Termout.org logo/LING


Update: February 24, 2023 The new version of Termout.org is now online, so this web site is now obsolete and will soon be dismantled.

Lista de candidatos sometidos a examen:
1) proposition (*)
(*) Términos presentes en el nuestro glosario de lingüística

1) Candidate: proposition


Is in goldstandard

1
paper corpusSignosTxtLongLines203 - : Il faudrait pouvoir s’entendre -mais ceci est une proposition à discuter- sur le fait que les sciences du langage -dénomination qui s’est substituée, à juste titre, à celle de linguistique, trop restrictive- se développent dans deux directions : l’une, tournée vers la connaissance des structures de la langue (ou des langues ), allant, dans certains courants, jusqu’à tenter de décrire les mécanismes mentaux qui les engendrent (cognitivisme); l’autre, tournée vers les usages et l’analyse des discours, des textes et des faits de communication, s’inspirant de plusieurs courants (la philosophie analytique, la sociologie du langage, l’ethnométhodologie, la sémiologie, etc.), et s’attachant à étudier les discours sociaux.

2
paper corpusSignosTxtLongLines217 - : The difference between proposition and situation can also be illustrated by distinguishing between the different levels within an utterance. Lyons (1977) makes a similar distinction between propositions and events in terms of frst, second and third order entities (see also Hengeveld, 1989):

3
paper corpusSignosTxtLongLines598 - : According to ^[32]Palmer (2001: 1), modality “is a category that is closely associated with tense and aspect” in the sense that they affect the clause in which these phenomena appear. A more specific definition given in the same source reads as follows: “Modality is concerned with the status of the proposition that describes the event” (^[33]Palmer, 2001: 1 ). This means that modality realised by modal particles has scope over the proposition, and this, in turn, represents the stance of the author regarding the contents of the proposition. However, the notion of modality is unevenly treated in the scientific literature on the subject. The following are some of the definitions of modality:

4
paper corpusSignosTxtLongLines598 - : The function of ‘may’ in (8), as explained earlier, pursues an evaluative dimension in which the authors want to indicate how probable the fulfilment of P is. According to ^[136]Collins (2009: 92), epistemic ‘may’ is used to imply the authors’ “lack of confidence in the truth of the proposition”, and this is certainly a case of hedging in ^[137]Hyland’s (1998) terminology. In short, hedges allow writers to “present a proposition as an opinion rather than a fact” (Hyland, 1998: 5 ), and this is understood as a declaration of the lack of the authors’ commitment to the proposition (^[138]Coates, 2003).

Evaluando al candidato proposition:


1) modality: 5 (*)
2) authors: 3

proposition
Lengua: eng
Frec: 37
Docs: 9
Nombre propio: / 37 = 0%
Coocurrencias con glosario: 1
Puntaje: 1.667 = (1 + (1+3.16992500144231) / (1+5.24792751344359)));
Candidato aceptado

Referencias bibliográficas encontradas sobre cada término

(Que existan referencias dedicadas a un término es también indicio de terminologicidad.)
proposition
: Palmer, M., Gildea, D. & Kingsbury, P. (2005). The proposition bank: An annotated corpus of semantic roles. Computational linguistics, 31(1), 71-106.