/LING
|
Update: February 24, 2023 The new version of Termout.org is now online, so this web site is now obsolete and will soon be dismantled. |
Lista de candidatos sometidos a examen:
1) perception (*)
(*) Términos presentes en el nuestro glosario de lingüística
1) Candidate: perception
Is in goldstandard
1
paper corpusSignosTxtLongLines300 - : During the so-called learning community portion of the course, the students were afforded a ZPD through the introduction the genres of technical communication. Allen is one student who wrote about his perception of the split in English 104 in his end of semester reflection for English 104:
2
paper corpusSignosTxtLongLines319 - : iii) Combining with Infinitival complements of perception verbs: Perception verbs take eventuality expressions as infinitival complements in (29) but neither ser nor estar display this behavior in (30):
3
paper corpusSignosTxtLongLines426 - : Local deixis, also called place or spatial deixis, stands for “the linguistic expression of the speaker’s perception of his position in three-dimensional space” (Fillmore, 1997: 27), denoting “the relationship of objects to a speaker”, or “how a speaker is situated in physical space” (Simpson, 1993: 13 ).
4
paper corpusSignosTxtLongLines478 - : Cognitive Strategies Usefulness Perception in Female and Male Learners of Spanish: An International Empirical Study
5
paper corpusSignosTxtLongLines513 - : This research focuses on the function of neologisms and casts serious doubts on the applicability of the traditional dichotomy ‘denominative neologisms’ and ‘stylistic neologisms’. Although this classification is widely mentioned in the literature on neology, both from a theoretical and applied perspective it shows some limitations that call into question that they really work as opposing categories (Llopart-Saumell, 2016). The starting point of this study is a linguistic survey based on the perception of the speakers: participants were asked to classify a set of neologisms in Catalan (in context ) in denominative, stylistic or with both values (denominative and stylistic). Then, we study the degree of coincidence of the results obtained and, finally, we contrast them with sociolinguistic (frequency and stability of use), discursive (context and discursive position) and linguistic data (morpho-semantic) of each of the neologisms. The results point out that those neologisms considered
6
paper corpusSignosTxtLongLines530 - : Due to one constantly available artifact (i.e., linguistic and professionally-inclined academic training in Spanish), the participant reported that he felt highly competent to carry out formal interpretations, particularly among physicians and Spanish monolingual patients. This perception of professional capability was particularly acquired after having completed four courses in Spanish: a class focused on the professions (i .e., Health and Human Services) and Spanish Translation I, II & III. This sense of preparation particularly corresponded to five factors. Two of these were language-related: (1) becoming aware of sociolinguistic features (i.e., formal vs. informal register), and (2) acquiring a more complex and professional jargon (i.e., medical lexicon); while the other three were embedded in translation matters. The latter implied the development of three specific techniques: (a) visiting with community members before the interpretation procedure takes place; (b) encouraging the latter
7
paper corpusSignosTxtLongLines534 - : The positive perception of poetry as a means of encouraging the expression of personal opinions and feelings (item 14) was reported by five participants in terms of the personal enrichment they obtain when given the chance to compare their own emotions with those of others’: ‘Poets express what they feel through their poems and I like knowing how other people feel about topics like love, happiness or death and comparing them with my own . I find it enriching’. When justifying the ability of poetry to help understand the emotions of others’ (item 15), three informants emphasized their empathy with the universality of poetic themes: ‘Since poetry deals with general topics which I have experienced myself, I find it easy to relate to what the poet is feeling’. The negative comments reported for these two items (2 for item 14 and 3 for item 15), once again, stemmed from the perceived difficulty of poetic topics, in this case their metaphorical nature or their multivocality. The following comment
