Termout.org logo/LING


Update: February 24, 2023 The new version of Termout.org is now online, so this web site is now obsolete and will soon be dismantled.

Lista de candidatos sometidos a examen:
1) performance (*)
(*) Términos presentes en el nuestro glosario de lingüística

1) Candidate: performance


Is in goldstandard

1
paper corpusSignosTxtLongLines164 - : También su cuerpo es otra verdad, se enferma, se paraliza en su energía. El cuerpo de Rivas habla sin cesar en sus síntomas. Es una presencia que ella no quiere dejar de lado (Schneider, 1987: 456–457). En el Diario de Burdeos expone el diagnóstico de su padecimiento: antes y después de la menstruación. El flujo de sangre aparece como el límite de la resistencia del cuerpo. Escritura en el papel con sangre, escritura del cuerpo. Su decibilidad acoge la experiencia alterada del cuerpo femenino que sangra y al hacerlo altera la experiencia intelectual, mancha la escritura, la suspende y deja su huella. También la tinta de la escritura mancha y penetra ese cuerpo, lo deja marcado. Es inevitable que ambas producciones, la corporal sexuada y la intelectual sean arrojadas a las manos de los /las lectores/as en un gesto de escenificación, de montaje teatral que finaliza con la decisión suicida como cierre del Diario de Burdeos y su performance (Unruh, 1988: 61–84 ).

2
paper corpusSignosTxtLongLines334 - : Regarding our second task, the AT, our first finding was that children did not perform adult-like in any condition. However, the results obtained allowed us to rank childrens performance in the following manner in the order of most to least adult-like: (1 ) De-Complement, (2) Polysemic Free, and (3) Context Only. Since the difference in performance between the conditions was found to be statistically significant and because every condition controlled for different properties of ser and estar we can interpret this ranking as showing the kinds of knowledge children exploit in order to use copulas ser and estar. The result that children performed better in condition 2, where they had to rely on the syntactic requirement that estar but not ser can take de complements, confirms Seras (1992) intuition that Spanish-speaking children may use syntactic cues in order to discriminate between the copulas. The fact that childrens performance was better in this condition than on the condition that

3
paper corpusSignosTxtLongLines336 - : For machine learning experiments, we used WEKA version 3-6-2, open-source machine learning software (Hall, Frank, Holmes, Pfahringer, Reutemann & Witten, 2009; The University of Waikato, 2010b). Basically, we planned to study the performance of two techniques: one based on word frequency count and the other, on rules . As it was said earlier in this section, machine learning methods take advantage of various mathematical or statistical models. Basically, they are built on two types of models, in other words, two strategies or approaches. A lot of methods have been elaborated and implemented in WEKA. They vary in details but still remain within the boundaries of either strategy. Now we turn to considering the two approaches.

4
paper corpusSignosTxtLongLines336 - : What evidence have we obtained concerning lexical functions? We presented a sufficient number of collocations annotated with lexical functions to the computer that learned characteristic features of each function. It was demonstrated that the computer was able to assign lexical functions to unseen collocations with a significant average accuracy of 0.759. Is it satisfactory? We can compare our result with computer performance on another task of natural language processing: word sense disambiguation, i .e., identifying the intended meanings of words in context. Today, automated disambiguating systems reach the accuracy of about 0.700 and this is considered a substantial achievement. As an example of such works see (Zhong & Tou Ng, 2010). Therefore, our result is weighty enough to be a trustworthy evidence for the linguistic statement under discussion.

5
paper corpusSignosTxtLongLines429 - : Ninety-nine individuals were recruited for the study for a number of allegedly unrelated psychological tests. The participants were divided into three groups based on their performance on the Oxford Quick Placement Test (QPT): monolinguals[27]^[1] (13 females, 20 males ; M[age] = 23.60; SD[age] = 4.47), low-level bilinguals[28]^[2] (15 females, 18 males; M[age] = 32.12; SD[age] = 5.95), and high-level bilinguals[29]^[3] (12 females, 21 males; M[age] = 28.93; SD[age] = 5.96). Participants had only been exposed to English in secondary and post-secondary education and in language institutes.

6
paper corpusSignosTxtLongLines429 - : Ninety-two individuals were recruited for the study for a number of allegedly unrelated psychological tests. The participants were divided into three groups based on their performance on the Oxford Quick Placement Test (QPT): monolinguals^[32]1 (17 females, 13 males ; M[age] = 28.93; SD[age] = 7.34), low-level bilinguals^[33]2 (14 females, 18 males; M[age] = 29.81; SD[age] = 7.18), and high-level bilinguals^[34]3 (14 females, 16 males; M[age] = 30.3; SD[age] = 6.15). Participants had only been exposed to English in secondary and post-secondary education and in language institutes.

7
paper corpusSignosTxtLongLines455 - : To evaluate the performance of the ABWSD method, we carry out WSD using three databases: (i ) the semantically annotated corpus for the Senseval-2 English all-words task which consists of three documents with 2,456 words in 238 sentences (^[114]Palmer, Fellbaum, Cotton, Delfs & Dang, 2001), (ii) the English Semcor corpus (Fellbaum, 1998) created at Princeton University by the WordNet Project research team, which consists of more than 192,000 words in more than 19,000 sentences, and (iii) the semantically annotated corpus for the Semeval-2007 English all-words task which consists of 432 words in 96 sentences (^[115]Pradhan, Loper, Dligach & Palmer, 2007). The dictionary from which the senses were obtained was WordNet (^[116]Miller, 1995).

8
paper corpusSignosTxtLongLines455 - : The performance of the ABWSD method was evaluated by computing the following measures:

9
paper corpusSignosTxtLongLines464 - : Foster, P. & Skehan, P. (2012). Complexity, accuracy, fluency and lexis in task-based performance: A synthesis of the Ealing research . En A. Housen, F. Kuiken & I. Vedder (Eds.), Dimensions of L2 performance and proficiency: Complexity, accuracy and fluency in SLA (pp. 199-220). Amsterdam: John Benjamins. [ [132]Links ]

10
paper corpusSignosTxtLongLines529 - : The following research questions were examined in order to identify heritage language learners’ perspectives on the role of service-learning programs on their development of these key areas, evaluate learners’ professional and linguistic goals in language courses, and examine overall learner grammatical and lexical performance and development in service-learning courses:

11
paper corpusSignosTxtLongLines545 - : The decreased performance of Alzheimer’s Disease (AD) patients in semantic tasks is related to the progressive loss of the semantic attributes underlying category representation . The present study examined the extent to which semantic tasks focused on the ‘living beings’ category are affected as a function of the type of semantic relation between the nodes and the degree of cognitive impairment associated to AD. One hundred and eight volunteer participants from the Autonomous City of Buenos Aires, Argentina (Age M = 71 years old, SD = 6, Education M = 10 years old, SD = 5) completed a true-false sentence verification task. The task evaluated three types of semantic relation: taxonomic, part-whole and evaluative. The sample was divided into four groups, based on their cognitive performance: controls (n = 27), mild cognitive impairment or MCI (n = 50), mild AD (n = 36) and moderate AD (n = 14). The results showed decreased performance in false statements and greater impairment of the

12
paper corpusSignosTxtLongLines546 - : Raboutet, C., Sauzéon, H., Corsini, M. M., Rodrigues, J., Langevin, S. & N’Kaoua, B. (2010). Performance on a semantic verbal fluency task across time: Dissociation between clustering, switching and categorical exploitation processes . Journal of Clinical and Experimental Neuropsychology, 32, 268-280. [ [168]Links ]

Evaluando al candidato performance:


