temout/ling

/LING

Update: February 24, 2023 The new version of Termout.org is now online, so this web site is now obsolete and will soon be dismantled.

Lista de candidatos sometidos a examen:
1) linguistics (*)
(*) Términos presentes en el nuestro glosario de lingüística

1
paper corpusSignosTxtLongLines158 - : in linguistics characterized by their theoretical and empirical contributions to the field: Systemic Functional Linguistics and Text Linguistics . The concept of genre is fundamental to current linguistics, while it also represents an important challenge to diverse theoretical perspectives due to its intrinsically complex nature. Even if the different theoretical frameworks discuss the issue of genre, it is rare to find an "interschool dialogue" that would draw distinctions, make comparisons and arrive to conclusions that may enlarge our knowledge in this field. The paper is divided in two sections: the first compares and summarizes the main coincidences and differences referred to epistemological origins and general theoretical principles of Systemic Functional Linguistics and Text Linguistics. The second explores the concept of genre in both, based on the analysis of representative examples. The main purpose of this comparison is to advance some conclusions that may illuminate the

2
paper corpusSignosTxtLongLines158 - : Gnutzmann, C. & Oldenburg, H. (1991). Contrastive text linguistics in LSPResearch: Theoretical considerations and some preliminary findings . En H. Schröder (Ed.), Subjectoriented texts: Languages for special purposes & text theory (pp. 103136). Berlin: W. de Gruyter. [ [79]Links ]

3
paper corpusSignosTxtLongLines203 - : We have reached many inspiring results in cognitive linguistics, in solving some aspects of Platos problem: How can we know so much, given that we have so little information ? How is it possible that we can construct a world in our mind with only a few shreds of discourse? Our challenge for the years to come will lie in critical linguistics, in solving some aspects of Orwells problem: How can we know so little, given that we have so much information available? The fast growing amount of governmental documentation and in-formation has not resulted in better informed citizens. The activities of news agencies all over the world seem inversely proportional to getting real news to the people. We have so much information -in discourse- about how to work on communication between different cultures and religions, how to solve poverty, how to prevent war, but we do have the same problems, and even bigger ones, than forty years ago. Could it be that we are still pro-ducing discourse in institutions,

4
paper corpusSignosTxtLongLines264 - : Briggs, Ch. (1996). Conflict, language ideologies, and privileged arenas of discoursive authority in warao dispute mediation. En Ch. Briggs (Ed.), Disordely discourse. Narrative, conflict and inequality (pp. 204-242). Oxford Studies in Anthropological Linguistics, Oxford: Oxford University Press . [ [61]Links ]

5
paper corpusSignosTxtLongLines295 - : Learning a second or foreign language involves a considerable amount of time and dedication, and the learners expect, as a payoff from their efforts, to develop the ability to communicate effectively with other speakers or writers of the new language. To do so, learners need a grammatical description of the language that goes beyond listing forms and structures and includes a description of the available linguistic resources and of how they are used in social interactions. Systemic functional linguistics is particularly adequate for such a task since it conceives:

6
paper corpusSignosTxtLongLines309 - : Communication linguistics: The genre-based multiligual curriculum

7
paper corpusSignosTxtLongLines400 - : A connectionist approach to functional-cognitive linguistics: Spanish pronominal clitics and verb endings in relational-network terms

8
paper corpusSignosTxtLongLines410 - : Gnutzmann, C. & Oldenburg, H. (1991). Contrastive text linguistics in LSP-Research: Theoretical considerations and some peliminary findings . En H. Schröder (Ed.), Subject-oriented Texts: Language for Special Purposes and Text Tehorie (pp. 101-136). Nueva York/ Berlín: de Gruyter. [ [44]Links ]

9
paper corpusSignosTxtLongLines417 - : Nonetheless, the two perspectives developed above do not have to oppose each other. McEnery and Wilson (2001) do not consider intuition and the corpus-based approach mutually exclusive but complementary. Zhang (2013) does not question this idea but he highlights that semantic prosody is less accessible only through intuition, and computation would contribute to a better and more complete approach towards semantic prosody: “it is computational research and corpus linguistics that make it possible to highlight its existence” (Zhang, 2013: 64 ).

10
paper corpusSignosTxtLongLines426 - : In this respect, in spite of their distinct names in different disciplines, and considering the further definitions by Werth and Zarefsky, one can draw a parallel line between rhetorical space in Rhetorical Studies and discourse in Linguistics, the latter one defined as “a combination of text and its relevant context” (Werth, 1999: 47), where the context refers to “the situational context surrounding the speech event itself” (Werth, 1999: 83 ), and the text to both oral and written discourse. In the first case, it takes the form of transcription of speeches, which are normally used for this type of studies.

11
paper corpusSignosTxtLongLines453 - : Ruiz de Mendoza, F. (2013). Meaning construction, meaning interpretation and formal expression in the Lexical Constructional Model. In B. Nolan & E. Diedrichsen (Eds.), Linking constructions into Functional Linguistics: The role of constructions in grammar (pp . 231-270). Amsterdam: John Benjamins. [ [149]Links ]

12
paper corpusSignosTxtLongLines455 - : Agirre, E., Bengoetxea, K., Gojenola, K. & Nivre, J. (2011). Improving dependency parsing with semantic classes. In Proceedings of the 49th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics: Human Language Technologies: Short papers -Volume 2 (pp . 699-703). Association for Computational Linguistics. [ [143]Links ]

13
paper corpusSignosTxtLongLines496 - : implement methods and techniques of teaching. Furthermore, he states that one reason of the mismatch between the theory of certain methods and their actual practice is rooted in teachers' beliefs. There are many different definitions of the term 'belief' (^[30]Borg, 2006: 586) and researchers in this area need firstly to clarify what they exactly mean by this term. This study makes use of a working definition of 'belief' presented in the dictionary of applied linguistics, that is:

14
paper corpusSignosTxtLongLines500 - : Ruiz de Mendoza-Ibáñez, F. J. (2013). Meaning construction, meaning interpretation and formal expression in the Lexical Constructional Model. In B. Nolan & E. Diedrichsen (Eds.), Linking constructions into functional linguistics: The role of constructions in grammar (pp . 231-270). Amsterdam: John Benjamins . [ [121]Links ]

15
paper corpusSignosTxtLongLines505 - : Partee, B. H. (2008). Symmetry and symmetrical predicates. En A. E. Kibrik, V. I. Belikov & B. V. Dobrovolsky (Eds.), Computational linguistics and intellectual technologies: Papers from the international conference “Dialogue” (pp . 606-611). Moscow: Institut Problem Informatiki. [ [144]Links ]

16
paper corpusSignosTxtLongLines514 - : Connor, U. & Moreno, A. (2005). Tertium comparationis: A vital component in contrastive rhetoric. En P. Bruthiaux, D. Atkinson, W. Eggington, W. Grabe & V. Ramanathan (Eds.), Directions in applied linguistics: Essays in honour of Robert B . Kaplan (pp.153-164). Clevedon: Multilingual Matters. [ [367]Links ]

17
paper corpusSignosTxtLongLines524 - : A fundamental issue in LSP education that must be adequately addressed to achieve curricular coherence is what ^[45]Doyle calls a “tripartite integrated curricular structure” (Doyle, 2012: 108). Unlike courses in language, linguistics, or literature, LSP courses must find a balance between focusing instruction on topical knowledge--which may be quite technical--content-specific linguistic resources unique to the field, and cultural norms adhered to by a particular discourse community . Many of the curricular and programmatic difficulties, especially the identification of competent staff and the seamless integration into departmental/programmatic intellectual culture, derive from the ‘tripartite’ nature of LSP, regardless of the department or program offering the courses. These considerations come in addition to the obstacles presented by many students’ deficits in overall language proficiency; those who undertake LSP study without a solid foundation in the L2.

18
paper corpusSignosTxtLongLines579 - : Alsop, S. & Nesi, H. (2013). The summarising function of university Engineering lectures: a cross-cultural perspective. In A. N. Archibald (Ed.) Multilingual theory and practice in applied linguistics: Proceedings of the 45th annual meeting of the British Association for Applied Linguistics (pp .11-14). London: Scitsiugnil Press. [ [141]Links ]

19
paper corpusSignosTxtLongLines595 - : Arús, J. ([2006] 2010). On Theme in English and Spanish: A comparative study. En E. Swain (Ed.), Thresholds and Potentialities of Systemic Functional Linguistics: Multilingual, Multimodal and Other Specialised Discourses (pp . 23-48). Trieste: EUT. [ [210]Links ]

20
paper corpusSignosTxtLongLines598 - : [2]vol.54 número106 [3]Los modales dinámicos en textos de historia en lengua inglesa (1700-1900) [4]A cross-disciplinary study of verb boosters in research articles from Engineering, Medicine and Linguistics: Frequency and co-text variations [5] índice de autores [6]índice de materia [7]búsqueda de artículos [8]Home Page [9]lista alfabética de revistas

21
paper corpusSignosTxtLongLines599 - : A cross-disciplinary study of verb boosters in research articles from Engineering, Medicine and Linguistics: Frequency and co-text variations

22
paper corpusSignosTxtLongLines599 - : As can be seen in [108]Table 4, the highest frequency (4.363) was registered in the Linguistics corpus, while the lowest (3.083) in Medicine. Engineering registered the medium normalised frequency of 3.428 occurrences per 1,000 words. In comparison to the frequency data in the previous studies, the average frequency obtained here for Linguistics is similar to the figure reported by ^[109]Hyland (1998): 4 .6 per 1,000 words, but considerably lower than that given in ^[110]Peacock (2006): 10.58 occurrences per 1,000 words. As has already been pointed out, many of the corpus analysis results depend on the corpus design and the method of analysis. This study has used the smallest number of boosters (57), compared to ^[111]Hyland (1998a) with 61 and ^[112]Peacock (2006) with 116 items, and this is clearly reflected in the range of the frequencies obtained, especially for Linguistics (10.98 in ^[113]Peacock, 2006). The differences regarding Engineering (3.428) are not so notable, as the frequency

23
paper corpusSignosTxtLongLines600 - : [2]vol.54 número106 [3]A cross-disciplinary study of verb boosters in research articles from Engineering, Medicine and Linguistics: Frequency and co-text variations [4]English L2 connectives in academic bilingual discourse: A longitudinal computerised analysis of a learner corpus [5] índice de autores [6]índice de materia [7]búsqueda de artículos [8]Home Page [9]lista alfabética de revistas

24
paper corpusSignosTxtLongLines601 - : In the domain of Corpus Linguistics, recent empirical research using bilingual corpus produced in formal learning environments is mostly cross-sectional and decontextualised: the students’ linguistic competence is only defined as it is at a given time and the language production under examination is not content-bound . However, content plays such an important role in language development that Cummins’ distinction between ‘basic interpersonal communicative skills’ (BICS) and ‘cognitive academic language proficiency’ (CALP) (^[85]Cummins, 2008) is claimed not to be fully comprehensive (^[86]Harwood & Hadley, 2004; ^[87]Dressen-Hammouda, 2008; ^[88]Heine, 2014). For these authors, a third dimension should be added to the dichotomy: specialised academic register specific for each subject.

Evaluando al candidato linguistics:

4) corpus: 7 (*)
5) theoretical: 6
6) engineering: 6
7) functional: 6
9) discourse: 5 (*)
11) verb: 4 (*)
15) constructions: 4 (*)
16) systemic: 4 (*)
17) índice: 4
18) boosters: 4
19) computational: 4 (*)
20) articles: 3

linguistics
Lengua: eng
Frec: 1092
Docs: 274
Nombre propio: 12 / 1092 = 1%
Coocurrencias con glosario: 6
Puntaje: 6.618 = (6 + (1+5.85798099512757) / (1+10.0940776856719)));
Candidato aceptado

Referencias bibliográficas encontradas sobre cada término

(Que existan referencias dedicadas a un término es también indicio de terminologicidad.)

