Termout.org logo/LING


Update: February 24, 2023 The new version of Termout.org is now online, so this web site is now obsolete and will soon be dismantled.

Lista de candidatos sometidos a examen:
1) grammar (*)
(*) Términos presentes en el nuestro glosario de lingüística

1) Candidate: grammar


Is in goldstandard

1
paper corpusSignosTxtLongLines183 - : Lavid, J., Arús, J. & Zamorano, J. (2002). Developing a corpus-based generation grammar of Spanish: A contrastive study with English . En L. Iglesias & S. Doval (Eds.), Studies in contrastive linguistics (pp. 569-578). Santiago de Compostela: Publicaciones de la Universidad de Santiago de Compostela. [ [92]Links ]

2
paper corpusSignosTxtLongLines192 - : Castel (2004) proposes a text grammar which (a) treats field properties as belonging to a stratum lower than the genre stratum but higher than the lexicogrammatical stratum, and (b) defines field preferences that alter semantic feature probabilities in SNRs. This text grammar associates, with each terminal genre feature, a pair made up of a selection expression headed by the feature [field_entity], and a linguistic structure as in Diagram 10, where SU is a variable ranging over syntactic units:

3
paper corpusSignosTxtLongLines230 - : Martin, J.R. (2000). Grammar meets genre: Refections on the Sydney school . Inaugural lecture, Sydney associate for the arts, USyd. [en línea]. Disponible en: [67]http://www2.ocn.ne.jp/~yamanobo/systemic_bibliography/other_systemists_work/inaugural_martin.html [ [68]Links ]

4
paper corpusSignosTxtLongLines277 - : Fawcett, R. (2007b). Modelling "selection" between referents in the English nominal group: An essay in scientific inquiry in linguistics. En C. Butler, R. Hidalgo Downing & J. Lavid (Eds.), Functional Perspectives on Grammar and Discourse: Papers In Honour of Angela Downing (pp . 165-204). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.

5
paper corpusSignosTxtLongLines295 - : "The grammar of a language as a resource for making and exchanging meanings. A functional grammar is therefore the kind of grammar most likely to have useful things to say to language learners and teachers" (Lock, 1996: 3 ).

6
paper corpusSignosTxtLongLines309 - : "We need to reanalyze virtually all of English grammar at the discourse level in order to be able to teach our students rules of grammar that will serve them when they read and write English for academic purposes" (Celce-Murcia, 2002: 156 ).

7
paper corpusSignosTxtLongLines353 - : “Some linguists have in fact thought that English is only lexically ergative. But this is not a tenable position once we realize that lexis and grammar are not separate modules or components, but merely zones within a continuum: ‘lexical ergativity’ in English is an extension in delicacy of ‘grammatical ergativity’ within the experiential clause of the grammar ; and the explanation for the evolution of ergative patterning in English is grammatical in the first instance is rather than lexical.” (IFG, 286).

8
paper corpusSignosTxtLongLines360 - : Leow, R. P. (2009a). Input enhancement and L2 grammatical development: What the research reveals. In S. L. Katz & J. Watzinger-Tharp (Eds.), Conceptions of L2 grammar: Theoretical approaches and their application in the L2 classroom (pp . 16-34). Boston, MA: Heinle Publishers. [ [57]Links ]

9
paper corpusSignosTxtLongLines415 - : “To sum up, the statistical grammar checker will fail to capture errors if the errors are not word combination problems or they involve problems of non-adjacent word strings or conflicts across different clause boundaries” (Chen, 2009: 175 ).

10
paper corpusSignosTxtLongLines416 - : In our formalism, a relation phrase is limited to be either a single verb (e.g., estudia ‘studies’) or a verb immediately followed by dependent words until a preposition (e.g., atrae la atención de ‘attracts attention of’ or nació en ‘was born in’) optionally followed by infinitive (e.g., sirven bien para acentuar ‘serve well to emphasize’). The corresponding formal grammar expression for a verb phrase is:

11
paper corpusSignosTxtLongLines416 - : Another rule of our formal grammar describes noun phrases:

12
paper corpusSignosTxtLongLines416 - : To extend the coverage of our grammar, we use a rule for coordinating conjunctions:

13
paper corpusSignosTxtLongLines452 - : Ferris, D. (1999). The case for grammar correction in L2 writing classes: A response to Truscott (1996 ). Journal of Second Language Writing, 8, 1-10. [ [144]Links ]

14
paper corpusSignosTxtLongLines472 - : * Oxford Dictionaries, Thesaurus & Grammar ([145]http://www .oxforddictionaries.com/)

15
paper corpusSignosTxtLongLines500 - : In the parsing process of transforming language fragments into their equivalent semantic and grammatical structure, ARTEMIS will elaborate the constructional rules through the Grammar Development Environment by withdrawing information from the Lexicon and the Grammaticon, and this will result in the automatic generation of the CLS (^[57]Mairal & Periñán-Pascual, 2016). The CLS constructor, which is one of the three components which conforms ARTEMIS (together with the COREL-Scheme Builder and the Grammar Development Environment), is an enriched and extended text meaning representation operating on the linguistic level that takes RRG logical structures as a basis and includes the following type of information: the Aktionsart ascription represented by operators such as CACC for causative accomplishment in the locative construction displayed in [58]Figure 2 (‘He spread her toast with butter’ ); the number of constructional variables of the predicate (for instance, x, w, p in the same example)

16
paper corpusSignosTxtLongLines500 - : Of the different modules that constitute FunGramKB, it is the Lexicon and the Grammaticon that we will be focusing on in this research study. We will be specifically revising one of the attributes in the core grammar component in the Lexicon which has to do with the inventory of argumental constructions in which verbs can take part: L1- constructions .^[63]^5 The notion of construction, which is directly linked to the Grammaticon module (where constructional schemata are stored in different Constructicon modules), needs to be clearly and unequivocally defined in FunGramKB, as Periñán-Pascual himself highlights: “A key issue in this module [Grammaticon] is the definition of ‘construction’” (Periñán-Pascual, 2013: 213).

