Termout.org logo/LING


Update: February 24, 2023 The new version of Termout.org is now online, so this web site is now obsolete and will soon be dismantled.

Lista de candidatos sometidos a examen:
1) noun (*)
(*) Términos presentes en el nuestro glosario de lingüística

1) Candidate: noun


Is in goldstandard

1
paper corpusSignosTxtLongLines336 - : What do we mean by semantic and structural similarity between collocations? For convenience of explanation, we will comment on the structural similarity of collocations first. The latter is not a novelty, and a detailed structural classification of collocations (for English) was elaborated and used to store collocational material in the wellknown dictionary of word combinations The BBI Combinatory Dictionary of English (Benson, Benson & Ilson, 1997). However, we will exemplify collocational structures with Spanish data, listing some typical collocates of the noun alegría, joy:

2
paper corpusSignosTxtLongLines336 - : verb + noun: sentir alegría, to feel joy

3
paper corpusSignosTxtLongLines336 - : adjective + noun: gran alegría, great joy

4
paper corpusSignosTxtLongLines336 - : preposition + noun: con alegría, with joy

5
paper corpusSignosTxtLongLines336 - : noun + preposition: la alegría de (esa muchacha ),

6
paper corpusSignosTxtLongLines416 - : Another rule of our formal grammar describes noun phrases:

7
paper corpusSignosTxtLongLines416 - : Figure 2. Distribution of types of errors by issues for each dataset. R stands for the RawWeb dataset, F for FactSpaCIC. The issues are indicated with numbers: 1: underspecified noun phrase, 2: overspecified verb phrase, 3: non-contiguous verb phrase, 4: N-ary relation, 5: conditional clause, 6: relative clause, 7: coordinate structure, 8: inverse word order, 9: incorrect POS-tagging, 10: grammatical errors, 11: others .

8
paper corpusSignosTxtLongLines503 - : Fábregas, A. (2011). Concepts, countability and noun classes: On event nouns . Ponencia presentada en JeNom 4, 4èmes Journées d’étude sur les nominalisations, Universidad de Stuttgart, Alemania [en línea]. Disponible en: [109]http://ifla.uni-stuttgart.de/institut/mitarbeiter/florian/jenom/Antonio-Concepts.pdf. [ [110]Links ]

9
paper corpusSignosTxtLongLines510 - : The aim of this paper is to determine which noun classes may function as resumptives in Spanish syntax, which are their lexical properties and in which way the relation is established between the resumptive noun and the head of the relative clause. Assuming that resumption may involve several categories, relational and part-whole nouns are analyzed in terms of the Generative Lexicon Theory put forth in Pustejovsky (1991, 1995, 1998): lexical representations, hierarchically structured, account for the information which classifies the noun as either relational or part-whole denoting and which enables the noun to function as resumptive if its Qualia Structure allows for an agreement relation with the antecedent . Similarities between the two noun classes are established, some data is presented regarding their syntactic behaviour and context-sensitive lexical representations are proposed in order to provide a theoretical explanation of the information allegedly encoded within the lexical entry

10
paper corpusSignosTxtLongLines511 - : Noun formation in Mapudungun: Productivity, genuineness and language planning

11
paper corpusSignosTxtLongLines511 - : The main objective of this research is to analyze -from a diachronic perspective- the productivity of the processes of noun formation in Mapudungun, based on the hypothesis that the processes observed in periods of less contact with Spanish will exhibit greater linguistic genuineness than those found in periods where contact is more intense. For this purpose, we analyzed the formation process of 2,779 nouns, classified into three groups according to their primary source of record: early period, composed of 274 units documented in Valdivia (1606 ); intermediate period, comprising 855 units documented in Febrés ([1765] 1882); and recent period, which includes 1,650 units documented in Augusta (1916). The analysis reveals that certain processes remain highly productive across the periods (compounding and derivation), others lose productivity (syntactic conversion, semantic changes and borrowing), and others remain unproductive over time (onomatopoeia, reduplication, syntagmatic compounding,

12
paper corpusSignosTxtLongLines577 - : In response to RQ1: ‘What grammatical features characterise the genre of crowdfunding project proposals and what are the functions of these features in communicating meaning?’, the findings of the present study indicate that these proposals rely heavily on the use of phrasal patterns, being noun phrases the most frequent phrase type (almost half of all phrase types coded in the corpus). The fact that both the online and the expanded texts of the proposals were built upon “more nominal than verbal” patterns (^[110]Biber & Gray, 2010) suggests that nouns are core linguistic features in this genre. The presence of nouns, an “especially common grammar feature in academic prose” (^[111]Biber & Gray, 2016: 318 ), indicates that one function of nominal patterns is to provide information about the science being crowdfunded. As a further exploration, the constructs of tokens, types and type-token ratio (TTR) of each of the proposals ([112]Table 1), and the average means of these constructs in the

