. : Dannels, D. (2009). Features of success in engineering design dresentations: A call for relational genre knowledge. Journal of Business and Technical Communication, 23(4), 399-427. : DeKeyser, R. (1978). The effect of error correction on L2 grammar knowledge and oral proficiency. Modern Language Journal, 77, 501-514. : Dienes, Z. & Perner, J. (1999). A theory of implicit and explicit knowledge. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 22, 735-808. : Dong, Y. R. (1996). Learning how to use citations for knowledge transformation: Non-native doctoral student´s dissertation writing in science. Researh in the Teaching of English, 30(4), 428-457. : Duvala, C., Desgrangesa, B., De la Sayette, V., Belliard, S., Eustachea, F. & Piolino, P. (2012). What happens to personal identity when semantic knowledge degrades? A study of the self and autobiographical memory in semantic dementia. Neuropsychologia, 50, 254-265. : Essed, P. (1992). Alternative knowledge sources in explanations of racist events. M. McLaughlin, M. Cody & S. Read (Eds.), Explaining one's self to others: Reason giving in a social context (pp. 199-224). Hillside, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum. : Esteban-Guitart, M. & Moll, L. (2014). Funds of identity: A new concept based on the funds of knowledge approach. Culture & Psychology, 20(1), 31-48. : Faber, P. (1999). Conceptual analysis and knowledge acquisition in scientific translation. Terminologie et traduction, 2, 97-123. : Favazzo, L., Willford, J. D. & Watson, R. M. (2014). Correlating student knowledge and confidence using a graded knowledge survey to assess student learning in a general microbiology classroom. Journal of microbiology & biology education, 15(2), 251. : Fernández Dobao, A. M. (2004). The use of communication strategies by Spanish learners of English. A study of the collaborative creation of meaning, language, and linguistic knowledge. Unplished master’s thesis, Universidad de Santiago de Compostela, Spain. : Ferragina, P. & Scaiella, U. (2010). TAGME: On-the-fly Annotation of Short Text Fragments (by Wikipedia Entities). Proceedings of the 19th ACM international conference on Information and knowledge management. (pp. 1625-1628). Toronto, ON, Canada: ACM. : Flavell, J., Green, F., Flavell, E. (1995) "The Development of Children´s Knowledge About Attentional Focus" en Developmental Psychology, vol. 31, N 4 (pp.706-712). : Foltz, P. (1998) Quantitative Approches to Semantic Knowledge Representations. Discourse Processes, 25(2&3), 127-130. : Foulin, J. N. (2004). Why is letter-name knowledge such a good predictor of learning to read? Reading and Writing: An Interdisciplinary Journal, 18(2), 129-155. : FunGramKB comprises three major knowledge levels that consist of several independent, yet related, modules: : Geertz, C. (1983). Local knowledge: Further essays in interpretive Anthropology. New York: Basic Books. : Gillespie, A., Olinghouse, N. G. & Graham, S. (2013). Fifth-grade students' knowledge about writing process and writing genres. Elementary School Journal, 113(4), 565-588. Doi: 10.1086/669938 : Goldin-Meadow, S., Wein, D. & Chang, C. (1992). Assesing knowledge through gesture: Using children's hands to read their minds. Cognition and Instruction, 9(3), 201-219. : Golombek, P. (1998). A study of language teachers personal practical knowledge. Tesol Quarterly, 32(3), 447-464. : González, N., Moll, L. & Amanti, K. (2005). Funds of knowledge: Theorizing practices in households, communities, and classrooms. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum. : Graesser, A. & Clark, L. (1985). Structures and procedures of implicit knowledge. Norwood, N.J.: Ablex Pub. Co. : Gross, A. & Buehl, J. (Eds.), (2016). Science and the Internet: Communicating knowledge in a digital age. Amityville, NY: Baywood Publishing Company. : Gruber, T. R. (1993). A translation approach to portable ontology specifications. Knowledge Acquisition, 5(2), 199-220. : Guion, S. G. (2005). Knowledge of English word stress patterns in early and late Korean-English bilinguals. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 27(4), 503-533. : Gülich, E. (2003). Conversational techniques used in transferring knowledge between medical experts and non-experts. Discourse Studies, 5(2), 235-263. : Hagoort, P., Hald, L., Bastiaansen, M. & Petersson, K. M. (2004). Integration of word meaning and world knowledge in language comprehension. Science, 304(5669), 438-441. doi: 10.1126/science.1095455 : Hall, S. (2001). Foucault: Power, knowledge and discourse. En M. Wetherell, S. Taylor & S. Yates (Eds.), Discourse Theory and Practice. A Reader (pp. 72-81). Londres: Sage. : Halliday, M. (1998). Things and relations. Regrammaticising experience as technical knowledge. En J. Martin & R. Veel (Eds.), Reading science: Critical and functional perspectives on discourses of science (pp. 185-235). Londres/Nueva York: Routledge . : Halliday, M. A. K. (1990). The construction of knowledge and value in the grammar of scientific discourse: Charles Darwin's The Origin of the Species. In C. De Stasio, M. Gotti & R. Bonadei (Eds.), La rappresentazione verbale e icónica (pp. 57-80). Milano: Guerini. : Halliday, M.A.K. (1998). Things and relations. Regrammaticising experience as technical knowledge. En J. R. Martin & R. Veel (Eds.), Reading science. Critical and functional perspectives on discourses of science (pp. 185-236). Londres: Routledge . : Han, Y. & Ellis, R. (1998). Implicit knowledge, explicit knowledge and general language proficiency. Language teaching research, 2(1), 1-23. : Harciarek, M. & Kertesz, A. (2011). Primary progressive aphasias and their contribution to the contemporary knowledge about the brain-language relationship. Neuropsychology Review, 21(3), 271-287. : Heritage, J. (2012). Epistemics in Action: Action Formation and Territories of Knowledge. Research on Langauge and Social Interaction, 45(1), 1-29. : Hovy, E., Lavid, J., Maier, E., Mittal, V. & Paris, C. (1992). Employing knowledge resources in a new text planner architecture. En R. Dale, E. Hovy, D. Rösner & O. Stock (Eds.), Aspects of automated natural language generation (pp. 57-72). Berlín y Heildeberg: Springer. : However, the exploration of the ‘network connections’ underlying these systems has been very limited. To the best of my knowledge, the only network-based model of these systems semantic-lexicogrammatical interface is found in Castel (2012). : Hulme, C., Bowyer-Crane, C., Carroll, J. M., Duff, F. J. & Snowling, M. J. (2012). The causal role of phoneme awareness and letter-sound knowledge in learning to read: Combining intervention studies with mediation analyses. Psychological Science, 23(6), 572-577. : Humphrey, S. (2017). Academic Literacies in the Middle Years A Framework for Enhancing Teacher Knowledge and Student Achievement. New York, London: Routledge. : Hyland, K. (1998). Boosting, hedging and the negotiation of academic knowledge, Text & Talk,18(3), 349-382. : Hyland, K. (1999). Academic attribution: Citation and constructions of disciplinary knowledge. Applied Lingüistic, 20(3), 341-367. : Ibáñez, R. (2010). The disciplinary text genre as a means for accessing disciplinary knowledge: A study from genre analysis perspective. En G. Parodi (Ed.), Academic and professional discourse genres in Spanish (pp. 189-112). Amsterdam: John Benjamins. : Jasińska, K. & Laura-Ann, P. (2017). Age of bilingual exposure is related to the contribution of phonological and semantic knowledge to successful reading development. Child Development, 89(1), 310-331. : Jin, W. & Srihari, R. K. (2007). Graph-based text representation and knowledge discovery. Ponencia presentada en ACM symposium on Applied computing, Nueva York, Estados Unidos. : Joachims, T. (2006). Training linear SVMs in linear time. En ACM SIGKDD International conference on knowledge discovery and data mining. Philadelphia, PA, USA. : Kellogg, R. T. (1987). Effects of topic knowledge on the allocation of processing time and cognitive effort to writing processes. Memory & Cognition, 15(3), 256-266. : Kelly, A. R. & Miller, C. R. (2016). Intersections: Scientific and parascientific communication on the Internet. In