17
paper corpusSignosTxtLongLines500 - : ^[64]Periñán-Pascual (2013) points out that Goldberg’s broad conception of construction in Construction Grammar (CxG) makes it difficult to provide an accurate definition of the term since from her point of view any single lexical item (or even a suffix such as -ed) could be conceived as a construction: “all levels of grammatical analysis involve constructions” (Goldberg, 2006: 5 ). This implies that, within this broad definition, constructions are conceived as the building blocks in linguistic realization. Periñán-Pascual’s conception of construction differs from CxG and is closer to the LCM in the sense that constructions are viewed from a holistic perspective in which the meaning of the construction is always larger than the meaning of the building blocks conforming it. What is more, Periñán-Pascual (2013) shares ^[65]Ruiz de Mendoza-Ibáñez’s (2013) claim that for any linguistic pattern to be regarded as a construction some essential properties have to be met. Thus, the following criteria

18
paper corpusSignosTxtLongLines500 - : Bergen, B. K. & Chang, N. (2005). Embodied construction grammar in simulation-based language understanding. In J. Östman & M. Fried (Eds.), Construction grammars: Cognitive groundings and theoretical extensions (Constructional approaches to language 3 ) (pp. 147-190). Amsterdam: John Benjamins. [ [99]Links ]

19
paper corpusSignosTxtLongLines534 - : The positive perception held by EFL learners, including our future teachers, of poetry as a potential facilitator of grammar and vocabulary acquisition challenges two of the arguments most frequently put forward by critics of the use of poetry in EFL. These include, firstly, its detrimental effect on the development of language skills based on poetry's lexical difficulty, and secondly the deviation which poetic language entails from the conventions and rules underlying standard discourse (^[103]Lima, 2010). Surprisingly, the two benefits most widely highlighted by authors when advocating the use of poetry as a means of developing grammar and vocabulary, its memorability (^[104]Lazar, 1990) and the creativity of literary texts in contrast to the “bland correctness of specially written ESL textbooks” (^[105]Boggs, 1997: 64 ), were not mentioned by our informants perhaps due to their lack of an in-depth understanding of the stylistic features of poetic discourse.

20
paper corpusSignosTxtLongLines577 - : Grammar features and discourse style in digital genres: The case of science-focused crowdfunding projects

21
paper corpusSignosTxtLongLines577 - : VPs with copula be are generally followed by an embedded to-infinitive complement clause. Often, these clauses contain further clausal embedding, thus reflecting structural elaboration at the level of grammar:

22
paper corpusSignosTxtLongLines577 - : In response to RQ1: ‘What grammatical features characterise the genre of crowdfunding project proposals and what are the functions of these features in communicating meaning?’, the findings of the present study indicate that these proposals rely heavily on the use of phrasal patterns, being noun phrases the most frequent phrase type (almost half of all phrase types coded in the corpus). The fact that both the online and the expanded texts of the proposals were built upon “more nominal than verbal” patterns (^[110]Biber & Gray, 2010) suggests that nouns are core linguistic features in this genre. The presence of nouns, an “especially common grammar feature in academic prose” (^[111]Biber & Gray, 2016: 318 ), indicates that one function of nominal patterns is to provide information about the science being crowdfunded. As a further exploration, the constructs of tokens, types and type-token ratio (TTR) of each of the proposals ([112]Table 1), and the average means of these constructs in the

23
paper corpusSignosTxtLongLines601 - : However, the BICS/CALP dichotomy does not provide a full account of academic language. Instead, CALP arbitrates its own form and shape in each discipline. In other words, the knowledge structures of every academic discipline (mathematics, biology, history, etc.) display their specific language representations (^[30]Shanahan & Shanahan, 2008). Each field triggers particular language structures (not only lexicon) which mould a disciplinary language of its own. Equation, distribution and similarity are mathematical notions. Revolution, agreement or corroboration (fact-checking) have special significations in history. Each discipline constitutes its own properties and produces peculiar disciplinary genres (see ^[31]Biber, 1992; ^[32]Lorenzo, 2013). Peculiarities can be traced down to levels below the sentence. In history, the abundance of causal relations is accompanied by particular grammar and syntax structures: ambiguous use of conjunctions, nominalisations, implicit causal and temporal

Evaluando al candidato grammar:


3) periñán-pascual: 6
5) linguistic: 5 (*)
6) grammatical: 5 (*)
9) proposals: 4 (*)
11) phrase: 4 (*)
12) structures: 4
14) constructions: 4 (*)
15) constructional: 4 (*)
17) feature: 4
18) academic: 4
19) poetry: 4
20) lexicon: 4 (*)

grammar
Lengua: eng
Frec: 521
Docs: 158
Nombre propio: 6 / 521 = 1%
Coocurrencias con glosario: 7
Puntaje: 7.671 = (7 + (1+5.7279204545632) / (1+9.02790599656988)));
Candidato aceptado

