/LING
|
Update: February 24, 2023 The new version of Termout.org is now online, so this web site is now obsolete and will soon be dismantled. |
Lista de candidatos sometidos a examen:
1) scoring (*)
(*) Términos presentes en el nuestro glosario de lingüística
1) Candidate: scoring
Is in goldstandard
1
paper CL_LiteraturayLingüísticatxt384 - : Evaluative attitude in scoring patterns in the book class: trials, emotions and insights of teachers a vulnerable educational context
2
paper CO_Íkalatxt93 - : The teacher also reported that it was time consuming to check and correct all the exercises that needed hand-grading. In fact, he said that he was behind scoring the exercises due to the amount of these:
3
paper UY_ALFALtxt204 - : Heilman, John, Jon Miller, Ann Nockerts y Claudia Dunaway. 2010. Properties of the narrative scoring scheme using narrative retells in young school-age children, American Journal of Speech-Language Pathology, 19: 154-166 . (en línea) Disponible en [154]https://doi.org/10.1044/1058-0360(2009/08-0024) [ [155]Links ]
Evaluando al candidato scoring:
scoring
Lengua:
Frec: 67
Docs: 41
Nombre propio: / 67 = 0%
Coocurrencias con glosario:
Puntaje: 0.141 = ( + (1+0) / (1+6.08746284125034)));
Candidato aceptado
Referencias bibliográficas encontradas sobre cada término
(Que existan referencias dedicadas a un término es también indicio de terminologicidad.)| scoring |
: 19. Jonsson, A., & Svingby, G. (2007). The use of scoring rubrics: Reliability, validity and educational consequences. Educational Research Review, 2, 130–144. Retrieved from [81]http://dx.doi.org/10.1016%2Fj.edurev.2007.05.002 : 19. Oller, J. W. (1972). Scoring methods and difficulty levels for cloze tests of proficiency in English as a second language. Modern Language Journal. 56 (3), 151-157. : 24. Mertler, Craig A. (2001). Designing scoring rubrics for your classroom. Practical Assessment, Research & Evaluation, 7(25). Tomado de [88]http://PAREonline.net/getvn.asp?v=7&n=25 : 32. Boston, MA: Heinle & Heinle. Panadero, E., & Jonsson, A. (2013). The use of scoring rubrics for formative assessment purposes revisited: A review. Educational Research Review, 9, 129–144. [98]http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.edurev.2013.01.002 : 33. Picón, E. (2007). Rubric: A scoring device to enhance fair assessment. Cartilla pedagógica para la formación de maestros en ejercicio. Medellín, Colombia: Escuela de Idiomas, Universidad de Antioquia. : Attali, Y. & Burstein, J. (2006). Automated Essay Scoring With e-rater® V.2. The Journal of Technology, Learning and Assessment, 4(3) [on line]. Retrieved from: [71]https://ejournals.bc.edu/index.php/jtla/article/view/1650 : Batten, E. (2003). Project Essay Grade: PEG. En M. Shermis & J. Burstein (Eds.), Automated essay scoring: A cross-disciplinary perspective (pp. 39-50). Mahwah, NJ.: Erlbaum. : Brundage, S. B. & Brookshire, R. H. (1995). A system for scoring proverb interpretations provided by non-brain-damaged adults and aphasic adults. Clinical Aphasiology, 23, 165-177. : Burstein, J., Kukich, K., Wolff, S., Lu, C., Chodorow, M., Bradenharder, L. & Harris, M. (1998). Automated scoring using a hybrid feature identification technique. Proceedings of the Annual Meeting of the Association of Computational Linguistics, Montreal, Canada. : Cyr, P., Smith, K., Broyles, I. & Holt, C. (2014). Developing, evaluating and validating a scoring rubric for written case reports. International Journal of Medical Education, 5, 18-23. doi: 10.5116/ ijme.52c6.d7ef. : Deygers, Bart y Van Gorp, Koen (2015). Determining the scoring validity of a co-constructed CEFR-based rating scale. Language Testing, 32(4), 521-541. : Evola, J., Mamer, E. & Lentz, B. (1980). Discrete point versus global scoring for cohesive devices. In J. Oller Jr. & K. Perkins (Eds.), Research in language testing (pp. 177-181). Rowley, MA: Newbury House. : Gierl, M., Latifi, S., Lai, H., Boulais, A.P. & De Champlain, A. (2014). Automated essay scoring and the future of educational assessment in medical education. Medical Education, 48(10), 950-962. : Kobayashi, Miyoko. 2002. "Cloze Test Revisited: Exploring Item Characteristics with Special Attention to Scoring Methods", en The Modern Language Journal 86, 571-586. : Landauer, T. K., Laham, D. & Foltz, P. W. (2003). Automated essay scoring: A cross disciplinary perspective. En M. Shermis & J. Burstein (Eds.), Automated essay scoring and annotation of essays with the Intelligent Essay Assessor (pp.87-112). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum. : Myers, M. (1980) A procedure for writing assessment and holistic scoring, Urbana, Illinois: NCTE. : Rudner, L. & Liang, T. (2002). Automated essay scoring using bayes' theorem. Journal of Technology, Learning, and Assessment, 1(2). [on line]. Retrieved from: [68]http://www.bc.edu/research/intasc/jtla/journal/v1n2.shtml : The results of the tests were submitted to three raters who were familiar with the scoring procedures of the speaking span test. Correlations were run among the scores determined by the three raters and a decision was made to accept only strong correlations (above .7). : Vantage Learning Tech. (2000). A study of expert scoring and intellimetric scoring accuracy for dimensional scoring of grade 11 student writing responses. Technical Report RB-397, Vantage Learning Technology, Newtown, Philadelphia, U.S.A. : Wang, Ping (2009). The inter-reliability in scoring composition. English Language Testing, 2(3), 39-43. : White, S. & Venneman, A. (2000). NAEP scoring of fourth-grade narrative writing. Education Statistics Quarterly, 4, 1-7. |