Termout.org logo/LING


Update: February 24, 2023 The new version of Termout.org is now online, so this web site is now obsolete and will soon be dismantled.

Lista de candidatos sometidos a examen:
1) proposals (*)
(*) Términos presentes en el nuestro glosario de lingüística

1) Candidate: proposals


Is in goldstandard

1
paper corpusSignosTxtLongLines282 - : Success in obtaining international funding for the implementation of research projects may be the result of an interplay of a great variety of factors. The results of this study contribute to an understanding of interpersonal positioning in the scientific community through the use of heteroglossic strategies. There is no attempt to imply that the achievement of the social purpose of this genre is a direct consequence of this single factor; writing proposals such as the ones under analysis constitutes a very complex process . Nevertheless, the role of evaluative resources cannot be underestimated.

2
paper corpusSignosTxtLongLines283 - : Success in obtaining international funding for the implementation of research projects may be the result of an interplay of a great variety of factors. The results of this study contribute to an understanding of interpersonal positioning in the scientific community through the use of heteroglossic strategies. There is no attempt to imply that the achievement of the social purpose of this genre is a direct consequence of this single factor; writing proposals such as the ones under analysis constitutes a very complex process . Nevertheless, the role of evaluative resources cannot be underestimated.

3
paper corpusSignosTxtLongLines319 - : We have seen that several researchers have tried to account for ser and estar based on syntactic, semantic and pragmatic approaches. This just shows how complex it is to characterize the behavior of the two Spanish copulas. Leaving aside the controversial topic of whether the relevant distinctions are encoded in the syntax, the semantics, the pragmatics of either, the copulas or the whole predication, most of the influential proposals seem to converge on the following general picture: Predicates with ser and estar give rise to different interpretations: ser predicates are generally (but not necessarily ) associated with properties that are perceived to last, to be permanent, to be inherent while estar predicates are commonly (but not always) associated with properties that are perceived as temporary, non-inherent and easy to change. Thus, most analyses agree that ser predicates are more relaxed than estar predicates in temporal terms. Importantly, ser is seen as disconnected from the

4
paper corpusSignosTxtLongLines510 - : ^3No debe olvidarse, pues, que “The generative approach to lexical semantics derives its name from the use of generative devices instead of a fixed set of primitives. Much of the theory consists of structuring and integrating a number of well-known proposals on specific topics in lexical semantics and knowledge representation into one coherent theory” (Heylen, 1995: 129 ). Vid. De Miguel (2012, 2014) para un panorama actual sobre algunos proyectos lexicológicos en marcha.

5
paper corpusSignosTxtLongLines577 - : Regarding RQ2: ‘What is the discourse style of crowdfunding projects in terms of grammatical complexity, elaboration and degree of explicitness of meanings?’, this exploratory study strongly suggests that grammar is a key language variable that shapes the discourse style of this genre and, above all, that language forms “functionally match the requirements” of a particular situation (^[131]Biber & Conrad, 2019). Supporting the claim that emerging genres in the Internet draw on features of existing genres (^[132]Herring, 2013; ^[133]Giltrow, 2017), the discourse style of the proposals proved to be to some extent similar to that of an already existing genre, the research project proposal: a style characterised by structurally complex grammar patterns that convey information very explicitly and, therefore, a style strongly associated with densification and economy . This is precisely the style of informational registers in English and Spanish (^[134]Biber et al., 1999; ^[135]Parodi, 2010,

Evaluando al candidato proposals:


2) predicates: 5 (*)
4) genre: 4 (*)
6) semantics: 3 (*)
9) projects: 3
11) discourse: 3 (*)

proposals
Lengua: eng
Frec: 88
Docs: 28
Nombre propio: / 88 = 0%
Coocurrencias con glosario: 4
Puntaje: 4.702 = (4 + (1+4.24792751344359) / (1+6.4757334309664)));
Candidato aceptado

Referencias bibliográficas encontradas sobre cada término

(Que existan referencias dedicadas a un término es también indicio de terminologicidad.)
proposals
: Cirillo, L. & Niemants, N. (Eds.) (2017). Teaching Dialogue Interpreting: Research-based Proposals for Higher Education. Amsterdam, Netherlands: John Benjamins .
: Connor, U. & Mauranen, A. (1999). Linguistic analysis of grant proposals: European Union research grants. English for Specific Purposes, 18(1), 47-62.
: Connor, U. & Upton, T. (2004b). The genre of grant proposals: A corpus linguistics analysis. En U. Connor & T. Upton (Eds.), Discourse in the professions. Perspectives from corpus linguistics (pp. 235-255). Amsterdam: Benjamins.
: Fuertes-Olivera, P. A. (2009). Specialised lexicography for learners: Specific proposals for the construction of pedagogically-oriented printed business dictionaries. Hermes. Journal of Language and Business Communication, 42, 167-188.
: Fábregas, A. (2012). A guide to IL and SL in Spanish: Properties, problems and proposals. Borealis: An International Journal of Hispanic Linguistics, 1(2), 1-71.
: Kövecses, Z. (2008). Conceptual metaphor theory: Some criticisms and alternative proposals. Annual Review of Cognitive Linguistics, 6(1), 168-184.
: Pascual, M. & Unger, L. (2010). Appraisal in the research genres: An analysis of grant proposals by Argentinean researchers. Revista Signos. Estudios de Lingüística , 43(73), 261-280.
: Rabadán, R. (2016). Proposals in meeting minutes. An English-Spanish corpus-based study. Languages in Contrast, 16(2), 213-238. DOI: 10.1075/lic.16.2.03rab
: Tribble, C. (2000). Genres, Keywords, Teaching: Towards a Pedagogic Account of the Language of Project Proposals. In L. Burnard & T. McEnery (Eds.), Rethinking Language Pedagogy from Corpus Perspective (pp. 74-90). New York: Peter Lang.