Referencias bibliográficas encontradas sobre cada término

(Que existan referencias dedicadas a un término es también indicio de terminologicidad.)
grammar
: Amritavalli, R. (1997). Chunking, lexical phrases and collocations: The grammar of words. En V. Prakasam & K. Tirumalesh (Eds.), Issues in English grammar (pp. 100-112). Hyderabad: Central Institute of English and Foreign Languages.
: Anderson, R. (2007). Exploring the grammar of Spanish-speaking children with specific language impairment. En J. Centeno, R. Anderson & L. Obler (Eds.), Communication disorders in Spanish speakers (pp. 113-126). Londres: Multilingual Matters.
: Arús, J. & Lavid, J. (2001). The grammar of relational processes in English and Spanish: Implications for machine-aided translation and multilingual generation. Estudios Ingleses de la Universidad Complutense, 9, 61-79.
: Barres, V. & Lee, J. (2014). Template construction grammar: From visual scene description to language comprehension and agrammatism. Neuroinformatics, 12(1), 18-208.
: Bergen, B. & Chang, N. (2013). Embodied construction grammar. In T. Hoffmann & G. Trousdale (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of Construction Grammar (pp. 168-190). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
: Biber, D., Johansson, S., Leech, G., Conrad, S. & Finegan, E. (1999). Longman Grammar of Spoken and Written English. Harlow: Longman.
: Bishop, D., Adams, C. & Norbury, C. (2006). Distinct genetic influences on grammar and phonological short-term memory deficits: evidence from 6-year-old twins. Genes, brain and behavior, 5(2), 158-169.
: Boas, H. & Sag, I. (Eds.) (2012). Sign-based construction grammar. Stanford, CA: CSLI Publications.
: Boas, H. (2011). Coercion and leaking argument structures in Construction Grammar. Linguistics, 49(6), 1271-1303.
: Boas, H. C. & Sag, I. A. (Eds.) (2012). Sign-based Construction Grammar. Palo Alto Ca.: CSLI Publications.
: Bolinger, D. (1991). Essays on Spanish. Words and Grammar. Newark Delaware: Juan de la Cuesta Hispanic Monographs.
: Borer, H. (2009). Roots and categories. Ponencia presentada en el 19^th Colloquium on Generative Grammar, University of the Basque Country, Vitoria-Gasteiz.
: Bourke, J. M. (2005). The grammar we teach. Reflections on English language teaching, 4, 85-97.
: Brookes, D. & Etkina, E. (2007). Using conceptual metaphor and functional grammar to explore how language used in physics affects student learning. Physical Review Special Topics - Physics Education Research, 3(1), 010105.
: Burke, D. M. (1999). Language production and aging. En S. Kemper & R. Kliegel (Eds.), Constraints on language: Aging, grammar and memory (pp. 3-27). Boston: Kluwer Academic Publishers.
: Burston, J. (1996). A comparative evaluation of French grammar checkers. CALICO Journal,
: Butler, C. (2005). Focusing on focus: A comparison of functional grammar, role and reference grammar and systemic functional grammar. Language Sciences, 27, 585-618.
: Caffarel, A. (2004). Metafunctional profile of the grammar of French. En A. Caffarel, J. R. Martin & C. Matthiessen (Eds.), Language Typology, A functional perspective (pp. 77-137). Ámsterdam: John Benjamins.
: Caffarel, A. (2006). A Systemic Functional Grammar of French. From grammar to discourse. Londres: Continuum.
: Carter, R. (2004). Grammar and spoken English. En C. Coffin, A. Hewings & K. O’Halloran (Eds.), Applying English grammar: Functional and corpus approaches (pp. 25-39). London: Arnold.
: Castel, V. (2006a). A computer implementation of the Cardiff grammar generator. Computational Linguistics Unit, University of Cardiff, Wales, United Kingdom. [For access permission contact [96]rp.fawcett@virgin.net].
: Castel, V. (2007). Rule types in a Systemic Functional Grammar: An XML definition of the Cardiff Lexicogrammar Generator. En B. Leila & T. Berber Sardinha (Eds.), Proceedings of the 33rd International Systemic Functional Congress (pp. 270-299). San Pablo: PUCSP.
: Chaput, P. R. (1997). Culture in grammar. The Slavic and East European Journal, 41(3), 403-414.
: Chen, H.-J. (2009). Evaluating two web-based grammar checkers - Microsoft ESL Assistant and NTNU Statistical Grammar Checker. Computational Linguistics and Chinese Language Processing,
: Chierchia, G. (1982). Nominalization and Montague grammar: A semantics without types for natural languages. Linguistics and Philosophy, 5, 303-54.
: Chomsky, N. (1970). Remarks on nominalizations. En R. Jacobs & P. Rosenbaum (Eds.), Readings in English transformational grammar (pp. 184-221). Waltham Massachusetts: Ging y Co.
: Codesido, A., Coloma, C., Garayzabal, E., Marrero, V., Mendoza, E. & Pavez, M. (2012). Spanish adquisition and development of PERLS. En M. Ball, D. Crystal & P. Fletcher (Eds.), Assessing grammar. The languages of LARSP (pp. 245-281). Bristol: Multilingual Matters.
: Crain, S. & Thornton, R. (1998). Investigations in universal grammar: A guide to experiments on the acquisition of syntax and semantics. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
