/LING
|
Update: February 24, 2023 The new version of Termout.org is now online, so this web site is now obsolete and will soon be dismantled. |
Lista de candidatos sometidos a examen:
1) screen (*)
(*) Términos presentes en el nuestro glosario de lingüística
1) Candidate: screen
Is in goldstandard
1
paper CL_LiteraturayLingüísticatxt454 - : Diamela Eltit is recognized for a challenging prose style that explores those vast social territories that she calls “zonas de dolor”. Fuerzas Especiales (2013) represents these zones as the consequence of the aspects of neoliberalism that endanger the life of the planet: the extreme militarization of entire populations, the accumulation of arms and capital and the bond between technology and war. Its text simultaneously references the written word, printed page, and computer screen, which all reflect the dilemma of our time: witnessing the end of the world as we know it . In Fuerzas Especiales capital not only determines social relations, consumer habits and fashions, but also a position with respect to fiction and literature. This position creates the possibility of “selfie” and “occupation” literatures, in which music functions as both poetic expressions and a technology of subjection.
2
paper CO_ColombianAppliedLinguisticsJournaltxt267 - : In the fourth article, ‘Smartphone screen recording apps: An Effective Tool to Enhance Fluency in the English Language’, Catherine Pardo Soto and Cecilia Cisterna Zenteno report on an action research study that aimed to assess the effectiveness of using a mobile video recording app to increase students’ English speaking fluency at a school in Chile .
3
paper CO_ColombianAppliedLinguisticsJournaltxt271 - : Smartphone Screen Recording Apps: An Effective Tool to Enhance Fluency in the English Language
4
paper CO_ColombianAppliedLinguisticsJournaltxt46 - : It is a fact that texts come in different formats and make use of different modes of communication. We are living an explosion of the digital era in which the notion of text has changed dramatically. We are certain that as linguists or applied linguists, we have been interested in visualizing and analysing texts as a purely linguistic phenomenon. However, these days texts can no longer be thought of or seen as such since most of the them combine visual and written modes of representing information. In this regard, Jewitt (2005: 317) states: "Until recently the dominance of image over word was a feature of texts, on screen and off screen: there are more images on screen and images are increasingly given a designed prominence over the written elements ." Along the same lines, she agrees that "Despite the multimodal character of screen-based texts and the process of text design and production, reading educational policy and assessment continue to promote a linguistic view of literacy and linear
5
paper CO_ColombianAppliedLinguisticsJournaltxt46 - : In relation to the effects that multimodality might have in order to understand the process of writing, different and controversial opinions are involved. For instance, Jewitt (2005) argues that print-based reading and writing have been always multimodal. She states that this occurs because they require the interpretation and design of visual marks, space, colour, font or style, and increasingly image, and other modes of representation. She also points out that "the new technologies emphasize the visual potential of writing in ways that bring forth new configurations of image and writing on screen: font, bold, italic, colour, layout, and beyond" (Jewitt, 2005: 321 ). Currently, new technologies allow people to use many computer applications to design and write well. In fact, the advantages of word processing enable students to design and redesign their written texts. These benefits allow students to alter the page set up, to change the margins, to move from different font styles and sizes,
6
paper CO_Íkalatxt106 - : 1. Go to Blackboard and log in. You can access blackboard from My UMBC or you can type in your browser blackboard.umbc.edu and the following screen will appear:
