/LING
|
Update: February 24, 2023 The new version of Termout.org is now online, so this web site is now obsolete and will soon be dismantled. |
Lista de candidatos sometidos a examen:
1) prosodies (*)
(*) Términos presentes en el nuestro glosario de lingüística
1) Candidate: prosodies
Is in goldstandard
1
paper CO_Íkalatxt298 - : This paper aims to characterize the discursive construction of two Chilean presi dential candidates of 2017 on education, from an intersubjective, multimodal and critical perspective, which integrates the multimodal discourse analysis, the appraisal model, and the critical discourse studies. The methodology is qualitative. The corpus is made up of the programs and television networks of the two Chilean presidential candidates. The analysis was developed in two stages, one descriptive and the other interpretive-integrative. After the analysis, the results showed that the construction of meanings is carried out through intersemiotic evaluative prosodies, in which predominate appreciations, and to a lesser extent, judgments and affects. These evaluative prosodies shape strategies of legitimiza tion and delegitimization: discredit and concealment in Piñera and alignment in Guillier . In this way, Piñera perpetuates the status quo of market logic in educa tion, while Guillier uses the
2
paper CO_Íkalatxt298 - : Cet article présente certaines caractéristiques dans la construction discursive électorale portant sur l´éducation inclusive, objet de débat entre deux candidats présidentiels au Chili en 2017 et qui ont reçu le plus de votes. On adopte une approche intégrant celle d´une intersubjectivité multimodale, d´analyse des émotions et d´analyse critique du discours. La méthodologie est qualitative. Le corpus regroupe les programmes et émissions de télévision au cours desquelles apparaissent les deux candidats chiliens. Nous avons développé l´analyse en deux étapes, l´une descriptive et l’autre interprétative. Les résultats rendent comptent de prosodies axiologiques intersémiotiques: il y prédomine les appréciations et dans une moindre mesure, les jugements et les émotions . Ces prosodies évaluatives se constituent en stratégies de légitimation ou délégitimation: discrédit et évitement chez Piñera ce qui lui permet de perpétuer le status quo de la logique mercantile de l´éduca
Evaluando al candidato prosodies:
1) deux: 3
3) piñera: 3
prosodies
Lengua: eng
Frec: 20
Docs: 11
Nombre propio: / 20 = 0%
Coocurrencias con glosario:
Puntaje: 0.706 = ( + (1+2.8073549220576) / (1+4.39231742277876)));
Candidato aceptado
Referencias bibliográficas encontradas sobre cada término
(Que existan referencias dedicadas a un término es también indicio de terminologicidad.)| prosodies |
: 17. Firth, J. C. (1948). Sounds and Prosodies. Transactions of the Philological Society: 127-152. : Dam-Jensen, H. & Zethsen, K. K. (2008). Translator awareness of semantic prosodies. Target, 20(2), 203-221. : D’Imperio, Mariapaola, Gorka Elordieta, Sónia Frota, Pilar Prieto e Marina Vigário. 2005. Intonational phrasing in Romance: the role of syntactic and prosodic structure, em S. Frota, M. Vigário e M. J. Freitas (eds.), Prosodies, Berlin/New York, Mouton de Gruyter: 59-97. : Hood, S. (2006). The persuasive power of prosodies: Radiating values in academic writing. Journal of English for Academic Purposes, 5(1), 37-49. [116]https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jeap.2005.11.001 : Louw, B. & Chateau, C. (2010). Semantic prosody for the 21st century: Are prosodies smoothed in academic contexts? A contextual prosodic theoretical perspective. In Proceedings of 10th International Conference on Statistical Analysis of Corpus Study (pp. 755-764). : Louw, B. (1993). Irony in the Text or Insincerity in the Writer? The Diagnostic Potential of Semantic Prosodies. In M. Baker, G. Francis & E. Tognini-Bonelli (Eds.), Text and Technology: In Honour of John Sinclair (pp. 157-175). Amsterdam: John Benjamins. : Louw, B. (2000). Contextual Prosodic Theory: Bringing Semantic Prosodies to Life. In C. Heffer, H. Sauntson & G. Fox (Eds.), Words in Context: A Tribute to John Sinclair on his Retirement (pp. 48-94). Birmingham: ELR. : Philip, G. (2009). Why prosodies aren’t always present. Insights into the idiom principle. Proceedings of the Corpus Linguistics Conference, University of Liverpool, Liverpool. : Sardinha, T. (2000). Semantic prosodies in English and Portuguese: A contrastive study. Cuadernos de Filología Inglesa, 9, 93-109. : Silverman, Kim. (1990). The separation of prosodies. John Kigston y Mary Bechian (Eds.) Papers in Laboratory Phonology I (139-151). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. |