: Croft, W. (2001). Radical construction grammar: Syntactic theory in typological perspective. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
: Culicover, P.W. (2013). Grammar & complexity. Language at the intersection of competence and performance. Oxford: Oxford University Press .
: Dancygier, B. & Sweetser, E. (2005). Mental spaces in grammar: Conditional constructions. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
: Davidse, K. (1991). Categories of experiential grammar. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Leuven, Leuven, Belgium.
: Davidse, K. (1992). Transitivity/ergativity: The janus-headed grammar of actions and events. En M. Davies, J.R. Martin & L. Ravelli (Eds.), Advances in systemic linguistics: Recent theory and practice (pp. 105-135). London: Pinter.
: De Swart, H. (2000). Tense, aspect and coercion in a cross-linguistic perspective. EnProceedings of the Berkeley Formal Grammar conference. University of California, Berkeley, USA.
: DeKeyser, R. (1978). The effect of error correction on L2 grammar knowledge and oral proficiency. Modern Language Journal, 77, 501-514.
: Derewianka, B. (2013). A new grammar companion for teachers. Sydney: PEETA.
: Dik, S. (1997). The theory of functional grammar. Part 1. The structure of the clause. Berlín: Mouton de Gruyter.
: Dik, S. C. (1997). The Theory of Functional Grammar. Part II. Dordrecht: Foris.
: Dixon, R. (1988). A grammar of Boumaa Fijian. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
: Dixon, R. (1991). A new approach to English grammar on semantic principles. Oxford: Clarendon Press.
: Dodge, E. & Petruck, M. (2014). Representing caused motion in Embodied Construction Grammar. In Proceedings of the ACL 2014 workshop on semantic parsing (pp. 39-44). Baltimore: Maryland.
: Dowty, D. (1979). Word meaning and Montague grammar: The semantics of verbs and times in generative semantics and in Montague.s PTQ. Dordrecht: Reidel.
: Dowty, D. (1979). Word meaning and montague grammar. Dordrecht: Reidel.
: Eggins, S. (1994). An introduction to systemic functional grammar. London: Printer.
: Ellis, N. C. (2013). Second language acquisition. En G. Trousdale & T. Hoffmann (Eds.), Oxford Handbook of Construction Grammar (pp. 365-378). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
: Escobar, M. A. (2011). English grammar and learning tasks for tourism studies. Unidad Didáctica. Madrid: UNED.
: Fauconnier, G. & Sweetser, E. (1996). Spaces, worlds, and grammar. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.
: Fauconnier, G. & Turner, M. (1996). Blending as a central process of grammar. En A. Goldberg (Ed.), Conceptual structure, discourse and language (pp. 113-129). Stanford: Center for the Study of Language and Information.
: Fawcett, R. (2008). Invitation to Systemic Functional Linguistics. The Cardiff Grammar as an extension and simplification of Halliday's Systemic Functional Grammar. Beijing: Beijing University Press.
: Fawcett, R. P. (2011). Alternative architectures in systemic functional grammar. How do we choose? London: Equinox.
: Fawcett, R., Tucker, G. & Lin, Y. (1993). How a systemic functional grammar works: The role of realization in realization. In H. Horacek & M. Zock (Eds.), New concepts in natural language generation (pp. 114-86). London: Pinter.
: Fernández-Ordóñez, I. (2009). Dialect grammar of Spanish from the perspective of the Audible Corpus of Spoken Rural Spanish (or Corpus Oral y Sonoro del Español Rural, COSER). Dialectologia, 3, 23-51.
: Fillmore, C. (2006). The articulation of lexicon and constructicon. Plenary talk at the Fourth International Construction Grammar Conference (pp. 53-63). University of Tokyo, Tokyo, Japan.
: Fillmore, C. (2008). Border conflicts: FrameNet meets Construction Grammar. In Proceedings of EURALEX13 (pp. 49-68). Barcelona, Universitat Pompeu Fabra.
: Fillmore, C., Lee-Goldman, R. & Rhomieux, R. (2012). The FrameNet Constructicon. In H. Boas & I. Sag (Eds.), Sign-Based Construction Grammar (pp. 309-372). Stanford, CA: CSLI.
: Fox, B. & Thompson, S. (1990). A discourse explanation of the grammar of relative clauses in English conversation. Language, 66, 297-316.
: Francis, G. & Sinclair, J. (1994). ‘I bet he drinks Carling Black Label’: A Riposte to Owen on Corpus Grammar. Applied Linguistics, 15(2), 190-200.
: Fraser, B. (1970). Idioms within a transformational grammar. Foundation of Language, 6(1), 22-42.
: Givón, T. (1979). On understanding grammar. Nueva York/San Francisco/Londres: Academic Press.
: Givón, T. (1993). English grammar. A function-based approach. Amsterdam/ Philadelphia: Benjamins.
: Goldberg, A. (1995). Constructions. A construction grammar approach to argument structure. Chicago/Londres: The University of Chicago Press.
: Goldberg, A. (2013). Constructionist approaches. In T. Hoffmann & G. Trousdale (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of Construction Grammar (pp. 15-31). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