1) semantic: 6 (*)
2) task: 6 (*)
3) females: 6
4) males: 6
8) participants: 5
11) escritura: 4 (*)
12) lexical: 4 (*)
14) condition: 4
16) accuracy: 4
18) annotated: 3 (*)
19) fluency: 3 (*)
20) sentences: 3 (*)

performance
Lengua: eng
Frec: 280
Docs: 98
Nombre propio: 1 / 280 = 0%
Coocurrencias con glosario: 7
Frec. en corpus ref. en eng: 466
Puntaje: 7.742 = (7 + (1+5.78135971352466) / (1+8.13442632022093)));
Rechazado: muy común;

Referencias bibliográficas encontradas sobre cada término

(Que existan referencias dedicadas a un término es también indicio de terminologicidad.)
performance
: Agirre, E., Baldwin, T. & Martínez, D. (2008). Improving parsing and PP attachment performance with sense information. In Proceedings of ACL-08: HLT (pp. 317-325).
: Balharry, G. (2006). The use of lexical communication strategies in the performance of oral tasks by learners of English as a Second Language. Unpublished master’s thesis, Universidad de Chile, Santiago, Chile.
: Balota, D. & Chumbley, J. (1984). Are lexical decisions a good measures of lexical access? The role of word frequency in the neglected decision stage. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human perception and performance, 10, 340-357.
: Banaruee, H., Khatin-Zadeh, O. & Ruegg, R. (2018). Recasts vs. direct corrective feedback on writing performance of High School EFL learners. Cogent Education, 5(1), 23.
: Bauman, R. & Briggs, Ch. (1990). Poetics and performance as critical perspectives on language and social life. Annual Review of Anthropology, 19, 59-88.
: Bauman, R. (1975). Verbal art as performance. American Anthropologist, New Series, 77(2), 290-311.
: Bell, P. & Volckmann, D. (2011). Knowledge surveys in general chemistry: Confidence, overconfidence, and performance. Journal of Chemical Education, 88(11), 1469-1476.
: Best, C. T., McRoberts, G. W. & Sithole, N. M. (1988). Examination of perceptual reorganization for nonnative speech contrasts: Zulu click discrimination by English-speaking adults and infants. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 14(3), 345-360.
: Bialystok, E. (1992). Attentional control in children's metalinguistic performance and measures of field independence. Developmental Psychology, 4, 654-664.
: Briggs, Ch. (1988). Competence in performance. The creativity of tradition in Mexicano verbal art. Philadelphia: University of Pensilvannia Press.
: Buriel, R., Perez, W., De Ment, T. L., Chavez, D. V. & Moran, V. R. (1998). The relationship of language brokering to academic performance, biculturalism, and self-efficacy among Latino adolescents. Hispanic Journal of Behavioral Sciences, 20(3), 283-297.
: Byalistok, E. & Bouchard, E. R. (1985) "A metacognitive framework for the development of first and second language skills" en D. L. Forrest-Presley, G. E. MacKinnon y T. Gary Waller (Eds.) Metacognition, Cognition and Human Performance, Orlando: Academic Press, 207-252.
: Campbell, K., Mothersbaugh, D., Brammer, C. & Taylor, T. (2001). Peer versus self assessment of oral business presentation performance. Business Communication Quarterly, 64, 23-42.
: Catricalà, E., Della Rosa, P. A., Plebani, V., Garrard, P. & Cappa, S. F. (2015). Semantic feature degradation and naming performance. Evidence from neurodegenerative disorders. Brain and Language, 147, 58-65.
: Chen, M., Chen, W. & Lee, H. (2019). Memory performance of people with different dementia severity for different semantic hierarchies. Experimental Aging Research, 45(3), 266-281.
: Clark, H. H. & Carlson, T. B. (1981). Context for comprehension. Attention and performance IX, 313-330.
: Clarke, M. A. (1980). The short circuit hypothesis of ESL reading or when language competence interferes with reading performance. Modern Language Journal, 64(2), 203-209.
: Culicover, P.W. (2013). Grammar & complexity. Language at the intersection of competence and performance. Oxford: Oxford University Press .