Evaluando al candidato perception:
2) neologisms: 5 (*)
3) linguistic: 4 (*)
4) item: 4
5) poetry: 3
9) topics: 3
10) speaker: 3 (*)
perception
Lengua: eng
Frec: 180
Docs: 57
Nombre propio: 2 / 180 = 1%
Coocurrencias con glosario: 3
Puntaje: 3.650 = (3 + (1+4.52356195605701) / (1+7.49984588708321)));
Candidato aceptado
Referencias bibliográficas encontradas sobre cada término
(Que existan referencias dedicadas a un término es también indicio de terminologicidad.)| perception |
: Altmann, H. (2006). The perception and production of second language stress: A cross-linguistic experimental study. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Delaware, Newark, U.S.A. : Athanasopoulos, P., Dering, B., Wiggett, A., Kuipers, J.-R. & Thierry, G. (2010). Perceptual shift in bilingualism: Brain potentials reveal plasticity in pre-attentive colour perception. Cognition, 116, 437-443. : Balota, D. & Chumbley, J. (1984). Are lexical decisions a good measures of lexical access? The role of word frequency in the neglected decision stage. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human perception and performance, 10, 340-357. : Barsalou, L. & WiemerHastings, K. (2005). Situating abstract concepts. En D. Pecher & R. Zwaan (Eds.), Grounding cognition: The role of perception and action in memory, language, and thought (pp. 129163). New York: Cambridge University Press. : Best, C. T. & Strange, W. (1992). Effects of phonological and phonetic factors on cross-language perception of approximants. Journal of Phonetics, 20(3), 305-330. : Best, C. T., McRoberts, G. W. & Sithole, N. M. (1988). Examination of perceptual reorganization for nonnative speech contrasts: Zulu click discrimination by English-speaking adults and infants. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 14(3), 345-360. : Bunn, L, Roy, E. & Elliot, D. (2007). Speech perception and motor control in children with Down syndrome. Child Neuropsychology, 13(2), 262-275. : Choi, H. & Scholl, B. (2004). Effects of grouping and attention on the perception of causality. Perception & Psychophysics, 66(6), 926-942. : Csepeli, G. & Simon, D. (2004). Construction of Roma identity in Eatern and Central Europe: Perception and Self-identification. Journal of Ethnic and Migration Studies, 30(1), 129-150. : Derryberry, D. & Tucker, D. M. (1994). Motivating the focus of attention. In P. M. Niedenthal & S. Kitayama (Eds.), Heart’s eye: Emotional influences in perception and attention (pp. 167-196). New York: Academic Press. : Dutke, S. (2005). Remembered duration: Working memory and the reproduction of intervals. Perception & Psychophysics, 67(8), 1404-1413. : Feldman, R. & Reznick, J. S. (1996). Maternal perception of infant intentionality at 4 and 8 months. Infant Behavior and Development, 19, 483-496. : Fifié, M. & Townsend, J. (2010). Information-processing alternatives to holistic perception: Identifying the mechanisms of secondary-level holism within a categorization paradigm. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 36(5), 1290-1313. : Figure 5 Inter-relationships among perception, practice, and progress (^[118]Yu, 2004: 4). : Flege, J. E. & Wayland, R. (2019). The role of input in native Spanish Late learners’ production and perception of English phonetic segments. Journal of Second Language Studies, 2(1), 1-44. : Fonlupt, P. (2003). Perception and judgment of physical causality involve different brain structures. Cognitive Brain Research, 17, 248-254. : Förster, J. & Higgins, E. T. (2005). How global versus local perception fits regulatory focus. Psychological Science, 16, 631-636. : Gaskell, M. & Marslen-Wilson, W. (1997). Integrating form and meaning: A distributed model of speech perception. Language and Cognitive Processes, 16, 583-607. : Gaskell, M. & Marslen-Wilson, W. (2002). Representation and competition in the perception of spoken words. Cognitive Psychology, 45, 220-266. : Gisborne, N. (2010). The Event Structure of Perception Verbs. Oxford: Oxford University Press. : Goto, H. (1971). Auditory perception by normal Japanese adults of the sounds L and R. Neuropsychologia, 9, 317-323. : Gray, B. & Cortés, V. (2011). Perception vs. evidence: An analysis of this and these in academic prose. English for Specific Purposes, 30(1), 31-43. : Gullberg, M. & Holmqvist, K. (1999). Keeping an eye on gestures. Visual perception of gestures in face-to-face communication. Pragmatics & Cognition, 7, 35-63. : HORNBY, Richard. 