A. Gross & J. Buehl (Eds.), Science and the Internet: Communicating knowledge in a digital age (pp. 221-245). Amityville, NY: Baywood. : Kempe, D., Kleinberg, J. & Tardos, E. (2003). Maximizing the spread of influence through a social network. In KDD’03: Proceedings of the ninth ACM SIGKDD international conference on knowledge dicovery and data mining (pp. 137-146). USA: ACM. : Kennedy, M. M. (1999). Ed schools and the problem of knowledge. In J. Raths & A. McAninch (Eds.),What counts as knowledge in teaching? (pp. 29-45). Stanford, CA: Ablex. : Keysar, B., Barr, D. J., Balin, J. A. & Brauner, J. S. (2000). Taking perspective in conversation: The role of mutual knowledge in comprehension. Psychological Science, 11(1), 32-38. : Khan, B. (2005). A comprehensive e-learning model. Journal of e-Learning and Knowledge Society, 1, 33-43. : Kintsch, W (1998). The role of knowledge in discourse comprehension: A construction-integration model. Psychological Review, 95, 163-182 : Kintsch, W. (1994). The role of knowledge in discourse comprehension: A construction-integration model. En H. Singer y B. Rudell (Eds.), Theoretical Models and Processes of Readin, (pp. 951 -995). Newark, Delaware: IRA & Erlbaum. : Kintsch, W. (1998) "The role of knowledge in discourse comprehension: a construction-integration model". Psychological Review. 95(2), 163-182. : Klein, J. T. (1996). Crossing boundaries: Knowledge, disciplinarities, and interdisciplinarities. Charlottesville: University of Virginia Press. : Knipp, D. (2001). Knowledge surveys: What do students bring to and take from a class? United States Air Force Academy Educator: Spring. : Kohavi, R. (1996). Scaling up the precision of naive-bayes classifiers: A decision tree hybrid. Ponencia presentada en el Second International Conference on Knowledge Discovery and Data Mining, Portland, Oregon. : Kolcz, A. & Yih, W. (2007). Raising the baseline for high-precision text classifiers. En ACM SIGKDD International conference on knowledge discovery and data mining. San José, California, USA. : Kostouli, T. (2005). Co-constructing writing contexts in classrooms: Scaffolding, collaboration, and asymmetries of knowledge. In T. Kostouli (Ed.), Writing in context(s): Textual practices and learning processes in sociocultural settings (pp. 93-116). Boston: Springer. : LENSKI, S. (1998) "Strategic knowledge when reading in order to write", Reading Psychology: An International Quarterly, 19, 287-315. : Lacasa, J. N. & Lacasa, J. (1983). Interest in and needs for knowledge of Hispanic culture as perceived by students currently studying Spanish. Hispania, 66(1), 65-69. : Landauer, T. & Dumais, S. (1997) A solution to Plato’s problem: The latent semantic analysis theory of acquisition, induction and representation of knowledge. Psychological Review, 104, 211-240. : Larsen, S. (1983). Text Processing and Knowledge Updating in Memory for Radio News. Discourse Processes 6, 21-38. : Lascarides, A. & Asher, N. (1991). Discourse relations and defeasible knowledge. En Proceedings of the 29^th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics (pp. 55-63). Morris-ton, N.J.: Association for Computational Linguistics. : Lear, D. & Abbott, A. (2009). Aligning expectations for mutually beneficial community service-learning: The case of Spanish language proficiency, cultural knowledge, and professional skills. Hispania, 92(2), 312-323. : Leskovec, J., Grobelnik, M. & Milic-Frayling, N. (2004). Learning semantic graph mapping for document summarization. Ponencia presentada en ECML/PKDD-2004 Workshop on Knowledge Discovery and Ontologies, Pisa, Italia. : Letter-Name sound Knowledge 3.40 (0.7) 3.88 (0.6) 0.49 0.62 : León, J.A. & Pérez, O. (2001). The infuence of prior knowledge on the time course of clinical diagnosis inferences: A comparison of experts and novices. Discourse Processes, 31, 187-213. : MYERS, G. (1997). "Texts as Knowledge Claims: The Social Construction of Two Biology Articles", en R. A. Harris (ed.), Landmark Essays on Rhetoric of Science. Case Studies. New Jersey: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc. pp 