13
paper corpusSignosTxtLongLines577 - : Previous rhetorical and linguistic studies contend that colloquial features associated with conversation can be traced across genres and new forms of communication in Web 2.0 (^[150]Luzón, 2013; ^[151]Mancera & Pano, 2013; ^[152]Barbieri, 2018; ^[153]Mancera, 2018; ^[154]Moya & Carrió-Pastor, 2018a, 2018b). One linguistic difference between Spanish and English that needs to be addressed in the analysis of crowdfunding proposals concerns the issue of structural elaboration vs. structural compression. In English academic writing “phrasal (non-clausal) modifiers embedded in noun phrases are the major type of structural complexity” (^[155]Biber & Gray, 2010: 3), rendering a compressed style that packages information into nominal compounds that condense information in chunks and is thus “efficient for expert readers, who can quickly extract large amounts of information from relatively short, condensed texts” (^[156]Biber & Gray, 2016: 326 ). Yet, the Spanish proposals differed in that phrasal

Evaluando al candidato noun:


1) proposals: 6 (*)
2) structural: 6
5) phrase: 5 (*)
6) alegría: 5
7) gray: 4
9) biber: 4
10) linguistic: 4 (*)
12) lexical: 4 (*)
14) phrases: 3
16) collocations: 3 (*)
17) patterns: 3 (*)
18) processes: 3
19) periods: 3
20) joy : 3

noun
Lengua: eng
Frec: 134
Docs: 45
Nombre propio: 1 / 134 = 0%
Coocurrencias con glosario: 6
Puntaje: 6.846 = (6 + (1+5.83289001416474) / (1+7.07681559705083)));
Candidato aceptado

Referencias bibliográficas encontradas sobre cada término

(Que existan referencias dedicadas a un término es también indicio de terminologicidad.)
noun
: Aikhenvald, A. Y. (2004). Gender and noun class. In G. E. Booij, C. Lehmann & J. Mugdan (Eds.), Morphologie/Morphology: Ein Internationales Handbuch Zur Flexion und Wortbildung, Volume 2 (pp. 1031-1045). Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
: Bedore, L. & Leonard, L. (2005). Verb inflections and noun phase morphology in the spontaneous speech of Spanish-speaking children with Specific Language Impairment. Applied Psycholinguistics, 26,195-225.
: Bourigault, D. (1992). Surface grammatical analysis for the extraction of terminological noun phrases. Ponencia presentada en el 14th International Conference on Computational Linguistics. Nantes, Francia.
: Caplan, D., Hildebrandt, N. & Waters, G. S. (1994). Interaction of verb selectional restrictions, noun animacy and syntactic form in sentence processing. Language and Cognitive Processes, 9(4), 549-585.
: Clegg, J. H. (2010). Native Spanish speaker intuition in noun gender assignment. Language Design, 12, 5-18.
: Comrie, B. & Keenan, E. (1979). Noun phrase accessibility revisited. Language, 55(3), 649-664.
: Espinal, T. (2013). Bare nominals, bare predicates. Properties and related types. En J. Kabatek & J. Wall (Eds.), New Perspectives on Bare Noun Phrases In Romance and Beyond (pp. 63-94). Ámsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins.
: ExtrHech processes coordinating conjunctions for verb relations and noun phrase arguments with a rule implemented according to the expression (3). For example:
: Fraurud, K. (1990). Definiteness and the processing of noun phrases in natural discourse. Journal of Semantics 7, 395-433.
: Heim, I. (1982). The semantics of definite and indefinite noun phrases. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Massachusetts, Amherst. USA.
: Keenan, E. L. & Comrie, B. (1977). Noun phrase accessibility and universal grammar. Linguistic Inquiry, 8(1), 63-99.
: Kihm, A. (2005). Noun class, gender, and the lexicon-syntax-morphology interfaces: A comparative study of Niger-Congo and Romance languages. En G. Cinque & R. Kayne (Eds.), Comparative Syntax (pp. 459-512). Oxford: Oxford University Press .
: Klein, N. M., Gegg-Harrison, W. M., Carlson, G. N. & Tanenhaus, M. K. (2013). Experimental investigations of weak definite and weak indefinite noun phrases. Cognition, 128, 187-2013.
: Martin, J. (1993). Life as a noun: Arresting the universe in Science and Humanities. En M. Halliday & J. Martin (Eds.), Writing science: Literacy and discursive power (pp. 221-267). Pennsylvania: University of Pittsburgh Press .
: Nieuwland, M. S. & van Berkum, J. J. (2008). The interplay between semantic and referential aspects of anaphoric noun phrase resolution: Evidence from ERPs. Brain and Language, 106(2), 119-131.
: Saviciüté, E., Ambridge, B. & Pine, J. M. (2018). The roles of word-form frequency and phonological neighbourhood density in the acquisition of Lithuanian noun morphology. Journal of Child Language, 45, 641-672.
: Schmitt, C. (1996). Aspect and the syntax of noun phrases. PhD Dissertation. University of Maryland, USA.
: von Heusinger, K. (2007). Accessibility and definite noun phrases. En M. Schwarz-Friesel, M. Consten & M. Knees (Eds.), Anaphors in text. Cognitive, formal and applied approaches to anaphoric reference (pp. 123-144). Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins.