/LING
|
Update: February 24, 2023 The new version of Termout.org is now online, so this web site is now obsolete and will soon be dismantled. |
Lista de candidatos sometidos a examen:
1) composition (*)
(*) Términos presentes en el nuestro glosario de lingüística
1) Candidate: composition
Is in goldstandard
1
paper corpusSignosTxtLongLines421 - : Multimodality is the term followed in this article because it is used by Kress and van Leeuwen (2006), the authors of the model of visual grammar chosen in this paper. Their approach will be followed for the analysis of the images in this article. These authors propose three main types of composition in multimodal texts that will be taken into account in this paper: (a ) the ‘information value’, or compositional organization (e.g. centre/margin, top/bottom or left/ right); (b) ‘salience’, or different elements designed to catch the readers’ attention (e.g. size, colour or sharpness, backgrounding or foregrounding); and c) ‘framing’, or presence or absence of frames that connect or disconnect elements pointing out whether they go together or not in the making of meanings.
2
paper corpusSignosTxtLongLines421 - : The photograph is the most salient element of the composition due to its size and to the message it conveys: the politician appears foregrounded, the background is blurred but lighter than the one in the previous poster ; the fact that he is the only social actor represented contributes to emphasizing the candidate. Ahern looks directly at the audience, which is a clear way of interacting with them and requesting an answer or rather an action from them: their vote for Fianna Fáil. This can be considered a demand image (Kress & van Leeuwen, 2006), which contrasts with the one presented in the previous poster. Ahern looks less serious and more relaxed and sure than in the last poster. Moreover, the posture of his hands shows that he is a confident leader who is willing to continue doing things for Ireland. In this sense it is outstanding that, although he is also wearing smart clothes (a shirt and a tie), on this occasion he has taken off his jacket, making thus his image as a politician more
3
paper corpusSignosTxtLongLines421 - : approachable than in the previous poster; it can also be understood that he is working and he takes off his jacket in order to be more comfortable. The hands are important in the composition because there are different vectors that join them with the rest of the multimodal text: with the slogan at the bottom, with Ahern’s nose in the centre and with the name of the party at the top, which is preceded by the party’s symbol ; it has the shape of a harp, which is a typical Irish instrument.
4
paper corpusSignosTxtLongLines421 - : This political poster shows that there is a significant change in the way the candidate for Prime Minister is advertised, in the colours used, in the format, etc. This could be due to having a different candidate or to changes in marketing. The new candidate for the Fianna Fáil election campaign in 2011, Micheál Martin, appears alone in the poster under analysis. The information value of the composition shows that the poster is divided in two sections: the written text appears on the left and the photograph on the right . It is read from top to bottom because the candidate’s head appears at the top of the composition.
5
paper corpusSignosTxtLongLines510 - : ^4En aras de fidelidad al original, cito a continuación las palabras del autor: “By defining the functional behavior of lexical items at different levels of representation we hope to arrive at a characterization of the lexicon as an active and integral component in the composition of sentence meanings. Because of the more expressive mechanisms involved in composition, this approach will enable us to conflate different word senses into a single meta-entry” (Pustejovsky, 1998: 62 ).