: Goldberg, A. E. (1995). Constructions, a construction grammar approach to argument structure. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
: Greenberg, J. (1963). Some universals of grammar with particular reference to the order of meaningful elements. En J. Greenberg, (Ed.), Universals of Language. (pp. 58-90). Massachusetts: The MIT Press.
: Grondona, V. M. (1998). A grammar of mocovi. Tesis doctoral, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, Estados Unidos.
: HALLIDAY M.A.K. (1988) An introduction to functional grammar. Arnold, London.
: Haddock, N. J., Klein, E. & Morrill, G. (1987). Categorial Grammar, Unification Grammar, and Parsing. Technical Report No. EUCCS/WP-1. Centre for Cognitive Science, Edimburgo: Universidad de Edimburgo.
: Halliday, M. & Matthiessen, C. (2004). An Introduction to Functional Grammar (3^rd ed) Londres: Arnold .
: Halliday, M. (1961). Categories of the theory of grammar. Word, 17(3), 241-292.
: Halliday, M. (1966a). Some notes on 'deep' grammar. Journal of Linguistics, 2(1), 57-67.
: Halliday, M. (1985). An introduction to Functional Grammar. Londres: Arnold.
: Halliday, M. (1991). Corpus linguistics and probabilistic grammar. En K. Aijmer & B. Altenberg (Eds.), English corpus linguistics: Studies in honour of Jan Svartvik (pp. 30-44). London: Longman.
: Halliday, M. (1994) An introduction to functional grammar, London: Arnold.
: Halliday, M. (2005). On grammar. En J. Webster (Ed.), Collected Works of M.A.K. Halliday (Vol. 1). London: Continuum.
: Halliday, M. A. K (2004a). An introduction to functional grammar. Londres: Arnold.
: Halliday, M. A. K. & Matthiessen, Ch. (2009). Systemic Functional Grammar: A first step into the theory. Beijing: Higher Education Press.
: Halliday, M. A. K. & Matthiessen, Ch. (2014). An Introduction to the Functional Grammar. Londres: Edward Arnold.
: Halliday, M. A. K. (1961). Categories of the Theory of Grammar. Word, 17, 241–292.
: Halliday, M. A. K. (1985). An introduction to Functional Grammar. Londres: Edward Arnold.
: Halliday, M. A. K. (1990). The construction of knowledge and value in the grammar of scientific discourse: Charles Darwin's The Origin of the Species. In C. De Stasio, M. Gotti & R. Bonadei (Eds.), La rappresentazione verbale e icónica (pp. 57-80). Milano: Guerini.
: Halliday, M. A. K. (1994). An Introduction to Functional Grammar, 2nd edition. Londres: Edward Arnold.
: Halliday, M. A. K. (1996). On grammar and grammatics. In R. Hasan, C. Cloran & D. Butt (Eds.), Functional descriptions: Theory and practice (pp. 1-38). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
: Halliday, M. A. K. (2004). An introduction to functional grammar. Londres: Edward.
: Halliday, M.A. K. (2005). On grammar. En J. Wenster (Ed.), Collected Works of M.A.K. Halliday (Vol.1). Londres: Continuum.
: Halliday, M.A.K. & Mathiessen, C. (2004). An introduction to functional grammar (Third edition). London: Edward Arnold.
: Halliday, M.A.K. & McDonald, E. (2004). Metafunctional profile of the grammar of Chinese. EnA. Caffarel , J. R. Martin & C.M.I.M. Matthiessen (Eds.), Language Typology: A Functional Perspective (pp. 305-396). Ámsterdam: John Benjamins.
: Halliday, M.A.K. (1967). Intonation and grammar in British English. The Hague: Mouton.
: Halliday, M.A.K. (1970). Language structure and language function. En J. Webster (Ed.), On Grammar (pp.173-195). Londres: Continuum.
: Halliday, M.A.K. (1985). An introduction to functional grammar. London: Arnold.
: Halliday, M.A.K. (1994b). The construction of knowledge and value in the grammar of scientific discourse, with reference to Charles Darwin’s The Origin of species. En M. Coulthard (Ed.), Advances in written text analysis (pp. 136-156). Londres: Routledge .
: Halliday, M.A.K. (2004). An introduction to functional grammar. London: Edward Arnold.
: Halliday, M.A.K. (2004). Metafunctional profile of the grammar of Chinese. En A. Caffarel, J.R. Martin & C.M.I.M. Matthiessen (Eds.), Language typology: A functional perspective (pp. 305-396). Amsterdam: Benjamins.
: Halliday, M.A.K. (2014). Introduction to functional grammar. Nueva York: Routledge.
: Hasan, R. (1987). The grammarian's dream: Lexis as most delicate grammar. En M. Halliday & R. Fawcett (Eds.), New developments in systemic linguistics: Theory and description (pp. 184-211). London: Pinter.
: Heine, B. (1997). Cognitive foundations of grammar. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
: Hengeveld, K. & Mackenzie, J. (2008). Functional discourse grammar. A typologically-based theory of language structure. Londres & Nueva York: OUP.
: Hengeveld, K. (1989). Layers and operators in functional grammar. Journal of Linguistics, 25, 127-157.
: Hengeveld, K. (2004). The architecture of a Functional Discourse Grammar. En J. Lachlan Mackenzie & M. A. Gómez-González (Eds.), A new architecture for Functional Grammar (pp. 1-21). Berlín: Mouton de Gruyter.