linguistics

: Aarts, J. (1991). Intuitionbased and observationbased grammars. En K. Aijmer & A. Bengt (Eds.), English Corpus Linguistics. Studies in honor of Jan Svartvik (pp. 4462). London: Longman.
: Abdollahzadeh, E. (2010). Poring over the findings: Interpersonal authorial engagement in applied linguistics papers. Journal of Pragmatics, 43, 288-297.
: Achugar, M. & Schleppegrell, M. (2005). Beyond connectors: The construction of cause in history textbooks. Linguistics and Education, 16(3), 298-318.
: Achugar, M., Schleppegrell, M. & Oteíza, T. (2007). Engaging teachers in language analysis: A functional linguistics approach to reflective literacy. Teaching English: Practice and Critique, 6(2), 8-24.
: Adetunji, A. (2006). Inclusion and exclusion in political discourse: Deixis in Olusegun Obasanjo’s Speeches. Journal of Language and Linguistics, 5(2), 177-191.
: Agirre, E., de Lacalle, O. L. & Soroa, A. (2014). Random walks for knowledge-based word sense disambiguation. Computational Linguistics, 40(1), 57-84.
: Aissen, J. & Rivas, A. M. (1975). The proper formulation of the spurious se rule in Spanish. Berkeley Linguistics Society, 1, 1-15.
: Alsop, S. & Nesi, H. (2015). Introductions in engineering lectures. In F. Formato & A. Hardie (Eds.) Proceedings of the 8th International Corpus Linguistics conference (CL2015) (pp. 19-22). Lancaster: UCREL.
: Ananiadou, S. (1994). A methodology for automatic term recognition. Ponencia presentada en el 15th International Conference on Computational Linguistics, Kyoto, Japón.
: Ando, R. K. (2006). Applying alternating structure optimization to word sense disambiguation. Proceedings of the Tenth Conference on Computational Natural Language Learning (pp. 77-84). Association for Computational Linguistics.
: Andreu, L., Sanz-Torrent, M., Guárdia, J. & Macwhinney, B. (2011). Narrative comprehension and production in children with SLI: An eye movement study. Clinical linguistics & phonetics, 25(9), 767-738.
: Apresjan, J. (1974). Regular polysemy. Linguistics, 142, 5-32.
: Aranovich, R. (1995). Spanish casi as Scalar Operator. En L. Bilmes, A. C. Liang & W. Ostapirat (Eds.), Proceedings of the Twenty-First Annual Meeting of the Berkeley Linguistics Society (pp. 12-23). Berkeley: Berkeley Linguistic Society.
: Ariel, M. (1988). Referring and accessibility. Journal of Linguistics, 24, 65-87.
: Aronoff, M. & Fudeman, K. (2005). What is morphology? Fundamental of Linguistics. Nueva Jersey: Wiley-Blackwell.
: Arús, J. (2017). Theme in Spanish. En T. Bartlett & G. O'Grady (Eds.), The Routledge handbook of Systemic Functional Linguistics (pp.194-212). Londres/ Nueva York: Routledge.
: Asención-Delaney, Y. & Collentine, Y. (2011). A multidimensional analysis of a written L2 Spanish corpus. Applied Linguistics, 32, 299-322.
: Aske, J. (1989). Path predicates in English and Spanish: A closer look. Ponencia presentada en Fifteenth Annual Meeting of the Berkeley Linguistics Society. Universidad de California Berkeley, Berkeley, Estados Unidos de Norteamérica.
: Askehave, I. & Swales, J. (2001). Genre identification and communicative purpose: A problem and a possible solution. Applied Linguistics, 22, 95-212.
: Astruc, L. (2005). The form and function of extra-sentential elements. Cambridge Occasional Papers in Linguistics, 2, 1-25.
: Asudeh, A. (2005). Relational nouns, pronouns and resumption. Linguistics and Philosophy, 28, 375-446.
: Avrutin, S. & Wexler, K. (1992). Development of Principle B in Russian: Coindexation at LF and Coreference. Language Acquisition: A Journal of Developmental Linguistics, 2(4), 259-306.
: Bamberg, M. (1986). A functional approach to the acquisition of anaphoric relationships. Linguistics, 24, 227-284.
: Baron, N. S. (1998). Letters by phone or speech by other means: The linguistics of email. Language and Communication, 18, 133-170 [en línea]. Disponible en: [137]https://doi.org/10.1016/S0271-5309(98)00005-6
: Barzilay, R. & McKeown, K. R. (2005). Sentence fusion for multidocument news summarization. Computational Linguistics, 31(3), 297-328.
: Basile, P., Caputo, A. & Semeraro, G. (2014). An enhanced lesk word sense disambiguation algorithm through a distributional semantic model. Proceedings of COLING 2014, the 25th International Conference on Computational Linguistics: Technical Papers (pp. 1591-1600).
: Basturkmen, H. (2013). Needs analysis and syllabus design for language for specific purposes. In C. A. Chapelle (Ed.), The Encyclopedia of Applied Linguistics (pp. 4209-4217). Oxford, UK: Blackwell.
: Bayraktar, M., Say, B. & Akman, V. (1998). An analysis of English punctuation: The special case of comma. International Journal of Corpus Linguistics, 3(1), 33-57.
: Beaugrande, R. & Dressler, W. (1981). Introduction to text linguistics. London: Longman.
: Bednarek, M. (2008). Semantic preference and semantic prosody re-examined. Corpus Linguistics and Linguistic Theory, 4(2), 119-139.
: Benmamoun, E., Montrul, S. & Polinsky, M. (2013). Heritage languages and their speakers: Opportunities and challenges for linguistics. Theoretical Linguistics, 39(3-4), 129-181.
: Benítez Castro, M. A. & Thompson, P. (2015). Shell-nounhood in academic discourse. A critical state-of-the art review. International Journal of Corpus Linguistics, 20(3), 378-404.
: Bergenholtz, H. & Tarp, S. (2003). Two opposing theories: On H. E. Wiegand’s Recent Discovery of Lexicographic Functions. Hermes. Journal of Linguistics, 31, 171-196.
: Berger, A., Della Pietra S. & Della Pietra, S. (1996). A maximum entropy approach to natural language processing, Computational Linguistics, 22(1), 39-71.
: Bernhardt, E. B. & Kamil, M. L. (1995). Interpreting relationships between L1 and L2 reading: Consolidating the linguistic threshold and the linguistic interdependence hypothesis. Applied Linguistics, 16(1), 15-33.
: Bernstein, B. (1973). Language and socialization. En N. Minnis (Ed.), Linguistics at large (pp. 225-243). Hertfordshire: Paladin.
: Berry, M. (1981a). Systemic linguistics and discourse analysis: A multilayered approach to exchange structure. M. Coulthard & M. Montgomery (Eds.), Studies in Discourse Analysis (pp. 120145). London: Routledge & Kegan Paul.
: Bhatia, V., Langton, N. & Lung, J. (2004). Legal discourse: Opportunities and threats for corpus linguistics. En U. Connor & T. Upton (Eds.), Discourse in the professions. Perspectives from corpus linguistics (pp. 203-231). Amsterdam: Benjamins.
: Biber, D. & Jones, J. K. (2009). Quantitative methods in corpus linguistics. En A. Lüdeling & M. Kytö (Eds.), Corpus Linguistics: An international handbook (pp. 1286-1304). Berlín: Mouton de Gruyter.
: Biber, D. (1993). Using register-diversified corpora for general language studies. Computational Linguistics, 19, 243-258.
: Biber, D. (2004). Representativeness in corpus design. En G. Sampson & D. McCarthy (Eds.), Corpus Linguistics: Readings in a widening discipline (pp. 174-197). Londres: Continuum.
: Biber, D. 1989. A typology of English texts. Linguistics, 27, 3-43.
: Biber, D., Conrad, S. & Cortés, V. (2003). Lexical bundles in speech and writing: An initial taxonomy. En A. Wilson, P. Rayson, & T. McEnery (Eds.), Corpus linguistics by the lune: A festschrift for Geoffrey Leech (pp. 7192). Frankfurt: Peter Lang.
: Biber, D., Conrad, S. & Cortés, V. (2004). If you look at: Lexical bundles in university teaching and textbooks. Applied Linguistics, 25(3), 371405.
: Biber, D., Conrad, S. & Repen, R. (1998). Corpus Linguistics. Investigating language structure and use. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
: Birdsong, D. & Paik, J. (2008). Second language acquisition and ultimate attainment. En B. Spolsky & F. M. Hult (Eds.), The Handbook of Educational Linguistics (pp. 424-436). Oxford: Blackwell .
: Birjandi, P. & Jazebi, S. (2014). A comparative analysis of teachers’ scaffolding practices. International Journal of Language and Linguistics, 2(3), 154-164.
: Blake, R. J. & Zyzik, E. C. (2003). Who’s helping whom?: Learner/heritage-speakers’ networked discussions in Spanish. Applied Linguistics, 24(4), 519-544.
: Block, D. (2010). Researching language and identity. En B. Paltridge & A. Phakti (Eds.), Continuum Companion to Research Methods in Applied Linguistics (pp. 337-347). Londres: Continuum.
: Boas, F. (1940). Introduction to International Journal of American Linguistics. Race, language and culture (pp. 199-210). New York: Free Press.
: Boas, H. (2011). Coercion and leaking argument structures in Construction Grammar. Linguistics, 49(6), 1271-1303.
: Bobaljik, J. (2008). Where’s Φ?: Agreement as a post-syntactic operation. En M. Van Koppen, P. Hendriks, F. Landsbergen, M. Poss & J. van der Wal (Eds.), Special Issue of Leiden Papers in Linguistics, 3(2), 1-23.
: Bobkina, J. & Domínguez, E. (2014). The use of literature and literary texts in the EFL classroom; between consensus and controversy. International Journal of Applied Linguistics & English Literature, 3(2), 248-260.
: Bolshakov, I.A. & Miranda-Jiménez S. (2004). A small system storing Spanish collocations. In A. Gelbukh (Ed.), Lecture notes in computer science: Computational linguistics and intelligent text processing (pp. 248–252). Berlin: Springer-Verlag.
: Bolívar, A. & Parodi, G. (2014). Academic and professional discourse. En M. Lacorte (Ed.), Routledge Encyclopedia of Hispanic Applied Linguistics. Londres: Routledge (en prensa).
: Bonet, E. (1994). The person-case constraint: A morphological approach. MIT Working Papers in Linguistics, 22, 33-52.
: Bonyadi, A. (2011). Linguistic manifestations of modality in newspaper editorials. International Journal of Linguistics, 3(1), 1-13.
: Bordag, S. (2006). Word sense induction: Triplet-based clustering and automatic evaluation. Proceedings of the 11th Conference of the European Chapter of the Association for Computational Linguistics (EACL) (pp. 137-144).
: Borgonovo, C. & Neeleman, A. (2000). Transparent adjuncts. Canadian Journal of Linguistics, 45(3/4), 199-224.
: Bourigault, D. (1992). Surface grammatical analysis for the extraction of terminological noun phrases. Ponencia presentada en el 14th International Conference on Computational Linguistics. Nantes, Francia.
: Brawerman-Albini, A., Kluge, D. C., Silva, A. H. & Albini, L. C. P. (2017). Perceptual training effects on the acquisition of English stress by Brazilian learners. International Journal of English Linguistics, 7(6), 1-15.
: Breen, M. P. & Candlin, C. (1980). The essentials of a communicative curriculum in language teaching. Applied Linguistics, 1(2), 89-112.
: Breivega, K. R., Dahl, T. & Flottum, K. (2002). Traces of self and others in research articles. A comparative pilot study of English, French and Norwegian research articles in medicine, economics and linguistics. International Journal of Applied Linguistics, 12(2), 218-239.
: Brill, E. (1995). Transformation-based error-driven learning and natural language processing: A case study in part-of-speech tagging. Computational Linguistics, 21, 543-566.
: Bull, W. (1965). Spanish for teachers: Applied linguistics. New York: The Ronald Press Co.
: Burstein, J., Kukich, K., Wolff, S., Lu, C., Chodorow, M., Bradenharder, L. & Harris, M. (1998). Automated scoring using a hybrid feature identification technique. Proceedings of the Annual Meeting of the Association of Computational Linguistics, Montreal, Canada.
: Bylund, E., Athanasopoulos, P. & Oostendorp, M. (2013). Motion event cognition and grammatical aspect: Evidence from Afrikaans. Linguistics, 51, 929-955.
: Cadierno, T. (2000). The acquisition of Spanish preterite and imperfect by Danish advanced language learners. Denmark. University of Southern Denmark. Spanish Applied Linguistics, 4, 1-53.
: Calderón, M. (2012). Intersections between literacy beliefs and written texts produced by 7 to 10 years old Chilean children. Ponencia presentada en the Lancaster University Postgraduate Conference in Linguistics & Language Teaching, Reino Unido.
: Cameron, L. & Maslen, R. (Eds.) (2010). Metaphor analysis: Research practice in applied linguistics, social sciences and the humanities. Londres: Equinox.
: Canale, M. & Swain, M. (1980). Theoretical bases of communicative approaches to second language teaching and testing. Applied Linguistics,
: Carletta, J. (1996). Assessing agreement on classification tasks: The Kappa statistic. Computational Linguistics, 22, 250-254.
: Carpenter, A. C. (2015). Phonetic training significantly mitigates the stress ‘deafness’ of French speakers. International Journal of Linguistics, 7(3), 94-108.
: Carrell, P. & Grabe, W. (2002). Reading. En N. Schmitt (Ed.), An introduction to applied linguistics. (pp. 233-250). London: Arnold.
: Carrell, P. L. (1991). Second language reading: Reading ability or reading proficiency? Applied Linguistics, 12, 159-179.
: Castel, V. (2006a). A computer implementation of the Cardiff grammar generator. Computational Linguistics Unit, University of Cardiff, Wales, United Kingdom. [For access permission contact [96]rp.fawcett@virgin.net].
: Cenoz, J., Genesee, F. & Gorter, D. (2014). Critical analysis of CLIL: Taking stock and looking forward. Applied Linguistics, 35, 243-262.
: Chafe, W. (1992). The importance of corpus linguistics to understand the nature of language. En J. Svartvik (Ed.), Directions in Corpus Linguistics (pp. 7997). Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
: Chan, Y. S., Ng, H. T. & Chiang, D. (2007). Word sense disambiguation improves statistical machine translation. Annual Meeting-Association for Computational Linguistics, 45(1), 33.
: Chapelle, C. (1999). Validity in language assessment. Annual Review of Applied Linguistics, 19, (54-72).
: Chen, H. & Lee, J. (1996). Identification and classification of proper nouns in Chinese texts. En T. Seely (Ed.), Proceedings of 16th International Conference on Computational Linguistics, Copenhagen, Denmark (pp. 222-229). Copenhagen: Ministry of Research Denmark.
: Chen, H.-J. (2009). Evaluating two web-based grammar checkers - Microsoft ESL Assistant and NTNU Statistical Grammar Checker. Computational Linguistics and Chinese Language Processing,
: Chen, W. (2008). Dimensions of subjectivity in natural languages. Ponencia presentada en el 46th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics on Human Language Technologies, 13-16.
: Chierchia, G. (1982). Nominalization and Montague grammar: A semantics without types for natural languages. Linguistics and Philosophy, 5, 303-54.
: Chodorow, M. & Leacock, C. (2000). An unsupervised method for detecting grammatical errors. Proceedings of the 1st North American chapter of the Association for Computational Linguistics conference. Association for Computational Linguistics, 140-147 [en línea]. Disponible en:
: Chomsky, N. (1966). Cartesian linguistics. A chapter in the history of rationalist thought . New York: Harper & Row.
: Christie, F. (1998). Pedagogy and the Shaping of Consciousness: Linguistic and social processes. Londres: Cassell (Open Linguistics Series).
: Christie, F. (2004). Systemic Functional Linguistics and a theory of language in education. Ilha do desterro, 46.
: Church, K. & Hanks, P. (1990). Word association norms, mutual information, and lexicography. Computational Linguistics, 16(1), 22-29.