Evaluando al candidato screen:
1) texts: 5 (*)
5) font: 3
6) jewitt: 3
8) visual: 3
9) fluency: 3 (*)
12) recording: 3
15) modes: 3
screen
Lengua: eng
Frec: 94
Docs: 59
Nombre propio: 1 / 94 = 1%
Coocurrencias con glosario: 2
Frec. en corpus ref. en eng: 125
Puntaje: 2.738 = (2 + (1+4.58496250072116) / (1+6.56985560833095)));
Rechazado: muy común;
Referencias bibliográficas encontradas sobre cada término
(Que existan referencias dedicadas a un término es también indicio de terminologicidad.)| screen |
: 19. Díaz Cintas, J. yAnderman, Gunilla (Eds.) (2009). Audiovisual translation: Language transfer on screen. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan. : 23. Gambier, Y. (2008). Recent developments and challenges in audiovisual translation research. In Chiaro, D., Heiss, C. y Bucaria, C. (Eds.), Between Text and Image: Updating Research in Screen Translation (pp. 11-33). Amsterdam: John Benjamins Publishing Co. : 25. Georgakopoulou, P. (2009). Subtitling for the DVD Industry. In Díaz Cintas, J. and Anderman, Gunilla (Eds.), Audiovisual translation: Language transfer on screen (pp. 21-35). Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan. : Bravo, C. (2008). Putting the reader in the picture: Screen translation and foreign-language learning. Tesis doctoral presentada en la Universitat Rovira i Virgili, Tarragona. : Citation/ Para citar este Artículo: Pardo Soto, C., & Cisterna Zenteno, C. (2019). Smartphones Screen Recording Apps: An Effective Tool to Enhance English Language Fluency. Colomb. Appl. Linguistic. J., 21(2), pp. 208-229 : Dillon, A., Richardson, J. & Mcknight, C. (1990). The effects of display size and text splitting on teading lengthy text from screen. Behaviour and Information Technology, 9, 215-227. : Gil de Zúñiga, H., Garcia-Perdomo, V., & McGregor, S. C. (2015). What Is Second Screening? Exploring Motivations of Second Screen Use and Its Effect on Online Political Participation. Journal of Communication, 65(5), 793-815. : Jewitt, C. (2003). Computer-mediated learning: The multimodal construction of mathematical entities on screen. En C. Jewitt & G. Kress (Eds.), Multimodal literacy (pp. 34-55). New York: Peter Lang. : Kazanci, Z. (2015). University students’ preferences of reading from a printed paper or a digital screen - A longitudinal study. International Journal of Culture and History, 1(1), 50-53. [245]https://doi.org/10.18178/ijch.2015.1.1.009 : Kress, G. (1997). Visual and verbal modes of representation in electronically mediated communication the potentials of new forms of texts. In I. Snyder (Ed.), Page to screen: Taking literacy into the electronic era (pp. 53-79). London: Routledge. : Lunenfeld, P. (1999). Screen Grabs: The Digital Dialectic and New Media Theory. Cambridge, Massachussets: The MIT Press. : Mangen, A., Walgermo B. R., Broènnick, K. (2013). Reading linear texts on paper versus computer screen: Effects on reading comprehension. International Journal of Educational Research, (58), 61-68. : Neves, J. (2009). Interlingual Subtitling for the Deaf and Hard-of-Hearing. En J. Díaz-Cintas, y G. M. Anderman (Eds.), Audiovisual Translation: Language Transfer on Screen (pp. 151-169). Nueva York: Palgrave MacMillan. : Piolat, A. Roussey, J-Y. & Thuning, O. (1997). Effects of screen presentation on text reading and revising. Internationa Journal of Human-Computer Studies, 47(4), 565-589. : Salter, J. & Antonopoulos, N. (2006). Cinema screen recommender agent: Combining collaborative and content-based filtering. IEEE Intelligent Systems and Their Applications, 21(1), 35-41. : Sidi, Y., Shpigelman, M., Zalmanov, H., & Ackerman, R. (2017). Understanding metacognitive inferiority on screen by exposing cues for depth of processing. Learning and Instruction, 51, 61-73. doi: 10.1016/j.learninstruc.2017.01.002 : Turkle, S. (1995). Life on the Screen. Identity in the Age of the Internet. New York: Simon & Schuster. : Walsh, G. (2016). Screen and paper reading research. A literature review. Australian Academic and Research Libraries, 47(3), 160-173. [129]https://doi.org/10.1080/00048623.2016.1227661 |