: Hinkel, E. (2004). Teaching academic ESL writing. Practical techniques in vocabulary and grammar. Mahwah: Lawrence Erlbaum.
: Hoffmann, T. & Trousdale, G. (Eds.) (2013). The Oxford handbook of construction grammar. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
: Hosali, P. (1997). Collocations in Indian English. En V. Prakasam & K. Tirumalesh (Eds.), Issues in English grammar (pp. 94-99). Hyderabad: Central Institute of English and Foreign Languages.
: Huddleston, R. & Pullum, G. K. (2002). The Cambridge grammar of the English language. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
: Hunston, S. & Francis, G. (2000). Pattern grammar. A corpus-driven approach to the lexical grammar of English. Amsterdam: John Benjamins .
: Hunston, S. & Sinclair, J. (2000). A local grammar of evaluation. En S. Hunston & G. Thompson (Eds.), Evaluation in Text: Authorial Stance and the Construction of Discourse (pp. 74-101). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
: Hunt, K. (1970). Recent measures in syntactic development. En M. Lester (Ed.), Reading in applied transformational grammar (pp. 179-192). Nueva York: Holt, Rinehart and Wiston.
: Jackendoff, R. (1972). Semantic interpretation in generative grammar. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
: Jacobs, G. & Rodgers, C. (1999). Treacherous Allies: Foreign language grammar checkers. CALICO Journal,
: Kay, M. (1979). Functional Grammar. Ponencia presentada en el 5th meeting of the Berkeley Linguistics Society, Berkeley Linguistics Society, California, USA.
: Keenan, E. L. & Comrie, B. (1977). Noun phrase accessibility and universal grammar. Linguistic Inquiry, 8(1), 63-99.
: Keenan, E. L. (1972). On semantically based grammar. Linguistic Inquiry, 3(4), 413-461.
: Knapp, P. & Watkins, M. (2005). Genre, text, grammar: Technologies for teaching and assessing writing. Sydney: UNSW Press.
: Kress, G. & Van Leeuwen, T. (2006). Reading images. The grammar of visual design. Londres/Nueva York: Routledge.
: Krifka, M. (1998). The origins of telicity. En S. Rothstein (Ed.), Events and grammar (pp. 197-235). London: Kluwer.
: Lamb, S. (1966). Outline of stratificational grammar. Washington, D.C.: Georgetown University Press.
: Langacker, R. (1986). Foundations of cognitive grammar (Vol. 1). Stanford: Stanford University Press.
: Langacker, R. (1998). Indeterminacy in semantics and grammar. En J.L. Cifuentes (Ed.), Estudios de Lingüística Cognitiva II (pp. 649–672). Alicante: Universidad de Alicante.
: Langacker, R. (1999). Grammar and conceptualization. Berlin: M. de Gruyter.
: Langacker, R. (2001). Discourse in cognitive grammar. Cognitive Linguistics, 12(2), 143–188.
: Langacker, R. W. (1991). Concept, image, and symbol: The cognitive basis of grammar. Berlín: Mouton de Gruyter.
: Lavid, J, Arús, J. & Zamorano, J. R. (2010). Systemic functional grammar of Spanish: A contrastive study with English. Londres & Nueva York: Continuum.
: Lavid, J. (2008). The grammar of emotion in English and Spanish: A systemic-functional approach. En C. Jones & E. Ventola (Eds.), From language to multimodality: New developments in the study of ideational meaning (pp. 67-85). Londres: Equinox.
: Lavid, J., Arús, J. & Zamorano, J. (2010). Systemic Functional Grammar of Spanish: A Contrastive Study with English. London: Continuum.
: Lee, S. & Huang, H. (2008). Visual input enhancement and grammar learning: A metaanalytic review. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 30(3), 307-331.
: Levin, B. & Rappaport, M. (1992). The lexical semantics of verbs of motion: The perspective from unaccusativity. En I. M. Roca (Ed.),Thematic Structure: Its Role in Grammar (pp. 247-269). Foris: Berlin.
: Lin, N. Y., Soe, K. M. & Thein, N. L. (2011). Developing a chunk-based grammar checker for translated English sentences.
: Lock, G. (1996). Functional English grammar: An introduction for second language teachers. Cambridge: Cambridge UP.
: Longacre, R. (1983). The Grammar of Discourse. New York: Plenum Press.
: Martin, J. (1997). Interpersonal meaning: Some notes on realisation. En V. Prakasam & K. Tirumalesh (Eds.), Issues in English grammar (pp. 31-49). Hyderabad: Central Institute of English and Foreign Languages.
: Martin, J. (2003). Making history, grammar for interpretation. En J. Martin & R. Wodak (Eds.), Re/reading the past: critical and functional perspectives on time and value (pp. 19-57). Amsterdam: Benjamins.
: Martin, J. (2013). Systemic Functional Grammar: A next step into the theory - axial relations. Beijing: Higher Education Press.
: Martin, J. R. (2000). Grammar meets genre: Reflections on the Sydney school. Inaugural lecture at Sydney University Arts Association.
: Martin, J. R. (2003). Making history: Grammar for explanation. In J. R. Martin & R. Wodak (Eds.), Re/reading the past: Critical and functional perspectives in time and value (pp. 19-57). Amsterdam: Benjamins.