: Church, K., & Mercer, R. (1993). Introduction to the special issue on computational linguistics. Using large corpora. Computational Linguistics, 9(1), 124.
: Ciaramita, M. & Altun, Y. (2006). Broad-coverage sense disambiguation and information extraction with a supersense sequence tagger. Proceedings of the 2006 Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing (pp. 594-602). Association for Computational Linguistics.
: Clements, J. C. (1988). The semantics and pragmatics of the Spanish construction. Linguistics, 26(5), 779-822.
: Coffey, S. (2018). Choosing to study modern foreign languages: Discourses of value as forms of cultural capital. Applied Linguistics, 39(4), 462-480.
: Coffin, C. (2006). Learning the language of school history: The role of linguistics in mapping the writing demands of the secondary school curriculum. Journal of Curriculum Studies, 38(4), 413-429.
: Cohen, A. D. (2010). Focus on the language learner: Styles, strategies and motivation. En N. Schmitt (Ed.), An Introduction to Applied Linguistics (pp. 161-178). Nueva York: Routledge .
: Coll-Florit, M., Castellón, I., Climent, S. & Santiago, J. (2009). Realidad psicológica del aspecto léxico. Evidencias experimentales. En J. Valenzuela & A. Rojo (Eds.), Trends in Cognitive Linguistics: Theoretical and Applied Models (pp. 85-100) Frankfurt am Main: Peter Lang.
: Collentine, J. (2000). The relationship between syntactic and morphological abilities in advanced FL learners of Spanish. En R. Leow & C. Sanz (Eds.), Spanish applied linguistics at the turn of the millennium (pp. 20-35). Medford, MA.: Cascadilla Press.
: Collet, T. (2004). What's a term? An attempt to define the term within the theoretical framework of text linguistics. Linguistica Antverpiensia, 3, 99-1 1.
: Connor, U. & Upton, T. (2004b). The genre of grant proposals: A corpus linguistics analysis. En U. Connor & T. Upton (Eds.), Discourse in the professions. Perspectives from corpus linguistics (pp. 235-255). Amsterdam: Benjamins.
: Connor, U. & Upton, T. (Eds.) (2004a). Discourse in the professions. Perspectives from corpus linguistics. Amsterdam: Benjamins.
: Conte, M. (1996). Anaphoric encapsulation. En N. de Mulder & L. Tasmowski (Eds.), Coherence & Anaphora (pp. 1-33). Belgian Journal of Linguistics, 10. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
: Conti-Ramsden, G. (2003). Processing and linguistics markers in young children with Specific Language Impairment (SLI). Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research, 46, 1029-1037.
: Corder, S. P. (1967). The significance of learner’s errors. International Review of Applied Linguistics in Language Teaching, 5(1-4), 161-170.
: Cornillie, B. & Delbecque, N. (2008). Speaker Commitment: Back to the Speaker. Evidence from Spanish Alternations. Belgian Journal of Linguistics, 22, 37-62.
: Cornillie, B. (2010). On conceptual semantics and discourse function. the case of spanish modal adverbs in informal conversation. Review of Cognitive Linguistics, 8(2), 300-320.
: Coulson, S. & Oakley, T. (2000). Blending Basics. Cognitive Linguistics, 11(34), 175196.
: Coulthard, M. (1994). On the use of corpora in the analysis of forensic texts. Forensic Linguistics. The International Journal of Speech Language and the Law, 1(1), 27-43.
: Coulthard, M. (2004). Author identification, idiolect, and linguistic uniqueness. Applied Linguistics, 25(4), 431-447.
: Croft, W. & Cruse, D. A. (2004). Cognitive linguistics. Cambridge: Cambrigde University Press.
: Crookes, G. (1986). Towards a validated analysis of scientific text structure. Applied Linguistics, 7(1), 57-70.
: Crossley, S. A., Salsbury, T. & McNamara, D. S. (2010b). The development of semantic relations in second language speakers: A case for Latent Semantic Analysis. Vigo International Journal of Applied Linguistics, 7, 55-74.
: Crystal, D. (1976). Child language, learning and linguistics. Londres: Edward Arnold.
: Crystal, D. (1991). A dictionary of linguistics and phonetics. Oxford: Blackwell.
: Cumming, A. (1998). Theoretical perspectives on writing. Annual Review of Applied Linguistics, 18, 61-78.
: Curnow, T. J. (1993). Semantics of Spanish causatives involving HACER. Australian Journal of Linguistics, 13(2), 165-184.
: D'ANGELO, F. (1986) "Topoi and form in composition", en D. McQuade (Ed.), The territory of language: Linguistics, stylistics, and the teaching of composition, Carbondale: Southern Illinois University Press.
: Darlympe, M., Kanazawa, M., Kim, P. Y., Mchombo, S. A. & Peters, M. S. (1998). Reciprocal expressions and the concept of reciprocity. Linguistics and Philosophy, 21, 159-210.
: Darvin, R. & Norton, B. (2015). Identity and a model of investment in applied linguistics. Annual Review of Applied Linguistics, 35, 36-56.
: Davidse, K. (1992). Transitivity/ergativity: The janus-headed grammar of actions and events. En M. Davies, J.R. Martin & L. Ravelli (Eds.), Advances in systemic linguistics: Recent theory and practice (pp. 105-135). London: Pinter.
: Dawei, W., Jinbo, X. & Heping, W. (2016). The English past tense debate in the Chinese EFL learners’ mind: A masked priming study. Chinese Journal of Applied Linguistics, 39(2), 185-198.
: Dayal, V. (2004). Number marking and (in)definiteness in kind terms. Linguistics and Philosophy, 27, 393-450.
: De Beaugrande, R. & Dressler, W. (1981). Introduction to text linguistics. Londres: Longman.
: De Bruin, J. & Sha, R. (1988). The interpretation of relational nouns. En el 26 th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics: Proceedings of the Conference (pp. 25-32). Morristown: Association of Computational Linguistics.
: De Cock, S. (1998). A recurrent word combination approach to the study of formulae in the speech of native and nonnative speakers of English. International Journal of Corpus Linguistics, 3(1), 59 80.
: De Haan, F. (1999). Evidentiality and epistemic modality: Setting boundaries. Southwest Journal of Linguistics, 18, 83-101.
: De Jonge, B. (1993). (Dis)continuity in language change: Ser and estar + age in Latin American Spanish. In F. Drijkoningen & K. Hengeveld (Eds.), Linguistics in the Netherlands (pp. 69-80). Amsterdam: Benjamins.
: DeKeyser, R. (2007). Practice in a second language: Perspectives from applied linguistics and cognitive psychology. Nueva York: Cambridge University Press.
: Deignan, A. (2005). Metaphor and Corpus Linguistics. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
: Del Valle, J. (2005). La lengua, patria común: Política lingüística, política exterior y el post-nacionalismo hispánico. En R. Wright & M. Ricktts (Eds.), Studies on ibero-romance linguistics dedicated to Ralph Penny (pp. 391-415). Newark, Delaware: Juan de la Cuesta.
: Denison, D. (1993). English historical syntax: Verbal constructions (Longman Linguistics Library). Londres, Nueva York: Longman.
: Depraetere, I. (1995). On the necessity of distinguishing between (un)boundedness and (a)telicity. Linguistics and Philosophy, 18, 1-19.
: Depraetere, I. (2017). On the pragmatics of modal verbs. Selected papers on theoretical and applied linguistics, 22, 14-26.
: Derewianka, B. (2003). Grammatical metaphor in the transition to adolescence. En A. M. Simon-Vandenberger, M. Taverniers & L. J. Ravelli. (Eds.), Grammatical metaphors. Views from systemic functional linguistics (pp. 185-220). Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins.
: Dewaele, J. M. & Furnham, A. (1999). Extraversion: The unloved variable in Applied Linguistics research. Language Learning, 49(3), 509-544.
: Di Carlo, S. (2017b). Understanding cognitive language learning strategies. International Journal of Applied Linguistics and English Literature, 6(2), 114-126. DOI: 10.7575/aiac.ijalel.v.6n.2p.114
: Divsar, H. & Tahriri, A. (2009). Investigating the effectiveness of an integrated approach to teaching literature in an EFL context. Journal of Pan-Pacific Association of Applied Linguistics, 13(2), 105-116.
: Dodd, B., Holm, A., Hua, Z. & Crosbie, S. (2003). Phonological development: A normative study of British English children. Clinical Linguistics & Phonetics, 17(8), 617-643.
: Dorshomal, N., Gorjian, B. & Pazhakh, A. (2013). The role of pedagogical films in developing pre-intermediate Iranian EFL learners' speaking skill: The case of motivation. International Journal of Language Learning and Applied Linguistics World, 4(4), 254- 268.
: Duff, P. (2008). Case study research in applied linguistics. New York/London: Lawrence Erlbaum.
: Dunning, T. (1994). Accurate methods for the statistics of surprise and coincidence. Computational Linguistics, 19(1), 61-74.
: Dzameshie, A. (1995). Social motivations for politeness behavior in Christian sermonic discourse. Anthropological linguistics, 37(2), 192-215.
: Díaz, A. & Martín, M. A. (2018). Computational treatment of clausal units in a controlled natural language: The ARTEMIS parser for ASD-STE100. Paper presented at the 36^th International Conference of the Spanish Association of Applied Linguistics, University of Cádiz, Spain.
: Dörnyei, Z. & Csizér, K. (2002). Some dynamics of language attitudes and motivation: Results of a longitudinal nationwide survey. Applied Linguistics, 23, 421-462.
: Edelsky, C., Hudelson, S., Flores, B., Bakin, F., Altwerger, B. & Jilbert, K. (1983). Semilingualism and language deficit. Applied Linguistics, 4, 1-22.
: Edmonds, P. (2006). Disambiguation, lexical. En K. Brown (Ed.), Encyclopedia of Language and Linguistics (pp. 607-623). Nueva York: Elsevier.
: Eggins, S. (1994). An Introduction to Systemic Functional Linguistics. London: Pinter.
: Elia, A., Monteleone, M. & Marano, F. (2011). From the concept of transformation in Harris and Chomsky to the Lexique-Grammaire of Maurice Gross. En V. Kasevich, Y. Kleiner & P. Sériot (Eds.), History of linguistics (pp. 76-82). Ámsterdam: John Benjamins .
: Ellis, J., & Ure, J. (1969). Language varieties: register. En A. R. Meetham (Ed.), Encyclopedia of Linguistics: information and control (pp. 251-259). Oxford: Pergamon.
: Ellis, N. C. & Robinson, P. (2008). An introduction to cognitive linguistics, second language acquisition, and language instruction. In N. C. Ellis & P. Robinson, (Eds.), Handbook of Cognitive Linguistics and Second Language Acquisition (pp. 3-24).Oxford: Routledge.
: Ellis, R. (2004). Individual differences in second language learning. En C. Elder & A. Davies (Eds.), Handbook of applied linguistics (pp. 525-551). Oxford: Blackwell.
: Engdahl, E. (1985). Parasitic gaps, resumptive pronouns, and subject extractions. Linguistics, 23(1), 3-44.
: Englander, K. (2006). Revisions of scientific manuscripts by non-native English speaking scientists in response to journal editor’s criticism of the language. Journal of Applied Linguistics, 3(2), 129-161.
: Epstein, R. (2002). The definite article, accessibility, and the construction of discourse referents. Cognitive Linguistics, 12(4), 333378.
: Erickson, F. (1986). Listening and speaking. En D. Tannen & J. Alatis (Eds.), Georgetown University Round Table on Language and Linguistics (pp. 294-319). Washington DC: Georgetown University Press.
: FAIRCLOUGH, N. (1992). "Text and Discourse: Linguistics and Intertextual Analysis within Discourse Analysis". Discourse and Society.
: Faber, P. (Ed.) (2012). A cognitive linguistics view of terminology and specialized language. Berlín, Boston: De Gruyter Mouton.
: Fairclough, M. (2015). Spanish as a heritage language. In M. Lacorte (Ed.), Routledge Handbook of Hispanic Applied Linguistics (pp. 134-149). New York, NY: Routledge.
: Fang, Z. (2004). Scientific literacy: A systemic functional linguistics perspective. Science Education, 89(2), 335-347. DOI: 10.1002/sce.20050
: Fang, Z. (2014). Writing a report: A study of preadolescents’ use of informational language. Linguistics and the Human Sciences, 10(2), 103-131. DOI: 10.1558/lhs.v10.2.28556
: Farías, M., Obilinovic, K. & Orrego, R. (2007). Implications of multimodal learning models for foreign language teaching and learning. Colombian Applied Linguistics Journal, 9, 174-199.
: Fawcett, R. (1980). Cognitive linguistics and social interaction. Heidelberg: Julius Groos and Exeter University.
: Fawcett, R. (2000). A theory of syntax for systemic functional linguistics. Amsterdam: Benjamins.
: Fawcett, R. (2008). Invitation to Systemic Functional Linguistics. The Cardiff Grammar as an extension and simplification of Halliday's Systemic Functional Grammar. Beijing: Beijing University Press.
: Fawcett, R. P. (2000). A theory of syntax for systemic functional linguistics. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
: Fawcett, R. P. (2003). A generative systemic functional micro-grammar for some central elements of the English Clause. Cardiff UK: Computational Linguistics Unit, Cardiff University.
: Fawcett, R. P. (2013). An integrative architecture of language and its use for systemic functional linguistics and other theories of language. London: Equinox.
: Fernando, S. & Stevenson, M. (2008). A semantic similarity approach to paraphrase detection. Ponencia presentada en el 11th Annual Research Colloquium of the UK Special Interest Group for Computational Linguistics, Oxford, United Kingdom.
: Fernández-Montraveta, A. & Vázquez, G. (2014). The SenSem Corpus: An annotated corpus for Spanish and Catalan with information about aspectuality, modality, polarity and factuality. Corpus Linguistics and Linguistic Theory, 10(2), 273-288.
: Fernández-Silva, S., Cabré, M. T. & Freixa, J. (2012). A cognitive approach to synonymy in terminology. En M. Brdar, I. Raffaelli & M. Žic Fuchs (Eds.), Cognitive Linguistics between Universality and Variation (pp. 189-212). Newcastle: Cambridge Scholars Publishing.
: Ferreira, A. (2017). El efecto del feedback correctivo para mejorar la destreza escrita en ELE. Colombian Applied Linguistics Journal, 19(1), 37 -50.
: Ferreira, F. & Patson, N. D. (2007). The 'good enough' approach to language comprehension. Language and Linguistics Compass, 1, 71-83.
: Fillmore, C. (1975). An alternative to checklist theories of meaning. En C. Gogen, H. Thompson, G. Thurgood, K. Whistler & J. Wright, (Eds.), Proceedings of the first annual meeting of the Berkeley Linguistic Society (pp.123-131). CA: Berkeley Linguistics Society.
: Fillmore, C. (1982). Frame semantics. En Linguistic Society of Korea (Ed.), Linguistics in the Morning Calm. Seúl, Hanshin Publishing Co.
: Fillmore, C. (1992). Corpus linguistics and Computeraded armchair linguistics. En J. Svartvik (Ed.), Directions in Corpus Linguistics (pp. 3560). Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
: Fillmore, C. J. (1982). Frame semantics. En Linguistic Society of Korea (Ed.), Linguistics in the morning calm: Selected papers from SICOL-1981 (pp. 111-137). Seúl: Hanshin.
: Firth, J. R. (1957). Modes of meaning. In J. R. Firth (Ed.), Papers in Linguistics 1934–1951 (pp. 190–215). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
: Fishman, J. (2001). 300-plus years of heritage language education in the United States. In J. Peyton, D. Ranard & S. McGinnis (Eds.), Heritage languages in America: Preserving a national resource (pp. 81-97). McHenry, IL: Center for Applied Linguistics and Delta Publishing.