: Demetriou, E. & Holtzer, R. (2017). Mild cognitive impairment moderate the effect of time on verbal fluency performance. Journal of the International Neuropsychological Society, 23(1), 44-55.
: Duijnhouwer, H. (2010). Feedback effects on student’s writing motivation, process and performance. Países Bajos: Dutch Interuniversity Centre for Educational Research.
: Forrest-Pressley, D., Mackinnon, G. & Gary Waller, T. (1985). Metacognition, cognition and human performance: Instructional Practices. Reino Unido: Academic Press inc. Ltd.
: Frazier, L. (1987). Sentence processing: A tutorial review. En M. Coltheart (Ed.), Attention and Performance XII (pp. 561-587). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
: Gordon, C. y C. Brown (1985) Metacognitive processes: reading and writing narrative discourses, en D.L. Forrest-Pressley, G.E. MacKinnon y G. Waller (Eds.), Metacognition, cognition and human performance. New York: Academic Press.
: Gottardo, A., Stanovich, K. E. & Siegel, L. (1996). The relationships between phonological sensitivity, syntactic processing, and verbal working memory in the reading performance of third–grade children. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 63, 563-582.
: Gregersen, T. & Horwitz, E. (2002). ‘Language learning and perfectionism: Anxious and non-anxious language learners’ reactions to their own oral performance. The Modern Language Journal, 86, 562-570.
: Gualda, R. (2012). The discourse of Hugo Chavez in Aló Presidente: Establishing the Bolivarian revolution through television performance. Tesis doctoral, Universidad de Austin, Texas, Estados Unidos.
: Hall, J. R., Harvey, M., Vo, H. T. & O’Bryant, S. E. (2011). Performance on a measure of category fluency in cognitively impaired elderly. Aging, Neuropsychology, and Cognition, 18(3), 353-361.
: Haswell, R. H. (1986). Change in undergraduate and post-graduate writing performance: Quantified findings (Technical Report). Retrieved from: ERIC database. (ED269780)
: Henry, J. D. & Crawford, J. R. (2004). A meta-analytic review of verbal fluency performance following focal cortical lesions. Neuropsychology, 18, 284-295.
: Henry, J. D., Crawford, J. R. & Phillips, L. H. (2004). Verbal fluency performance in dementia of the Alzheimer’s type: a meta-analysis. Neuropsychologia, 42(9), 1212-1222.
: Herd, S., Banich, M. & O’Reilly, R. (2006). Neural mechanisms of cognitive control: An integrative model of Stroop task performance and fMRI data. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 18(1), 22-32.
: Housen, A., Kuiken, F. & Vedder, I. (2012). Dimensions of L2 performance and proficiency: Complexity, accuracy and fluency in SLA. Nueva York: John Benjamins.
: Jackson, G., Mathews, E., Lin, D. & Graesser, A. (2003). Modeling student performance to enhance the pedagogy of AutoTutor. En P. Brusilovsky, A. Corbett & F. de Rosis (Eds.), Lecture Notes in Computer Science (pp. 368-372). New York: Springer.
: Kim, H., Yoon, J. H., Lee, J. E., Baek, E. J., Sohn, Y. H. & Na, D. L. (2011). Is confrontation naming performance in Alzheimer’s disease the nominal linguistic retrogenesis of normal development? European Neurology, 66(4), 195-199.
: Kirby, J. 1984. Strategies and processes, en J. Kirby (Ed), Cognitive strategies and educational performance. New York: Academic Press, 21-38.
: Kluger, A. N. & DeNisi, A. (1996). The effects of feedback interventions on performance: A historical review, a meta-analysis, and a preliminary feedback intervention theory. Psychological Bulletin, 119(2), 254-284.
: Kobayaski, M. (2002). Method effects on reading comprehension test performance: Text organization and response form. Language Testing, 19, 193-220.