: Martin, J. R. (2004). Metafunctional profile of the grammar of Tagalog. EnA. Caffarel , J. R. Martin & C.M.I.M. Matthiessen (Eds.), Language Typology: A Functional Perspective (pp. 255-304). Ámsterdam: John Benjamins.
: Martin, J. R. (2013). Systemic Functional Grammar: A Next Step into the Theory. Axial Relations. Beijing: Higher Education Press.
: Martin, J. R. , Quiroz, B., Wang, P. & Zhu, Y. (en prensa). Systemic Functional Grammar: Another step into the theory - grammatical description. Beijing: Higher Education Press.
: Martin, J. R., Matthiessen, C.M.I.M. & Painter, C. (2010). Deploying Functional Grammar. Beijing: The Commercial Press.
: Martin, J., Mathiessen, C. & Painter, C. (1997). Working with functional grammar. Londres: Arnold .
: Martin, J.R. & Rothery, J. (1993). Grammar: Making meaning in writing. En B. Cope & M. Kalantzis (Eds.), The powers of literacy: A genre approach to teaching writing (pp. 137-154). London: The Falmer Press.
: Martin, J.R. (2004). Metafunctional profile of the grammar of Tagalog. En A. Caffarel, J.R. Martin & C.M.I.M. Matthiessen (Eds.), Language typology: A functional perspective (pp. 255-304). Amsterdam: Benjamins.
: Matthiessen, C.M.I.M. & Halliday, M.A.K. (2009). Systemic functional grammar: A first step into the theory. Beijing: Higher Education Press.
: Michaelis, L. (1998). Aspectual grammar and past-time reference. Londres: Routledge.
: Montague, M., Maddux, C. & Dereshiwsky, M. (1990). Story grammar and comprehension and production of narrative prose by students with learning disabilities. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 23(3), 190-197.
: Moreno, J. (1990). Impersonal constructions in Spanish. En M. Hannay & E. Vesters (Eds.) Working with functional grammar: Descriptive and computational applications (pp. 31-40). Dordrecht: Foris.
: Moré, J. (2006). A grammar checker based on web searching. Digithum, 8, 1-5 [en línea]. Disponible en:
: Nazar, R. & Renau, I. (2012). Google Books N-gram corpus used as a grammar checker. Proceedings of EACL 2012: Second Workshop on Computational Linguistics and Writing. Avignon, France [en línea]. Disponible en:
: Nesbitt, C. & Plum, G. (1988). Probabilities in a systemic grammar: The clause complex in English. En R. Fawcett & D. Young (Eds.), New developments in systemic linguistics (pp. 6-38). London: Frances Pinter.
: Nolan, B. (2011). Meaning construction and grammatical inflection in the layered structure of the Irish word: An RRG account of morphological constructions. In W. Nakamura (Ed.), New perspectives in Role and Reference Grammar (pp. 64-101). Newcastle upon Tyne: Cambridge Scholars.
: Nolan, B. (2014). Theoretical and computational considerations of linking constructions in Role and Reference Grammar. Review of Cognitive Linguistics 12(2), 410-442.
: París, L. & Koenig, J (2003). What does it mean to be a dependent? Ponencia presentada en el 10^th International Conference on Head Driven Phrase Structure Grammar. Stanford: CSLI.
: Periñán, C. (2013). Towards a model of constructional meaning for natural language understanding. In B. Nolan & E. Diedrichsen (Eds.), Linking constructions into Functional Linguistics: The role of constructions in grammar (pp. 205-230). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
: Periñán-Pascual, C. & Mairal, R. (2009). Bringing role and reference grammar to natural language understanding. Procesamiento del Lenguaje Natural, 43, 265-273.
: Periñán-Pascual, C. (2013). Towards a model of constructional meaning for natural language understanding. In B. Nolan & E. Diedrichsen (Eds.), Linking constructions into functional linguistics: The role of constructions in grammar (pp. 205-230). Amsterdam: John Benjamins .
: Perkins, Revere D., Deixis, Grammar, and Culture. Amsterdam: John Benjamins Publishing Company, 1992.
: Phipps, S. & Borg, S. (2009). Exploring tensions between teachers’ grammar teaching beliefs and practices. System, 37(3), 380-390.
: Pollard, C. & Sag, I. (1993). Head-driven phrase structure grammar. Chicago & London: The University of Chicago Press.
: Prakasam, V. (2004). Metafunctional profile of the grammar of Telugu. En A. Caffarel, J.R. Martin & C.M.I.M. Matthiessen (Eds.), Language typology: A functional perspective (pp. 433-478). Amsterdam: Benjamins.
: Quirk, R., Greenbaum, S., Leech, G. & Svartvik, J. (1985). A comprehensive grammar of the English Language. London: Longman.
: Quiroz, B. (2010). Reseña del libro Systemic Functional Grammar of Spanish: A contrastive Study with English. Onomázein, 22(9), 239-250.
: Quiroz, B. (2013). The interpersonal and experiential grammar of Chilean Spanish: Towards a principled Systemic-Functional description based on axial argumentation. Tesis doctoral, University of Sydney, Sydney, Australia.
: Razagifard, P. & Razzaghifard, V. (2011). Corrective feedback in a computer-mediated communicative context and the development of second language grammar. Teaching English with Technology, 11(2), 1-17.