: Flowerdew, J. (2009). Use of signalling nouns in a learner corpus. En J. Flowerdew & M. Mahlberg (Eds.), Lexical cohesion and corpus linguistics (pp. 85-102). Ámsterdam: John Benjamins.
: Flowerdew, L. (2004). The argument for using English specialized corpora to understand academic and professional language. En U. Connor & T. Upton (Eds.), Discourse in the professions. Perspectives from corpus linguistics (pp. 11-33). Amsterdam: Benjamins.
: Foley, W. (1997). Anthropological linguistics: An introduction. Blackwell Publishers.
: Forbes, J. N., Poulin-Dubois, D., Rivero, M. & Sera, M. (2008). Grammatical gender affects bilinguals’ conceptual gender: Implications for linguistic relativity and decision making. The Open Applied Linguistics Journal, 1, 68-76.
: Forey, G. & Sampson, N. (2017). Textual metafunction and Theme. En T. Bartlett & G. O'Grady (Eds.), The Routledge handbook of Systemic Functional Linguistics (pp. 131-145). Londres/Nueva York: Routledge.
: Foster, P., Tonkyn, A. & Wigglesworth, G. (2000). Measuring spoken language: A unit for all reasons. Applied Linguistics, 21(3), 354-375.
: Francis, G. & Sinclair, J. (1994). ‘I bet he drinks Carling Black Label’: A Riposte to Owen on Corpus Grammar. Applied Linguistics, 15(2), 190-200.
: Franco, K., Zenner, E. & Speelman, D. (2018). Let’s agree to disagree. (Variation in) the assignment of gender to nominal anglicisms in Dutch. Journal of Germanic Linguistics, 30(1), 43-87.
: Fábregas, A. & Marín, R. (2012). The role of Aktionsart in deverbal nouns: State nominalizations across languages. Journal of Linguistics, 8, 35-70.
: Fábregas, A. (2012). A guide to IL and SL in Spanish: Properties, problems and proposals. Borealis: An International Journal of Hispanic Linguistics, 1(2), 1-71.
: Gallego, Á. & Uriagereka, J. (2016). Estar = Ser + X. Borealis: An International Journal of Hispanic Linguistics, 5(1), 123-156.
: García Mayo, M. P. (2002). The effectiveness of two form-focused tasks in advanced EFL pedagogy. International Journal of Applied Linguistics, 12(2), 156-175.
: García, A. M. & Gil, J. M. (2011a). A historical survey into the origins of Lambian linguistics. LACUS Forum, 36, 111-123.
: García, A. M. (2013). Relational network theory as a bridge between linguistics and neuroscience: An interview with Professor Sydney Lamb. Linguistics and the Human Sciences, 8(1), 3-27.
: Gardner, S. & Nesi, H. (2013). A classification of genre families in university student writing. Applied Linguistics, 34(1), 25-52.
: Gayraud, F., Lee, H. R. & Barkat-Defradas, M. (2011). Syntactic and lexical context of pauses and hesitations in the discourse of Alzheimer patients and healthy elderly subjects. Clinical Linguistics & Phonetics, 25(3), 198-209.
: Gee, J. (2001). Educational linguistics. En M. Aronoff & J. Rees-Miller (Eds.), The handbook of linguistics (pp. 647-663). Oxford: Blackwell.
: Geeraerts, D. (1993). Vagueness’s puzzles, polysemy’s vagaries. Cognitive Linguistics, 4, 229-272.
: Gelbukh, A. & Sidorov, G. (2001). Zipf and Heaps Laws’ coefficients depend on language. Proceedings of the second CICLing Conference, Intelligent Text Processing and Computational Linguistics. Ciudad de México, México.
: Genest, P. E. & Lapalme, G. (2012). Fully abstractive approach to guided summarization. Ponencia presentada en el 50th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics, Jeju, Corea.
: Gerding, C., Fuentes, M., Gómez, L. & Kotz, G. (2014). Anglicisms: An active word-formation mechanism in Spanish. Colombian Applied Linguistics Journal, 16(1), 40-54.
: Ghadessy, M. (Ed.). (1988). Registers of Written English: situational factors and linguistics features. London: Pinter.
: Gibbons, J. & Turell, M. T. (Eds.) (2008). Dimensions of Forensic Linguistics. Ámsterdam/Filadelfia: John Benjamins.
: Gibbons, J. (2003). Forensic linguistics. An introduction to language in the Justice System. Oxford: Blackwell Publishing.
: Gibbons, J. (2004). Language and the law. En A. Davies & C. Elder (Eds.), Handbook of applied linguistics (pp. 285-303). Oxford: Blackwell.
: Gibbs, R. (1990). Psycholinguistic studies on the conceptual basis of idiomaticity. Cognitive Linguistics, 1, 417-451.
: Gildea, D. & Jurafsky, D. (2002). Automatic labeling of semantic roles. Computational Linguistics, 28, 245-288.
: Gilroy, M. (1995). An investigation into teachers' attitudes to using literature in the language classroom. Edinburgh Working Papers in Applied Linguistics, 6, 1-17.
: Girju, R., Badulescu, A. & Moldovan, D. (2006). Automatic discovery of part-whole relations. Computational Linguistics, 32(1), 83-135.
: Gisborne, N. & Holmes, J. (2007). A history of English evidential verbs of appearance. English Language and Linguistics, 11(1), 1-29. [85]https://doi.org/10.1017/S1360674306002097
: Gnutzmann, C. & Oldenburg, H. (1991). Contrastive text linguistics in LSP-Research: Theoretical considerations and some preliminary findings. En H. Schröder (Ed.), Subject-oriented texts: Languages for special purposes & text theory (pp. 103-136). Berlin: W. de Gruyter.
: Goh, O. & Foong, K. (1997). Chinese ESL students’ learning strategies: A look at frequency, proficiency, and gender. Hong Kong Journal of Applied Linguistics. 2(1), 39-53.
: Goldberg, A. E. (2002). Surface generalizations: An alternative to alternations. Cognitive Linguistics, 13(4), 327-356.
: Goldstein, B. A. & Pollock, K. E. (2000). Vowel errors in Spanish-speaking children with phonological disorders: A retrospective, comparative study. Clinical Linguistics and Phonetics, 14, 217-225.
: Goodrich, P. (1987). Legal discourse. Studies in linguistics, rhetoric and legal analysis. London: MacMillan.
: Gorter, D. (2013). Linguistic landscapes in a multilingual world. Annual Review of Applied Linguistics, 33, 190-212.
: Gosden, H. (1993). Discourse functions of subject in scientific research articles. Applied Linguistics, 14(1), 56-75.
: Gottlieb, H. (2006). Linguistic influence. In K. Brown (Ed.), Encyclopedia of language and linguistics, 2nd edition (pp. 196-205). Oxford: Elsevier Science.
: Grady, J., Oakley, T. & Coulson, S. (1999). Blending and metaphore. En G. Steen & R. Gibbs (Eds.), Metaphor in cognitive linguistics (pp. 101-124). Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamin.
: Gregory, M. (1967). Aspects of varieties differentiation. Journal of Linguistics, 3, 177-198.
: Gregory, M. (2002). Phasal analysis within communication linguistics: Two contrastive discourses. En P. H. Fries, M. Cummings, D. Lockwood & W. Spruiell (Eds.), Relations and Functions within and around Language (pp. 316-545). Nueva York: Continuum.
: Gries, S. (2010). Corpus linguistic and theoretical linguistic: A love-hate relationship? Not Necessarily. International Journal of Corpus Linguistics, 15(3), 327-343.
: Gries, S. T. (2008). Dispersions and adjusted frequencies in corpora. International Journal of Corpus Linguistics, 13(4), 403-437.
: Grosz, B. & Sidner, C. L. (1986). Attention, intentions, and the structure of discourse. Computational linguistics, 12(3), 175-204.
: Grzega, J. (2014). Lexical-semantic variables’. En J. M. Hernández-Campoy & J. Camilo Conde-Silvestre (Eds.), The Handbook of Historical Linguistics (pp. 271-292). Oxford: Wiley.
: Guendouzi, J. & Müller, N. (2002). Defining trouble-sources in dementia: Repair strategies and conversational satisfaction in interactions with an Alzheimer’s patient. Investigations in clinical phonetics and linguistics, 15-30.
: Guitart, J. (1978). Aspects of Spanish aspect: A new look at the Preterit/Imperfect distinction. En M. Suñer (Ed.), Contemporary studies in romance linguistics. Baltimore: Georgetown University Press.
: Gullberg, M. (2006). Some reasons for studying gesture and Second Language acquisition (Hommage à Adam Kendon). International Review of Applied Linguistics in Language Teaching, 44(2), 103 -124.
: Gunnarsson, B.L., Linell, P., & Nordberg, B. (Eds.) (1994). Text and Talk in Professional Contexts. Selected Papers from the International Conference "Discourse and the Professions" (Uppsala, 26-29 agosto 1992). Uppsala: The Swedisch Association of Applied Linguistics.
: Gutiérrez, M. (1992). The extension of estar: A linguistic change in progress in the Spanish of Morelia, Mexico. Hispanic Linguistics, 5(1-2), 109-141.
: Gómez González, M. A. & García Varela, A. P. (2014). Discourse-organizational patterns in English and Spanish. Some notes on the thematic management of news reports. Spanish Journal of Applied Linguistics, 27(1), 87-117.
: Göpferich, S. (2000). Analysing LSP Genres (Text Types): From Perpetuation to Optimization in Text(-type) Linguistics. En A. Trosborg (Ed.). Analysing Professional Genres (pp.227-247). Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins Publishing Company.
: Ha, L., Stewart, D., Hanna P. & Smith, F. (2006). Zipf and Type-Token rules for the English, Spanish, Irish and Latin languages. Web Journal of Formal, Computational and Cognitive Linguistics, 1(8), 1-12.
: Hale, K. & Keyser, S. J. (1993). On argument structure and the lexical expression of syntactic relations. En K. Hale & S. J. Keyser (Eds.), The View from Building 20: Essays in Linguistics in Honor of Sylvain Bromberger (pp. 53-109). Cambridge, Massachusetts: MIT Press .
: Halle, M. (1997). Distributed Morphology: Impoverishment and fission. MIT Working Papers in Linguistics, 30, 425-449.
: Halliday, M. (1966a). Some notes on 'deep' grammar. Journal of Linguistics, 2(1), 57-67.
: Halliday, M. (1967/8). Notes on transitivity and theme in English 1-3. Journal of Linguistics, 3-4.
: Halliday, M. (1970). Language structure and language function. En J. Lyons (Comp.), New Horizons of Linguistics (pp. 140-165). Londres: Penguin.
: Halliday, M. (1977). Aims and perspectives in linguistics. Applied Linguistics Association of Australia, 1, 123-145.
: Halliday, M. (1980). Foreword. En A. de Joia & A. Stenton (Eds.), Terms in systemic linguistics: A guide to Halliday (pp. 1-07). London: Batsford.
: Halliday, M. (1991). Corpus linguistics and probabilistic grammar. En K. Aijmer & B. Altenberg (Eds.), English corpus linguistics: Studies in honour of Jan Svartvik (pp. 30-44). London: Longman.
: Halliday, M. (1992). Language as a system and language as a instance: The corpus as a theoretical construct. En J. Svartvik (Ed.), Directions in corpus linguistics (pp. 61-77). New York: W. de Gruyter.
: Halliday, M. (2003). On language and linguistics. London: Continuum.
: Halliday, M. A. (1993). Towards a language-based theory of learning. Linguistics and education, 5(2), 93-116.
: Halliday, M. A. K. & Webster, J. (Eds.) (2009). Continuum companion to systemic functional linguistics. Londres/Nueva York: Continuum.
: Halliday, M. A. K. (1967). Notes on transitivity and theme in English Part 1. Journal of Linguistics, 3(1), 37-81.
: Halliday, M. A. K. (1989). Some grammatical problems in scientific English. Australian Review of Applied Linguistics. Supplement, 6, 13-37.
: Halliday, M. A. K. (2003). On language and linguistics. London & New York: Continuum.
: Halliday, M.A.K. (1987). Language and the order of nature. In N. Fabb, D. Attridge, A. Durant & C. MacCabe (Eds.), The linguistics of writing: Arguments between language and literature (pp. 135-154). Manchaster: Manchester University Press.
: Halliday, M.A.K. (1993). Towards a language-based theory of learning. Linguistics and Education, 5, 93- 116.
: Halliday, M.A.K. (2003). On language and linguistics. Londres: Continuum .
: Halliday, M.A.K. (2009). Methods –techniques- problems. En M.A.K. Halliday & J. Webster (Eds.), Continuum companion to Systemic Functional Linguistics (pp. 59-86). Londres: Continuum.
: Han, F. (2012). Comprehension monitoring in reading English as a foreign language. New Zealand Studies in Applied Linguistics, 18(1), 36-49.
: Han, Z-H., Park, E. S. & Combs, C. (2008). Textual enhancement of input: Issues and possibilities. Applied Linguistics, 29(4), 597-618.
: Hansen, N. & Chemla, E. (2017). Color adjectives, standards, and thresholds: An experimental investigation. Linguistics and Philosophy, 40(3), 239 -78 [en línea]. Disponible en: [111]http://centaur.reading.ac.uk/68143/.
: Hardwood, N. (2005b). We do not seem to have a theory…the theory I present here attempts to fill this gap: Inclusive and exclusive pronouns in academic writing. Applied Linguistics, 26, 343-375.
: Harley, H. (2014). On the identity of roots. Theoretical Linguistics, 40(3-4), 225-276. DOI: [123]https://doi.org/10.1515/tl-2014-0010. Berlín: De Gruyter Mouton.
: Harman, R. (2018). Transforming normative discourses of schooling: Critical systemic functional linguistics praxis. New York: Springer. DOI: 10.1007/978-3-319-60953-9_1
: Harris, Z. (1959). The Transformational Model of Language Structure. Anthropological Linguistics, 1(1), 27-29.
: Harris, Z. (1970). Papers in structural and transformational linguistics. Dordrecht: Springer.
: Harris, Z. (1985). Distributional structure. En J. J. Katz (Ed.), The philosophy of linguistics (pp. 26-47). Nueva York: Oxford University Press.
: Harrison, C. J. (2000). PureNet: A modeling program for neurocognitive linguistics. Doctoral thesis, Michigan: Bell & Howell Information and Learning.
: Harwood, N. (2005). ‘We Do Not Seem to Have a Theory … The Theory I Present Here Attempts to Fill This Gap’: Inclusive and Exclusive Pronouns in Academic Writing. Applied Linguistics, 26(3), 343-375.
: Hasan, R. (1984). The nursery tale as a genre. Nottingham Linguistic Circular, (Special Issue on Systemic Linguistics), 13, 71-102.
: Hasan, R. (1985). Linguistics, language, and verbal art. Geelong: Deakin University Press.
: Hasan, R. (1987). The grammarian's dream: Lexis as most delicate grammar. En M. Halliday & R. Fawcett (Eds.), New developments in systemic linguistics: Theory and description (pp. 184-211). London: Pinter.
: Hasan, R. (1989). Semantic variation and sociolintuistics. Australian Journal of Linguistics, 9(2), 221.
: Hatch, E. & Lazaraton, N. (1991). The research manual. Design and statistics for applied linguistics. Massachusetts: Heinle & Heinle Publishers.
: Hausser, R. (2001). Foundations of computational linguistics. Berlin: Springer-Verlag.
: Haverkate, H. (1978). The vocativo phrase in modern Spanish. A contribution to the study of illocutionary functions. En M. Zonneveld (Ed.), Linguistics in the Netherlands (pp. 46-62). Lisse.
: Hearts, M. (1992). Automatic acquisition of hyponyms from large text corpora. En Proceedings of Conference COLING. Nantes: Association for Computational Linguistics.
: Hengeveld, K. (1989). Layers and operators in functional grammar. Journal of Linguistics, 25, 127-157.
: Hengeveld, K., Rijkhoff, J. & Siewierska, A. (2004). Parts-of-speech systems and word order. Journal of Linguistics, 40(2), 527–570.
: Henríquez, R. & Ruiz, M. (2014). Chilean students learn to think historically: Construction of historical causation through the use of evidence in writing. Linguistics and Education, 25(1), 145-157.
: Hidalgo, R. & Downing, A. (2012). Topic and topicality in text: A contrastive study of English and Spanish narrative texts. Linguistics and the Human Sciences, 6, 193-213.
: Hill, M. & Laufer, B. (2003). Type of task, time-on-task and electronic dictionaries in incidental vocabulary acquisition. International Review of Applied Linguistics in Language Teaching, 41(2), 87-106.
