/LING
|
Update: February 24, 2023 The new version of Termout.org is now online, so this web site is now obsolete and will soon be dismantled. |
Lista de candidatos sometidos a examen:
1) metaphor (*)
(*) Términos presentes en el nuestro glosario de lingüística
1) Candidate: metaphor
Is in goldstandard
1
paper corpusSignosTxtLongLines183 - : Arús, J. (2003b). Ambiguity in grammatical metaphor: One more reason why the distinction transitive/ergative pays off . En A. Vandenbergen, M. Taverniers & L. Ravelli (Eds.), Grammatical metaphor: Views from systemic functional linguistics (pp. 101-126). Amsterdam: Benjamins. [ [70]Links ]
2
paper corpusSignosTxtLongLines353 - : Arús, J. (2003b). Ambiguity in grammatical metaphor: One more reason why the distinction transitive/ergative pays off . In A. Vandenbergen, M. Taverniers & L. Ravelli (Eds.), Grammatical metaphor: Views from systemic functional linguistics (pp. 101-126). Amsterdam: John Benjamins. [ [45]Links ]
3
paper corpusSignosTxtLongLines396 - : In this research, the metaphor-based theoretical views on managing projects will be contrasted with the real language use in the project management discipline. Even though the use of metaphor in project management has not attracted much attention from scholars and practitioners, two papers (Angling, 1988; Eskerod, 1996) proposed specific metaphors to better understand and manage projects in multi-project environments. The metaphor of the Chinese wall and the metaphor of the Chinese dragon focus on contrasting aspects of managing projects: the former highlights order and predictability, while the latter, constant change and dynamism . These two opposing conceptualizations of projects provide different views on project management practices, and may have implications for business management, as well as for linguistic representation in discourse.
4
paper corpusSignosTxtLongLines396 - : The metaphor of the Chinese wall represents multi-project environments or programmes, which Angling (1988: 198 ) defined as containing “ten, a hundred or a thousand projects”, with the basic unit of the programme no longer being a single task or an activity, but rather a self-contained project. Managing a multi-project programme, then, is to effectively plan and supervise each project following specific guidelines.
5
paper corpusSignosTxtLongLines396 - : Eskerod (1996) was interested in the ‘management by projects’ strategy, rather than in multi-project environments. This strategy was developed in the 1990s as a way to improve companies’ product development capabilities, and it emphasized the need to understand multi-project issues. In her paper, Eskerod (1996) questioned the basic aspects of multi-project environments, that is, planning, scheduling and control, based on the assumptions that only stability, predictability, a top-down decision process, etc. ensure success. The metaphor of the Chinese dragon served to critique Angling’s (1988) metaphor of the Chinese wall, representing the classic view of multi-project environments: “Companies do not need good stonemasons as much as they need an ability to read the signals that tell them that it is time to change their building style” (Eskerod, 1996: 63 ). Projects, from this perspective, cannot be conceived as static stones, since the distance between them is neither static nor well-defined.
6
paper corpusSignosTxtLongLines396 - : Of the 46 building lexical items from the corpus word list, 25 were used metaphorically. ‘Build’, ‘foundation’, ‘construct’, ‘base’, and ‘architecture’ registered the highest frequencies in the corpus ([27]Figure 1). Regarding the animal vehicles, of the 86 lexical items identified in the corpus word list, 55 were used metaphorically: nearly twice as many as the building items . [28]Figure 2 shows the 34 most frequently used metaphor vehicles and their frequencies, while the data concerning the remaining and less frequent metaphor vehicles are included in [29]Appendix 2. In comparison to the building vehicles, more animal vehicles (13) registered significant frequencies (above the average frequency of 0.050): ‘grow’, ‘life’, ‘agile’, ‘body’, ‘health’, ‘head’, ‘face’, ‘neural’, ‘vital’, ‘mature’, ‘lifecycle’, ‘kill’, ‘survive’. Only four building vehicles (‘build’, ‘foundation’, ‘base’, ‘architecture’) were used in this ran
7
paper corpusSignosTxtLongLines396 - : A diachronic study of the use of building and animal metaphors could also reveal the evolution of the preferences for one metaphor over the other in a given period of time, while possibly providing insight into the changes in discourse practices under the impact of scholarly publications . A study of Bredillet’s (2008) metaphors over time would be suitable for further research in this line.
