Termout.org logo/LING


Update: February 24, 2023 The new version of Termout.org is now online, so this web site is now obsolete and will soon be dismantled.

Lista de candidatos sometidos a examen:
1) references (*)
(*) Términos presentes en el nuestro glosario de lingüística

1) Candidate: references


Is in goldstandard

1
paper corpusSignosTxtLongLines177 - : 1. For several values of n (usually from 1 to 3), calculate the Modified Unified Precision (MUP) of the student answer, i.e. the percentage of n-grams from the student's answer which appears in any of the references:

2
paper corpusSignosTxtLongLines177 - : 3. Apply a brevity factor to penalise the texts shorter than all the references:

3
paper corpusSignosTxtLongLines426 - : Similar approach was taken in the study of personal deixis in Spanish political-electoral debate between Felipe González and José María Aznar during the 1993 general elections (Arroyo, 2000). As a result, the author discovers two major personal deictic references: the presidential I and the partisan we:

4
paper corpusSignosTxtLongLines426 - : Thus, the present study departs from a corpus analysis of deictic items and reference chains found in this speech. Among the deictic items under scrutiny, stand out personal references (e.g., nosotros (we) / Ustedes (you, plural) / ellos (they)), demonstratives and locatives, particularly, time and space anchors, like binaries este / ese (this / that), and acá / allá (here / there). These seem to play a role in reconfiguring or disambiguating rhetorical space thereby (dis)connecting the addressees with the message of political kind (Cramer, 2010). Regarding the first group of deictic items, i.e., personal references, Yang (2011: 129) distinguishes between their deictic and social roles, claiming that:

5
paper corpusSignosTxtLongLines426 - : As has been claimed at the beginning of this paper, the present study departs from the concept of rhetorical space (rather than rhetoric per se) and its definition through deixis following Werth’s approach (Werth, 1999; Gavins, 2005; 2007). In this case, the study is done merely through the linguistic analysis of the deictic references, “whose meaning is not encoded intrinsically, but instead depends on the context of utterance in order to ‘anchor’ the meaning” (Mulderrig, 2012: 708 ). This, in its turn, is believed to play the main role in the construction of rhetorical space. In other words, this paper departs from the representative notion of political discourse, rather than from its decision-making and action counterparts, leaving, thus, aside the argumentative and reasoning facets of the analysis, and concentrating on the way political actors represent or construct the reality (Fairclough & Fairclough, 2012) in a certain context[27]^[3].

6
paper corpusSignosTxtLongLines426 - : According to Yang (2011: 129), “a text, whether in its written or oral realization, is closely related to the concepts of space and time”, and “every utterance token is spatio-temporary unique, being spoken or written at a particular place and at a particular time. Thus, the second set of analyses deals with the spatial (or local) and time adverbial deictic references based on two-level ‘distance’ range with the speaker as a referent point, or ‘the centre of conceptualization’ (Yang, 2011): distal vs . proximal, where proximal pole is considered to be more close to the speaker and the distal one – closer to the addressee (Stawarska, 2008; Cornish, 2011):

7
paper corpusSignosTxtLongLines596 - : “reflexive linguistic expressions referring to the evolving text per se or its linguistic form, including references to the writer persona and the imagined reader qua reader and the reader of the current text” (^[59]Ädel, 2005: 154 ).

Evaluando al candidato references:


1) deictic: 7 (*)
6) yang: 3
7) rhetorical: 3 (*)
8) reader: 3 (*)
9) departs: 3
11) items: 3
13) linguistic: 3 (*)

references
Lengua: eng
Frec: 93
Docs: 29
Nombre propio: / 93 = 0%
Coocurrencias con glosario: 4
Frec. en corpus ref. en eng: 108
Puntaje: 4.755 = (4 + (1+4.70043971814109) / (1+6.55458885167764)));
Rechazado: muy común;

Referencias bibliográficas encontradas sobre cada término

(Que existan referencias dedicadas a un término es también indicio de terminologicidad.)
references
: Carciu, O. (2009). An intercultural study of first-person plural references in biomedical writing. Ibérica, 18, 71-92.
: Chubin, D. E. & Moitra, S. D. (1975). Content analysis of references: Adjunct or alternative to citation counting. Social Studies of Science, 5, 423-41.
: Fløttum, K. (2003). Bibliographical references and polyphony in research articles. En K. Fløttum & F. Rastier (Eds.), Academic discourse. Multidisciplinary approaches (pp. 97-119). Oslo: Novus Press.
: The statistical module of Atenea relies on the BiLingual Evaluation Understudy (BLEU) algorithm (Papineni, Roukos, Ward & Zhu, 2001). Basically, it looks for n-gram coincidences between the student's answer and the references. Its pseudocode is as follows: