Update: February 24, 2023 The new version of Termout.org is now online, so this web site is now obsolete and will soon be dismantled. |
propositional |
: 19.Reilly, Judy; Elisheva Baruch; Harriet Jisa y Ruth Berman. 2002. Propositional attitudes in written and spoken language. Written Language and Literacy (Special Issue) 5, 2. 183-218. : Berry, M. (1981b). Polarity and propositional development, their relevance to the wellformedness of an exchange. Nottingham Linguistic Circular, 10(1), 3663. : Bovair, S. & Kieras, D.E. (1985). A guide to propositional analysis for research on technical prose. In Britton, B.K. & Black, J.B. (Eds.), Understanding expository text. A theoretical handbook for analyzing explanatory text (pp. 315-362). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum. : Cozijn, Reinier, Noordman, Leo y Vonk, Wietske. 2011. Propositional integration and world-knowledge inference: Processes in understanding because sentences. Discourse Processes, 48(7), 475-500. [195]https://doi.org/10.1080/0163853X.2011.594421 : Cresswell, M. (1985). Structured Meanings: The Semantics of Propositional Attitudes. Cambridge, Mass: MIT Press. : Dennis, S. (2004). An unsupervised method for the extraction of propositional information from text. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 101, 5.206-5.213. : Frishkoff, G., & Tucker, D. (2000). Anatomy of the N400: Brain Electrical Activity in Propositional Semantics. Brain Electrophysiology Lab, University of Oregon Electrical Geodesics, Inc. : Kemper S., Thompson, T. & Marquis, J. 2001. "Longitudinal change in language production: Effects of aging and dementia on grammatical complexity and propositional content". Psychology of Aging, 16, 4, pp. 600-614. : Perrig, W. & Kintsch, W. (1985). Propositional and situational representations of text. Journal of Memory and Language, 24, 503-519. : Ratcliff, G. & McKoon, G. (1978). Priming in item recognition: Evidence for the propositional structure of sentences. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 17, 403417. : Schmalhofer, F. & Glavanov, D. (1986). Three components of understanding a progrmmer’s manual: Verbatim, propositional, and situation representations. Journal of Memory and Language, 25, 279-294. : While interpersonal elements indicate different attitudes towards the propositional material, textual elements contribute to unfolding the texts coherently and cohesively. ^[54]Crismore (1984), for instance, explains this as follows: |