: Roca, I. (Ed.) (1992). Thematic structure: Its role in grammar. New York: W. de Gruyter.
: Rodríguez-Juárez, C. (2017). Accounting for the alternating behaviour of location argumnets from the perspective of role and reference Grammar. ATLANTIS. Journal of the Spanish Association of Anglo-American Studies, 39(2), 169-189.
: Roeper, T., Ramos, E., Seymour, H. & Abdul-Karim, L. (2001). Language disorders as a window on universal grammar: An abstract theory or agreement for IP, DP, and V-PP. Brain and Language, 77(3), 378-397.
: Rose, D. (2004). Metafunctional profile of the grammar of Pitjantjatjara. In A. Caffarel, J. R. Martin & C. M. I. M. Matthiessen (Eds.), Language typology (pp. 479-536). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
: Sag, I. (2011). Sign-based construction grammar: An informal synopsis. In H. C. Boas & I. Sag (Eds.), Sign-Based Construction Grammar (pp. 69-202). Stanford: CSLI.
: Schleppegrell, M., Achugar, M. & Oteíza, T. (2004). The grammar of History: Enhancing content-based instruction through a functional focus on language, Tesol Quarterly, 38, 67-93.
: Sekine, S., & Grishman, R. (1995). A corpus-based probabilistic grammar with only two nonterminals. Fourth International Workshop on Parsing Technology, Praga, República Checa, 216-223.
: Smeets, I. (2008). A grammar of Mapuche. Berlín, Nueva York: Mouton de Gruyter.
: Steels, L. & van Trijp, R. (2011). How to make Construction Grammars fluid and robust. In L. Steels (Ed.), Design patterns in Fluid Construction Grammar (pp. 301-330). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
: Steels, L. (Ed.) (2011). Design patterns in fluid construction grammar. Amsterdam: John Benjamins .
: Steels, L. (Ed.) (2017). Basics of Fluid Construction Grammar [on line]. Retrieved from: [125]https://www.fcg-net.org/wp-content/uploads/papers/basics-of-fcg.pdf.
: Steiner, E. & Teich, E. (2004). Metafunctional profile of the grammar of German. En A. Caffarel, J.R. Martin & C.M.I.M. Matthiessen (Eds.), Language typology: A functional perspective (pp. 139-184). Amsterdam: Benjamins.
: Steiner, E. (1992). Some representational issues in a fragmentary systemic grammar of German. Duisburg: LAUD Papers in Linguistics.
: Stine-Morrow, E. & Soederberg L. (1999). Resource allocation as a limiting factor. En S. Kemper & R. Kliegel (Eds.), Constraints on language: Aging, grammar and memory (pp. 53-75). Boston: Kluwer Academic Publishers.
: Stubbs, M. (1986). A matter of prolonged field work: Notes toward a modal of grammar of English. Applied Linguistics, 7(1), 1–25.
: Teruya, K. (1998). An exploration into the world of experience: A Systemic-Functional interpretation of the grammar of Japanese. Tesis doctoral, Macquarie University, Sydney, Australia.
: Teruya, K. (2004). Metafunctional profile of the grammar of Japanese. En A. Caffarel, J.R. Martin & C.M.I.M. Matthiessen (Eds.), Language typology: A functional perspective (pp. 185-254). Amsterdam: Benjamins.
: Thompson, G. (1996) Introducing functional grammar, London: Arnold.
: Torrent, T., Meireles Lage, L., Fernandes Sampaio, T., da Silva Tavares, T. & da Silva Santos, E. (2014). Revisiting border conflicts between FrameNet and Construction Grammar. Constructions and Frames, 6(1), 33-50.
: Truscott, J. (1996). Review article. The case against grammar correction in l2 writing classes. Language Learning, 46(2), 327-369.
: Van Trijp, R. (2011). A design pattern for argument structure constructions. In L. Steels (Ed.), Design patterns in Fluid Construction Grammar (pp. 115-145). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
: Van Valin Jr, R. D. (2004). Semantic macroroles in role and reference grammar. En R. Kailuweit & M. Hummel (Eds.), Semantische Rolen (pp. 62-82). Tubinga: Nar [en línea]. Disponible en: [159]http://www.acsu.buffalo.edu/~rrgpage/rrg/vanvalin_papers/SemMRsRRG.pdf
: Van Valin, R. (2005). The Syntax-semantics-pragmatics interface: An introduction to Role and Reference Grammar. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press .
: Wierzbicka, A. (1988). The semantics of grammar. Ámsterdam: John Benjamins.
: Wilkinson, L. (2005). The grammar of graphics. Nueva York: Springer-Verlag.
: Williams, G. (1999). Grammar as a metasemiotic tool in child literacy development. En C. Ward & W. Renandya (Eds.), Language teaching: New insights for the language teacher. Series 40 (pp. 89-124). Singapore: Regional Language Centre.
: Zeevat, H., Klein, E. & Calder, J. (1987). Unification categorial grammar. In J. Haddock, E. Klein & G. Morill (Eds.), Categorial grammar, unification grammar and parsing (pp. 195-222). Edinburgh: Centre for Cognitive Science.
: den Hertog, C. (1973). Nederlandse Spraakkunst (A Dutch Grammar). Amsterdam: Versluys.
: van Valin, R. (1993). A synopsis of role and reference grammar. En R. van Valin (Ed.), Advances in role and reference grammar(pp. 1-164). Amsterdam: Benjamins.