: Kraan, C., Stolwyk, R. J. & Testa, R. (2013). The abilities associated with verbal fluency performance in a young, healthy population are multifactorial and differ across fluency variants. Applied Neuropsychology: Adult, 20, 159-168.
: Lawson (1984) "Being Executive about Cognition" en Kirby, I. Eds. Cognitive Strategies and Educational Performance. Orlando: Academic Press. (pp.34-50).
: Layton, A., Robinson, J. & Lawson, M. (1998). The relationship between syntactic awareness and reading performance. Journal of Research in Reading, 21(1), 5-23.
: Leech, G. (1992). Corpora and theories of linguistic performance. En J. Svartvik (Ed.), Trends in Linguistics Studies and Monographs Directions in Corpus Linguistics (pp.105-122). Nueva York: Mouton de Gruyter.
: Letts, C., Edwards, S., Sinka, I., Schafer, B. & Gibbons, W. (2013). Socio-economic status and language acquisition: children´s performance on the new Reynell Developmental Language Scales. International Journal of Language and Communication Disorders, 48(2), 131-143.
: Mankins, M. & Steele, R. (2005). Turning great strategy into great performance. Harvard Business Review, 83(7), 64.
: Messick, S. (1994). The interplay of evidence and consequences in the validation of performance assessments. Educational Researcher, 23(2), 13-23.
: Miller, Patricia (1985). "Metacognition and Attention" en D . L. Forrest-Presley, G. E. MacKinnon y T. Gary Waller (Eds.) Metacognition, Cognition and Human Performance. Orlando: Academic Press.
: Mitchell, D. C. (1987). Lexical guidance in human parsing: Locus and processing characteristics. En M. Coltheart (Ed.), Attention and Performance XII (pp. 601-618). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
: Moghadam, S. H., Zainal, Z. & Ghaderpour, M. (2012). A review on the important role of vocabulary Knowledge in reading comprehension performance. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 66, 555-563.
: Naveh-Benjamin, M., Craik, F. I. M., Guez, J. & Kreuger, S. (2005). Divided attention in younger and older adults: Effects of strategy and relatedness on memory performance and secondary task costs. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory and Cognition, 32, 520-537.
: Nota. Fuente: Adaptado de ^[80]Vercellotti, M.L. (2012). Complexity, Accuracy, and Fluency as Properties of Language Performance: The Development of the Multiple Subsystems over Time and in Relation to Each Other (p.73). Tesis doctoral, Universidad de Pittsburg, Estados Unidos.
: Perruchet, P. & Baveux, P. (1989). Correlational analyses of explicit and implicit memory performance. Memory & Cognition, 17(1), 77-86.
: Qiang, G. (2010). An effective algorithm for improving the performance on naive Bayes for text classification. En International conference on computer research and development. Kuala Lumpur, Malasia.
: Qin, W. & Uccelli, P. (2016). Same language, different functions: A cross-genre analysis of Chinese EFL learners’ writing performance. Journal of Second Language Writing, 33, 3-17. DOI: 10.1016/j.jslw.2016.06.001
: RUMELHART, D. (1977), Toward an Interactive Model of Reading, en Attention and performance NY, Academy Press.
: Rayner, K., Ashby, J., Pollatsek, A. & Reichle, E. (2004). The effects of frequency and predictability on eye fixations in reading: Implications for the E-Z Reader Model. Journal of Experimental Psychology & Human Perception Performance, 30(4), 720-32.
: Saito, Y. & Samimy, K. (1996). Foreign language anxiety and language performance: A study of learning anxiety in beginning, intermediate, and advanced-level college students of Japanese. Foreign Language Annals, 29, 239-251.
: Schneider, K. (2005) Techniques for improving the performance of naive Bayes for text classification. En International conference on computational linguistics and intelligent text processing. Ciudad de México, México.
