Termout.org logo/LING


Update: February 24, 2023 The new version of Termout.org is now online, so this web site is now obsolete and will soon be dismantled.

Lista de candidatos sometidos a examen:
1) rhetoric (*)
(*) Términos presentes en el nuestro glosario de lingüística

1) Candidate: rhetoric


Is in goldstandard

1
paper CL_LiteraturayLingüísticatxt190 - : Aristotle (1354) 'Rhetoric 1-11: Art, Dialectic,and Philosophical Rhetoric' . [ [43]Links ] Cited in Rhetoric Society Quarfer/y Vol. 12 (1982): Philadelphia, PA 19106, USA. Pp. 9-12.

2
paper CL_LiteraturayLingüísticatxt42 - : ULLA CONNOR: Contrative Rhetoric: Cross-cultural Aspects of Second-Language Writing, de Patricio Novoa 207

3
paper CL_LiteraturayLingüísticatxt101 - : It is important to teach grammar in a way that students will find interesting and useful. For instance, in his article "Teaching Punctuation as a Rhetorical Tool," John Dawkins describes how good writers use punctuation as a form of rhetoric, regardless of grammatical rules. Many good writers break grammatical rules in their work. "There is a system underlying what good writers, in fact do; it is a surprisingly simple system; it is a system that enables writers to achieve important _even subtle_ rhetorical effects" ([34]1995: 533 ). Rhetoric is defined by The Oxford American Dictionary as "the art of using words impressively, especially in public speaking"([35]1980: 581). In writing, rhetoric can be defined as a method of persuading or affecting the reader.

4
paper CO_ColombianAppliedLinguisticsJournaltxt197 - : This theoretical approach was advanced by Yankah (1989) based on his famous work, The proverb in the context of Akan rhetoric: A theory of proverb praxis . He theorizes an approach for the study of the proverb based on contextual perspectives. Exploring the nature of the proverb, he explicates that discussing the proverb and identifying its meaning without recourse to context, leads to ignoring the functionality of the proverb as important part of discourse (Yankah 1989). He discusses the social, situational, and discourse contexts surrounding the proverbs. The context of the proverb is crucial in navigating their content. Moreover, proverbs, due to their dynamic nature, have the potential for varied meanings. Context, therefore, helps to identify the intended meaning in a given situation. It should be noted that context in this sense includes not only the social environment in which proverbs are used, but also the social credentials of speakers and audience, and the more immediate situation

5
paper CO_ColombianAppliedLinguisticsJournaltxt124 - : From Contrastive Rhetoric towards Perceptions of Identity: Written Academic English in Central Mexico^*

6
paper CO_ColombianAppliedLinguisticsJournaltxt124 - : In second language writing contrastive rhetoric has played a powerful role in defining many concepts that we often apply. The explanatory framework employed by contrastive rhetoric is useful for this research for several reasons. First, at the core of contrastive rhetoric is the notion that that logic is a cultural phenomenon (Kaplan, 1967; Ruanni and Tupas, 2006, p.2). Rhetorical expectation and conventions, therefore, differ among cultures (Liebman, 1988, p.6). Second, contrastive rhetoric has its origins in and is partly related to English language pedagogy: it "examines differences and similarities in EFL and ESL writing across languages and cultures as well as across such different contents as education and commerce" (Connor, 2002, p .493). Since this research is concerned with second language writers this framework is useful. Finally, contrastive rhetoric has sufficient empirical evidence to lend some serious consideration to its claims:

7
paper CO_ColombianAppliedLinguisticsJournaltxt124 - : The impact of contrastive rhetoric on second language writing is clearly noteworthy and has definitely had a strong impact based on the well-documented research that exists in the area. In brief, contrastive rhetoric:

8
paper CO_ColombianAppliedLinguisticsJournaltxt199 - : The visual mode of communication manifests in different ways in the SG page. The first visual element that draws the reader's attention is the pictorial image of a bird. The question that arises is: What is the purpose of this picture? It is traditional that the book cover of SG determines the general visual theme of the book. For this edition, the theme was the hummingbird. The fact that the hummingbird appears in several sections of the book aims to create cohesion and coherence with the general visual theme of the book. Likewise, it is undergird by an aesthetic motif. The visual mode also relies on the affordances of color and in the written page it is used for emphasis, but at the same time to differentiate and codify the role and status of certain concepts. On the page, blue is used for headings (e.g. "10.1 Rhetoric: From Analysis to Rhetorical Analysis" ) and, as mentioned above, red highlights the conceptual importance of certain words and phrases (e.g. "rhetoric… rhetorical

9
paper CO_ColombianAppliedLinguisticsJournaltxt199 - : The authors of SG favor the second person point of view to directly address the reader: "You've probably heard the word rhetoric before" (M3, para. 1). By drawing on the second person point of view, the authors are able to insert a casual and conversational tone, personalize the writing, and make an interpersonal connection with their audience. This informal tone is heightened by the use of contractions ("you've"), low introduction of technical terms (low lexical density and complexity), lack of citations, and an effort to explain in simplified language concepts such as rhetoric or rhetorical situation. For instance, while dictionaries or other textbooks typically define rhetoric as 'the art of persuasion,' SG introduces a definition that appears to be more understandable to freshman: "rhetoric is best thought of as any type of communication that seeks to move an audience toward a specific position, understanding, or action" (M3, paragraph 1 ). Unlike more formal and technical texts that are

