/LING
|
Update: February 24, 2023 The new version of Termout.org is now online, so this web site is now obsolete and will soon be dismantled. |
Lista de candidatos sometidos a examen:
1) psycholinguistic (*)
(*) Términos presentes en el nuestro glosario de lingüística
1) Candidate: psycholinguistic
Is in goldstandard
1
paper corpusSignosTxtLongLines463 - : This paper is part of a comprehensive study on the psycholinguistic processing of causality and counter-causality in discourse. The particular aim is to analyze the articulation between the semantic and syntactic information during this process. That is, how the syntactic complexity is related to the processing complexity when readers have to understand pieces of discourse that express particular semantic relationships: causal and counter-causal. One of the main objectives will be to study how the performance pattern changes when the possibility / impossibility to involve world knowledge conditions the process. We present a psycholinguistic experiment, which aims at analyzing the comprehension of causal and counter-causal relations, expressed by sentences with different syntactic structure -coordinates and subordinates- and in two conditions regarding the type of information: every-day items -the speaker may involve their world knowledge- and technical items -this intervention of previous
Evaluando al candidato psycholinguistic:
1) syntactic: 3 (*)
psycholinguistic
Lengua:
Frec: 46
Docs: 29
Nombre propio: / 46 = 0%
Coocurrencias con glosario: 1
Puntaje: 1.458 = (1 + (1+2) / (1+5.55458885167764)));
Candidato aceptado
Referencias bibliográficas encontradas sobre cada término
(Que existan referencias dedicadas a un término es también indicio de terminologicidad.)| psycholinguistic |
: Brennan, S. E. & Hanna, J. E. (2017). Psycholinguistic approaches. En E. Weigand (Ed.), The Routledge Handbook of Language and Dialogue (pp. 93-108). Nueva York: Routledge. : Cenoz, J. & Genesee, F. (1998). Psycholinguistic perspectives on multilingualism and multilingual education. En J. Cenoz & F. Genesee (Eds.), Beyond bilingualism: Multilingual and multilingual education (pp. 16-32). Clevedon: Multilingual Matters. : Coltheart, M. (1981). The MRC psycholinguistic database. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 33A, 497-505. : Cornejo, C., Simonetti, F., Aldunate, N., Ibáñez, A., López, V. & Melloni, L. (2007). Electrophysiological evidence of different interpretive strategies in irony comprehension. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research, 36(6), 411-430. : Fox, B. & Routh, D. (1975). Analyzing spoken language into words, syllables and phonemes: A developmental study. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research, 4, 331-342. : Frauenfelder, U. & Schreuder, R. (1992). Constraining psycholinguistic models of morphological processing and representation: The role of productivity. En G. Booij & J. van Marle (Eds.), Yearbook of morphology (pp. 165-183). Dordrecht: Kluwer. : Gibbs, R. & Nayak, N. (1989). Psycholinguistic studies on the syntactic behavior of idioms. Cognitive Psychology, 21(1), 100-138. : Gibbs, R. (1985). On the process of understanding idioms. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research, 14(5), 465-472. : Gibbs, R. (1990). Psycholinguistic studies on the conceptual basis of idiomaticity. Cognitive Linguistics, 1, 417-451. : Goodman, K. (1980b). Reading a psycholinguistic guessing game. En H. Singer & R. Ruddell (Eds.), Theoretical models and processes of reading (pp. 497-508). Newark, DE: International Reading Association. : Guasch, M., Boada, R., Ferré, P. & Sánchez-Casas, R. M. (2013). NIM: A Web-based Swiss army knife to select stimuli for psycholinguistic studies. Behavioral Research Methods, 45(3), 765-771. : Izumi, S. (2003). Comprehension and production processes in second language learning: In search of the psycholinguistic rationale of the noticing hypothesis. Applied Linguistics, 24(2), 168-196. : Kasper, G. & Kellerman, E. (1997). Communication strategies, Psycholinguistic and Sociolinguistic perspectives. United States: Pearson Education Limited. : Lobina, D., Demestre, J. & García-Albea, J. E. (en prensa). Disentangling perceptual and psycholinguistic factors in syntactic processing: Tone monitoring via ERPs. Behavior Research Methods. : Louwerse, M. & Jeuniaux, P. (2009). Computational psycholinguistic techniques to measure cohesion in discourse. En J. Renkema (Ed.), Discourse of course (pp.213-226). Amsterdam: Benjamins. : MacWhinney, B. (2005). A unified model of language acquisition. In J. F. Kroll & A. M. B. de Groot (Eds.), Handbook of bilingualism: Psycholinguistic approaches (pp. 49-67). New York: Oxford University Press. : McKoon, G. & Ratcliff, R. (1998). Memory based language processing: Psycholinguistic research in the 1990’s. Annual Review of Psychology, 49, 25-42. : Mitchell, D., Cuetos, F., Corley, M. & Brysbaert, M. (1995) Exposure-based models of human parsing: Evidence for the use of coarse-grained (non-lexical) statistical records. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research, 24, 469-488. : Pollio, H., Fabrizi, M., Sills, A. & Smith, M. (1984). Need metaphoric comprehension take longer than literal comprehension? Journal of Psycholinguistic Research, 13(3), 195-214. : Streb, J., Hennighausen, E. & Rösler, F. (2004). Different anaphoric expressions are investigated by event-related brain potentials. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research, 33(3), 175-201. : Wagner, J. & Firth, A. (1997). Communication strategies at work. In G. Kasper & E. Kellerman (Eds.), Communication Strategies: Psycholinguistic and Sociolinguistic Perspectives (pp. 323-344). London & New York: Longman . : Wayland, R., Landfair, D., Li, B. & Guion, S. G. (2006). Native Thai speakers’ acquisition of English word stress patterns. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research, 35(3), 285-304. : Yule, G. & Tarone, E. (1997). Investigating communication strategies in L2 reference: Pros and cons. In G. Kasper & E. Kellerman (Eds.), Communication Strategies: Psycholinguistic and Sociolinguistic Perspectives (pp. 17-30). London & New York: Longman . : Ziegler, J. & Goswami, U. (2005). Reading acquisition, developmental dyslexia, and skilled reading across languages: A psycholinguistic grain size theory. Psychological Bulletin, 131(1), 3-29. |