8
paper corpusSignosTxtLongLines412 - : Strategic functions of metaphor networks on political discourse: An Hugo Chavez interactional discourse analysis
9
paper corpusSignosTxtLongLines489 - : Ideational grammatical metaphor: A key resource for advanced and academic literacy
Evaluando al candidato metaphor:
1) projects: 7
2) multi-project: 7
3) vehicles: 6
6) grammatical: 5 (*)
8) eskerod: 4
9) management: 4
10) views: 4
12) corpus: 3 (*)
13) angling: 3
15) managing: 3 (*)
16) discourse: 3 (*)
17) wall: 3
19) environments: 3 (*)
20) frequencies: 3
metaphor
Lengua: eng
Frec: 159
Docs: 41
Nombre propio: / 159 = 0%
Coocurrencias con glosario: 5
Puntaje: 5.827 = (5 + (1+5.88264304936184) / (1+7.32192809488736)));
Candidato aceptado
Referencias bibliográficas encontradas sobre cada término
(Que existan referencias dedicadas a un término es también indicio de terminologicidad.)| metaphor |
: Amanzio, M., Geminiani, G., Leotta, D. & Cappa, S. (2008). Metaphor comprehension in Alzheimer’s disease: Novelty matters. Brain and Language, 107, 1-10. : Arzouan, Y., Goldstein, A. & Faust, M. (2007). Dynamics of hemispheric activity during metaphor comprehension: Electrophysiological measures. Neuroimage, 36(1), 222-231. : Balaban, V. (1999). Self and agency in religious discourse. Perceptual metaphors for knowledge at a Marian apparition site. En L. Boeve & K. Feyaerts (Eds.), Metaphor and God-talk. Religions and Discourse (pp. 125-144). Nueva York: Peter Lang. : Bambini, V., Bertini, C., Schaeken, W., Stella, A. & Di Russo, F. (2016). Disentangling metaphor from context: An ERP study. Frontiers in Psychology, 7. : Bowker, J. (1996). Cancer, individual process, and control: A case study in metaphor analysis. Health Communication, 8(1), 91-104. : Boyd, R. (1993). Metaphor and theory change: What is ‘metaphor’ a metaphor for. In A. Ortony (Ed.), Metaphor and Thought, (pp. 481-532). New York: Cambridge University Press. : Brookes, D. & Etkina, E. (2007). Using conceptual metaphor and functional grammar to explore how language used in physics affects student learning. Physical Review Special Topics - Physics Education Research, 3(1), 010105. : Cameron, L. & Maslen, R. (Eds.) (2010). Metaphor analysis: Research practice in applied linguistics, social sciences and the humanities. Londres: Equinox. : Charteris-Black, J. & Ennis, T. (2001). A comparative study of metaphor in Spanish and English financial reporting. English for Specific Purposes, 20, 249-266. : Chilton, P. & Ilyin, M.V. (1993). Metaphor in political discourse: The case of the ‘Common European House’. Discourse and Society, 4(1), 7-31. : Chilton, P. & Lakoff, G. (1995). Foreign policy by metaphor. En Ch. Schaffner & A. Wenden (Eds.), Languages and peace (pp. 37-59). Brookfield, VT: Dartmouth Publishing Company. : Colombi, C. (2006). Grammatical metaphor: Academic language development in Latino students in Spanish. En H. Byrnes (Ed.), Advanced Language Learning: The Contribution of Halliday and Vygotsky (pp. 147-164). Londres: Continuum. : Corts, D. & Pollio, H. (1999). Spontaneous productions of figurative language and gesture in college lectures. Metaphor and Symbol, 14(2), 81-100. : Coulson, S. & Matlock, T. (2001). Metaphor and the space structuring model. Metaphor and Symbol, 16(3-4), 295-316. doi: 10.1080/10926488.2001.9678899 : Coulson, S. & Van Petten, C. (2002). Conceptual integration and metaphor: An event-related potential study. Memory and Cognition, 30(6), 958-968. doi: 10.3758/BF03195780 : Coulson, S. & Van Petten, C. (2007). A special role for the right hemisphere in metaphor comprehension? ERP evidence from hemifield presentation. Brain Research, 1146, 128-145. doi: 10.1016/j.brainres.2007.03.008 : Deignan, A. (2005). Metaphor and Corpus Linguistics. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. : Derewianka, B. (2003). Grammatical metaphor in the transition to adolescence. En A. M. Simon-Vandenberger, M. Taverniers & L. J. Ravelli. (Eds.), Grammatical metaphors. Views from systemic functional linguistics (pp. 185-220). Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins. : Evert, S. (2006). How random is a corpus? The library metaphor. Zeitschrift für Anglistik und Amerikanistik, 54(2), 177-190. : Gibbs, R. (1999). Researching metaphor. En L. Cameron & G. Low (Eds.), Researching and Appalying Metaphor (pp. 29-47). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. : Gibbs, R. W. & Franks, H. (2002). Embodied metaphor in women’s narratives about their experiences with cancer. Health Communication, 14(2), 139-165. : Gibbs, R. W. (2017). Metaphor wars: Conceptual metaphors in human life. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press . : Glucksberg, S. (2001). Understanding figurative language: From metaphor to idioms. Nueva York: Oxford University Press. : Glucksberg, S. (2003). The psycholinguistics of metaphor. Trends in Cognitive Science, 7, 92-96. : Grady, J., Oakley, T. & Coulson, S. (1999). Blending and metaphore. En G. Steen & R. Gibbs (Eds.), Metaphor in cognitive linguistics (pp. 101-124). Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamin. : Grupo Pragglejaz (2007). MIP: A method for identifying metaphorically used words in discourse. Metaphor and Symbol, 22(1), 1-39. : Hanks, P. (2004). The syntagmatics of metaphor and idiom. International Journal of Lexicography, 17(3), 245-274. : Henderson, W. (1982). Metaphor in economics. Economics, 18(4), 147-153. : Henderson, W. (1994). Metaphor and economics. In R. E. Backhouse (Ed.), New Directions in Economic Methodology (pp. 343-367). London: Routledge. : Holyoak, K. J. & Stamenković, D. (2018). Metaphor comprehension: A critical review of theories and evidence. Psychological bulletin, 144(6), 641. : Hurley, K. E. (2014). To fight, or not to fight: A cancer psychotherapist with cancer confronts the battle metaphor. Women & Therapy, 37(3-4), 311-318. : Kintsch, W. & Bowles, A. (2002). Metaphor comprehension: What makes a metaphor difficult to understand? [en línea]. Disponible en: [52]http://lsa.colorado.edu/papers/KintschBowles.pdf : Kintsch, W. (2000). A computational theory of metaphor comprehension. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 7,257266. : Kintsch, W. (2003). Metaphor comprehension: A computational theory. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review. [En línea]. Disponible en: [70]http://lsa.colorado.edu/papers/metaphor.kintsch.pdf : Kintsch, W. y Bowles, A. (2002) Metaphor comprehension: What makes a metaphor difficult to understand? Metaphor and symbol. 17, 249-262. : Kuhn, T. S. (1979). Metaphor in science. In A. Ortony (Ed.), Metaphor and Thought, (pp. 533-42.). New York: Cambridge University Press. : Kövecses, Z. (2002). Metaphor. A practical introduction. Oxford and New York: Oxford University Press. : Kövecses, Z. (2003). Metaphor and emotion: Language, culture, and body in human feeling. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press . : Kövecses, Z. (2008). Conceptual metaphor theory: Some criticisms and alternative proposals. Annual Review of Cognitive Linguistics, 6(1), 168-184. : Kövecses, Z. (2015). Where metaphors come from: Reconsidering context in metaphor. Nueva York: Oxford University Press. : Lakoff, G. (1992). Metaphors and war: The metaphor system used to justify war in the Gulf. En M. Putz (Ed.), Thirty years of linguistics evolution (pp. 463-481). Amsterdam: Benjamins. : Lakoff, G. (1993). The contemporary theory of metaphor. En A. Ortony (Ed.), Metaphor and Thought (pp. 202-251). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. : Laranjeira, C. (2013). The role of narrative and metaphor in the cancer life story: A theoretical analysis. Medine Health Care and Philosophy, 16, 469-481. : Lassen, Inger (2003). Accessibility and acceptability in technical manuals. A survey of style and grammatical metaphor. 