10
paper CO_ColombianAppliedLinguisticsJournaltxt199 - : characterized by grammatical complexity (Eggins, 2004), this page of SG is easy to read because, for example, it is mostly written in active voice (only two examples of passive voice are found) and makes little use of nominalizations: "provide your audience with a better understanding" (M3, paragraph 2). In brief, this page of SG draws on several semiotic resources to enact interactions such as inviting students to write annotations. It expresses positions and attitudes toward who is addressed, mainly, a casual and friendly pedagogical orientation, and toward what is being represented–the area of rhetoric which is presented as accessible and engaging to the extent that readers are positioned as practitioners of rhetorical analysis: "Your job as a rhetorical analysts is ..." (M3, paragraph 2).

11
paper CO_ColombianAppliedLinguisticsJournaltxt199 - : audiences" (see [39]Figure 3). Lexical coherence is attained through repetition of words such as "rhetoric," "rhetorical analysis," and "you" and through the inclusion of words or nominal groups that are common in the semantic field of rhetoric: speech, politicians, audience, manipulate, position, move, and rhetorical analysis .

12
paper CO_ColombianAppliedLinguisticsJournaltxt166 - : En esta fase se hizo un rastreo en bases de datos, a partir de las palabras clave: epidíctico y educación. Infortunadamente se encontró un solo artículo sobre este tema, titulado "Prophetic Epi-deictic Rhetoric: Poetic Education Beyond Good and Evil" de Jim Garrison (2003 ), en la Revista Educational Theory (53) pp. 221-41. También se hizo una pesquisa en las bibliotecas de la Universidad Javeriana, Universidad Nacional y Universidad de los Andes, así como en la biblioteca Luis Ángel Arango. Allí se encontraron referencias al epidíctico pero en su formulación clásica, es decir, el epidíctico visto como decoración o asociado únicamente a lo poético.

13
paper CO_FormayFuncióntxt274 - : REVOLUTIONARY RHETORIC IN LINGUISTICS: RECEPTION OF THEORIES AND SCIENTIFIC INNOVATION

14
paper CO_Íkalatxt259 - : Berlin, J. A. (1987). Rhetoric and reality: Writing instruction in American colleges, 1900- 1985 . Carbondale, IL: Southern Illinois University Press . [ [196]Links ]

15
paper VE_Letrastxt199 - : Suárez Tejerina, L. y Moreno, A. (2008). The rhetorical structure of literary academic book reviews: An English-Spanish cross-linguistic approach . En U. Connor, E. Nagelhout, & W. Rozycki (Eds.). Contrastive Rhetoric: Reaching to Intercultural Rhetoric [Libro en línea], pp. 147-168. Amsterdam: Benjamins. Disponible: http://www.unizar.es/aelfe2006/ALEFE06/1.discourse/28..pdf [Consulta: 2013, febrero 4].

16
paper VE_Letrastxt93 - : The rhetoric of tradition in Venezuelan political discourse: the cult of heroes

17
paper corpusSignostxt382 - : There are other approaches to the analysis of genres and –whether it is the new rhetoric, systemic functional linguistics or ESP– they have much in common. Miller (1994) argues that genre is a rhetorical action based on recurrent situations. In the new rhetoric studies, ethnographic research or case studies shift the focus from the ‘features’ of the text to the ‘relations’ between text and context. In other words, new rhetoric genre theorists focus on "tying the linguistic and substantive similarities to regularities in human spheres of activities" (Freedman & Medway, 1994: 1 ). Miller (1994: 69) suggests that genres are bearers of "knowledge of the aesthetics, economics, politics, religious beliefs and all the various dimensions of what we know as human culture". This means that one should discuss the regularities in discourse within the broader context of social and cultural behaviour.

18
paper corpusSignostxt382 - : According to Tismăneanu and Kligman (2001: 83) Tudor’s image is that of a person who fights for justice, the cause and the rights of the people, but also jokes a lot and uses theatrics to accompany his rhetoric: "a combination of antisystem nationalist caudillo and self-indulgent jester" . In a previous article (Săftoiu & Popescu, 2012), we identified and analysed the most widely discussed topics on Tudor’s agenda in both the Romanian Senate and the European Parliament: mafia and ‘corruption’ in his home country. In one of the speeches in the European Parliament, Tudor takes a stand and blames the communist regime, although he was one of the ‘court poets’ of the Ceauşescu family:

19
paper corpusSignostxt596 - : The articles have been organised considering these textual compilations and the metadiscourse elements under focus. The first two articles -by Alonso-Almeida and by Álvarez-Gil and Domínguez Morales- aim to shed light on the use of modal verbs in academic writing. In the first article, the author reports on the use of modal verbs with dynamic senses in historical texts from a diachronic perspective. The second article focuses on a corpus of academic articles in the field of tourism in order to describe the use of modal verbs to indicate the authors’ stance towards the information they offer in the introduction and conclusion sections of their papers. The next two studies -by Skorczynska and Carrió-Pastor and by del Saz- have been conducted within the frame of the *IAMET project, which is a competitive project granted by the Spanish Ministry of Economy and Competitivity (Proyecto: FFI2016-77941-P) entitled: Identification and analysis of rhetoric elements in Spanish and in English: study of

20
paper corpusSignostxt600 - : The articles selected are part of the corpus compiled for the research project “Identification and analysis of rhetoric elements in Spanish and in English: study of metadiscoursive strategies”, financed by the Spanish Ministry of Economy, Industry and Competitiveness (FFI2016-77941-P ). In its first stage, this project was concerned with the annotation and identification of metadiscoursal devices in the three main disciplines under analysis. All the texts were electronically extracted from scientific journals included in the Social Science Citation Index and Science Citation Index Expanded (Web of Science) from the years 2016-2018. Since the sources of these texts were selected bearing in mind the need to ensure the highest quality of research reported and of English language use, just those texts written by native-proficiency speakers of English were chosen. Native proficiency was determined by the personal details included (name, surname, affiliation). The three sub-corpora yielded a total

21
paper corpusSignostxt600 - : I would like to express my sincere gratitude to the anonymous reviewers of this paper for their enlightening and pertinent comments, which have helped me greatly improve the final version of it. This article is also a contribution to the research project “Identification and analysis of rhetoric elements in Spanish and in English: a study of metadiscoursive strategies” (FFI2016-77941-P ) .

Evaluando al candidato rhetoric:


1) contrastive: 9 (*)
7) proverb: 7
9) context: 6
11) texts: 5 (*)
13) writers: 5
18) visual: 5

rhetoric
Lengua: eng
Frec: 358
Docs: 164
Nombre propio: 6 / 358 = 1%
Coocurrencias con glosario: 2
Puntaje: 2.659 = (2 + (1+5.24792751344359) / (1+8.48784003382305)));
Rechazado: muy disperso;