187-215. : Mairal, R. & Periñán, C. (2009). The anatomy of the lexicon component within the framework of a conceptual knowledge base. Revista Española de Lingüística Aplicada, 22, 217-244. : Mairal, R. (2015). Constructional meaning representation within a knowledge engineering framework. Review of Cognitive Linguistics, 13(1), 1-27. : Mairal-Usón, R. & Periñán-Pascual, C. (2009). The anatomy of the lexicon within the framework of an NLP knowledge base. Revista Española de Lingüística Aplicada, 22, 217-244. : Mann, V. & Singson, M. (2003). Linking morphological knowledge to English decoding ability Large effects of little suffixes. En E. Assinck & D. Sandra (Eds.), Morphology and reading (pp. 1-25). Ámsterdam: Kluver Publishers. : Mannes, S. & St. George, M. (1996). Effects of prior knowledge on text comprehension: A simple modeling approach. En B. Britton & A. Graesser (Eds.), Models of understanding text (pp. 115-140). Hillsdale, NJ.: Erlbaum. : Markman, A.(1999). Knowledge representation. New Jersey: Erlbaum. : Martin, A. & Fedio, P. (1983). Word production and comprehension in Alzheimer’s disease: The breakdown of semantic knowledge. Brain Language, 19, 124-141. : Martin, J. & Rose, D. (2012). Learning to write, reading to learn. Genre, knowledge and pedagogy in the Sydney School. Sheffield (UK) and Bristol (USA) : Equinox Publishing. : Martin, J. (1991). Nominalization in science and humanities: Distilling knowledge and scaffolding text. En E. Ventola (Ed.), Functional and systemic linguistics (pp. 307-338). Berlín: Mouton. : Martin, J. (2007). Construing knowledge: A functional linguistic perspective. En F. Christie & J. Martin (Eds.), Language Knowledge and Pedagogy. Functional Linguistic and Sociological Perspectives. (pp. 34-61). Londres: Continuum . : Maton, K. & Moore, R. (Eds.). (2010). Social realism, knowledge and the sociology of education: Coalitions of the mind. London: Continuum. : Maton, K. (2007). Knowledge-knower structures in intellectual and educational fields. En F. Christie & J. Martin (Eds.), Language, knowledge and pedagog y: functional linguistics and sociological perspective (pp. 87-108). Londres: Continuum. : Maton, K. (2010). Progress and canons in the arts and humanities: Knowers and gazes. In K. Maton & R. Moore (Eds.), Social Realism, Knowledge and the Sociology of Education: Coalitions of the mind (pp. 154-178). London, Continuum. : Matsumoto, Y. (2003). Lexical knowledge acquisition. En R. Mitkov (Ed.), The Oxford handbook of computational linguistics (pp. 396-409). New York: Oxford University Press. : McBride-Chang, C., Tardif, T., Cho, J., Shu, H., Fletcher, P., Stokes, S., Wong, A. & Leung, K. (2008). What's in a word? Morphological awareness and vocabulary knowledge in three languages. Applied Psycholinguistics, 29, 437-462. : McCloskey, D. (1994). Knowledge and persuasion in Economics. Cambridge: CUP. : McDonald, S. P. (1992). A method for analysing sentence-level differences in disciplinary knowledge making. Written Communication, 9(4), 533-569. : McKeown, M. G., Beck, I. L., Sinatra, G. M., & Loxterman, J. A. (1992). The contribution of prior knowledge and coherent text to comprehension. Reading Research Quarterly, 27, 79-93. : McNamara, D. & Kintsch, W. (1996). Learning from texts: Effects of prior knowledge and text coherence. Discourse Processes, 22, 247-288. : McNamara, D. S. & O’Reilly, T. (2010). Theories of comprehension and comprehension skill: Knowledge and strategies versus capacity and suppression. En A. M. Columbus (Ed.), Advances in Psychology Research (pp. 113-136). Hauppauge, NY: Nova Science Publishers. : McNamara, D. S. (2001). Reading both high-coherence and low coherence texts: Effects of text sequence and prior knowledge. Canadian Journal of Experimental Psychology, 55, 51-62. : McNamara, D. S., & Kintsch, W. (1996). Learning from texts: Effects of prior knowledge and text coherence. Discourse Processes, 22, 247-288. : McNamara, D. S., Kintsch, E., Butler-Songer, N. & Kintsch, W. (1996). Are good texts always better? Interactions of text coherence, background knowledge, and