: Hollien, H. & Martin, C.A. (1996). Conducting research on the effects of intoxication on speech. Forensic Linguistics. The International Journal of Speech, Language and the Law, 3(1), 107-128.
: Hood, S. (2005). What is evaluated and how in academic research writing? The co-patterning of attitude and field. Australian Review of Applied Linguistics Series. S(19), 23-40.
: Hornberger, N. (2004). The Continua of biliteracy and the bilingual educator: Educational linguistics in practice. International Journal of Bilingual Education and Bilingualism, 7(2), 155-171.
: Howard-Malverde, R. (1998). Words for our Lord of Huanca: Discursive strategies in a Quechua sermon from Southern Peru. Anthropological linguistics, 40(4), 570-595.
: Howarth, P. (1998). Phraseology and second language proficiency. Applied Linguistics, 19(1), 2444.
: Hu, G. & Cao, F. (2011). Hedging and boosting in abstracts of applied linguistics articles: A comparative study of English-and-Chinese-medium journals. Journal of Pragmatics, 43, 2795-2809.
: Hualde, J. I. (2012). Stress and rhythm. In J. I. Hualde, A. Olarrea & E. O’Rourke (Eds.), The handbook of Hispanic linguistics (pp. 152-171). Malden, MA: Wiley-Blackwell.
: Huang, Y. (2007). Pragmatics (Oxford Textbooks in Linguistics). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
: Hubbard, P. (2009). Computer assisted language learning: Critical concepts in linguistics. Present trends and future directions in CALL. Londres: Routledge.
: Hughes, C. (2009). Assessment as text production: Drawing on systemic functional linguistics to frame the design and analysis of assessment tasks. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 34(5), 553-563. DOI: 10.1080/02602930802187316
: Humphrey, S., Martin, J. R., Dreyfus, S. & Mahboob, A. (2010). The 3x 3: Setting up a linguistic toolkit. In A. Mahboob & N. Knight (Eds.), Appliable linguistics (pp. 185-195). London: Bloomsbury.
: Hunston, S. (2002). Corpora in Applied Linguistics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
: Hunston, S. (2007). Semantic prosody revisited. International Journal of Corpus Linguistics, 12(2), 249-268.
: Hyland, K. & Tse, P. (2004). Metadiscourse in academic writing: A reappraisal. Applied Linguistics, 25, 156 - 177.
: Hyland, K. (1996). Writing without conviction? Hedging in science research articles. Applied Linguistics, 17(4), 433-454.
: Hyland, K. (1999). Academic attribution: Citation and the construction of disciplinary knowledge. Applied Linguistics, 20 (3), 341-367.
: Hyland, K. (2002). Directives: Argument and engagement in Academic Writing. Applied Linguistics, 23(2), 215-39.
: Hyland, K. (2002). Genre: Language, context and literacy. Annual Review of Applied Linguistics, 22, 113-135.
: Ignatieva, N. & Rodríguez-Vergara, D. (2015). Verbal processes in academic language in Spanish: Exploring discourse genres within the systemic functional framework. Functional Linguistics, 2(2), 1-10.
: Ignatieva, N. (2017). Attitude in student texts: Analysis of verbal, mental and relational clauses in Spanish. En S. Neumann, R. Wegener, J. Fest & P. Niemietz (Eds.), Challenging Boundaries in Linguistics: Systemic Functional Perspectives (pp. 187-202). Frankfurt: Peter Lang.
: Ignatieva, N. (2019). Transitive and attitudinal aspects in a functional analysis of academic discourse in Spanish. Open Journal of Modern Linguistics, 9, 165-178.
: Inoue, M. (2006). Standardization. En K. Brown (Ed.), Encyclopedia of Language & Linguistics (pp. 121-127). Oxford: Elsevier.
: Iuliano, R. (1976). La perífrasis ir + a + infinitivo en el habla culta de Caracas. En F. Aid, M. Resnick & B. Saciuk (Eds.), 1975 Colloquium on Hispanic Linguistics (pp. 59-86). Washington: Georgetown University Press.
: Ivanic, R. (1991). Nouns in search of a context: A study of nouns with both open- and closed-system characteristics. Intenational Review of Applied Linguistics, 29(2), 93-114.
: Ivanič, R. (1994). I is for interpersonal: Discoursal construction of writer identities and the teaching of writing. Linguistics and Education, 6(1), 3-15.
: Izumi, S. (2003). Comprehension and production processes in second language learning: In search of the psycholinguistic rationale of the noticing hypothesis. Applied Linguistics, 24(2), 168-196.
: Jakobson, R. (1961). Linguistics and poetics. New York: Wiley.
: Jarvis, S. (2007). Theoretical and methodological issues in the investigation of conceptual transfer. Vigo International Journal of Applied Linguistics, 4, 43-71.
: Jiang, F. & Hyland, K. (2016). Nouns and academic interactions: A neglected feature of metadiscourse. Applied Linguistics, 37, 1-25.
: Jiang, J. & Conrath, D. (1997). Semantic similarity based on corpus statistics and lexical taxonomy. Ponencia presentada en el International Conference on Research in Computational Linguistics. Taiwán.
: Jin, P., Sun, X., Wu,Y. & Yu, S. (2007). Word clustering for collocation-based word sense disambiguation. In P. Jin, X. Sun,Y.Wu & S.Yu (Eds.), Lecture notes in computer science: Computational linguistics and intelligent text processing (pp. 267–274). Berlin: Springer-Verlag.
: Jones, B. (1996). Towards texting the syntax of punctuation. En Proceedings of the 16th International Conference on Computational Linguistics (COLING-96) (pp. 363-365). Copenhagen: COLING.
: Jones, S. & Sinclair, J. (1974). English lexical collocations. A study in computational linguistics. Cahiers de Lexicology, 24(1), 15-61.
: Joshi, A. (1999). Computational linguistics. En R. Wilson & F. Keil (Eds.), The MIT Encyclopedia of the Cognitive Sciences (pp. 162-164). Masachussets: MIT Press.
: Jurafsky, D. & Martin, J. (2000). An introduction to natural language processing, computational linguistics and speech processing, Prentice Hall.
: Kamberelis, G. & Scott, K. D. (1982). Other people’s voices: The coarticulation of texts and subjectivities. Linguistics and Education, 4, 359‐403.
: Kamide, Y. (2008). Anticipatory processes in sentence processing. Language and Linguistics Compass, 2(4), 647-670. doi: 10.1111/j.1749-818X.2008.00072.x
: Kay, M. (1979). Functional Grammar. Ponencia presentada en el 5th meeting of the Berkeley Linguistics Society, Berkeley Linguistics Society, California, USA.
: Kelly, G. & Bazerman, C. (2003). How students argue scientific claims: A rhetorical-semantic analysis. Applied Linguistics, 24(1), 28-55.
: Kennedy, G. (1998). An introduction to corpus linguistics. New York: Longman.
: Kenneth, W. C. & Hanks, P. (1989). Word association norms, mutual information, and lexicography. En Proceedings of the 27th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics (pp. 76-83). Association for Computational Linguistics.
: Key Words: Academic discourse, professional discourse, disciplinary discourse, Corpus linguistics, Corpus PUCV-2006.
: Key Words: Data-driven learning, digital literacy, online reading and writing, corpus linguistics, computer-assisted-translation.
: Khan, S. & Victori, M. (2011). Improving method-in-use through classroom observation. IRAL - International Review of Applied Linguistics in Language Teaching, 49, 27-53 [on line]. Retrieved from: [153]http://doi.org/10.1515/iral.2011.003
: Khodadady, E. (2009). The beliefs about language learning inventory: Factorial validity, formal education and the academic achievement of Iranian students majoring in English. Iranian Journal of Applied Linguistics, 12(1), 115-166.
: Kiparsky, P. (1982). Lexical phonology and morphology. En I. Yang (Ed.), Linguistics in the morning calm (pp. 3-91). Seúl: Hanshin.
: Kjellmer, G. (1998). A dictionary of English collocations, based on the Brown Corpus. International Journal of Corpus Linguistics, 3(2), 338-348.
: Kratzer, A. (1989). Stage and individual level predicates. Papers on quantification. NSF Grant Report, Linguistics Department, University of Massachusetts, Amherst. USA.
: Kredens, K. & Gorálewska-Lach, G. (1998). Language as sole incriminating evidence: The Augustynek case. Forensic Linguistics. The International Journal of Speech, Language and the Law, 5(2), 193-202.
: Kress, G. (2001). Multimodal teaching and learning: The rhetorics of the science classroom. Advances in applied linguistics. London; New York: Continuum.
: Kuperberg, G. (2010). Language in schizophrenia Part 1: An introduction language and linguistics compass. Journal Compilation Blackwell Publishing, 4(8), 576-589.
: Kurzon, D. (1997). Legal language: Varieties, genres, registers, discourses. International Journal of Applied Linguistics, 7(2), 119-139.
: Kwan, B. (2006). The schematic structure of literature reviews in doctoral theses of applied linguistics. English for Specific Purposes, 25, 30–55.
: Kövecses, Z. & Szabó, P. (1996). Idioms: A view from cognitive linguistics. Applied Linguistics, 17(3), 326-355.
: Kövecses, Z. (2008). Conceptual metaphor theory: Some criticisms and alternative proposals. Annual Review of Cognitive Linguistics, 6(1), 168-184.
: Künzel, H. J. (1997). Some general phonetic and forensic aspects of speaking tempo. Forensic Linguistics. The International Journal of Speech, Language and the Law, 4(1), 48-83.
: Lado, R. (1957). Linguistics across cultures, applied linguistics language leachers. Ann Arbor, MI: University of Michigan Press.
: Lai, Y. H. (2014). Discourse features of Chinese-speaking seniors with and without Alzheimer’s disease. Language and Linguistics, 15(3), 411-434.
: Lakoff, G. (1972). Hedges: A study in meaning criteria and the logic of fuzzy concepts. Proceedings of the Chicago Linguistics Society, 8, 183228.
: Lakoff, G. (1983). Categories: An essay in cognitive linguistics. En Linguistic Society of Korea (Ed.), Linguistics in the Morning Calm. Seúl: Hanshin Publishing Co.
: Lakoff, G. (1992). Metaphors and war: The metaphor system used to justify war in the Gulf. En M. Putz (Ed.), Thirty years of linguistics evolution (pp. 463-481). Amsterdam: Benjamins.
: Lamb, S. (1980). A new look at phonotactics. In J. Copeland & P. Davis (Eds.), Papers in cognitive-stratificational linguistics (pp. 1-18). Houston: Rice University.
: Langacker, R. (2001). Discourse in cognitive grammar. Cognitive Linguistics, 12(2), 143188.
: Langacker, R.W. (1993). Reference-point constructions. Cognitive Linguistics, 4, 1-38.
: Larsen-Freeman, D. (1997). Chaos/complexity Science and second language acquisition. Applied Linguistics, 18, 141-165.
: Lascarides, A. & Asher, N. (1991). Discourse relations and defeasible knowledge. En Proceedings of the 29^th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics (pp. 55-63). Morris-ton, N.J.: Association for Computational Linguistics.
: Lauwers, P. & Willems, D. (2011). Coercion: Definition, challenges, current approaches, and new trends. Linguistics, 49(6), 1219-1235.
: Lee, D. (2001). Cognitive linguistics: An introduction. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
: Leech, G. (1991). The state of the art in corpus linguistics. En K. Aijmer & A. Bengt (Eds.), English Corpus Linguistics. Studies in honor of Jan Svartvik (pp. 829). London: Longman.
: Leech, G. (1992). Corpora and theories of linguistic performance. En J. Svartvik (Ed.), Trends in Linguistics Studies and Monographs Directions in Corpus Linguistics (pp.105-122). Nueva York: Mouton de Gruyter.
: Leeman, J. (2015). Heritage language education and identity in the United States. Annual Review of Applied Linguistics, 35, 100-119.
: Lemke, J. (1992). Interpersonal meaning in discourse: Value orientations. En M.Davies & L.Ravelli (Eds.), Advances in systemic linguistics. Recent theory and practice (pp. 82-104). London: Pinter.
: Lengeris, A. (2008). The effectiveness of auditory phonetic training on Greek native speakers’ perception and production of Southern British English vowels. In Proceedings of the 2nd ISCA Workshop on Experimental Linguistics (pp. 133-136) Athens, Greece.
: Levon, E. (2010). Organizing and processing your data: The nuts and bolts of quantitative analysis. En L. Litosseliti (Ed.), Research Methods in Linguistics (pp. 68-92). Londres: Continuum .
: Lichtenberk, F. (1985). Multiple uses of reciprocal constructions. Australian Journal of Linguistics, 5(1), 19-41.
: Lim, J. M.-H. (2014). Formulating research questions in experimental doctoral dissertations on Applied Linguistics. English for Specific Purposes, 35, 66-88.
: Lindstedt, J. (2006). Perfects, resultatives, and experientials. En K. Brown (Ed.), Encyclopedia of language and linguistics (pp. 270-272). Oxford: Elsevier.
: Llombart-Huesca, A. & Pulido, A. (2017). Who needs linguistics? Service-learning and linguistics for Spanish heritage language learners. Hispania, 100(3), 348-360.
: Loan, N. & Pramoolsook, I. (2015). Move analysis of results-discussion chapters in TESOL Master’s theses written by Vietnamese students. Language, Linguistics, Literature, 21, 1-15.
: Lockwood, D. (1972). Introduction to stratificational linguistics. New York: Harcourt Brace Jovanovich.
: Lorenzo, F. (2017). Historical Literacy in bilingual settings: Cognitive academic language in L2 History Narratives. Linguistics and Education, 37, 32-41.
: Lorenzo, F., Casal, S. & Moore, P. (2010). The effects of content and language integrated learning in European education: Key findings from the Andalusian bilingual sections evaluation project. Applied Linguistics, 31(3), 418-442.
: Lorenzo, F., Granados, A. & Rico, N. (2020). Equity in bilingual education: Socioeconomic status and content and language integrated learning in monolingual Southern Europe. Applied Linguistics, amaa037.
: Loureda, Ó., Cruz, A., Rudka, M., Nadal, L. & Zuloaga, M. (2015). Focus particles in information processing: An experimental study on pragmatic scales with Spanish incluso. Linguistics Online, 71(2), 129-151.
: Louwerse, M. & Graesser, A. (2006). Macroestructure. En E. K. Brown (Ed.), Encyclopedia of language and linguistics (pp. 426-429). Amsterdam: Elsevier.
: Louwerse, M. (2001). An analytic and cognitive parameterization of coherence relations. Cognitive Linguistics, 12, 291-315.
: Louwerse, M.M. & Graesser, A.C. (2004). Coherence in discourse. In P. Strazny (Ed.), Encyclopedia of linguistics. Chicago: Fitzroy Dearborn.
: Louwerse, M.M. (2002a). An analytic and cognitive parameterization of coherence relations. Cognitive Linguistics, 12, 291–315.
: Low, G. (1996) Intensifiers and hedges in questionnaire items and the lexical invisibility hypothesis. Applied Linguistics, 17, 1-37.
: Lu, X. (2010). Automatic analysis of syntactic complexity in second language writing. International Journal of Corpus Linguistics, 15(4), 474-496.
: Lujan-Ortega, V. (1997). The influence of situational factors on the use of compensatory strategies. ESRI Working Papers in Language and Linguistics, 13, 5-49.
: Lundquist, L. (1991). Some considerations on the relations between text linguistics and the study of texts for specific purposes. En H. Schröder (Ed.), Subject-oriented texts: Languages for special purposes & text theory (pp. 231-243). Berlin: W. de Gruyter.
: Luukka, M. R. (1994). Metadiscourse in academic texts. En B. L. Gunnarsson, P. Livell & B. Nordberg (Eds.), Text and Talk in Professional Contexts (pp. 77-88). Upsala: ASLA, The Swedish Association of Applied Linguistics.