Referencias bibliográficas encontradas sobre cada término

(Que existan referencias dedicadas a un término es también indicio de terminologicidad.)
rhetoric
: The accumulating evidence from contrastive rhetoric research warrants the view that linguistic, cultural and educational backgrounds have some influence in the organizational structures of ESL text, although they are by no means the only factors. (Matsuda, 1997, p.48)
: 1. Bazerman, Ch. (1994). Systems of genres and the enhancement of social intentions. En A. Freedman & P. Medway (Eds.), Genre and New Rhetoric (pp. 79-101). London: Taylor and Francis.
: 10. Johnson, B. (1980). The critical difference: Essays in the contemporary rhetoric of reading. Baltimore, John Hopkins University Press.
: 13. Spackman, B. (1989). Decadent genealogies. The rhetoric of sickness from Baudelaire to D´Annunzio. Ithaca: Cornell University Press.
: 16. Van Eemeren, Franz y Peter Houtlosser. 2002. Strategic maneuvering in argumentative discourse: A delicate balance. En Franz van Eemeren y Peter Houtlosser (eds.), Dialectic and rhetoric: The wharp and woof of argumentation analysis, 131-159. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers Group.
: 24. Freedman, A., & Medway, P. (1994, Eds.). Genre and the new rhetoric. London: Taylor & Francis.
: 39. Land, R., & Whitley, C. (1989). Evaluating second language essays in regular composition classes: Toward a pluralistic U.S. Rhetoric. In: D.M. Johnson & D.H. Roen (Eds.), Writing: Empowering ESL students. New York: Longman.
: 5. Connor, U. (1996). Contrastive rhetoric: Cross-cultural aspects of secondlanguage writing. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
: 5. Copeland, R. (1991). Rhetoric, Hermeneutics, and Translation in the Middle Ages. Academic Traditions and vernacular texts. Cambridge University Press.
: 78. White, P. (1999). Telling media tales: The news story as rhetoric. Tesis doctoral, Universidad de Sydney, Australia.
: 8. Freedman, A. & Medway, P. (Eds.) (1994). Genre and the New Rhetoric. London, Taylor & Francis.
: 9. Berlin, J. (1988). Rhetoric and Ideology in the writing class. College English, 50, 477-494.
: Abasi, A. (2012). The pedagogical value of intercultural rhetoric: A report from a Persian-as-a-foreign- language classroom. Journal of Second Language Writing, 21 (3), 195-220.
: Abbott, D. (1996). Rhetoric in the New World: Rhetorical Theory and Practice in Colonial Spanish America. Columbia, South Carolina: University of South Carolina Press.
: Atkinson, D. (2004). Contrasting rhetorics/contrasting cultures: Why contrastive rhetoric needs a better conceptualization of culture. Journal of English for Academic Purposes, 3(4), 277-289.
: Augoustinos, M., Lecouteur, A. & Soyland, J. (2002). Self-sufficient arguments in political rhetoric: Constructing reconciliation and apologizing to the stolen generations. Discourse & Society, 13(1), 105-142.
: BITZER, L. (1968) "The rhetorical situation", Philosophy and Rhetoric, 1, 1-14.
: BRINTON, A. (1981) "Situation in the theory of rhetoric", Philosophy and Rhetoric, 14, 234-248.
: Balak, B. (2006). McCloskey's rhetoric: Discourse ethics in Economics. London: Routledge.
: Barthes, R. (1977). The Rhetoric of the Image. En S. Heath (ed.), Image-Music-Text (pp. 32-51). London: Fontana.
: Bawarshi, A. y Reiff, M. (2010). Genre: An introduction to history, theory, research, and pedagogy (reference guides to rhetoric and composition). California: Parlor Press.
: Bazerman, C. (1994). System of genres and the enactment of social intentions. En A. Freedman & P. Medway (Eds.), Genre and the new rhetoric (pp. 79-101). London: Taylor & Francis.
: Bazerman, C. (2013). A rhetoric of literate action: Literate action Volume I. Fort Collins: The WAC Clearinghouse & Parlor Press.
: Bazerman, Ch. (1994). Systems of genres and the enhancement of social intentions. En A. Freedman & P. Medway (Eds.), Genre and New Rhetoric (pp. 79-101). Londres: Taylor & Francis.
: Bazerman, Ch. (2002). Genre and identity: Citizenship in the age of the internet and the age of global capitalism. En R. Coe, L. Lingard y T. Teslenko (Eds.), The rhetoric and ideology of genre (pp. 13-37). Cresskill, nj: Hampton Press.
: Beasley, V. (2006). Who belongs in America? Presidents, rhetoric, and immigration. College Station: Texas A&M Unviversity Press.
: Bicchieri, C. (1989). Should a scientist abstain from metaphor?. In A. Klamer, D. McCloskey. & R. M. Solow (Eds.), The Consequences of Economic Rhetoric (pp. 100-14). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
: Bitzer, L. (1966). The rhetorical situation, Philosophy and Rhetoric, 1, 1-14.
: Bitzer, L. (1968). The rhetorical situation. In W. A. Covino (Ed.), Rhetoric: Concepts, definitions, boundaries (pp. 1-14). Boston, M.A.: Allyn and Bacon.
: Bitzer, L. (1968). The rhetorical situation. Philosophy and Rhetoric, 1, 1-14.
: Blair, J. A. (2004). The Rhetoric of Visual Arguments. En C. A. Hill y M. Helmers (Eds). Defining visual retorics (pp. 41-61). Mahwah: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
: Booth, W. (1961). The rhetoric of fiction. Chicago: Chicago university press.
: Booth, Wayne C., & Marshall W. Gregory. (1987). Rhetoric: Writing as thinking, thinking as writing. New York: Harper & Row.
: Booth, Wayne. The Rhetoric of Fiction. Chicago, Universidad de Chicago, 1983.
