/LING
|
Update: February 24, 2023 The new version of Termout.org is now online, so this web site is now obsolete and will soon be dismantled. |
Lista de candidatos sometidos a examen:
1) cross-disciplinary (*)
(*) Términos presentes en el nuestro glosario de lingüística
1) Candidate: cross-disciplinary
Is in goldstandard
1
paper corpusSignosTxtLongLines598 - : [2]vol.54 número106 [3]Los modales dinámicos en textos de historia en lengua inglesa (1700-1900) [4]A cross-disciplinary study of verb boosters in research articles from Engineering, Medicine and Linguistics: Frequency and co-text variations [5] índice de autores [6]índice de materia [7]búsqueda de artículos [8]Home Page [9]lista alfabética de revistas
2
paper corpusSignosTxtLongLines599 - : A cross-disciplinary study of verb boosters in research articles from Engineering, Medicine and Linguistics: Frequency and co-text variations
3
paper corpusSignosTxtLongLines599 - : One of the most interesting of Peacock’s findings was the identification of booster clusters, the use of which resulted in a notable increase in the persuasive force of boosting. Regarding the cross-disciplinary variation in the frequency of booster use, writers in the two sciences (Physics and Materials Science, as well as Environmental Science) used a much higher proportion of boosters of the “evidential or implicit truth” type (^[92]Peacock, 2006: 73 ), such as ‘show’, ‘demonstrate’, ‘find’ or ‘establish’ than authors in other disciplines. Peacock suggests that writers in sciences seek to minimise their personal involvement in their findings and appear more objective, which is in accordance with ^[93]Hyland’s (1998a) line of argumentation. In addition, however, they present their claims as evidential, that is, fully based on convincing data rather than being attributable to the writer’s persuasive skills. The author argues that the choice of the verbs mentioned may reflect a disti
4
paper corpusSignosTxtLongLines600 - : [2]vol.54 número106 [3]A cross-disciplinary study of verb boosters in research articles from Engineering, Medicine and Linguistics: Frequency and co-text variations [4]English L2 connectives in academic bilingual discourse: A longitudinal computerised analysis of a learner corpus [5] índice de autores [6]índice de materia [7]búsqueda de artículos [8]Home Page [9]lista alfabética de revistas
Evaluando al candidato cross-disciplinary:
1) índice: 4
3) boosters: 4
4) verb: 3 (*)
5) articles: 3
6) medicine: 3
7) linguistics: 3 (*)
9) peacock: 3
10) engineering: 3
11) co-text: 3 (*)
cross-disciplinary
Lengua: eng
Frec: 17
Docs: 9
Nombre propio: / 17 = 0%
Coocurrencias con glosario: 3
Puntaje: 4.143 = (3 + (1+4.90689059560852) / (1+4.16992500144231)));
Candidato aceptado
Referencias bibliográficas encontradas sobre cada término
(Que existan referencias dedicadas a un término es también indicio de terminologicidad.)| cross-disciplinary |
: Batten, E. (2003). Project Essay Grade: PEG. En M. Shermis & J. Burstein (Eds.), Automated essay scoring: A cross-disciplinary perspective (pp. 39-50). Mahwah, NJ.: Erlbaum. : Lin, L. & Evans, S. (2012). Structural patterns in empirical research articles: A cross-disciplinary study. English for Specific Purposes, 31, 150-160. : Peacock, M. (2006). A cross-disciplinary comparison of boosting in research articles. Corpora, 1(1), 61-84. : Uccelli, P. , Phillips Galloway, E. P., Barr, C. D., Meneses, A. & Dobbs, C. L. (2015). Beyond vocabulary: Exploring cross-disciplinary academic-language proficiency and its association with reading comprehension. Reading Research Quarterly, 50(3), 337-356. DOI: 10.1002/rrq.104 : Vold, E. (2006). Epistemic modality markers in research articles: A cross-linguistic and cross-disciplinary study. International Journal of Applied Linguistics, 16(1), 61-87. : Wodak, R. (2007). Pragmatics and critical discourse analysis. A cross-disciplinary enquiry. Pragmatics & Cognition, 15(1), 203-225. |