/LING
|
Update: February 24, 2023 The new version of Termout.org is now online, so this web site is now obsolete and will soon be dismantled. |
Lista de candidatos sometidos a examen:
1) recognition (*)
(*) Términos presentes en el nuestro glosario de lingüÃstica
1) Candidate: recognition
Is in goldstandard
1
paper corpusSignosTxtLongLines236 - : Spoken word recognition in Mapudungu: A preliminary research
2
paper corpusSignosTxtLongLines364 - : SOEs, after the 1994 Company Law was ‘criticized for its inability to cope with the changing economy in China’. A comprehensive revision began in 2004, and in October 2005 "The National People’s Congress (NCP) passed the new company law…" which gave "explicit recognition to CSR" (Li-Wen, 2010: 70 ). The fear and awareness common amongst many American companies that CSR might repress profit-maximization has not yet been fully embedded in the attitude of SOEs, which perhaps is another reason for the more rigorous implementation of the practice. CSR reporting has gained more prominence amongst Chinese industries as a tool to help compete with Western countries and encourage them to work in China.
3
paper corpusSignosTxtLongLines408 - : Visual recognition and semantic categorization of novel words in English as a foreign language ( L2): The role of incidental reading and vocabulary exercises
4
paper corpusSignosTxtLongLines451 - : Traditional language courses teach pronunciation and auditory recognition of L2 phonemes commonly using four basic steps:(1 ) presentation/explanation, (2) imitation, (3) adjustment, and (4) recognition (^[28]Celce-Murcia, Brinton & Goodwin, 2010). First, the instructor describes what position the articulatory organs must take and how they must move in order to produce the target sound or sound combination; second, the learner listens to words with the target sound and repeats them; third, the teacher provides feedback and identifies, explains, and corrects errors with relevant exercises until production of the target sound is appropriate depending on the orientation of the course and the learner’s level; fourthly and finally, the learner listens to input and discriminates between a word with the target sound and a word without it.
5
paper corpusSignosTxtLongLines524 - : Indeed, these co-existing trends in language education, namely, the increase in SHLs and corresponding recognition of their unique needs, the need for domain-specific language education in the form of LSP, and the contemporary emphasis on experiential, community-based service learning led many scholars and language educators to a rather obvious conclusion: SSP for SHLs deployed via community service learning had untapped potential and could be a powerful agent for change . The potential for learning transcended language and could result in not only positive linguistic outcomes, but intrapersonal, political, and socio-cultural ones as well. Many applied linguists have closely analyzed the interface between two of the three elements (i.e., SHLs, SSP, and CSL), but to our knowledge there exists scant research that explores the confluence of all three. The need to develop connections between these three areas has created a curricular gap that is explored in the next section.
6
paper corpusSignosTxtLongLines524 - : * 2) Recognition: There is still a lack of professional recognition in higher education for SSP teachers, especially in the United States . Some university departments and administrations still give more importance to traditional fields such as literature or theoretical linguistics when it is time to evaluate for promotion or tenure.
7
paper corpusSignosTxtLongLines530 - : More specifically, ^[62]Barreneche and Ramos-Flores (2013) created a database based on their examination of the curricula of over 40 public and private institutes of higher-education that offered different degrees of social-service involvement across the nation. The objective of this effort was to establish whether the outreach component was valuable in foreign language programs. Overall, these universities were classified as falling into one of the following categories: (1) mandatory outreach; or (2) tracks where social engagement and service were elective elements. These authors’ observations led them to support the implementation and further development of opportunities related to community service in language classes. Aware of the little recognition that Spanish instructors often get when leading or designing an outreach project, the authors call for the establishment of:
Evaluando al candidato recognition:
3) target: 4
6) outreach: 3 (*)
9) learner: 3 (*)
10) learning: 3
11) shls: 3
recognition
Lengua: eng
Frec: 128
Docs: 55
Nombre propio: / 128 = 0%
Coocurrencias con glosario: 2
Puntaje: 2.635 = (2 + (1+4.08746284125034) / (1+7.01122725542325)));
Candidato aceptado
Referencias bibliográficas encontradas sobre cada término
(Que existan referencias dedicadas a un término es también indicio de terminologicidad.)| recognition |
: Al Otaiba, S., Kosanovich, M. L. & Torgesen, J. K. (2012). Assessment and instruction for phonemic awareness and word recognition skills. In A. G. Kamhi & H. W. Catts (Editors), Language and reading disabilities (pp. 112-140). New York: Pearson. : Allopenna, P. D., Magnuson, J. S. & Tanenhaus, M. K. (1998). Tracking the time course of spoken word recognition using eye movements: Evidence for continuous mapping models. Journal of memory and language, 38(4), 419-439. : Ananiadou, S. (1994). A methodology for automatic term recognition. Ponencia presentada en el 15th International Conference on Computational Linguistics, Kyoto, Japón. : Brown, R. (1982). What is speaker recognition. Journal of the International Phonetics Association, 12(1), 13-24. : Brysbaert, M. & Dijkstra, T. (2006). Changing views on word recognition in bilinguals. En J. Morais & G. d'Ydewalle (Eds.), Bilingualism and second language acquisition (pp. 25-37). Bruselas: KVAB. : Dijkstra, T. & van Heuven, W. (1998). The BIA model and bilingual word recognition. En J. Grainger & A. Jacobs (Eds.), Localist conectionist approches to human cognition (pp. 189-225). Mahwah, N.J.: Erlbaum. : Dijkstra, T. & van Heuven, W. (2002). The architecture of the bilingual word recognition system: From identification to decision. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition, 5, 175-197. : Diller, D., Nobel, P. & Shiffrin, R. (2001). An ARC-REM model for accuracy and response time in recognition and recall. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 27, 414-435. : Dufour, S. & Peereman R. (2003a). Inhibitory priming effects in auditory word recognition: When the target's competitors conflict with the prime word. Cognition, 88, B33-B44. : Dufour, S. & Peereman R. (2004). Phonological priming in auditory word recognition: Initial overlap facilitation effect varies as a function of target word frequency [en lÃnea]. Disponible en lÃnea: [33]http://cpl.revues.org/document437.html : Frantzi, K. & Ananiadou, S. (1997). Automatic term recognition using contextual cues. Ponencia presentada en el IJCAI Workshop on Multilinguality in Software Industry, AIC, Japón. : Frantzi, K., Ananiadou, S. & Hideki, M. (2000). Automatic recognition of multi-word terms: The C-value/NC-value method. International Journal of Digital Libraries, 3(2), 115-130. : Fukkink, R. G., Hulstijn, J. & Simis, A. (2005). Does training in second-language word recognition skills affect reading comprehension? An experimental study. The Modern Language Journal, 89(1), 54-75. : Gillund, G. & Shiffrin, R. (1984). A retrieval model for both recognition and recall. Psychological Review, 91, 1-67. : Goldinger, S., Luce, P. , Pisoni, D. & Macario, J. (1992). Form-based priming in spoken words recognition: The rol of competition and bias. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning Memory and Cognition, 18, 1211-1238. : Gulan, T. & Valerjev, P. (2010). Semantic and related types of priming as a context in word recognition. Review of Psychology, 17(1), 53-58. : Hargreaves, I. S. & Pexman, P. M. (2012). Does richness lose its luster? Effects of extensive practice on semantic richness in visual word recognition. Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, 6, 234. : Harish, B. S., Guru, D. S. & Manjunath, S. (2010). Representation and classification of text documents: A brief review. IJCA Special Issue on Recent Trends in Image Processing and Pattern Recognition, 2,110-119. : Hintzman, D. (1988). Judgments of frequency and recognition memory in a multiple-trace memory model. Psychological Review, 95, 528-551. : Jiang, Y., Meng, W. & Clement, Y. (2011): Topic sentiment change analysis. En Machine Learning and Data Mining in Pattern Recognition (pp. 443-457). Springer Verlag: Heidelberg. : Jurafsky, D. & Martin, J. (2000). Speech and language processing. An introduction to natural language processing, Computational linguistics, and speech recognition. Nueva Jersey: Prentice Hall Inc. : Kageura, K. & Umino, B. (1996). Methods of automatic term recognition. Terminology, 3(2), 259-290. : Kienast, M. & Glitza, F. (2003). Respiratory sounds as an idiosyncratic feature in speaker recognition. En Proceedings of the 15th International Congress of Phonetic Sciences (pp. 1607-1610). Bellaterra: Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona. : Levin, J. R. (1977) "Developmental changes in assesing recall and recognition memory capacity", Developmental Psychology,13, 608-615. : Levin, J. R., Yussen, S.R., DeRose, T. M. y Pressley, M. (1977) "Developmental changes in assessing recall and recognition memory capacity", Development Psychology, 13, 608 615. : Lew-Williams, C. & Fernald, A. (2007). Young children learning Spanish make rapid use of grammatical gender in spoken word recognition. Psychological Science, 18(3), 193-198. : Lively, S. E., Pisoni, D. B. & Goldinger, S. D. (1994). Spoken word recognition: Research and theory. En M. A. Gernsbacher (Eds.), Handbook of psycholinguistics (pp. 265-301). Nueva York: Academic Press. : Luce, P. & McLennan, C. (2005). Spoken word recognition. En D. Pisoni & R. Remez (Eds.), The handbook of speech perception (pp. 591-609). Malden, Ma.: Blackwell. : López-Yáñez, I., Sheremetov, L. & Yáñez-Márquez, C. (2014). A novel associative model for time series data mining. Pattern Recognition Letters, 41, 23-33. : Marslen-Wilson, W. & Welsh, A. (1978). Processing interactions and lexical accessduring word recognition in continuos speech. Cognitive Psychology, 10, 29-63. : Marslen-Wilson, W. (1987). Functional parallelism in spoken word recognition. Cognition, 25, 71-102. : Maynard, D. & Ananiadou, S. (2000). TRUCKS: A model for automatic multi-word term recognition. Journal of Natural Language Processing, 8(1), 101-125. : McKoon, G. & Ratcliff, R. (1980). Priming in item recognition: The organization of propositions in memory for text. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 19, 369-386.* : McQueen, J. & Cutler, A. (1998). Morphology in word recognition. En A. Zwicky & A. Spencer (Ed.), The handbook of morphology (pp. 406-427). Oxford: Blackwell. : McQueen, J. M. (2007). Eight questions about spoken word recognition. En M. G. Gaskell (Ed.), The Oxford Handbook of Psycholinguistics (pp. 617-626). Oxford: Oxford University Press. : Morton, J. (1969). Interaction of information in word recognition. Psychological Review, 76, 165-178. : Morton, J. (1979). Facilitation in word recognition: Experiments causing change in the logogen model. En P. A. Kolers, M. E. Wrolstad & H. Bouma (Eds.), Processing of visible language (pp. 259-268). Nueva York: Plenum. : Nation, K. & Snowling, M. J. (1998). Semantic processing and the development of word recognition skills: Evidence from children with reading comprehension difficulties. Journal of Memory and Language, 39(1), 85-101. : Neely, J. H. (1991). Semantic priming effects in visual word recognition: A selective review of current findings and theories. Basic processes in reading: Visual word recognition, 11, 264-336. : Nolan, F. (1983). The phonetic bases of speaker recognition. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. : Norris, D. (1994). Shortlist: A conectionism model of continuous speech recognition. Cognition, 52, 189-234. : Norris, D., McQueen, J. & Cutler, A. (2000). Merging information in speech recognition: Feedback is never necessary. Brain and Behavioral Sciences, 23, 299-335. : Pexman, P. (2012). Meaning-based influences on visual word recognition. En J. S. Adelman (Ed.), Visual word recognition: Meaning and context, individuals and development (pp. 24-43). Hove, UK: Psychology Press. : Radeau, M., Morais, J. & Devier, A. (1989). Phonological priming in spoken word recognition: Task effects. Memory and Cognition, 157, 525-535. : Ratcliff, G. & McKoon, G. (1978). Priming in item recognition: Evidence for the propositional structure of sentences. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 17, 403–417. : Rodd, J., Gaskell, G. & Marslen-Wilson, W. (2004). Modelling the effects of semantic ambiguity in word recognition. Cognitive Science, 28, 89-104. : Schegloff, E. A. (1979). Identification and recognition in telephone conversation openings. In G. Psathas (Ed.), Everyday Language: Studies in Ethnomethodology (pp. 23-78). New York: Irvington Publishers. : Shiffrin, R. & Steyvers, M. (1994). Model for recognition memory: REM - Retrieving effectively from memory. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 4(2), 145-166. : Slowiaczek, L. & Hamburger, M. (1992). Prelexical facilitation and lexical interfernce in auditory word recognition. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 18, 1239-1250. : Spinelli, E., Segui, J. & Radeau, M. (2001). Phonological priming in spoken word recognition with bisyllabic targets. Language and Cognitive Processes, 16(4), 367-392. : Stanfield, R. & Zwaan, R. (2001). The effect of implied orientation derived from verbal context on picture recognition. Psychological Science, 121, 153–156. : Suh, S. y Trabasso, T. (1993) Inferences during reading: converging evidence from discourse analysis, talk-aloud protocols, and recognition priming. Journal of Memory and Language, 32, 279-300. : Tapiero, I. & Denhière, G. (1995). Simulating recall and recognition by using Kintsch’s construction-integration model. En C. Weaver, S. Mannes & C. Fletcher (Eds.), Discourse comprehension: Essays in honor of Walter Kintsch (pp. 211-232). Mahwah, N.J.: Erlbaum. : Vitevitch, M. & Luce, P. (1999). Probabilistic phonotactic and neighborhood activation in spoken word recognition. Journal of Memory and Language, 40, 374-408. : Vitevitch, M. & RodrÃguez, E. (2005). Neighborhood density effect in spokenword recognition in Spanish. Journal of Multilingual Disorders, 3, 64-73. : Vitevitch, M. (2002). Infuence of onset density on spoken word recognition. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 28, 270-278. : Vivas, L., GarcÃa GarcÃa, R., Perea Bartolomé, M. V., Leite D’almeida, A. & Ladera Fernández, V. (2016). Recognition of thematic and taxonomic conceptual relations in patients with aphasia. Aphasiology, 30(6), 657-677. : Yap, M. J., Pexman, P. M., Wellsby, M., Hargreaves, I. S. & Huff, M. J. (2012). An abundance of riches: Cross-task comparisons of semantic richness effects in visual word recognition. Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, 6, 72. : Yu, D. & Deng, L. (2012). Automatic speech recognition. Berlin-Heidelberg: Springer. : Ziegler J., Muneaux, M. & Grainger, J. (2003). Neighborhood effects in auditory word recognition: Phonological competition and orthographic facilitation. Journal of Memory and Language, 48, 779-793. : Zimny, S. (1987). Recognition memory for sentence from a discourse. Tesis doctoral. Universidad de Colorado, Boulder, Estados Unidos de Norteamérica. |