183 pp. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. ISBN 1568-1963 : Magaña, D. & Matlock, T. (2018). How Spanish speakers use metaphor to describe their experiences with cancer. Discourse & Communication, 12(6), 627-644. : Maki, Y., Yamaguchi, T., Koeda, T. & Yamaguchi, H. (2013). Communicative competence in Alzheimer’s disease: Metaphor and sarcasm comprehension. American Journal of Alzheimer's Disease & Other Dementias®, 28(1), 69-74. : McGlone, M. & Manfredi, D. (2001). Topic-vehicle interaction in metaphor comprehension. Memory and Cognition, 29, 1209-1219. : Moravcsik, J. (2001). Metaphor, creative understanding and the Generative Lexicon. En P. Bouillon & F. Busa (Eds.), The language of word meaning (pp. 247-261). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. : Olkoniemi, H., Ranta, H. & Kaakinen, J. K. (2016). Individual differences in the processing of written sarcasm and metaphor: Evidence from eye movements. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 42(3), 433. : O’Halloran, K. (2007). Critical discourse analysis and the corpus-informed interpretation of metaphor at the register level. Applied Linguistics, 28, 1-24. : Ponterotto, D. (2000). The cohesive role of cognitive metaphor in discourse and conversation. En A. Barcelona (Ed.), Metaphor and metonymy at the crossroads (pp. 283-298). Berlin: Gruyter. : Pragglejaz Group (2007). MIP: A method for identifying metaphorically used words in discourse. Metaphor and Symbol, 22(1), 1-39. : Pynte, J., Besson, M., Robichon, F. & Poli, J. (1996). The time-course of metaphor comprehension: An event-related potential study. Brain and Language, 55, 293-316. : Ravelli, L. J. (1988). Grammatical metaphor. An initial analysis. En E. Steiner & R. Veltman (Eds.), Pragmatics, discourse and text. Some systemically-inspired approaches (pp. 133-147). Londres: Pinter Publishers. : Reisfield, G. & Wilson, G. (2004). Use of metaphor in the discourse on cancer. Journal of Clinical Oncology, 22(19), 4024-4027. : Ricoeur, P. (1977). The rule of metaphor: Multidisciplinary studies of the creation of meaning in language. Toronto: University of Toronto Press. : Schmidt, G., DeBuse, C. & Seger, C. (2005). Right hemisphere metaphor processing. Characterizing the lateralization of semantic processes. Brain and Language, 100, 127-141. : Searle, J. (1993). Metaphor. En A. Ortony (Ed.), Metaphor and thought (pp. 83-111). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. : Semino, E., Demjén, Z., Hardie, A., Payne, S. & Rayson, P. (2018). Metaphor, cancer and the end of life: A corpus-based study. Nueva York: Routledge. : Shanon, B. (1990a). The knot in the handkerchief. Metaphor and Symbol, 5(2), 109-114. doi: 10.1207/s15327868ms0502_4 : Simon-Vandenbergen, A-M., Taverniers, M. & Ravelli, L. (Eds.). (2003). Metaphor: Systemic and functional perspectives. Amsterdam: Benjamins. : Skorczynska, H. & Deignan, A. (2006). Readership and Purpose in the Choice of Economics Metaphors. Metaphor and Symbol, 21(2), 87-104. : Skorczynska, H. (2010). Metaphor and knowledge specialization: The use of building metaphors in the general business and project management discourse. Proceedings of the 9th AELFE Conference (pp. 1-15). Universität de Hamburg, Germany. : Spivey, N. (1997). The constructivist metaphor: Reading, writing and the making of meaning. San Diego, CA: Academic Press. : Thibodeau, P. H. & Boroditsky, L. (2011). Metaphors we think with: The role of metaphor in reasoning. PLOS ONE, 6(2), e16782. : Williams, J. (2016). Get the metaphor right! Cancer treatment metaphors in the English and Spanish press. Alfinge, 28, 109-138. : Winter, B. & Matlock, T. (2013). Reasoning about similarity and proximity. Metaphor & Symbol 28, 1-14. |