: Brewer, W. (1980). Literary theory, rhetoric, and stylistics: Implications for psychology. En R. Spiro, B. Bruce & W. Brewer (Eds.), Theoretical issues in reading comprehension (pp. 221-239). Hillsdale, N.J.: Erlbaum.
: Brinton, A. (1981). Situation in the theory of rhetoric. Philosophy and Rhetoric, 14, 234-248.
: Burton, J. and Mickan, P. (1993). Teachers' classroom research: rhetoric and reality. Teachers Develop Teachers Research. Papers on classroom research and teacher development. Oxford: Heinemann.
: CARTER, M. (1988) "Stasis and kairos: Principles of social construction in classical rhetoric", Rhetoric Review, 1, 97-112.
: COE, R. (1981) Form and substance: An advanced rhetoric, Glenview: Scott, Foresman, and Company.
: Campbell, K. K. (1986). Style and content in the rhetoric of early afro-american feminists. Quarterly Journal of Speech, 72, 434-445.
: Campbell, K. K. (1989). Man cannot speak for her: A critical study early feminist rhetoric. (Vol. 1). New York, USA: Greenwood Press.
: Campbell, K. K. (1998). The Discursive Performance of Feminity: Hating Hillary. Rhetoric & Public Affairs, 1(1), 1-20.
: Chaffee, J., McMahon, C. & Stout, B. (2002). Critical thinking, thoughtful writing: A rhetoric with readings. Boston: Houghton Mifflin Company.
: Charteris-Black, J. (2005). Politicians and rhetoric: Te persuasive power of metaphor. Houndmills: Palgrave Macmillan.
: Cisneros, J. (2008). Contaminated communities: The metaphor of “immigrant as pollutant” in media representations of immigration. Rhetoric & public affairs, 11(4), 569-601.
: Coe, R. (1994) An arousing and fulfillment of desires: The rhetoric of genre in the process era - and beyond. En A. Freedman y P. Medway (eds.), Genre and the new rhetoric. London: Taylor & Francis. 181-90.
: Coe, R., Lingard, L. & Teslenko, T. (eds.) (2002). The Rhetoric and Ideology of Genre. Cresskill, NJ: Hampton.
: Connor, U. (1996). Contrastive Rhetoric: Cross-cultural Aspects of Second Language Writing. New York: Cambridge University Press
: Connor, U. (1996). Contrastive rhetoric. UK: Cambridge University Press
: Connor, U. (1996). Contrastive rhetoric: Cross-cultural aspects of second language writing. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
: Connor, U. (2002). New direction in contrastive rhetoric. TESOL Quarterly, 36(4), 493-510.
: Connor, U. (2003). Changing currents in contrastive rhetoric: Implications for teaching and research. En Kroll, B. (Ed.). Exploring the Dynamics of Second language Writing. (pp. 218-241). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
: Connor, U. (2004). Intercultural rhetoric research: Beyond texts. Journal of English for Academic Purposes, 3, 291-304.
: Connor, U., Nagelhout, E. & Rozycki, W. (Eds.) (2008). Contrastive Rhetoric: Reaching to intercultural Rhetoric (Vol. 169). Amsterdam and Philadelphia: John Benjamins.
: Connors, R. J. (1999). The Rhetoric of Citation Systems, Part II: Competing Epistemic Values in Citation. Rhetoric Review, 17(2), 219-245.
: Conte, Gian Biagio 1986 The Rhetoric of Imitation. Genre and Poetic Memory in Virgil and other Poets. London: Cornell University Press.
: Covino, William A. (1988). Magic and/as rhetoric: outlines of a history of phantasy. JAC, Volume 12, Issue 2.
: Crawford, T., Mora Pablo, I., Lengelign, M., & Goodwin, D. (2013). From contrastive rhetoric towards perceptions of identity: Written academic English in central Mexico. Colombian Applied Linguistics Journal, 15(1), 9-24.
: Crismore, A. & Farnsworth, R. (1989). Darwin and his readers: Exploring interpersonal metadiscourse as a dimension of ethos. Rhetoric Review, 8, 91–112.
: Crismore, A. (1984). The rhetoric of textbooks: Metadiscourse. Curriculum Studies,16(3), 279-296.
: Daxenbichler, M., & Gregory, R. (2013). Electing of the Commander in Chief: the Gender Regimen and Hillary Clinton's 2008 Campaign Rhetoric. En, M. Lockhart & K. Mollick (Eds.), Political women. Language and leadership (pp. 193-200). Maryland, USA: Lexington Books.
: Detweiler, E. (2016). Disfiguring Socratic Irony. Philosophy and Rhetoric, 49(2), 149-172.
: Doing What Comes Naturally. Change and the Rhetoric ofTheory in Literary and Legal Studies. Duke University Press, Durham and London, 1989.
: Douglas, W. W. (1976). Rhetoric for the meritocracy: The creation of composition at Harvard. In R. M. Ohlmann & W. W. Douglas (Eds.), English in America: A radical view of the profession (pp. 97-132). Oxford, England: Oxford University Press.
: Down, B., & Tonn, M. B. (1993). 'Feminine style' and political judgment in the rhetoric of Ann Richards. Quarterly Journal of Speech, 79, 286-302.
: ELBOW, P. (1990) "Closing my eyes as I speak: An argument for ignoring audience" en R. L. Graves (Ed.), Rhetoric and Composition, Portsmouth: Boynton/Cook Publishers, 247-266.
: Eemeren, F. H. van, and Houtlosser, P. (2000) Rhetoric in pragma-dialectics. University of Amsterdam. Website address: [56]http://www.argumentation.sbp.ru/2001_1/papers/1_2000p1.htm/papers/1_2000p1.htm
: Engel, S. M. (1986b). Fallacy, Wit, and Madness. Philosophy and Rhetoric, 19(4), 224 - 241.
: Enkvist, N. E. (1997). Why we need contrastive rhetoric. Alternation, 4, 188-206.
: Farmer, F. (1995). Voice reprised: Three studies for a dialogic understanding. Rhetoric Review, 13(2), 304-320.