levels of understanding in learning from text. Cognition and Instruction, 14(1), 1-43. : McNamara, D.S. & Kintsch, W. (1996). Learning from text: Effects of prior knowledge and text coherence. Discourse Processes, 22, 247-287. : McNamara, D.S. (2001). Reading both high and low coherence texts: Effects of text sequence and prior knowledge. Canadian Journal of Experimental Psychology, 55, 51-62. : McNamara, D.S., & Kintsch, W. (1996). Learning from text: Effects of prior knowledge and text coherence. Discourse Processes, 22, 247-287. : McNamara, D.S., Kintsch, E., Songer, N.B., & Kintsch, W. (1996). Are good texts always better? Text coherence, background knowledge, and levels of understanding in learning from text. Cognition and Instruction, 14, 1-43. : Mckenzie, R., Evans, J. St. B. T. & Handley, S. J. (2010). Conditional reasoning in autism: Activation and integration of knowledge and belief. Developmental Psychology, 46(2), 391-403. : Means, M. L., & Voss, J. F. (1985). Star Wars: A developmental study of expert and novice knowledge structures. Journal of Memory and Language, 24, 746-757. : Melville, P., Gryc, W. & Lawrence, R. (2009). Sentiment analysis of blogs by combining lexical knowledge with text classification. Ponencia presentada en el 15th Conference on Knowledge Discovery and Data Mining. ACM, Nueva York, USA. : Minsky, M. (1975). A framework for representing knowledge. En P. H. Winston (Ed.), The psychology of computer vision (pp. 211-277). Nueva York: McGraw-Hill. : Moghadam, S. H., Zainal, Z. & Ghaderpour, M. (2012). A review on the important role of vocabulary Knowledge in reading comprehension performance. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 66, 555-563. : Moore, J. Schleppegrell, M. & Palincsar, A. S. (2018). Discovering disciplinary linguistic knowledge with English learners and their teachers: Applying systemic Functional linguistics concepts through design-based research. TESOL Quarterly, 52(4), 1022-1049. DOI: 10.1002/tesq.472 : Moravcsik, J. E., & Kintsch, W. (1993). Writing quality, reading skills, and domain knowledge as factors in text comprehension. Canadian Journal of Experimental Psychology, 47, 360-374. : Moreno-Martínez, F. J., Quaranta, D. & Gainotti, G. (2019). What a pooled data study tells us about the relationships between gender and knowledge of semantic categories. Journal of Clinical and Experimental Neuropsychology, 41(6), 634-643. : Mota, C., Barreiro, A., Raposo, F., Ribeiro, R., Curto, S. & Coheur, L. (2016). eSPERTo’s paraphrastic knowledge applied to question-answering and summarization. Communications in computer and information science, 811, 208-222. : Muller, J. (2007). On splitting hairs: Hierarchy, knowledge and the school curriculum. In F. Christie & J. M. Martin (Eds.), Language, knowledge and pedagogy: Functional linguistic and sociological perspectives (pp. 64-86). London: Cassell. : Mushin, I. (2013). Making knowledge visible in discourse: Implications for the study of linguistic evidentiality.Discourse studies,15(5), 627-645. : Myers y Paris (1978) "Children Metacognitive Knowledge about reading" en Journal of Educational Psychology, N 70, 680-690. : Myers, G. (1992). Textbooks and the Sociology of Scientific Knowledge. English for Specific Purposes, 11, 3-17. : Myers, G. A. (1990). Writing biology: Texts in the social construction of scientific knowledge. Madison: University of Wisconsin Press. : Myers, G. A. (1991). Lexical cohesion and specialised knowledge in science and popular science texts. Discourse Processes, 14(1), 1-26. : Myers, S. (1990). Writing biology:Texts in the social construction of scientific knowledge. Madison, WI.: University of Wisconsin Press. : Nagy, W. & Herman, P. (1987). Breadth and depth of vocabulary knowledge: Implication for acquisition and instruction. En M. McKeown & M. Curtis (Eds.), The nature of vocabulary acquisition (pp. 19-35). Hillsdale, N.J.: Erlbaum. : Nam, J., Kim, J., Mencía, E., Gurevych, I. & Fürnkranz, J. (2014). Large-scale multi-label text classification -Revisiting Neural Networks. Machine Learning and Knowledge Discovery in Databases, ECML PKDD, 437-452. : Nebes, R. D. (1992). Semantic memory dysfunction in Alzheimer’s disease: Disruption of semantic knowledge or information-processing limitation? En L. R. Squire & N. Butters (Eds.), Neuropsychology of memory (pp. 233-240). Nueva York: The Guilford Press. : Neumann, S., Newman, E. & Dywer, J. (2011). Educational effects of the vocabulary intervention on preescolars´ word knowledge and conceptual development: A cluster-randomized trial. Reading Research Quarterly, 46(3), 249-272. : Nieuwland, M. S. (2015b). The truth before and after: Brain potentials reveal automatic activation of event knowledge during sentence comprehension. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 27(11), 2215-2228. doi: 10.1162/jocn_a_00856 : Noordman, L., Vonk, W., Cozjin, R. & Frank, S. (2015). Causal inferences and world knowledge. En E. J. O´Brien, A. E. Cook & R. F. Lorch (Eds.), Inferences during reading (pp. 260-289). MA: Cambridge University Press. : North, S. (1987) The making of knowledge in composition. London and Portsmouth, NH: Heinemann. : Nuhfer, E. B. & Knipp, D. (2003). The Knowledge Survey: A tool for all reasons. To improve the academy, 21(1), 59-78. : Nuhfer, E. B. (2015). Clarification to Points in Correlating Student Knowledge and Confidence Using a Graded Knowledge Survey to Assess Student Learning in a General Microbiology Classroom. Journal of microbiology & biology education, 16(2), 125. : O'Reilly, T., & McNamara, D. S. (2002a). Text coherence effects: Interactions of prior knowledge and reading skill. Ponencia presentada en the 43rd annual meeting of the Psychonomic Society Inc., Kansas City, MO. : Otero, J. (1998). Influence of Knowledge activation and context on compression monitoring of science text. In D. Hacher, J. Dunlosky & A. Graesser (Coor.), Metacognition in Eductional theory and practice (pp. 145-164). New Jersey: LEA. : Ovchinnikova, E. (2012). Integration of world knowledge for natural language understanding. París: Atlantis Press. : O’Reilly,T., Sabatini, J., Bruce, K. & Sukkarieh, J. (2011). What multiple choice tests of reading ability don’t tell you: Evidence of reflection and knowledge integration in high quality constructed responses. Educational Testing Service, Princeton, NJ, U.S.A. : PMI Standards Committee (2008). A Guide to the Project Management Body of Knowledge. Newtown Square, PA.: Project Management Institute. : Painter, C. (2000). Preparing for school: Developing a semantic style for educational knowledge. En F. Christie (Ed.), Pedagogy and the shaping of consciousness. Linguistic and social processes (pp. 66-87). London: Continuum. : Parodi, G. (2012). University genres and multisemiotic features: Accessing specialized knowledge through disciplinarity. Forum Linguist. Florianópolis, 9(4), 259-282. : Pasca, M. (2004). Acquisition of categorized named entities for Web search. En Proceedings of the 13th ACM international conference on Information and knowledge management. Washington: ACM. : Patry, A. & Langlais, P. (2005). Corpus-based terminology extraction. Ponencia presentada en el 7th International Conference on Terminology and Knowledge Engineering, Copenhagen, Dinamarca. : Perfetti, C. & Stafura, J. (2014). Word knowledge in a theory of reading comprehension.Scientific Studies of Reading, 18(1), 22-37. : Periñán-Pascual, C. & Arcas-Túnez, F. (2004). Meaning postulates in a lexico-conceptual knowledge base. Preceedings. 15th International Workshop on Databases and Expert Systems Applications, 38-42. Los Alamitos: IEEE. : Periñán-Pascual, C. & Arcas-Túnez, F. (2007). Cognitive modules of an NLP knowledge base for language understanding. Procesamiento del Lenguaje Natural, 39, 197-204. : Periñán-Pascual, C. & Arcas-Túnez, F. (2007a). Deep semantics in an NLP knowledge base. Proceedings of the 12th Conference of the Spanish Association for Artificial Intelligence (pp. 279-288). Salamanca: Universidad de Salamanca. : Periñán-Pascual, C. & Arcas-Túnez, F. (2007b). Cognitive modules of an NLP knowledge base for language understanding. Procesamiento del