: Lynch, T. & Mendelsohn, D. (2002). Listening. En N. Schmitt (Ed.), An introduction to applied linguistics (pp. 193-194). London: Arnold.
: Magaña, D. (2015). From pedagogy to communities: Issues within and beyond the Spanish heritage language classroom. Studies in Hispanic and Lusophone Linguistics, 8(2), 375-388.
: Maienborn, C. (2005). A discourse-based account of Spanish ser/estar. Linguistics, 43(1), 155-180.
: Maienborn, C. (2005). On the limits of The Davidsonian approach: The case of copula sentences. Theoretical Linguistics, 31, 275-316.
: Mairal, R. (2015). Constructional meaning representation within a knowledge engineering framework. Review of Cognitive Linguistics, 13(1), 1-27.
: Marantz, A. (1997). No escape from syntax: Don’t try morphological analysis in the privacy of your own lexicon. En A. Dimitriadis (Eds.), Proceedings of the 21st Annual Penn Linguistics Colloquium. University of Pennsylvania Working Papers in Linguistics, 4(2), 201-225.
: Marantz, A. (2001). Words. Ponencia presentada en el 20 th West Coast Conference on Formal Linguistics. University of Southern California, California, USA.
: Marshall, C. (2006). A relational network perspective of diachronic linguistics: A case study of the French genitive. LACUS Forum, 32, 119-132.
: Martin, J. (1991). Nominalization in science and humanities: Distilling knowledge and scaffolding text. En E. Ventola (Ed.), Functional and systemic linguistics (pp. 307-338). Berlín: Mouton.
: Martin, J. (1993) Genre and literacy - Modeling context in educational linguistics. En W. Grabe et al. (eds.), Annual review of applied linguistics, 13. Issues in second language teaching and learning. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 141-73.
: Martin, J. (2009). Genre and language learning: A social semiotic perspective. Linguistics and Education, 20(1), 10-21.
: Martin, J. (2012). A context for genre: Modelling social processes in functional linguistics. En Z. Wang (Ed.), Genre Studies: Collected Works of J. R. Martin, Volume 3. (pp. 248-77). Shanghai: Shanghai Jiaotong University Press.
: Martin, J. (2015). One of three traditions: Genre, functional linguistics, and the “Syndney School”. En N. Artemeva & A. Freedman (Eds.), Genre studies around the globe: Beyond the three traditions (pp. 31-79). Edmonton, Canada: Inkshed Publications.
: Martin, J. R. ( en prensa b). A context for genre: modelling social processes in functional linguistics. En R. Stainton & J.Devilliers (Eds.), Communication in Linguistics. Toronto: GREF (Collection Theoria).
: Martin, J. R. (1983). Participant identification in English. Tagalog and Kate, Australian Journal of Linguistics, 3(1), 45-74.
: Martin, J. R. (1992a). Theme, method of development and existentiality: The price of reply. Occasional Papers in Systemic Linguistics, 6, 147-183.
: Martin, J. R. (1993). Genre and literacy - modelling context in educational linguistics. Annual Review of Applied Linguistics, 13, 141-172.
: Martin, J. R. (1997b). Register and genre: modelling social context in functional linguistics - narrative genres. En E. Pedro (Ed.), Proceedings of the First Lisbon International Meeting on Discourse Analysis. Lisbon: Colibri/APL.
: Martin, J. R. (1999). Linguistics and the consumer: Theory in practice. Linguistics and Education, 9(3), 409-446.
: Martin, J. R. (2000). Design and practice: Enacting functional linguistics in Australia. Annual Review of Applied Linguistics 20 (20th Anniversary Volume 'Applied Linguistics as an Emerging Discipline'), 116-126.
: Martin, J. R. (2007). Construing knowledge: A functional linguistics perspective. En F. Christie (Ed.), Pedagogy and the shaping of consciousness. Linguistic and social processes (pp. 34-64). London: Continuum.
: Martin, J. R. (en prensa a). A Modelling context: the crooked path of progress in contextual linguistics (Sydney SFL). En M. Ghadessy (Ed.), Context: theory and practice. London: Cassell.
: Martínez, R. & Schmitt, N. (2012). A phrasal expressions list. Applied Linguistics. 33(3), 299-320.
: Maslov, V. & Maslova, T. (2006). On Zipf’s Law and rank distributions in linguistics and semiotics. Mathematical Notes, 80(5), 679-691.
: Maton, K. (2007). Knowledge-knower structures in intellectual and educational fields. En F. Christie & J. Martin (Eds.), Language, knowledge and pedagog y: functional linguistics and sociological perspective (pp. 87-108). Londres: Continuum.
: Matsumoto, Y. (2003). Lexical knowledge acquisition. En R. Mitkov (Ed.), The Oxford handbook of computational linguistics (pp. 396-409). New York: Oxford University Press.
: Matthews, P. H. (2014). Concise Oxford dictionary of linguistics, 2nd edition. Oxford: Oxford University Press .
: Matthiessen, C. (2015). Register in the round: Registerial cartography. Functional Linguistics, 2(1), 1-48.
: Matthiessen, C. M. I. M., Teruya, K. & Lam, M. (2010). Key terms in Systemic Functional Linguistics. Nueva York/Londres: Continuum .
: Matthiessen, C.M.I.M. & Bateman, J. (1991). Text generation and Systemic Functional Linguistics: Experiences from English and Japanese. London: Pinter.
: Maynard, C. & Leicher, S. (2007). Pragmatic annotation of an academic spoken corpus for pedagogical purposes. En E. Fitzpatrick (Ed.), Corpus Linguistics beyond the word: Corpus research from phrase to discourse. Ámsterdam: Rodopi.
: McCarthy, M. & Handford, M. (2004). Invisible to us: A preliminary corpus-based study of spoken business English. En U. Connor & T. Upton (Eds.), Discourse in the professions. Perspectives from corpus linguistics (pp. 167-202). Amsterdam: Benjamins.
: McCarthy, M. & OKeeffe, A. (2004). Research in the teaching of speaking. Annual Review of Applied Linguistics, 24, 26-43.
: McEnery, T. & Hardie, A. (2011). Corpus linguistics: Method, theory and practice (Cambridge textbooks in linguistics). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
: McEnery, T. & Wilson, A. (1996). Corpus linguistics. Edinburgh: Edinburg University Press.
: McGee, I. D. (2008). Word frequency estimates revisited - A response to Alderson (2007). Applied Linguistics, 29(3), 509-514.
: McLaughlin, B. (1990). Restructuring. Applied Linguistics, 11(2), 113-128.
: McNally, L. & de Swart, H. (2015). Reference to and via properties: The view from Dutch. Linguistics and Philosophy, 38, 315-362.
: Mei, A. & Nathalang, S. (2010). Use of communication strategies by Chinese EFL learners. Chinese Journal of Applied Linguistics,
: Mel’čuk, I. (1995). Phrasemes in language and phraseology in linguistics. In M. Everaert, E.-J. van der Linden, A. Schenk & R. Schreuder (Eds.), Idioms: Structural and Psychological perspectives (pp. 167–232). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
: Menéndez, S. M. (2017a). Agentividad: Causalidad y Ejecución. La Proyección Discursiva de los Procesos. Ponencia presentada en la 27th ESFLC (European Systemic Functional Linguistics Conference), Universidad de Salamanca, Salamanca, España.
: Messineo, C. (2003). Lengua toba (guaycurú). Aspectos gramaticales y discursivos. En Lincom Studies in Native American Linguistics 48. Muenchen: Lincom Europa Academic Publisher.
: Messineo, C. (2004). Toba discourse as verbal art. Anthropological Linguistics, 46(4), 216-238. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.
: Mihatsch, W. (2012). Hedges. En C. A. Chappelle (Ed.), The Encyclopedia of Applied Linguistics (pp. 2457-2462). Oxford: Wiley-Blackwell.
: Mihatsch, W. (2013). Hedges. The enciclopedia of applied linguistics, 2457-2462.
: Mitchell, T. (1975) The language of buying and selling in Cyrenaica: A situational statement. En T. Mitchell (Ed.), Principles of firthian linguistics (pp. 167200). London: Longman.
: Mitkov, R. (2009). Anaphora resolution. En R. Mitkov (Ed.), The Oxford Handbook of Computational Linguistics (pp. 266-283). Oxford: Oxford University Press .
: Mittwoch, A. (1991). In defence of Vendlers achievements. Belgian Journal of Linguistics, 6, 71-85.
: Moessner, L. (1997). Economy as a principle of syntactic change. In R. Hickey & S. Puppel (Eds.), Trends in linguistics: Language history and linguistic modelling (pp. 357-372). Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter .
: Monaghan, J. (1979). The Neo-Firthian Tradition and its Contribution to General Linguistics. Tübingen: Max Niemeyer.
: Montemurro, M. (2001). Beyond the Zipf-Mandelbrot Law in quantitative linguistics. Physica: A Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, 300(4-5), 567-578.
: Moore, J. & Pollack, M. (1992). A problem for RST: The need for multi-level discourse analysis. Computational Linguistics, 18, 537-544.
: Moore, J. Schleppegrell, M. & Palincsar, A. S. (2018). Discovering disciplinary linguistic knowledge with English learners and their teachers: Applying systemic Functional linguistics concepts through design-based research. TESOL Quarterly, 52(4), 1022-1049. DOI: 10.1002/tesq.472
: Moore, K. E. (2006). Space-to-time mappings and temporal concepts. Cognitive Linguistics, 17, 199-244.
: Moreno-Fernández, F. (2007). Anglicismos en el léxico disponible de los adolescentes hispanos de Chicago. In K. Potowski & R. Cameron (Eds.), Spanish in Contact: Policy, Social and Linguistics Inquiries (pp. 41-58). Amsterdam, Netherlands: John Benjamins .
: Mori, J. & Hayashi, M. (2006). The achievement of intersubjectivity through embodied completions: A study of interactions between First and Second Language Speakers. Applied Linguistics, 27(2), 195-219.
: Morin, R. (2010). Terminal letters, phonemes, and morphemes in Spanish gender assignment. Linguistics, 48(1), 143-169.
: Morley, J. & Partington, A. (2009). A few Frequently Asked Questions about semantic –or evaluative– prosody. International Journal of Corpus Linguistics, 14(2), 139-158.
: Moskowich, I. & Crespo, B. (2014). Stance in present scientific writing, indeed. Evidence from the Coruña Corpus of English scientific writing. TOKEN. A Journal of English Linguistics, 3, 91-113.
: Moskowich, I. & Crespo, B. (2018). Categories and genres in CHET and CECHeT. En A. Moreno Ortiz & C. Pérez Hernández (Eds.), International Conference on Corpus Linguistics. EPiC Series in Language and Linguistics, 1, 308-294. [93]https://doi.org/10.29007/kvjx
: Mourelatos, A. (1978). Events, processes and states. Linguistics and Philosophy, 2, 415-34.
: Murillo, S. (2012). The use of reformulation markers in Business Management research articles: An intercultural analysis. International Journal of Corpus Linguistics, 17(1), 64-90.
: Myers, G. (1989). Pragmatic politeness in scientific articles. Applied linguistics, 10, 1-35.
: Naskar, S. K. & Bandyopadhyay, S. (2007). JU-SKNSB: Extended WordNet based WSD on the English all-words task at SemEval-1. Proceedings of the 4th International Workshop on Semantic Evaluations (pp. 203-206). Association for Computational Linguistics.
: Nazar, R. & Renau, I. (2012). Google Books N-gram corpus used as a grammar checker. Proceedings of EACL 2012: Second Workshop on Computational Linguistics and Writing. Avignon, France [en línea]. Disponible en:
: Nesbitt, C. & Plum, G. (1988). Probabilities in a systemic grammar: The clause complex in English. En R. Fawcett & D. Young (Eds.), New developments in systemic linguistics (pp. 6-38). London: Frances Pinter.
: Nolan, B. (2014). Theoretical and computational considerations of linking constructions in Role and Reference Grammar. Review of Cognitive Linguistics 12(2), 410-442.
: Norris, J. & Ortega, L. (2009). Towards an organic approach to investigating CAF in instructed SLA: The case of complexity. Applied Linguistics, 30(4), 555-578.
: Nouwen, R. (2000). Remarks on the polar orientation of almost. En J. van de Weijer & B. Los (Ed.), Linguistics in the Netherlands (pp. 162-173). Ámsterdam: John Benjamins.
: Nunberg, G. (1990). The linguistics of punctuation. Stanford: CSLI Lecture Notes. Stanford University Press.
: Ono, T. & Thompson, S. (1995). What can conversation tell us about syntax? En P. Davis (Ed.), Descriptive and theoretical modes in alternative linguistics (pp. 213-271). Amsterdam & Philadelphia: John Benjamins.
: Onysko, A., Callies, M. & Ogiermann, E. (2013). Gender variation of anglicisms in German: The influence of cognitive factors and regional varieties. Poznan Studies in Contemporary Linguistics, 49, 103-136.
: Ormeño, V. & Rosas, M. (2015). Creencias acerca del aprendizaje de una lengua extranjera en un programa de formación inicial de profesores de inglés en Chile. Colombian Applied Linguistics Journal, 17(2), 207-228.
: Overstreet, M. (1998). Text enhancement and content familiarity: The focus of learner attention. Spanish Applied Linguistics, 2(2), 229-258.
: Oxford, R. (1993). Research on second language learning strategies. Annual Review of Applied Linguistics, 13, 175-187 [en línea]. Disponible en: [337]http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/S0267190500002452
: Oxford, R. (1994). Language learning strategies: An update. ERIC Digest . (Report No. EDO-FL-95-02). ERIC Clearinghouse on Language and Linguistics: Washington, DC [en línea]. Disponible en: [339]http://www.ericdigests.org/1995-2/update.htm
: Oyelaran, O. (1967). Aspects of linguistic theory in Firthian linguistics. Word, 23, 428-452.
: O’Hallaron, C. L, Palincsar, A. S. & Schleppegrell, M. J. (2015). Reading science: Using systemic functional linguistics to support critical language awareness. Linguistics and Education, 32, 55-67. DOI: 10.1016/j.linged.2015.02.002
: O’Halloran, K. (2007). Critical discourse analysis and the corpus-informed interpretation of metaphor at the register level. Applied Linguistics, 28, 1-24.
: Palmer, F. R. (1986). Mood and modality. Cambridge textbooks in linguistics. Cambridge, New York: Cambridge University Press.
: Palmer, M., Fellbaum, C., Cotton, S., Delfs, L. & Dang, H. T. (2001). English tasks: All-words and verb lexical sample. The Proceedings of the Second International Workshop on Evaluating Word Sense Disambiguation Systems (pp. 21-24). Association for Computational Linguistics.
: Palmer, M., Gildea, D. & Kingsbury, P. (2005). The proposition bank: An annotated corpus of semantic roles. Computational linguistics, 31(1), 71-106.
: Pantel, P. & Pennacchiotti, M. (2006). Espresso: Leveraging generic patterns for automatically harvesting semantic relations. En Proceedings of Conference on Computational Linguistics Association for Computational Linguistics. Sydney: ACL.
: Panther, K. & Thornburg, L. (2007). Metonymy. En D. Geeraerts & H. Cuyckens (Eds.), The Oxford Handbook of Cognitive Linguistics (pp. 236-263). Oxford: University Press.
: Parodi, G. (2015). Variation across university genres in seven disciplines. A corpus-based study on academic written Spanish. International Journal of Corpus Linguistics, 20(4), 469-499. [231]https://doi 10.1075/ijcl.20.4.03par
: Partington, A. (2004). Utterly Content in Each Other’s Company: Semantic Prosody and Semantic Preference. International Journal of Corpus Linguistics, 9, 131-156.
: París, L. (2008). On expanditures. En N. Adam, A. Cooper, F. Parrill & T. Wier (Eds.), Proceedings of the 40th Regional Meeting of the Chicago Linguistic Society. Main Session (pp. 291-304). Chicago: Chicago Linguistics Society.
: Patwardhan, S., Banerjee, S. & Pedersen, T. (2003). Using measures of semantic relatedness for word sense disambiguation. International Conference on Intelligent Text Processing and Computational Linguistics (pp. 241-257). Springer Berlin Heidelberg.
: Peacock, M. & Ho, B. (2003). Student language learning strategies across eight disciplines.International Journal of Applied Linguistics, 13(2), 17-200 [en línea]. Disponible en: [354]http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/1473-4192.00043
: Pearce, W., James, D. & McCormack, P. (2010). A comparison of oral narratives children with specific language and non-Specific Language Impairment. Clinical Linguistics & Phonetics, 24(8), 622-646.
: Pederson, L. (1996). LAMR/LAWS and the Main Chance. Journal of English Linguistics, 24(3), 234-249.
: Penka, D. (2006). Almost there: The meaning of almost. Proceedings of Sinn und Bedeutung 10. ZAS Papers in Linguistics, 44, 272-286.
: Periñán, C. (2013). Towards a model of constructional meaning for natural language understanding. In B. Nolan & E. Diedrichsen (Eds.), Linking constructions into Functional Linguistics: The role of constructions in grammar (pp. 205-230). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
: Philip, G. (2009). Why prosodies aren’t always present. Insights into the idiom principle. Proceedings of the Corpus Linguistics Conference, University of Liverpool, Liverpool.
: Pho, P. (2008). Research article abstracts in applied linguistics and educational technology: A study of linguistic realizations of rhetorical structure and authorial stance. Discourse Studies, 10, 231-250.
: Pietrandea, P. (2007). The grammatical nature of some epistemic-evidential adverbs in spoken italian. Italian Journal of Linguistics, 19(1), 39-63.
: Piller, I. (2003). Advertising as a site of language contact. Annual Review of Applied Linguistics, 23, 170-183.
: Piqué-Angordans, J. & Posteguillo, S. (2006). Medical discourse and academic genres. In K. Brown (Ed.), The Encyclopedia of Language and Linguistics (pp. 649-657). London: Elsevier.
: Pojanapunya, P. & Watson, R. (2009). Relevance of findings in results to discussion sections in applied linguistics research. English for Specific Purposes, 22(4), 365-385.
: Polinsky, M. & Kagan, O. (2007). Heritage languages: In the ‘wild’ and in the classroom. Language and Linguistics Compass 1(5), 368-395.
: Polio, C. & Yoon, H. J. (2018). The reliability and validity of automated tools for examining variation in syntactic complexity across genres. International Journal of Applied Linguistics, 28(1), 165-188.
: Portner, P. (2006). Comments on Faller’s paper. Ponencia presentada en Workshop on Philosophy and Linguistics, University of Michigan, Michigan.
: Posio, P. (2012). The functions of postverbal pronominal subjects in spoken Peninsular Spanish and European Portuguese. Studies in Hispanic and Lusophone Linguistics, 5(1), 149-190.
: Pozzer-Ardenghi, P. & Roth, W. (2005). Photographs in lectures: Gestures as meaning-making resources. Linguistics and Education, 15, 275-293.
: Pradhan, S. S., Loper, E., Dligach, D. & Palmer, M. (2007). SemEval-2007 task 17: English lexical sample, SRL and all words. Proceedings of the 4th International Workshop on Semantic Evaluations (pp. 87-92). Association for Computational Linguistics.
: Preston, D. (2011). Methods in (applied) folk linguistics. AILA Review, 24, 15-39.
: Prince, E. F. (1990). Syntax and discourse: A look at resumptive pronouns. En D. J. Costa (Ed.), Proceedings of the Sixteenth Annual Meeting of the Berkeley Linguistics Society (pp. 482-497). California: Berkeley Linguistic Society.
: Prince, E., Bosk, C. & Frader, J. (1982). On hedging in physician-physician discourse. En J. di Pietro (Ed.), Linguistics and the professions (pp. 83-97). Norwood: Ablex.
: Pustejovsky, J. & Anick, P. (1988). On the semantic interpretation of nominal. Ponencia presentada en el 12 th International Conference On Computational Linguistics, Budapest, Hungría.
: Pustejovsky, J. & Jezek, E. (2009). Semantic ccoercion in language: Beyond distributional analysis. Italian Journal of Linguistics, 20(2), 181-214.
: Pustejovsky, J. (1991). The generative lexicon. Computational Linguistics, 17(4), 409-441.
: Pustejovsky, J. (2011). Coercion in a general theory of argument selection. Linguistics, 49(6), 1401-1431.
: Querido, A. (1976). The semantics of copulative constructions in Portuguese. In M. Luján & F. Hensey (Eds.), Current studies in Romance linguistics (pp. 343-366). Washington D.C.: Georgetown University Press.
: Quiroz, B. (2008). Towards a systemic profile of the Spanish MOOD. Linguistics and the Human Sciences, 4(1), 31-65.
: Quiroz, B. (2017). The verbal group. En T. Bartlett & G. O'Grady (Eds.), The Routledge handbook of Systemic Functional Linguistics (pp. 301-318). Londres/Nueva York: Routledge.
: Rabab’ah, G. & Bulut, D. (2007). Compensatory strategies in Arabic as a second language. Poznań Studies in Contemporary Linguistics, 43(2), 83-106.
: Raskin, V. (1987). Linguistics and natural language processing. In S. Nirenburg (Ed.), Machine translation: Theoretical and methodological issues (pp. 42-58). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
: Recasens, M., Martí, M. & Taulé, M. (2009). First-mention definites: More than exceptional cases. En S. Featherston & S. Winkler (Eds.), The Fruits of Empirical Linguistics (pp. 768-793). Berlin: de Gruyter.
: Rees, A. (1983). Pronouns of person and power: A Study of personal pronouns in public discourse. Unpublished Master’s Thesis. Department of Linguistics. University of Sheffield.
: Reinhart, T. (1982). Pragmatics and linguistics: An analysis of sentence topics. Philosophica, 27, 53-94.
: Reinhart, T. (1984). Principles of Gestalt perception in the temporal organization of narrative texts. Linguistics, 22, 779-809.
: Reisinger, D., Rudinger, R., Ferraro, F., Harman, C., Rawlins, K. & Van Durme, B. (2015). Semantic proto-roles. Transactions of the Association for Computational Linguistics, 3, 475-488.
: Reitter, E. & Moore, J. (2007). Predicting success in dialogue. En Proceedings of 44th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics, 1 (45), 808-815.
: Renkema, J. (1986). The stylistics of Dutch officialese. En J. van Oosten and J. P. Snapper (Eds.) Dutch Linguistics at Berkeley, Proceedings of a Colloquium. Berkeley, pp. 85-98.
: Renouf, A. & Sinclair, J. (1991). Collocational frameworks in English. En K. Aijmer & B. Altenberg (Eds.), English corpus linguistics: Studies in honour of Jan Svartvik (pp. 128-145). London: Longman.
: Renouf, A., Kehoe, A. & Banerjee, J. (2007). WebCorp: An integrated system for web text search. En M. Hundt, N. Nesselhauf & C. Biewer (Eds.), Corpus Linguistics and the Web (pp. 47-67). Ámsterdam: Rodopi.
: Reppen, R. (2004). Academic language: An exploration of university classroom and textbook language. En U. Connor & T. Upton (Eds), Discourse in the professions. Perspectives from corpus linguistics (pp. 65-87). Amsterdam: Benjamins.
: Reppen, R. (2010). Building a corpus: What are the key considerations. En A. OÂ´Keeffe & M. McCarthy (Eds.), The Routledge Handbook of Corpus Linguistics (pp. 31-38). Nueva York: Routledge.
: Richards, J. C. & Schmidt, R.W. (2002). Longman Dictionary of Language Teaching and Applied Linguistics (3^rd edn.). Harlow, Essex and London: Pearson Education/Longman.
: Rodríguez-Sabater, S. (2015). Service learning and intercultural competence in the Spanish as a second language classroom. Southern Journal of Linguistics, 39(1), 1-23.
: Rojo, G. (2015). Hispanic corpus linguistics. En M. Lacorte (Ed.), The Routledge Handbook of Hispanic Applied Linguistics (pp. 371-386). Nueva York: Routledge.
: Rose, D. (2006). Metaphors, grammatical. En K. Brown (Ed.), Encyclopedia of Language & Linguistics. 2^nd ed. (pp. 66-73). Oxford: Elsevier.
: Rose, D. (2007). Reading genre: A new wave of analysis. Linguistics and the Human Sciences, 2, 1.
: Rose, D. (2014). Analysing pedagogic discourse: An approach from genre and register. Functional Linguistics 1(11), 1-13 [en línea]. Disponible en: [205]https://doi.org/10.1186/s40554-014-0011-4
: Rose, H. (2012). Reconceptualizing strategic learning in the face of self-regulation: Throwing language learning strategies out with the bathwater. Applied Linguistics, 33(1), 92-98 [en línea]. Disponible en: [371]http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/applin/amr045
: Rothery, J. (1996). Making changes: Developing an educational linguistics. En R. Hasan & G. Williams (Eds.), Literacy in Society. (pp. 86-123). Harlow, Essex, Addison Wesley Longman.
: Rowley-Jolivet, E. & Carter-Thomas, S. (2005). The rhetoric of conference presentation introductions: context, argument and interaction. International Journal of Applied Linguistics, 15(1), 45-70.
: Rubin, J. (1981). Study of cognitive processes in second Language learning. Applied Linguistics, 2(2), 117-131 [en línea]. Disponible en: [373]http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/applin/2.2.117
: Ruiying, Y. & Allison, D. (2003). Research articles in applied linguistics: moving from results to conclusions. English for Specific Purposes, 22(4), 365-385.
: Salaberry, R. M. (1999). The development of past tense verbal morphology in classroom L2 Spanish. Applied Linguistics, 20, 151-178.
: Salager Meyer, F. & Alcaraz Ariza, M.A. (2003). Academic criticism in Spanish medical discourse: A cross-generic approach. International Journal of Applied Linguistics, 13(1), 96-114.
: Salager-Meyer, F., Defives, G. & Hamelynck, M. (1996). Epistemic modality in 19th and 20th century medical English written discourse: A principal component analysis. Interface. Journal of Applied Linguistics, 10, 163-199.
: SalagerMeyer, F. (1990a). Discoursal movements in medical English abstracts and their linguistic exponents: A genre analysis study. Interface . Journal of Applied Linguistics, 4(2), 107124.
: Sanders, T. & Maat, H. P. (2006). Cohesion and coherence: Linguistic approaches. En K. Brown, (Ed.), Encyclopedia of Language & Linguistics (pp. 591-595). Ámsterdam: Elsevier.
: Sanders, T. & Spooren, W. (2001). Modeling causal and contrastive connectives: On domains, subjectivity and mental spaces. International Cognitive Linguistics Conference. Santa Barbara, CA: USA.
: Sankoff, G. (2006). Age: Apparent time and real time. En K. Brown (Ed.), Encyclopedia of language and linguistics (pp. 110-116). Oxford: Elsevier.
: Santos, M. B. D. (1996). The textual organization of research of research paper abstracts in applied linguistics. Text & Talk, 16(4), 481-500.
: Saussure, F. de (1983 ). Course in general linguistics. London: Duckworth.
: Schleppegrell, M. (2004). The language of schooling. A functional linguistics perspective. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
: Schleppegrell, M. J. (2001). Linguistic features of the language of schooling. Linguistics and Education, 12(4), 431-459.
: Schleppegrell, M. J. (2004). The language of schooling. A functional linguistics perspective. Nueva Jersey: Lawrence Erlbaum.
: Schmidt, R. (1990). The role of consciousness in second language learning. Applied Linguistics, 11(2), 17-46.
: Schneider, E. W. & Kretzschmar Jr, W. A. (1989). LAMSAS goes SASsy: Statistical methods and linguistic atlas data. Journal of english linguistics, 22(1), 129-136.
: Schneider, K. (2005) Techniques for improving the performance of naive Bayes for text classification. En International conference on computational linguistics and intelligent text processing. Ciudad de México, México.
: Schulz, K. & van Rooij, R. (2006). Pragmatic meaning and non-monotonic reasoning: The case of exhaustive interpretation. Linguistics and Philosophy, 29, 205-250.
: Sedano, M. (1996). Estructura y forma de las hendidas en cinco lenguas románicas: Tensión entre economía y claridad. Hispanics Linguistics, 8(1), 123153.
: Sharwood-Smith, M. (1981). Consciousness-raising and the second language learner. Applied linguistics, 2(2), 159-168.
: Sheen, Y. & Ellis, R. (2011). Corrective feedback in language teaching. En E. Hinkel (Ed.), Handbook on Research in Second Language Teaching and Learning (ESL & Applied Linguistics Professional Series) (pp. 593-610). Nueva York: Routledge.
: Shleppegrell, M. (2004). The language of schooling. A functional linguistics perspective. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
: Sidorov, G. (2014). Should syntactic N-grams contain names of syntactic relations? International Journal of Computational Linguistics and Applications, 5(1), 139-158.
: Silva Corvalán, C. & Terrell, T. (1992). Notas sobre la expresión de futuridad en el español del Caribe. Hispanic Linguistics, 2, 190-208.
: Simpson, R. (2004). Stylistic features of academic speech: The role of formulaic expressions. En U. Connor & T. Upton (Eds.), Discourse in the professions. Perspectives from corpus linguistics (pp. 37-64). Amsterdam: Benjamins.
: Sinclair, J. (2004b). Meaning in the Framework of Corpus Linguistics. Lexicographica, 20, 20-32.
: Skehan, P. (2009). Modelling second language performance: Integrating complexity, accuracy, fluency, and lexis. Applied Linguistics, 30(4), 510-532.
: Skelton, J. (1997). The representation of truth in academic medical writing. Applied Linguistics, 18(2), 121-140.
: Slobin, D. (1987). Thinking for speaking. En J. Aske, N. Beery, L. Michaelis & H. Filip (Eds.), Berkeley Linguistics Society: Proceedings of the Thirteenth Annual Meeting (pp. 435444). Berkeley, CA: BLS.
: Snow, R., Jurafsky, D. & Ng, A. (2006). Semantic taxonomy induction from heterogeneous evidence. En Proceedings of the 21st International Conference on Computational Linguistics. Sydney: Association for Computational Linguistics.
: Soozandehfar, S. M. A. (2010). Is oral performance affected by motivation?Journal of Pan-Pacific Association of Applied Linguistics, 14(2), 105-119.
: Spoelman, M. & Verspoor, M. (2010). Dynamic patterns in development of accuracy and complexity: A longitudinal case study in the acquisition of finnish. Applied Linguistics, 31(4), 532-553.
: Steensig, J. (2012). Conversation analysis and affiliation and alignment. En C. A. Chapelle (Ed.), The Encyclopedia of Applied Linguistics. Oxford, Blackwell Publishing. [191]https://doi.org/10.1002/9781405198431.wbeal0196
: Steiner, E. (1992). Some representational issues in a fragmentary systemic grammar of German. Duisburg: LAUD Papers in Linguistics.
: Stirling, L. (2001). The multifunctionality of anaphoric expressions: A typological perspective. Australian Journal of Linguistics, 21(1), 7-23.
: Stubbs, M. (1986). A matter of prolonged field work: Notes toward a modal of grammar of English. Applied Linguistics, 7(1), 125.
: Stubbs, M. (1996). Text and Corpus Linguistics. Oxford: Blackwell.
: Stubbs, M. (2000). Society, education and language: The last 2,000 (and the next 20) years of language teaching. En H. Trappes-Lomax (Ed.), Change and continuity in applied linguistics (pp. 15-34). Clevedon: Multilingual Matters.
: Sukkarieh, J., Pulman, S. & Raikes, N. (2003). Auto-marking: Using computational linguistics to score short, free text responses. Proceedings of the 29^th Annual Conference of the International Association for Educational Assessment, Manchester, U.K.
: Sutcliffe, P.C. (2001). Humboldt’s ergon and energeia in Friedrich Max Müller’s and William Dwight Whitney’s Theories of Language. Logos and Language. Journal of General Linguistics and Language Theory, 2(2), 15-35.