: Franke, W. (2000). Metaphor and the making of sense: The Contemporary Metaphor renaissance. Philosophy and Rhetoric, 3(2), 137-153.
: Freedman, A. & Medway, P. (1994). Genre and the new rhetoric. London: Taylor and Francis.
: GAGE, J. (1984) "An adequate epistemology for composition: Classical and modern perspectives", en R. Connors, L. Ede y A. Lunsford (Eds.), Essays on classical rhetoric and modern discourse. Carbondale, Southern Illinois University Press.
: GROSS, A. G. (1997). "On the Shoulders of Giants: Seventeenth-Century Optics as an Argument Field", en R. A. Harris (ed.), Landmark Essays on Rhetoric of Science. Case Studies. New Jersey: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc. pp 19-38.
: Garrison, J. (2003). Prophetic Epideictic Rhetoric: Poetic Education Beyond Good and Evil. Educational Theory (53), 221-41.
: Goggin, M. D. (2000). Authoring a discipline. Scholarly journals and the Post-World War II Emergence of Rhetoric and Composition. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
: Goodrich, P. (1987). Legal discourse. Studies in linguistics, rhetoric and legal analysis. London: MacMillan.
: Gross, A. C. (1990). The rhetoric of science. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
: Gómez, J. (2011). Teaching EFL Academic Writing in Colombia: Reflections in Contrastive Rhetoric. PROFILE: Issues in Teachers’ Professional Development, 13(1), 205-213. Retrieved from [119]https://revistas.unal.edu.co/index.php/profile/article/view/20577/36840.
: HALLORAN, S. M. (1997). "The Birth of molecular Biology: An Essay in the Rhetorical Criticism of Scientific Discourse", en R. A. Harris (ed.), Landmark Essays on Rhetoric of Science. Case Studies. New Jersey: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc. pp 39-50.
: HARRIS, R. A. (1997). Landmark Essays on Rhetoric of Science. Case Studies. New Jersey: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc.
: Harris, R. A. (1991). Rhetoric of Science. College English, 53(3), 282-307.
: Heritage, J. & Greatbatch, D. (1986). Generating applause: A study of rhetoric and response at party political conferences. American Journal of Sociology, 92(1), 110-157.
: Hiippala, T. (2012). The interface between rhetoric and layout in multimodal artefacts. Literary and Linguistic Computing, 28(3), 461-471.
: Hoey, M. (1999). Persuasive Rhetoric in Linguistics: A Stylistic Study of some Features of the Language of Noam Chomsky. En S. Hunston y G. Thomson (Eds.), Evaluation in Text: Authorial Stance and the Construction of Discourse (pp. 28-37). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
: Hu, G., Li, L., & Lei, J. (2014). English-medium instruction at a Chinese university: Rhetoric and reality. Language Policy, 13(1), 21-40.
: Johnson Sheehan, R. D. (1999). Metaphor as Hermeneutic. Rhetoric Society Quarterly, 29(2), 47-64.
: Johnson, N. (1991). Nineteenth century rhetoric in North America. Carbondale: Southern Illinois University Press.
: Jordan, Mark. (1981). A Preface to the Study of Philosophic Genres. Philosophy and Rhetoric, 14(4), 199-211.
: Journalistic rhetoric and biopolitical controversies: The case of the news about the controversy of the ‘giant hamburgers’ (Spain, 2006)
: KINNEAVY, J. (1983) "Contemporary rhetoric", en W. B. Horner (Ed.), The present state of scholarship in historical and contemporary rhetoric, Columbia: University of Missouri Press.
: Kaplan, R.B. (1967). Contrastive rhetoric and the teaching of composition. TESOL Quarterly, 1(4), 10-16.
: Kennedy, G. (1972). The art of rhetoric in the roman world: 300 b. c. - a. d. 300. Princeton, N. J.: Princeton University Press.
: Kennedy, G. (1975). The present state of the study of ancient rhetoric. Classical Philology, 70, 278-282.
: Kennedy, G. (1994). A new history of classical rhetoric. Princeton, N. J.: Princeton University Press.
: Kent, T. (1994). Paralogic rhetoric: A theory of communicative interaction. Crambury, New Jersey: AUP.
: Konećni, E. (1978). Scientific and technical rhetoric: Glossary of technical terms. En M. Todd-Trimble , L. P. Trimble, &K. Drobnic (Eds.), English for specific purposes: Science and technology(pp. 359-386). Corvallis: English Language Institute, Oregon State University.
: Kubota, R. & Lehner, A. (2004). Toward critical contrastive rhetoric. Journal of Second Language Writing,13, 7-27.
: LINDEMANN, E. (1987) A rhetoric for writing teachers, Nueva York: Oxford University Press.
: Liebman, J. (1988). Contrastive rhetoric: Students as ethnographers. Journal of Basic Writing, 7(2), 6-27.
: Lindemann, Erika, with Daniel Anderson. (2001). A rhetoric for writing teachers. 4^th Edition. New York: Oxford University Press.
: Liu, X. (2011). Directions in Contrastive Rhetoric Research. Language Studies Working Paper, 3, 58-65. Recuperado de [129]https://www.researchgate.net/publication/228458048_Directions_in_Contrastive_Rhetoric_Research
: Luke, A. (1994). Preface. En A. Freedman & P. Medway (Eds.), Genre and the new rhetoric (pp. 11-12). London: Taylor & Francis.
: López-Arroyo, B., Fernández-Antolín, M. & de Felipe-Boto, R. (2007). Contrasting the rhetoric of abstracts in medical discourse. Implications and applications for English-Spanish translations. Languages in Contrast, 7(1), 1-28. DOI:10.1075/lic.7.1.02lop
: MYERS, G. (1997). "Texts as Knowledge Claims: The Social Construction of Two Biology Articles", en R. A. Harris (ed.), Landmark Essays on Rhetoric of Science. Case Studies. New Jersey: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc. pp 187-215.
: Martín-Martín, P. (2005). The rhetoric of the abstract in English and Spanish scientific discourse. Berna: Peter Lang.
: Matsuda, P. (1997). Contrastive rhetoric in context: A dynamic model of L2 writing. Journal of Second language Writing. 6(1) 45-60.
: Mauranen, A. (1993). Cultural differences in academic rhetoric. Frankfurt: Peter Lang.
: Mauranen, A. (2004). Contrastive ESP rhetoric: Metatext in Finnish-English economics texts. En G. M. Saracino (Ed.), Writing for scholarly publication in English: Issues for nonnative speakers (pp. 126-156). San Cesario di Lecce: Manni Editori.
: Mauranen, A. (2009). Spoken rhetoric: How do natives and non-natives fare? In E. Suomela-Salmi & F. Dervin (Eds.), Cross-linguistic and cross-cultural perspectives on academic discourse (pp. 199-218). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
: McCloskey, D. (1983). The rhetoric of Economics. Journal of Economic Literature, 31(2), 482-504.
: McCloskey, D. (1985). The rhetoric of Economics. Madison: University of Wisconsin Press.
: McCloskey, Dreide. (1983). The rhetoric of economics. Journal of Economic Literature, 31(2) 482-504.
: Mignolo, W. (2010). Delinking: The rhetoric of modernity, the logic of coloniality and the grammar of decoloniality. In W. Mignolo & A. Escobar (Eds.), Globalization and the decolonial option (pp. 303– 368). Routledge.
: Miller, C. (1984). Genre as social action. En: A. Freedman y P. Medway. (2005). Genre and the new rhetoric. London: Taylor and Francis.
: Miller, C. (1994). Rhetorical community: The cultural basis of genre. Genre and the new rhetoric, 67-78.
: Miller, T. P. (1997). The formation of college English: Rhetoric and belles lettres in the British cultural provinces. Pittsburgh, PA: University of Pittsburgh Press.
: Montaño-Harmon, M. (1991). Discourse features of written Mexican Spanish: Current research in contrastive rhetoric and its implications. Hispania, 74, 417-425.
: Moreno, A. (2004). Retrospective labelling in premise-conclusion metatext: An English-Spanish contrastive study of research articles on business and economics. Journal of English for Academic Purposes, Special Issue on Contrastive Rhetoric, 3(4), 321-340.
: Moreno, A. (2008). The importance of comparable corpora in cross-cultural studies. En U. Connor, E. Nagelhout & W. Rozycki (Eds.), Contrastive rhetoric. Reaching to intercultural rhetoric (pp. 25-41). Ámsterdam: John Benjamins .
: Mountford, R. (2001). On gender and rhetorical space. Rhetoric Society Quarterly, 31(1), 41-71.
: Mral, B. (2011). A womanization of public discourse? Reflections on rhetorical strategies used by Swedish female politicians. En, J. E. Kjeldesen & J. Grue (Eds.). Sandinavian Studies in Rhetoric (pp. 350-365). Oslo, Norway: University of Oslo.
: Mueller, D. (2012). Grasping rhetoric and composition by its long tail : What graphs can tell us about the field’s changing shape. College Composition and Communication, 64(1), 195-224.
: Olave, G. (2013). La argumentación epidíctica en el discurso político del conflicto armado colombiano contemporáneo. En M.A. Vitale & P.J. Salazar (eds.), Rhetoric in South America (pp. 45-57) República de Sudáfrica: África Rethoric Publishing.
: Olson, G. (1999). "Toward a post-process composition: abandoning the rhetoric of assertion". En Kent, T. (ed.) Post-process theory, beyond the writing-process paradigm (pp. 7-15). Illinois: Southern Illinois University.
: PERELMAN, CH. y OLBRECHTS-TYTECA, L. (1971) The new rhetoric: A treatise on argumentation, Londres: University of Notre Dame Press.
: PERITZ, J. When Learning is Not Enough: Writing Across the Curriculum and the (Re) turn to Rhetoric. JAC, 14,2, 1994.
: PRELLI, L. J. (1997). "The Rhetorical Construction of Scientific Ethos", en R. A. Harris (ed.), Landmark Essays on Rhetoric of Science. Case Studies. New Jersey: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc. pp 87-104.
: Panetta, C. G. (2001). Understanding cultural differences in the rhetoric and composition classroom: Contrastive rhetoric as answer to ESL dilemmas. In C.G. Panetta (Ed.) Contrastive Rhetoric Revisited and Redefined, pp.3-13, Mahwah, NJ.: Lawrence Erlbaum.
: Perelman, Ch. & Olbrechts-Tyteca, L. (2000). The new rhetoric. A treatise on argumentation. Notre Dame: University of Notre Dame Press.
: Perelman, L. (1991). The medieval art of letter writing: Rhetoric as institutional expression. In C. Bazerman & J. Paradis (Eds.), Textual Dynamics of the Professions (pp. 97-119). Madison: University of Wisconsin Press.
: Phelps, L. W. & Ackerman, J. (2010). Making the Case for Disciplinarity in Rhetoric, Composition, and Writing Studies: The Visibility Project. College Composition and Communication, 62, 180-215.
: Porter, J. (1986). Intertextuality and the discourse community. Rhetoric Review, 5(1), 34-47.
: Porter, J. (1992). Audience and rhetoric. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice.
: Potter, J. (1996). Representing reality: Discourse, rhetoric and social construction. Londres: Sage.
: Preda, A. (2005). AIDS, rhetoric, and medical knowledge. New York: Cambridge University Press.
