Update: February 24, 2023
The new version of
Termout.org is now online,
so this web site is now obsolete and will soon be dismantled.
|
Lista de candidatos sometidos a examen:
1)
marker (*)
(*) Términos presentes en el nuestro glosario de lingüística
Is in goldstandard
1
paper corpusSignosTxtLongLines378 -
: “while an evidential supplement can always be seen in an epistemic marker, the opposite does not always hold: not all evidential markers are modal in that they do not all necessarily imply an epistemic judgment” .
2
paper corpusSignosTxtLongLines579 - : The boundary
markers and the
markers/constructions with the initiating function were present in 91% of the lectures and thus proved most useful for the segmentation task. It should be noted that most frequently they appeared in combinations (e.g. OK. So,…; So let’s get started…), and that in 51 lectures they were preceded by a lengthy pause and in another 11 lectures by a filled pause (uhm, hm..
). The lecture-initial markers were discounted, and as for determining which marker to use to mark the separation point (as sometimes several such markers appeared in the very lecture introduction), we applied two criteria: 1 . the existence of visual cues, which was useful in about 2/3 of the cases, 2. semantic criteria - the lecture introduction was considered to have ended after the topic announcement and/or contextualization, i.e. before the lecturer’s going into the content of the topic lectured on (typically, providing a definition of a key term, asking students whether they knew what it was,
Evaluando al candidato marker:
1) lectures: 3
marker
Lengua:
Frec: 30
Docs: 22
Nombre propio: / 30 = 0%
Coocurrencias con glosario:
Puntaje: 0.504 = ( + (1+2) / (1+4.95419631038688)));
Candidato aceptado
Referencias bibliográficas encontradas sobre cada término
(Que existan referencias dedicadas a un término es también indicio de
terminologicidad.)
marker |
: Ahmed, S., Haigh, A. H., Jager, C. A. & Garrard, P. (2013). Connected speech as a marker of disease progression in autopsy-proven Alzheimer´s disease. Brain, 136, 3727-3737.
: Brown, P. & Fraser, C. (1979). Speech as a marker of situation. En K. R. Scherer & H. Giles (Eds.), Social markers in speech (pp. 3362). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
: Dahl, T. (2004). Textual metadiscourse in research articles: A marker of national culture or of academic discipline? Journal of Pragmatics, 36, 1807-1825.
: Girbau, D. (2016). The non-word repetition task as a clinical marker of specific language impairment in Spanish-speaking children. First Language, 36(1), 30-49.
: Reilly, J., Peelle, J., Antonucci, S. & Grossman, M. (2011). Anomia as a marker of distinct semantic memory impairments in Alzheimer’s disease and semantic dementia. Neuropsychology, 25(4), 413-426.
: Schwenter, S. (1999). Exclusivity and conditional marker form I: Adversative contexts. En S. Schwenter (Ed.), Pragmatics of Conditional Marking: Implicature, Scalarity and Exclusivity (pp. 117-230). Nueva York: Garland Pub.
: deber (see ^[130]De Kock & Gómez Molina, 2002), but rather as a marker of assertiveness.
|