/LING
|
Update: February 24, 2023 The new version of Termout.org is now online, so this web site is now obsolete and will soon be dismantled. |
Lista de candidatos sometidos a examen:
1) mitigators (*)
(*) Términos presentes en el nuestro glosario de lingüística
1) Candidate: mitigators
Is in goldstandard
1
paper CO_Íkalatxt127 - : As we can observe from[36] table 5, the range of lexical internal mitigators was much greater in the ND. While in the naturalistic interactions four types of lexical internal mitigators were used: politeness markers (e .g. por favor, [please]), cajolers (e.g. pues, [well],), diminutives (e.g. bocadillito [a little sandwich]), and appellatives (e.g. bonico, [cutie]), the politeness marker was the only one used by the RP participants. The politeness marker was the most frequently used device in both groups. It appeared in 46% of the RP interactions, while it was only used in 13% of the real-life interactions. Cajolers (2 or 4%), diminutives (4 or 7%) and appellatives (3 or 6.5%) were used occasionally in the ND. As García (1993) notes, diminutives and appellatives can be categorized as strategies that show solidarity and closeness towards the interlocutor, while politeness markers may be considered deference strategies.
2
paper UY_ALFALtxt48 - : This paper aims at characterizing a set of expressions very frequent in colloquial spoken varieties of Argentine Spanish (particularly among young people), used as mitigators: medio, onda, tipo, como and casi (que ). These expressions are utilized in different categorial domaines (nominal, adjectival, adverbial, verbal, sentential) in order to weaken the impact of the meaning of a word or of the whole assertion. First, we characterize the different processes of grammaticalization of medio, onda, tipo, como and casi (que) as mitigators, parting from other functional values or from a lexical-conceptual meaning. Then we analyze their uses in different domains, and specially the cases in which they function as sentential markers, trying to explain their distribution and their compatibility with various modalities, moods, polarities, contexts of subordination, etc., in order to describe their basic grammatical properties. Finally, we discuss which differences exist between mitigators and markers
3
paper corpusSignostxt562 - : The discourse origins of the proceduralized mitigators tipo, onda, corte and rollo: A micro-diachronic exploration
Evaluando al candidato mitigators:
1) politeness: 4 (*)
2) diminutives: 3
3) appellatives: 3
4) onda: 3
5) markers: 3 (*)
mitigators
Lengua: eng
Frec: 10
Docs: 7
Nombre propio: / 10 = 0%
Coocurrencias con glosario: 2
Puntaje: 3.141 = (2 + (1+4.08746284125034) / (1+3.4594316186373)));
Candidato aceptado
Referencias bibliográficas encontradas sobre cada término
(Que existan referencias dedicadas a un término es también indicio de terminologicidad.)| mitigators |
: Mondaca, L. (2019). Approximators and mitigators in Chilean Spanish: The case of ‘como’ and ‘como que’.Texts in Process, 5(1), 29-52. |