Evaluando al candidato composition:
1) poster: 5
3) candidate: 4
6) ahern: 3
composition
Lengua: eng
Frec: 127
Docs: 58
Nombre propio: / 127 = 0%
Coocurrencias con glosario:
Frec. en corpus ref. en eng: 134
Puntaje: 0.588 = ( + (1+3.70043971814109) / (1+7)));
Rechazado: muy común;
Referencias bibliográficas encontradas sobre cada término
(Que existan referencias dedicadas a un término es también indicio de terminologicidad.)| composition |
: Alamargot, D. & Fayol, M. (2009). Modelling the development of written composition. En R. Beard, D. Myhill, J. Riley & M. Nystrand, (Eds.). The SAGE Handbook of Writing Composition (pp. 23-47). Londres: SAGE. : Alamargot, D., Caporossi, G., Chesnet, D. & Ros, C. (2011). What makes a skilled writer? Working memory and audience awareness during text composition.Learning and Individual Differences,21(5), 505-516. : Asher, N. & Pustejosky, J. (2013). A type composition Logic for Generative Lexicon. En J. Pustejovsky, P. Bouillon, H. Isahara, K. Kanzaki & C. Lee (Eds.), Advances in Generative Lexicon Theory (pp. 39-66). Nueva York / Londres: Springer. : BEREITER, C. y SCARDAMARIA, M. (1987) The Psycology of Written Composition, RILLSDALE, N. Yersey: LEA. : BOOTH, W. (1963) "The rheorical stance", College Composition and Communication, 14, 139-145. : Bereiter, C. & Scardamalia, M. (1987) The Psychology of Written Composition. Hillsdale (N.J.): Erlbaum. : Bizzell, P. (1982) College composition: Initiation into the academic discourse community. Curriculum Inquiry , 12, 191-207. : Bizzell, P. (1986) Foundationalism and anti-foundationalism in composition studies. Pre/Text, 7, 37-56. : Carr, J. F., Carr, S. L. & Schultz, L. (2005). Archives of instruction: Nineteenth-Century rhetorics, readers, and composition books in the United States. Carbondale: Southern Illinois University Press. : Carter, M. (2007). Ways of knowing, doing, and writing in the disciplines. College Composition and Communication, 58(3), 385-406. : D'ANGELO, F. (1986) "Topoi and form in composition", en D. McQuade (Ed.), The territory of language: Linguistics, stylistics, and the teaching of composition, Carbondale: Southern Illinois University Press. : Devitt, A. (1993). Generalizing about genre: New conceptions of an old concept. College Composition and Communication, 44, 573-586. : EDE, L. y LUNSFORD, A. (1988) "Audience addressed/audience invoked: The role of audience in composition theory and pedagogy", en G. Tate y E. P. J. Corbett (Eds.), The writing teacher's sourcebook, Nueva York: Oxford University Press. : ELBOW, P. (1990) "Closing my eyes as I speak: An argument for ignoring audience" en R. L. Graves (Ed.), Rhetoric and Composition, Portsmouth: Boynton/Cook Publishers, 247-266. : Ede, L. & Lunsford, A. (1984). Audience addressed/audience invoked: The role of audience in composition theory and pedagogy. College Composition and Communication, 35, 155-171. : FLOWER, L. y HAYES, J. (1981) "A cognitive process theory of writing", College Composition and Communication, 32, 363-387. : FULKERSON, R. Composition Theory in the 80': Axiological Consensus and Paradigmatic Diversity. CCC,41,1990. : Faigley, L. (1986) Competing theories of process: A critique and a proposal. College Composition and Communication, 48, 527-42. : Fey, M., Catts, H., Proctor-Williams, K., Tomblin, B. & Zhang, X. (2004). Oral and written story composition skills of children with Language Impairment. Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research, 47, 1301-1318. : Flower, L. & Hayes, J. (1980). The cognition of discovery: Defining a rhetorical problem. College composition and Comunication, 31, 21-32. : Flower, L. (1989) "Cognition, context and theory building", en College composition and communication, 40, 3. : Flower, L. y J. Hayes (1980a) The cognition of discovery: Defining a rhetorical problem. College Composition and Communication, 31, 21-32. : Flower, L., Carey, L., Schriver, K., Stratman, J. (1986) "Detection, diagnosis and the strategies of revision" College Composition and Communication, 37, pp. 16-55. : Freedman, A. & Pringle, I. (1980). Writing in the college years: Some indices of growth. College Composition and Communication, 31, 311-324. : GAGE, J. (1984) "An adequate epistemology for composition: Classical and modern perspectives", en R. Connors, L. Ede y A. Lunsford (Eds.), Essays on classical rhetoric and modern discourse. Carbondale, Southern Illinois University Press. : Goggin, M. D. (2000). Authoring a discipline. Scholarly journals and the Post-World War II Emergence of Rhetoric and Composition. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum. : Gold, D. (2012). Remapping revisionist Historiography. College Composition and Communication, 64(1), 15-34. : HAYES, J., FLOWER, L., SCHIVER, K., STRATMAN, J. y CAREY, L. (1986) "Detection, diagnosis, and the strategies of revision", College Composition and Communication, 37, 16-55. : Hairston, M. (1982) Winds of change: Thomas Kuhn and the revolution in the teaching of writing. College Composition and Communication, 33, 76-88. : Hawk, B. (2007). A counter-History of composition: Toward methodologies of complexity. Pittsburgh, PA: University of Pittsburgh Press. : Hewett, B. (2000). Characteristics of interactive oral and computer-mediated peer group talk and its influence on revision. Computers & Composition, 17, 265-88. : Hillocks, G. (1986) Research on written composition. Urbana, IL: National Council of Research in English. : KINNEAVY, J. (1979) "The relation of the whole to the part in interpretation theory and in the composing process" en D. McQuade, (Ed.), Lingusitics, style, and the teaching of composition, Akron: University of Akron. : Moskovit, L. (1983). When is broad reference clear? College Composition and Communication, 34(4), 454-469. : Mueller, D. (2012). Grasping rhetoric and composition by its long tail : What graphs can tell us about the field’s changing shape. College Composition and Communication, 64(1), 195-224. : North, S. (1987) The making of knowledge in composition. London and Portsmouth, NH: Heinemann. : Nystrand, M. Greene, S. & Wiemelt, J. (1993) Where did Composition Studies Come From? Written Communication, 10, 3, 267-333. : Pemberton, M.A. (1993) Modeling theory and composing process models. College Composition and Communication, 44, 40-58. : Phelps, L. W. & Ackerman, J. (2010). Making the Case for Disciplinarity in Rhetoric, Composition, and Writing Studies: The Visibility Project. College Composition and Communication, 62, 180-215. : Russell, D. (2006). Historical studies of composition. En P. Smagorinsky (Ed.), Research on Composition: Multiple Perspectives on Two Decades of Change (pp. 217-273). Nueva York: Teachers College. : Scardamalia, M. y C. Bereiter (1982) "Assimilated processes in composition planning", Educational Psychologist, 17, 141-159. : Schmitt, C. (2005). Semi-copulas: Event and aspectual composition. In P. Kempchinsky & R. Slabakova (Eds.), Syntax, semantics and the acquisition of aspect (pp. 121-145). Springer: Kluwer. : Shipka, J. (2009). Negotiating Rhetorical, Material, Methodological, and Technological Difference: Evaluating Multimodal Designs. College Composition and Communication, 24. : Steinberg, E., Kaufer, D. & Geisler, C. (1984). Response to Leonard Moskovit, When is broad reference clear? College Composition and Communication, 35(4), 478-486. : Straub, R. (1996). The concept of control in teacher response: Defining the varieties of “directive” and “facilitative” commentary.College Composition and Communication,47(2), 223-251. : Swales, J. (1987). Approaching the concept of discourse community. Ponencia presentada en el Annual Meeting of the Conference on College Composition and Communication, Atlanta, Georgia, Estados Unidos de Norteamérica. : Tuzi, F. (2004). The impact of e-feedback on the revisions of L2 writers in an academic writing course. Computers and Composition, 21(2), 217-235. : Van de Kopple, W. (1985). Some exploratory discourse on metadiscourse. College Composition and Communication, 36(1), 82-93. : Vande Kopple, W. (2002). Metadiscourse, discourse and issues in composition and rhetoric. In E. Barton & G. Stygall (Eds.), Discourse studies in composition. Cresskill (pp. 91-113). New Jersey: Hampton Press. : Vande Kopple, W. J. (1985). Some exploratory discourse on metadiscourse. College Composition and Communication, 36, 82-93. : Verkuyl, H. (1989). Aspectual classes and aspectual composition. Linguistics and Philosophy, 12, 39-64. : WITTE, S. (1983) "Topical structure and revision: An exploratory study", College Composition and Communication, 34, 313-341. : YOUNG, R. (1987) "Recent developments in rhetorical invention" en G. Tate (Ed.), Teaching composition, Fort Worth: Texas Christian University Press. : Yuan, Y. (2003). The use of chat rooms in an ESL setting. Computers and Composition, 20, 194-206. |