1986: Drama, Metadrama and Perception. London, Bucknell University Press. : Healy, A.F., & Sinclair, G.P. (1996). The long-term retention of training and instruction. En E. L. Bjork & R. A. Bjork (Eds.), Memory: Handbook of perception and cognition (pp. 525-564). New York: Academic Press. : Heeger, D. & Ress, D. (2004). Neuronal correlates of visual attention and perception. In M. Gazzaniga (Ed.), The cognitive neurosciences (pp. 339-350). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press. : Holmes, K. J. & Wolff, P. (2010). Simulation from schematics: Dorsal stream processing and the perception of implied motion. Proceedings of the 32nd Annual Conference of the Cognitive Science Society, Portland, Oregon, USA. : Ishida, H. (2006). Learners’ perception and interpretation of contextualization cues in spontaneous Japanese conversation: Back-channel cue Uun. Journal of Pragmatics, 38(11), 1943-1981. : Iverson, P. & Evans, B. G. (2007). Learning English vowels with different first-language vowel systems: Perception of formant targets, formant movement, and duration. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 122(5), 2842-2854. : Jamieson, D. G. & Morosan, D. E. (1986). Training non-native speech contrasts in adults: Acquisition of the English /ð/-/θ/ contrast by francophones. Perception, & Psychophysics, 40(4), 205-215. : Kissling, E. M. (2012). The effect of phonetics instruction on adult learners' perception and production of L2 sounds. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Georgetown University, ProQuest Dissertations Publishing (Order Nº 3502930). : Krahmer, E. & Swerts, M. (2007). The effects of visual beats on prosodic prominence: Acoustic analyses, auditory perception and visual perception. Journal of Memory and Language, 57(3), 396-414. : Kuhl, P. K. & Iverson, P. (1995). Linguistic experience and the ‘Perceptual Magnet Effect.’ In W. Strange (Ed.), Speech Perception and Linguistic Experience: Issues in Cross-language Research (pp. 121-154). Baltimore, MD: York Press. : Lee, A. H., & Lyster, R. (2016). The effects of corrective feedback on instructed L2 speech perception. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 38(1), 1-30. : Lengeris, A. (2008). The effectiveness of auditory phonetic training on Greek native speakers’ perception and production of Southern British English vowels. In Proceedings of the 2nd ISCA Workshop on Experimental Linguistics (pp. 133-136) Athens, Greece. : Liberman, A. & Mattingly, I. (1985). The motor theory of speech perception revised. Cognition, 21, 1-36. : Liberman, N. & Förster, J. (2009). Distancing from experienced self: How global-versus-local perception affects estimation of psychological distance. Journal of personality and social psychology, 97(2), 203. : Luce, P. & McLennan, C. (2005). Spoken word recognition. En D. Pisoni & R. Remez (Eds.), The handbook of speech perception (pp. 591-609). Malden, Ma.: Blackwell. : Luce, P. , Goldinger, S., Auer Jr., E. & Vitevitch, M. (2000). Phonetic priming, neighborhood activation and parsyn. Perception & Psychophysics, 62(3), 615-625. : McClelland, J. & Elman, J. (1986). The TRACE model of speech perception. Cognitive Psychology, 18, 1-86. : Medina, A. & Gordon, L. (2014). Service learning, phonemic perception, and learner motivation: A quantitative study. Foreign Language Annals, 47(2), 357-371. : Miller, G., & Johnson-Laird, P. (1976). Language and Perception. Cambridge MA: Belknap Press of Harvard University Press. : Navon, D. (1977). Forest before trees: The precedence of global features in visual perception. Cognitive Psychology, 9, 353-383. : Peperkamp, S., Vendelin, I. & Dupoux, E. (2010). Perception of predictable stress: A cross-linguistic investigation. Journal of Phonetics, 38(3), 422-430. : Rayner, K. (2009). Eye movements and attention in reading, scene perception, and visual search, The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 62, 1457-1506. : Rayner, K., Ashby, J., Pollatsek, A. & Reichle, E. (2004). The effects of frequency and predictability on eye fixations in reading: Implications for the E-Z Reader Model. Journal