: Scott, C. & Windsor, J. (2000). General language performance measures in spoken and written narrative and expository discourse of school age children with language learning disabilities. Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research, 43, 324-339.
: Shao, Z., Janse, E., Visser, K. & Meyer, A. S. (2014). What do verbal fluency tasks measure? Predictors of verbal fluency performance in older adults. Frontiers in Psychology, 5, 772.
: Siegelman, N., Bogaerts, L., Elazar, A., Arciuli, J. & Frost, R. (2018). Linguistic entrenchment : Prior knowledge impacts statistical learning performance. Cognition, 177(April), 198-213 [en línea]. Disponible en: [129]https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cognition.2018.04.011
: Skehan, P. & Foster, P. (1997). Task type and task processing conditions as influences on foreign language performance. Language teaching research, 1(3), 185-211.
: Skehan, P. (2009). Modelling second language performance: Integrating complexity, accuracy, fluency, and lexis. Applied Linguistics, 30(4), 510-532.
: Soozandehfar, S. M. A. (2010). Is oral performance affected by motivation?Journal of Pan-Pacific Association of Applied Linguistics, 14(2), 105-119.
: Tabossi, P., Spivey-Knowlton, M., McRae, K. & Tanenhaus, M. (1994). Semantic effects on syntactic ambiguity resolution. En C. Umilta & M. Moscovitch (Eds.), Attention and Performance XV (pp. 589-615). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
: Tse, L. (1995a). Language brokering among Latino adolescents: Prevalence, attitudes, and school performance. Hispanic Journal of Behavioral Sciences, 17(2), 180-193.
: Turner, M. A. (1999). Generating novel ideas: Fluency performance in high functioning and learning disabled individuals with autism. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 40, 189-201.
: Unruh, V. (1998). Una equívoca Eva moderna: Performance y pesquisa en el proyecto cultural de Antonieta Rivas Mercado. Revista de Crítica Latinoamericana, 24(48), 61–84.
: Vercellotti, M. (2012). Complexity, accuracy, and fluency as properties of language performance: The development of the multiple subsystems over time and in relation to each other. Tesis doctoral, Universidad de Pittsburg, Estados Unidos.
: Vercellotti, M. (2015). The development of complexity, accuracy, and fluency in second language performance: A longitudinal study. Applied Linguistics, 36(2), 1-23.
: Vitevitch, M. (2002). Infuence of onset density on spoken word recognition. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 28, 270-278.
: Wallace, D. & Hinsz, V. (2009). Group members as actors and observers in attributions of responsibility for group performance. Small Group Research, 40, 52-71.
: Wellman H. M. (1985) "The Origins of metacognition". En D. L. Forrest-Presley, G. E. Mackinnon y T. G. Waller (Eds), Metacognition, cognition and human performance. New York: Academic Press pp. 1-3.
: Yanagawa, K. & Green, A. (2008). To show or not to show: The effects of item stems and answer options on performance on a multiple-choice listening comprehension test. System, 36(1), 107-122.
: Ying-hui, H. (2006). An investigation into the task features affecting EFL listening comprehension text performance. The Asian EFL journal quarterly, 8(2), 33-54.
: Yule, G. & Tarone, E. (1990). Eliciting the performance of strategic competence. In R. Scarcella, E. Andersen & S. Krashen (Eds.), Developing Communicative Competence in a Second Language (pp. 179-194). Boston: Heinle & Heinle.
: Yussen, S. (1985) "The role of metacognition in contemporary theories of cognitive development" en Forrest-Pressley, Mackinnon y Waller (Eds.) Metacognition, Cognition and Human Performance, Orlando: Academic Press, 253-283.
: “verbal and non verbal communication that may be called into action to compensate for breakdowns in communication due to performance variables or to insufficient competence” (^[26]Canale & Swain, 1980: 30).