Termout.org logo/LING


Update: February 24, 2023 The new version of Termout.org is now online, so this web site is now obsolete and will soon be dismantled.

Lista de candidatos sometidos a examen:
1) solidarity (*)
(*) Términos presentes en el nuestro glosario de lingüística

1) Candidate: solidarity


Is in goldstandard

1
paper CO_ColombianAppliedLinguisticsJournaltxt125 - : In the first place, although there were participants who preferred to use impersonal forms to express their ideas and support them, there was also an interesting tendency to use the pronoun "we" to address the readersand establish a closer relationship of solidarity, affinity, and partnership:

2
paper corpusRLAtxt136 - : Murray, Stephen O. (1987). Power and solidarity in 'interruption': A critique of the Santa Barbara School conception and its application by Orcutt and Harvey (1985 ). Symbolic Interaction, 10 (1), 101-110. [ [63]Links ]

3
paper corpusSignostxt265 - : Ideological solidarity in the historical discourse: Tension between monoglossic and heteroglossic orientations

4
paper corpusSignostxt283 - : [...] a comprehensive map of appraisal resources that we could deploy systematically in discourse analysis, both with a view to understanding the rhetorical effect of evaluative lexis as texts unfold, and to better understanding the interplay of interpersonal meaning and social relations in the model of language and the social we were developing, especially in the area of solidarity (Martin, 2000: 148 ).

5
paper corpusSignostxt599 - : According to ^[71]Peacock (2006), expressing accepted truth is similar to conveying evidential or implicit truth. Modals (e.g. ‘will’ or ‘must’) or certain phrases (e.g. ‘of course’, ‘clearly’ or ‘obviously’) are often used to express accepted truth, that is, when a claim made is already widely accepted in a particular discipline. Even though the author’s viewpoint is not meant to be involved in such cases, the boosters mentioned “mark involvement and solidarity with an audience, stressing shared information, group membership, and direct engagement with readers” (^[72]Hyland, 1998a: 350 ). The term “solidarity boosters”, introduced by ^[73]Vassileva (2001: 97), reflects more specifically the inclusion of the reader in a scientific or discourse community and his knowledge of the field (^[74]Myers, 1989; ^[75]Harwood, 2005). The examples mentioned previously could also be considered as solidarity boosters depending on the context in which they have been used. Peacock (^[76]2006: 65

6
paper corpusSignostxt282 - : [...] a comprehensive map of appraisal resources that we could deploy systematically in discourse analysis, both with a view to understanding the rhetorical effect of evaluative lexis as texts unfold, and to better understanding the interplay of interpersonal meaning and social relations in the model of language and the social we were developing, especially in the area of solidarity (Martin, 2000: 148 ).

7
paper corpusSignostxt382 - : in fostering in-group solidarity, and when it functions as a coping mechanism "easing dullness and tensions" (Young, 2012: 280 ).

Evaluando al candidato solidarity:


2) understanding: 4 (*)
3) discourse: 4 (*)
4) boosters: 3

solidarity
Lengua: eng
Frec: 133
Docs: 81
Nombre propio: / 133 = 0%
Coocurrencias con glosario: 2
Puntaje: 2.568 = (2 + (1+3.58496250072116) / (1+7.06608919045777)));
Candidato aceptado

Referencias bibliográficas encontradas sobre cada término

(Que existan referencias dedicadas a un término es también indicio de terminologicidad.)
solidarity
: 13. Brown, Roger yAlbert Gilman. 1960. The pronouns of power and solidarity. En Thomas Sebeok (ed.), Style in language, 255-276. Cambridge-Mass: MIT Press.
: Afro-Colombian Solidarity Network (s. f.). About. Recuperado de [168]https://afrocolombian.org/about
: Brown, R. & Gilman, A. (1960). The pronouns of power and solidarity. En T. A. Sebeok (ed.), Style in Language (pp. 253-276). Cambridge (ma), mit Press.
: Brown, Roger y Albert Gilman. 1960. The pronouns of power and solidarity, American Anthropologist, 4: 24-36.
: Dafouz, E. (2006). Solidarity strategies in CLIL university lectures: Teacher's use of pronouns and modal verbs. VIEWS, 15(3), 9-14.
: Dzameshie, A. (1993). The use of politeness strategies as solidarity and deference moves in Christian sermonic discourse. The SECOL Review, 17, 113-126.
: Hozhabrossadat, Sepideh. “Linguistic identities: How code switching and/or code-crossing help constructing solidarity or otherness in multilingual societies”. International Journal of English Literature and Culture, vol. 3, no. 6, 2015, pp. 194-198.
: Jaworski, A. (1995). ‘‘This is not an empty compliment!’’ Polish compliments and the expression of solidarity. International Journal of Applied Linguistics, 5, 63-94.
: Martin, J.R. (2004). Positive Discourse Analysis: Solidarity and Change. En W. Zhengua (Ed.), Collected Works of J.R. Martin, vol. 6 (pp. 278-298). Shanghai: Shanghai Jiao Tong University Press.
: Martin, J.R. (2004). Positive discourse analysis: Power, solidarity and change. Revista Canaria de Estudios Ingleses, 49, 179-200.
: Rorty, R. (1989). Solidarity or Objectivity. En: M. Krausz. Relativism, interpretation and confrontation. Notre Dame: University of Notre Dame Press.
: The above-mentioned finding is associated with ^[131]Sert (2005) , who insisted that this methodology creates a high level of academic solidarity and confidence (p. 1). In this regard, ^[132]Kutlay (2013),^[133] Lombard and Kloppers (2015),^[134] Lopatto, (2003) ,
: [134]Brown, Roger y Albert Gilman.[135] 1960. The pronouns of power and solidarity, en T. Sebeok (ed.), Style in language, Cambridge-Mass, MIT Press: 253-276.