Update: February 24, 2023 The new version of Termout.org is now online, so this web site is now obsolete and will soon be dismantled. |
metonymy |
: 10. Barcelona, A. (2003a). Metaphor and Metonymy at the Crossroads: A Cognitive Perspective. Berlin, Alemania: Mouton de Gruyter. : 11. Barcelona, A. (2003b). The case of metonymic basis of pragmatic inferencing: evidence from jokes and fanny anecdotes. En Panther, K-U and Thorndurg, L. (Eds.), Metonymy and Pragmatic Inference (pp. 81-101). Amsterdam, Philadelphia: John Benjamins. : 37. Dirven, R. (1993) Metonymy and metaphor: Different mental strategies of conceptualisation. Leuvense Bijdragen, Lovaina: Departamento de Lingüística, Universidad de Lovaina, 82, 1-25. : 38. Dirven, R. (1999). Conversion as a conceptual metonymy of event schemata. En K-U. Panther, y G. Radden (eds.), Metonymy in Language and Thought (pp. 275-287). Amsterdam & Philadelphia: John Benjamins Publishing Company. : 46. Pantner, K-U y Thornburg, L. (2007) Metonymy. En Geeraerts, D. y Cuyckens, H. (Eds.), The Oxford Handbook of Cognitive Linguistics (pp. 236-263). New York, United States of America: Oxford University Press. : 47. Kövecses, Z. y Radden G. (1998). Metonymy: developing a cognitive linguistic view. Cognitive Linguistics, Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter, 9, 37-77. : 52. Seto, K. (1999). Distinguishing metonymy from synecdoche. En: Panther, K-U and Radden, G. (Eds.), Metonymy in Language and Thought (pp. 91-120). Amsterdam, Paises Bajos: John Benjamins. : 71. Warren, B. (1995). Distinguishing between metaphor and metonymy. En G. Melchers y B. Warren (Eds.), Studies in Anglistics (pp. 137-150). Estocolmo, Suecia: Almqvist & Wiksell International. : 73. Warren, B. (2002). An alternative account of the interpretation of referential metonymy and metaphor. En R. Dirven y R. Pörings (Eds.), Metaphor and Metonymy in Comparison and Contrast (pp. 113-133). Berlin, Nueva York: Mouton de Gruyter. : 8. Barcelona, A. (2000). On the plausibility of claiming a metonymic motivation for conceptual metaphor. En A. Barcelona (Ed.), Metaphor and Metonymy at the Crossroads: a Cognitive Perspective (pp. 31-58). Berlín, Alemania: Mouton de Gruyter. : Barcelona, A. (2002). Clarifying and applying the notions of metaphor and metonymy within Cognitive Linguistics: an update. En R. Dirven & R. Pörings (Eds.) Metaphor and metonymy in comparison and contrast (pp. 207-77). Berlin - New York, Germany - USA: Mouton de Gruyter. : Barnden, J. A. (2010). Metaphor and metonymy: making their connections more slippery. En Cognitive Linguistics, 21(1), 1-34. : Croft, W. (2002). The Role of Domains in the Interpretation of Metaphors and Metonymies. In R. Dirven & R. Pörings (Eds.), Metaphor and Metonymy in Comparison and Contrast (pp. 161-205). Berlin/New York: Mouton de Gruyter. [94]https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110219197.16 : Hanks, P. (2006). Metaphoricity is gradable. En A. Stefanowitsch & S. T. Gries (Eds.). Corpus-Based Approaches to Metaphor and Metonymy (pp. 17-35). Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. : Kovacses, Z. & Radden, G. (1998). Metonymy: Developing a cognitive linguistic view. Cognitive Linguistic. 9(1), 37-77. : Maclagan, M., Davis, B. & Lunsford, R. (2008). Fixed expressions, extenders and metonymy in the speech of people with Alzheimer’s disease. En S. Granger & F. Meunier (Eds.), Phraseology: An interdisciplinary perspective (pp. 175-187). Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins. : Panther, K. & Thornburg, L. (1999). The potentiality for actuality metonymy in English and Hungarian. En K. Panther & G. Radden (Eds.), Metonymy in language and thought (pp. 333-357). Amsterdam and Philadelphia: Benjamins. : Panther, K. & Thornburg, L. (2007). Metonymy. En D. Geeraerts & H. Cuyckens (Eds.), The Oxford Handbook of Cognitive Linguistics (pp. 236-263). Oxford: University Press. : Panther, K. (2006). Metonymy as a usage event. En G. Kristiansen, M. Achard, R. Dirven & F. Ruiz de Mendoza Ibáñez (Eds.) Cognitive Linguistics: Applications and Future Perspectives (pp. 147-185). Berlin, Germany: Mouton de Gruyter. : Panther, K., & Thornburg, L. (2007). Metonymy. En, D. Geeraerts & H. Cuyckens (Eds.) The Oxford Handbook of Cognitive Linguistics (pp. 236-263). New York, USA: Oxford University Press. : Peirsman, Y. & Geeraerts, D. (2006). Metonymy as a Prototypical category. Cognitive Linguistics, 17, 269-316. : Ponterotto, D. (2000). The cohesive role of cognitive metaphor in discourse and conversation. En A. Barcelona (Ed.), Metaphor and metonymy at the crossroads (pp. 283-298). Berlin: Gruyter. : Radden, G e Z. Kövecses. 2007. Towards a theory of metonymy. (em linha) Disponível em [136]https://www.researchgate.net/publication/284894262_Towards_a_Theory_of_Metonymy : Radden, G. (2000). How Metonymic Are Metaphors? En A. Barcelona (Coord.). Metaphor and Metonymy at the Crossroads (pp. 93-108). Berlín/Nueva York: Mouton de Gruyter. : Radden, G. (2002). How metonymic are metaphors? En, R. Dirven & R. Pörings (Eds.) Metaphor and metonymy in comparison and contrast (pp. 407-434). Berlin-New York, Germany-USA: Mouton de Gruyter. : Ruiz de Mendoza, F. J. (2000). The role of mappings and domains in understanding metonymy. En A. Barcelona (Coord.), Metaphor and Metonymy at the Crossroads (pp. 109-132). Berlín/New York: Mouton de Gruyter. : Ruiz de Mendoza, F. J. (2007). High-level cognitive models: in search of a unified framework for inferential and grammatical behavior. En K. Kosecki (Coord.). Perspectives on Metonymy (pp. 11-30). Frankfurt/Main: Peter Lang. : Rundbald, G. (2007). Impersonal, general, and social: The use of metonymy versus passive voice in medical discourse. Written Communication, 24(3), 250-277. : Seto, K. (1999). Distinguishing metonymy from synecdoche. En, K. Panther & G. Radden (Eds.), Metonymy in language and thought, Metonymy in language and thought (Vol. 4, pp. 91-120). Amensterdam-Philadelphia, Netherlands-USA: John Benjamins Publishing. : Taylor, J. (2002). Category extension by metonymy and metaphor. En, R. Dirven & R. Pörings (Eds.) Metaphor and metonymy in comparison and contrast (pp. 323-347). Berlin-New York, Germany-USA: Mouton de Gruyter. : Warren, B. (1999). Aspects of referential metonymy. En, K. Panther & G. Radden (Eds.) Metonymy in language and thought, Metonymy in language and thought (Vol. 4, pp. 121-135). Amsterdam-Philadelphia, Netherlands-USA: John Benjamins Publishing. |