: Prelli, L. (1989). A Rhetoric of Science. Inventing Scientific Discourse. Columbia, USA: University of South Carolina Press.
: Purves, A. (Ed.) (1988). Writing across Languages and Cultures: Issues in Contrastive Rhetoric. Newbury Park, CA: Sage Publications.
: Pérez-Sabater, C. (2015). The rhetoric of online support groups: A contrastive analysis English-Spanish. Revista Española de Lingüística Aplicada, 28(2), 465-485.
: REEVES,C. (1997). "Owning as Virus: The Rhetoric of Scientific Discovery Accounts, en R.A. Harris (ed.), Landmark Essays on Rhetoric of Science. Case Studies. New Yersey: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc. pp. 151-168.
: Read, S. J., Cesa, I. L., Jones & D. , Collins N. L. (1990). When Is the Federal Budget Like a Baby? Metaphor in Political Rhetoric. Metaphor and Symbol ic Activity , 5(3), 125-149. doi: 10.1207/s15327868ms0503_1
: Richards, I. (1936). The Philosophy of rhetoric. New York: Oxford University Press.
: Rowley-Jolivet, E. & Carter-Thomas, S. (2005). The rhetoric of conference presentation introductions: context, argument and interaction. International Journal of Applied Linguistics, 15(1), 45-70.
: Sadoski, M. (1992). Imagination, cognition, and persona. Rhetoric Review, 10, 266-278.
: Scott, R. L. (1967). On viewing rhetoric as epistemic. Central States Speech Journal, 18(1), 9-17. [348]http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/10510976709362856
: Semple, A. (2001). How can teacher evaluation contribute to developing a quality profession? In J. Kennedy (Ed.). Beyond the rhetoric: Building a teaching profession to support quality teaching, (pp. 25-43). Canberra, Australia: Australian College of Education.
: Shaw, P. & Vassileva, I. (2009). Co-evolving academic rhetoric across culture; Britain, Bulgaria, Denmark, Germany in the 20^th century. Journal of Pragmatics, 41(2), 290-305.
: Slobin, D. (1998). Typology and Rhetoric: Verbs of Motion in English and Spanish. En M. Shibatani & S. A. Thompson (Eds.), Grammatical constructions: Their form and meaning (pp. 195-219). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
: Swearingen, C. J. (2002). "Rhetoric and composition as a coherent intellectual discipline: a meditation". En G. Olson (ed.), Rhetoric and composition as intellectual work (pp. 12-22). Carondale and Edwardsville: Southern Illinois University Press.
: Talebinejad, M. R., & Ghadyani, F. (2012). A contrastive rhetoric analysis of' code glosses' in medicine academic research posters written in English by native and Iranian writers.Journal of Language, Culture, and Translation, 1(2), 81-95.
: Ulla, C. (2004). Intercultural rhetoric research: beyond texts. Journal of English for Academic Purposes, 3(4), 291-304. doi: 10.1016/j.jeap.2004.07.003.
: Ulla, C., Nagelhout, E., y Rozycki, W. (2008). Contrastive Rhetoric: Reaching intercultural rhetoric. Ámsterdam, Holanda: John Benjamins.
: VATZ, R. (1973) "The myth of the rhetorical situation", Philosophy and Rhetoric, 6, 154-161.
: Valero-Garcés, C. (1996). Contrastive ESP rhetoric: Metatext in Spanish-English Economics Texts. English for Specific Purposes, 15(4), 279-294.
: Van Eemeren, F. & Houtlosser, P. (2002c). Strategic maneuvering: Maintaining a delicate balance. En F. van Eemeren & P. Houtlosser (Eds.), Dialectic and rhetoric: The warp and woof of argumentation analysis (pp. 131-159). Dordrecht: Kluwer.
: Vande Kopple, W. (2002). Metadiscourse, discourse and issues in composition and rhetoric. In E. Barton & G. Stygall (Eds.), Discourse studies in composition. Cresskill (pp. 91-113). New Jersey: Hampton Press.
: Vatz, R. (1973). The myth of the rhetorical situation. Philosophy and Rhetoric, 6, 154-161.
: Walker, Deron. (2011). How to teach contrastive (intercultural) rhetoric: Some ideas for pedagogical application. New Horizons in Education, 59(3), 71-81.
: Walton, D. (2007). Media argumentation. Dialectic, persuasion, and rhetoric. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
: Wenzel, J. W. (2006). Three Perspectives on Argument. Rhetoric, Dialectic, Logic. En R. Trapp & J. Schuetz (Eds.) Perspective on Argumentation. Essays in Honor of Wayne Brockriede (pp. 9-26). Nueva York, Estados Unidos: Idebate Press.
: Werry, Chris. (2001) The Rhetoric of Commercial Education'. Article quoted in Radical Teacher Journal, Vol. 63:10.
: White, P. R. R. (1998). Telling Media Tales: The News Story as Rhetoric. Sydney, Australia: University of Sydney.
: Woolever, K. (2001). Doing global business in the information age: Rhetorical contrasts in the business and technical professions. En C.G. Panetta (Eds.). Contrastive rhetoric theory revisited and redefined (pp. 47-64) Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
: Xiaoye, Y. (2005). Ideology, textbooks, and the rhetoric of production in China. College Composition and Communication, 56, 4, 632-653.
: Yankah K. (1986). Proverb rhetoric and African judicial processes: The untold story. Journal of American Folklore, 99(393), 280-303.
: Yankah, K. (1989). The proverb in the context of Akan rhetoric. A theory of proverb praxis. New York: Diasporic African Press.
: Zarefsky, D. (2004). Presidential rhetoric and the power of definition. Presidential Studies Quarterly, 34(3), 607-619.
: [239]Shattell[240], Mona y José Villalba. [241]2008. Anti-immigration rhetoric in the United States: Veiled racism?, Issues in Mental Health Nursing, 541-543.