: Svartvik, J. (Ed.) (1992). Directions in corpus linguistics. New York: Mouton de Gruyter.
: Swain, M. & Lapkin, S. (1995). Problems in output and the cognitive processes they generate: A step towards second language learning. Applied Linguistics, 16(3), 371-391.
: Swain, M. (1995). Three functions of output in second language learning. In G. Cook & B. Seidlhofer (Eds.), Principle and practice in applied linguistics: Studies in honour of H.G. Widdowson (pp. 125-44). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
: Swales, J. (1986). Citation analysis and discourse analysis. Applied Linguistics, 7(1), 39-56.
: Swales, J. M. (1990). Genre analysis: English in academic and research settings. Cambridge Applied Linguistics. Cambridge:Cambridge University Press.
: Swales, J. M., Ahmad, U. K., Chang, Y-Y., Chávez, D., Dressen, D. F. & Seymour, R. (1998). Consider this: The role of imperatives in scholarly writing. Applied Linguistics, 19(1), 97-121.
: Szarvas, G. (2008). Hedge classification in biomedical texts with a weakly supervised selection of keywords. Ponencia presentada en el 46th Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics, Ohio, USA.
: Sánchez-López, L. (2012). Spanish for specific purposes. In C. Chapel (Ed.), Encyclopedia of Applied Linguistics (pp. 5319-5326). Oxford, UK: Blackwell .
: Săftoiu, R. & Popescu, C. (2012). Brands in post-communist Romanian political arena, Word and Text. A Journal of Literary Studies and Linguistics, II(1), 177-192.
: Taavitsainen, I. & Pahta, P. (2000). Conventions of professional writing: The medical case report in a historical perspective. Journal of English Linguistics, 28, 60-76.
: Tannen, D. (1983). “I take out the rok-dok!”: How Greek women tell about being molested (and create involvement). Anthropological Linguistics, 25(3)359-374.
: Tannen, D. (1988). Hearing voices in conversation, fiction, and mixed genres. En D. Tannen (Ed.), Linguistics in contexts: Connecting observation and understanding (pp. 89-113). Norwood, N.J.: Ablex Publishing Company.
: Teubert, W. (2005). My version of corpus linguistics. International Journal of Corpus Linguistics, 10(1), 1-13.
: Thompson, G. & Ye, Y. (1991). Evaluation in the reporting verbs used in academic papers. Applied Linguistics, 12(1), 365382.
: Thompson, G. (1996). Voices in the text: Discourse perspectives on language reports. Applied Linguistics, 17, 501530.
: Thompson, G. (2001). Interaction in academic writing: Learning to argue with the reader. Applied Linguistics, 22, 5878.
: Thompson, S. (1990). Information flow and 'dative shift' in English. En J. Edmondson, K. Feagin & P. Mühlhäusler (Eds.), Development and diversity: Linguistic variation across time and space (pp. 239- 253). Dallas: Summer Institute of Linguistics.
: Thornburg, L. & Panther, K. (1997). Speech act metonymies. En W. Liebert, G. Redeker & L. Waugh (Eds.), Discourse and perspectives in cognitive linguistics (pp. 205-219). Amsterdam and Philadelphia: Benjamins.
: Tognini-Bonelli, E. (2001). Corpus Linguistics at Work. Studies in Corpus Linguistics. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
: Tono, Y. (2003). Learner corpora: Design, development and applications. En D. Archer, P. Rayson, A. Wilson & T. McEnery (Eds.), Proceedings of the Corpus Linguistics 2003 Conference (pp. 800-809). Lancaster (UK): University Centre for Computer Corpus Research on Language.
: Towell, R., Hawkins, R. & Bazergui, N. (1996). The development of fluency in advanced learners of French. Applied Linguistics, 17(1), 84-119.
: Trask, R. L. (1999). Key concepts in language and linguistics. London: Routledge.
: Tsatsaronis, G., Varlamis, I. & NÃ¸rvÃ¥g, K. (2010). SemanticRank: Ranking keywords and sentences using semantic graphs. Ponencia presentada en el 23rd International Conference on Computational Linguistics, Beijing, China.
: Tseng, W. T., Dörnyei, Z. & Schmitt, N. (2006). A new approach to assessing strategic learning: The case of self-regulation in vocabulary acquisition. Applied Linguistics, 27(1), 78-102 [en línea]. Disponible en: [383]http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/applin/ami046
: Tzoukermann, E., Klavans, J. & Strzalkowski, T. (2003). Information retrieval. En R. Mitkov (Ed.), The Oxford handbook of computational linguistics (pp. 530-544). New York: Oxford University Press.
: University of Joensuu electronic publications in linguistics and language technology, 1, 180-185 [en línea]. Disponible en: [60]http://epublications.uef.fi/pub/urn_isbn_952-458-771-8/urn_isbn_952-458-771-8.pdf#page=187
: Unsworth, L. (1998). "Sound" explanations in school science: A functional linguistic perspective on effective apprenticing texts. Linguistics and Education, 9(2), 199-226.
: Unsworth, L. (Ed.). (2000). Researching language in Schools and communities: Functional linguistics approaches. London: Cassell.
: Ure, J., & Ellis, J. (1977). Register in descriptive linguistics and linguistic sociology. En O. Uribe-Villas (Ed.), Issues in Sociolinguistics (pp. 197-243). The Hague: Mouton.
: Ureña, J. M. & Faber, P. (2010). Reviewing imagery in resemblance and non-resemblance metaphors. Cognitive Linguistics, 21(1), 123-149.
: Usonienė, A. (2000). On the modality of the English verbs of seeming. Belgian Journal of Linguistics, 14(1), 185-205.
: Valdés, G. (2001). Heritage language students: Profiles and possibilities. In J. K. Peyton, D. A. Ranard & S. McGinnis (Eds.), Heritage Language in America Preserving a Natural Source (pp. 37-77). Washington, DC, and McHenry, IL: Center of Applied Linguistics and Delta Systems.
: Vandergrift, L. (2004). Listening to learn or learning to listen? Annual Review of Applied Linguistics, 24, 3-23.
: Varela Suárez, A. (2017). The question-answer adjacency pair in dementia discourse. International Journal of Applied Linguistics, 1-16.
: Vassileva, I. (1998). Who am I/who are we in academic writing? A contrastive analysis of authorial presence in English, German, French, Russian and Bulgarian. International Journal of Applied Linguistics, 8(2), 163-190.
: Velardi, P., Pazienza, M. T. & Fasolo, M. (1991). How to encode semantic knowledge: A method for meaning representation and computer-aided acquisition. Computational Linguistics, 17(2), 153-170.
: Vendler, Z. (1967). Linguistics in Philosophy. Cornell University Press: Ithaca.
: Vennemann, T. (1974). Topic, subject and word-order: From SXV to SVX via TVX. En J. M. Anderson & C. Jones (Eds.), Historical linguistics (pp. 339-376). Amsterdam: North- Holland.
: Ventola, E. (1992). Writing scientific English: Overcoming intercultural problems. International Journal of Applied Linguistics, 2(2), 191219.
: Vercellotti, M. (2015). The development of complexity, accuracy, and fluency in second language performance: A longitudinal study. Applied Linguistics, 36(2), 1-23.
: Verkuyl, H. (1989). Aspectual classes and aspectual composition. Linguistics and Philosophy, 12, 39-64.
: Verspoor, M. & Van Dijk, M. (2014). Variability in a dynamic systems approach. En C. Chapelle (Ed.), The encyclopedia of Applied Linguistics (pp. 6051-6059). Oxford: Wiley-Blackwell.
: Vickrey, D., Biewald, L., Teyssier, M. & Koller, D. (2005). Word-sense disambiguation for machine translation. Proceedings of the conference on Human Language Technology and Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing (pp. 771-778). Association for Computational Linguistics.
: Villa, D. J. (2004). Heritage language speakers and upper-division language instruction: Findings from a Spanish linguistics program. In H. Byrnes & H. H. Maxim (Eds.), Advanced Foreign Language Learning: A Challenge to College Programs (pp. 88-98). Boston, MA: Heinle.
: Villalba, X. (2008). Definite adjective nominalizations in Spanish. En M. T. Espinal, M. Leonetti & L. McNally (Eds.), Journal of Linguistics (pp. 137-151). Alemania: Universität Konstanz.
: Vitevitch, M. S. & Luce, P. A. (2016). Phonological neighbourhood effects in spoken word perception and production. Annual Review of Linguistics, 2, 75-94.
: Vold, E. (2006). Epistemic modality markers in research articles: A cross-linguistic and cross-disciplinary study. International Journal of Applied Linguistics, 16(1), 61-87.
: WIDDOWSON, H. (1979) Conceptual and communicative functions in written discourse. U. London. Applied linguistics Vol. 1 (3).
: Wang, T. & Hirst, G. (2014). Applying a Naive Bayes Similarity Measure to Word Sense Disambiguation. Proceedings of the 52nd Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics (Short Papers) (pp. 531-537). Association for Computational Linguistics.
: Warren, M. (2004). So what have you been working on recently? Compiling a specialized corpus of spoken business English. En U. Connor & T. Upton (Eds.), Discourse in the professions. Perspectives from corpus linguistics (pp. 115-140). Amsterdam: Benjamins.
: Webb, S. (2007). The effects of repetition on vocabulary knowledge. Applied Linguistics, 28(1), 46-65.
: Weinert, R. (1995). The role of formulaic language in second language acquisition: A review. Applied Linguistics, 16(2), 180205.
: White, H. D. (2004). Citation analysis and discourse analysis revisited. Applied Linguistics, 25(1), 89-116.
: Whitley, M. (1986). Spanish-English contrasts: A course in Spanish linguistics. Washington, D.C.: Georgetown University Press.
: Whitsitt, S. (2005). A critique of the concept of semantic prosody. International Journal of Corpus Linguistics, 10, 283-305.
: Widdowson, H. (2000). On the limitations of linguistics applied. Applied Linguistics, 21, 3-25.
: Wignell, P. (1994). Genre across the curriculum. Linguistics and Education, 6, 355-372.
: Wignell, P., Martin, J. R. & Eggins, S. (1989). The discourse of geography: Ordering and explaining the experiential world. Linguistics and Education, 1(4), 359-392.
: Wiley, T. G. (2001). On defining heritage languages and their speakers. In J. K. Peyton, D. A. Ranard & S. Mcginnis (Eds.), Heritage Languages in America: Preserving a National Resource (pp. 29-36). McHenry, IL: Center for Applied Linguistics .
: Willet, T. (1988). A cross-linguistic survey of the grammaticization of evidentiality. Studies in Linguistics, 12, 57-91.
: Williams, G. (2002). In search of representativity in specialised corpora: Categorisation through collocation. International Journal of Corpus Linguistics, 7, 43–64.
: Williams, I. (1998). Collocational networks: Interlocking patterns of lexis in a corpus of plant biology research articles. International Journal of Corpus Linguistics, 3, 151-171.
: Williams, I. A. (2010). Cultural differences in Academic Discourse. Evidence from first-person verb use in the methods sections of medical research articles. Special Issue of International Journal of Corpus Linguistics, 15(2), 214-239.
: Wilson, D. & Sperber, D. (2002). Relevance Theory. UCL Working Papers in Linguistics, 14, 249-287.
: Wilson, D. (2004). Pragmatic Theory. London: UCL Linguistics Dept [em línea]. Disponível em: [64]http://www.phon.ucl.ac.uk/home/nick/pragtheory/
: Wodak, R. (1995). Critical linguistics and critical discourse analysis. En J. O. Varscheueren, J-O Östman & J. Blommart (Eds.), Handbook of Pragmatics (pp. 204-210). Ámsterdam: John Benjamins.
: Wong, D. & Peters, P. (2007). A study of backchannels in regional varieties of English, using corpus mark-up as the means of identification. International Journal of Corpus Linguistics, 12(4), 479-509.
: Wright, S. (2011). Language and nation building in Europe. En B. Kortmann & J. van der Auwera (Eds.), The languages and linguistics of Europe: A comprehensive guide, (pp. 775-788). Berlín/Boston: Walter de Gruyter.
: Wu, C. (2009). Corpus-based research. En M.A.K. Halliday & J. Webster (Eds.), Continuum companion to Systemic Functional Linguistics (pp. 128-142). Londres: Continuum.
: Wurr, A. J. & Hellebrandt, J. (Eds.) (2007). Learning the Language of Global Citizenship. Service-Learning in Applied Linguistics. Bolton, MA: Anker Publishing Co.
: Xiao, R. & McEnery, T. (2006). Collocation, Semantic Prosody, and Near Synonymy: A Cross-Linguistic Perspective. Applied Linguistics, 27, 103-129.
: Xuanwei, P. (2008). Evaluative meanings in literary texts. The first step towards appraisal stylistics. En N. Nørgaard (Ed.), Systemic Functional Linguistics in Use Odense Working Papers in Language and Communication (pp. 665-684). Denmark: University of Southern Denmark.
: Yali, G. (2010). L2 vocabulary acquisition through reading: Incidental learning and Intentional learning. Chinese Journal of Applied Linguistics, 33(1), 74-93.
: Yallop, C. (2004). Words and meaning. En M.A.K. Halliday, A. Cermáková, W. Teubert & C. Yallop (Eds.), Lexicology and Corpus Linguistics (pp. 23-72). Londres: Continuum.
: Yamashita, J. (2002). Reading strategies in L1 and L2: Comparison of four groups of readers with different reading ability in L1 and L2. Review of Applied Linguistics, 135-136, 1-35.
: Yang, W. & Sun, Y. (2012). The use of cohesive devices in argumentative writing by Chinese EFL learners at different proficiency levels. Linguistics and Education, 23, 31-48.
: Yeldham, M. (2009). Approaches to second language listening instruction: Investigating the ‘top-down/bottom-up debate’. Tesis doctoral, School of Languages & Linguistics, The University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Australia.
: Zenner, E., Speelman, D. & Geeraerts, D. (2013). Macro and micro perspectives on the distribution of English in Dutch. A quantitative usage-based analysis of job ads. Linguistics, 51(5), 1019-1064.
: Zhang, R. (2013). A corpus-based study of semantic prosody change: The case of the adverbial intensifier. Concentric: Studies in Linguistics, 39(2), 61-82.
: Zhila, A. & Gelbukh, A. (2013). Comparison of Open Information Extraction for Spanish and English. Computational Linguistics and Intellectual Technologies 12(1), 794-802.
: Zhong, Z. & Ng, H. T. (2012). Word sense disambiguation improves information retrieval. Proceedings of the 50th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics: Long Papers -Volume 1 (pp. 273-282). Association for Computational Linguistics.
: da Cunha, I., Montané, M. A. & Hysa, L. (2017). The arText prototype: An automatic system for writing specialized texts. Proceedings of the 15th Conference of the European Chapter of the Association for Computational Linguistics. Software Demonstrations, 57-60.
: van Dijk, T. (1972). Some aspects of text grammars. A study in theoretical linguistics and poetics. The Hague/Paris: Mouton.
: van Dijk, T. A. (2006a). Politics, ideology and discourse. In R. Wodak (Ed.), Elsevier encyclopedia of language and linguistics (pp. 728-740). Volume on Politics and Language. Oxford: Elsevier.
: van Dijk, T.A. (1972). Some aspects of text grammars. A study in theoretical linguistics and poetics. The Hague: Mouton.
: Álvarez, I. (2011). El ciberespañol: Características del español usado en Internet. En L. Ortiz-López (Ed.), Selected Proceedings of the 13th Hispanic Linguistics Symposium (pp. 33-41). Somerville, MA: Cascadilla Proceedings Project.

/LING

1) Candidate: linguistics

Evaluando al candidato linguistics:

Referencias bibliográficas encontradas sobre cada término