of Experimental Psychology & Human Perception Performance, 30(4), 720-32. : Reinhart, T. (1984). Principles of Gestalt perception in the temporal organization of narrative texts. Linguistics, 22, 779-809. : Romanelli, S., Menegotto, A. C. & Smyth, R. (2015). Stress perception: Effects of training and a study abroad program for L1 English late learners of Spanish. Journal of Second Language Pronunciation, 1(2), 181-210. : Rumelhart, D. & McClelland, J. (1981). An interactive activation model of context effects in letter perception. Psychological Review, 88, 375-407. : Sakai, M. (2016). (Dis) connecting perception and production: Training native speakers of Spanish on the English /i/-/I/ distinction. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Georgetown University, ProQuest Dissertations Publishing (Order Nº 10250896). : Scholl, B. & Nakayama, K. (2002). Causal capture: Contextual effects on the perception of collision events. Psychological Science, 13(6), 493-498. : Sosis, R. (1974). Internal-external control and the perception of responsibility of another for an accident. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 30, 393-399. : Strange, W. & Dittmann, S. (1984). Effects of discrimination training on the perception of/rl/by Japanese adults learning English. Perception & Psychophysics, 36(2), 131-145. : Strange, W. (2011). Automatic selective perception (ASP) of first and second language speech: A working model. Journal of phonetics, 39(4), 456-466. : Sylvester, C., Shulman, G., Jack, A. & Corbetta, M. (2007). Asymmetry of anticipatory activity in visual cortex predicts the locus of attention and perception. Journal of Neuroscience, 27(52), 14424-14433. : Tanenhaus, M. K. & Trueswell, J. C. (1995). Sentence comprehension. En P. Eimas & J. Miller (Eds.), Handbook in Perception and Cognition, Volume 11: Speech, Language, and Communication (pp. 217-262). San Diego, CA: Academic Press. : Thines, G., Costall, A. & Butterworth, G. (1990). Michotte’s experimental phenomenology of perception. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum. : Tremblay, A. (2009). Phonetic variability and the variable perception of L2 word stress by French Canadian listeners. International Journal of Bilingualism, 13(1), 35-62. : Trueswell, J. (2000). The organization and use of the lexicon for language comprehension. En B. Landau, J. Sabini, J. Jonidis & E. Newport (Eds.), Perception. cognition and language. Essays in honor of Henry and Lila Gleitman (pp. 327-345). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press. : Vitevitch, M. (2002). Infuence of onset density on spoken word recognition. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 28, 270-278. : Vitevitch, M. S. & Luce, P. A. (2016). Phonological neighbourhood effects in spoken word perception and production. Annual Review of Linguistics, 2, 75-94. : Voutilainen, L., Henttonen, P., Stevanovic, M., Kahri, M. & Peräkylä, A. (2019). Nods, vocal continuers, and the perception of empathy in storytelling. Discourse Processes, 56(4), 310-330. [204]https://doi.org/10.1080/0163853X.2018.1498670 : Werker, J. F. & Tees, R. C. (1984). Cross-language speech perception: Evidence for perceptual reorganization during the first year of life. Infant behavior and development, 7(1), 49-63. : Whitt, R. (2011). (Inter)Subjectivity and evidential perception verbs in English and German. Journal of Pragmatics, 43, 347-360. : Williams, C, Henderson, J. & Zack, R. (2005). Incidental visual memory for targets and distractors in visual search. Perception and Psychophysics, 67(5), 816-827. : Yamada, Y. (2015). Gender and age differences in visual perception of patterns randomness. Science Post-print, 1(2), 24-41. : Yu, G. (2004). Perception, practice and progress: Significance of scaffolding and zone of proximal development for second or foreign language teachers. Asian EFL Journal, 6(4), 1-24. : Zwaan, R. & Madden, C. (2005). Embodied sentence comprehension. En D. Pecher & R. Zwaan (Eds.), Grounding cognition: The role of perception and action in memory, language, and thought (pp. 224-245). New York: Cambridge University Press. : van Herten, M., Chwilla, D. J. & Kolk, H. H. (2006). When heuristics clash with parsing routines: ERP evidence for conflict monitoring in sentence perception. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 18, 1181-1197. |