Lenguaje Natural, 39, 197-204. : Peters, W., Sagri, M. & Tiscornia, D. (2007). The structuring of legal knowledge in LOIS. Artificial Intelligence and Law, 15, 117-135. : Preda, A. (2005). AIDS, rhetoric, and medical knowledge. New York: Cambridge University Press. : Pustejovsky, J. (2008). From concepts to meaning. The role of lexical knowledge. En P. van Sterkenburg (Ed.), Unity and Diversity of Languages (pp. 73-84). Amsterdam/ Philadelphia: John Benjamins. : Quan, X., Liu, G., Lu, Z., Ni, X. & Wenyin, L. (2009). Short text similarity based on probabilistic topics. Knowledge and Information Systems, 25(3), 473-491. : Rehder, B., Schreiner, M. E., Wolfe, M. B., Laham, D., Landauer, T. K. & Kintsch, W. (1998). Using Latent Semantic Analysis to assess knowledge: Some technical considerations. Discourse Processes, 25, 337-354. : Rose, D. & Martin J. R. (2012). Learning to write, reading to learn. Genre, knowledge and pedagogy in the Sydney School. Sheffield: Equinox. : Ruimy, N. (2006a). Structuring a domain vocabulary in a general knowledge environment. En LREC 2006 Proceedings [en línea]. Disponible en: [229]http://www.cs.brandeis.edu/~marc/misc/proceedings/lrec-2006/index.htm : Rumelhart, D.E., "The Presentation of Knowledge in Memory", en Schooling and the Acquisition of Knowledge. Hillsdale, NJ.: Erlbaum Associates, 1986. : Rundgren, C. J., Eriksson, M. & Rundgren, S. N. C. (2016). Investigating the intertwinement of knowledge, value, and experience of upper secondary students’ argumentation concerning socioscientific issues. Science & Education, 25(9), 1-23. Doi: 10.1007/s11191-016-9859-x : Sadler, T. & Donnelly, L. (2006). Socioscientific argumentation: The effects of content knowledge and morality. International Journal of Science Education, 28(12), 1463-1488. : Schank, R. & Abelson, R. (1977). Scripts, plans, goals and understanding: An inquiry into human knowledge structures. Hillsdale, N.J.: Erlbaum. : Seely, M. R. & Long, D. (1994). The Use of Generalized Knowledge Structures in Processing Television News Items. En H.van Oostendorp & R. Zwaan (Eds.), Naturalistic Text Comprehension (pp 149-164). Norwood, N.J.: Ablex. : Seidman, S., Nelson, K. & Gruendel, J. (1986). Make believe scripts: The transformation of ERs in fantasy. En K. Nelson (Ed.), Event knowledge: Structure and function in development (pp. 161-187). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum. : Shah, P., Mayer, R. & Hegarty, M. (1999). Graphs as aids to knowledge construction: Signaling techniques for guiding the process of graph comprehension. Journal of Educational Psychology, 91(4), 690-702. : Siegelman, N., Bogaerts, L., Elazar, A., Arciuli, J. & Frost, R. (2018). Linguistic entrenchment : Prior knowledge impacts statistical learning performance. Cognition, 177(April), 198-213 [en línea]. Disponible en: [129]https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cognition.2018.04.011 : Simoes Loureiro, I. & Lefebvre, L. (2016). Retrogenesis of semantic knowledge: Comparative approach of acquisition and deterioration of concepts in semantic memory. Neuropsychology, 30(7), 853-859. : Singer, M., & Ritchot, K. (1996). The role of working memory capacity and knowledge access in text inference processing. Memory & Cognition, 24, 733-743. : Skorczynska, H. (2010). Metaphor and knowledge specialization: The use of building metaphors in the general business and project management discourse. Proceedings of the 9th AELFE Conference (pp. 1-15). Universität de Hamburg, Germany. : Slabakova, R. & Montrul, S. (2008). Aspectual shifts: Grammatical and pragmatic knowledge in L2 acquisition. En J. M. Liceras, H. Zobl & H. Goodluck (Eds.), The Role of Formal Features in Second Language Acquisition (pp. 452-483). Nueva York: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates. : Sowa, J. (1999). Knowledge representation: Logical, Philosophical, and Computational Foundations. Pacific Grove, CA: Brooks Cole. : Spilich, G., Vesonder, G., Chiesi, H. & Voss, J. (1979). Text processing of domain-related information for individuals with high and low domain knowledge. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 18, 275-290. : Stivers, T. (2011). Morality and question design: “of course” as contesting a presupposition of askability. EnT. Stivers , L. Mondada & J. Steensig (Eds.), The morality of knowledge in conversation (pp. 82-106). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press . : Sun, R., Merrill, E. & Peterson, T. (2001). From implicit skills to explicit knowledge: a bottom-up model of skill learning. Cognitive Science, 25(2), 203-244. : Taler, V., Voronchikhina, A., Gorfine, G. & Lukasik, M. (2016) Knowledge of semantic features in mild cognitive impairment, Journal of Neurolinguistics, 38, 56-70. : Tarp, S. (2008). Lexicography in the Borderland between Knowledge and Non-knowledge. General Lexicographical Theory with particular Focus on Learner’s Lexicography. Tübingen: Niemeyer. : Thorndyke, P. (1979). Knowledge adquisition from newspaper stories. Discourse Processes, 2, 95-112. : Valente, A. & Breuker, J. (1994). Ontologies: The missing link between legal theory and AI & Law. En A. Soeteman (Ed.), Legal knowledge based systems JURIX 94: The foundation for legal knowledge systems (pp. 138-150). Lelystad: Koninklijke Vermande. : Valente, A. (1995). Legal knowledge engineering: A modeling approach. Ámsterdam: IOS Press. : Van Dijk, T. A. (2003b). Specialized discourse and knowledge. A case study of the discourse of modern genetics. Cadernos do estudos lingüisticos, 44, 21-55. : Van Kralingen, R. W., Visser, P. R. S., Bench Capon, T. J. M. & Van den Herik, H. J. (1999). A principled approach to developing legal knowledge systems. International Journal of Human-Computer Studies, 54, 1127-1154. : Velardi, P., Pazienza, M. T. & Fasolo, M. (1991). How to encode semantic knowledge: A method for meaning representation and computer-aided acquisition. Computational Linguistics, 17(2), 153-170. : Visser, P. R. S. (1995). Knowledge specification for multiple legal tasks. A case study of the interaction problem in the legal domain. Tesis doctoral, Universidad de Leiden, Leiden, Holanda. : Wang, M. C., Haertel, G. D. & Walberg, H. J. (1993). Toward a knowledge base for school learning. Review of Educational Research, 63(3), 249-294. : Waterman, A., Blades, M. & Spencer, C. (2004). Indicating when you do not know the answer: The effect of question format and interviewer knowledge on childrens "dont know" responses. British Journal of Developmental Psychology, 22(3), 335-348. : Webb, S. (2007). The effects of repetition on vocabulary knowledge. Applied Linguistics, 28(1), 46-65. : Wenger, E. (1987). Artificial Intelligence and Tutoring Systems: Computational and Cognitive Approaches to the Communication of Knowledge. Los Altos, CA: Morgan Kaufmann. : Wheelahan, L. (2010). Why knowledge matters in curriculum. Londores: Rouledge Taylor and Francis Group. : While many SHLs are quite competent with excellent linguistic skills and cultural knowledge, many are still very insecure about their language skills especially having often been criticized by native speakers of Spanish. ^[90]Pak (2018) notes: : Wignell, P. (2007a). Vertical and horizontal discourse and the social sciences. In F. Christie & J. R. Martin (Eds.), Language, knowledge and pedagogy: Functional linguistic and sociological perspectives (pp. 184-204). London: Cassell. : Wirth, K. R. & Perkins, D. (2005). Knowledge surveys: An indispensable course design and assessment tool. Proceedings of the Innovations in the Scholarship of Teaching and Learning. St. Olaf College, Northfield, Minnesota, USA. : You, W., Fontaine, D. & Barthes, J. P. (2013). An automatic keyphrase extraction system for scientific documents. Knowledge and Information Systems, 34(3), 691-724. : Zhou F., Zhang, F. & Yang, B. (2010). Graph-based text representation model and its realization. Ponencia presentada en el International Conference on Natural Language Processing and Knowledge Engineering, Beijing, China. : van Dijk, T. A. (2003). Specialized discourse and knowledge. A case study of the discourse of modern genetics. Cadernos de Estudos Lingüisticos, 44, 21-55. |