/LING
|
Update: February 24, 2023 The new version of Termout.org is now online, so this web site is now obsolete and will soon be dismantled. |
Lista de candidatos sometidos a examen:
1) spatiotemporal (*)
(*) Términos presentes en el nuestro glosario de lingüística
1) Candidate: spatiotemporal
Is in goldstandard
1
paper corpusSignostxt337 - : By manipulating the spatiotemporal contiguities of direct causal events, Fugelsang, Roser, Corballis, Gazzaniga and Dunbar (2005) devised a task to contrast brain activity during three conditions: direct events (i .e., Michottean launching), spatial discontiguity, and temporal discontiguity. The spatial discontiguity included a spatial gap between the two colliding objects while keeping the temporal succession between the objects. The temporal discontiguity consisted in a delay in the movement onset of the second object while maintaining spatial contiguity. Using fMRI, Fugelsang et al. (2005) observed lateralized right posterior regions involved in detecting the spatiotemporal contiguities of direct causal events (e.g., during the Michottean launching). Specifically, the right inferior parietal lobule (RIPL) was hypothesized to be involved in processing the temporal properties of the causal event, whereas the right middle temporal gyrus (RMTG) was hypothesized to process the spatial
2
paper corpusSignostxt319 - : What exactly is the source of the difference between ser and estar is far from settled. According to Kratzer´s (1995) and Diesing´s (1992) proposals, in which ser and estar are assumed to be the lexical exponents of IL/SL predicates, the source of the difference is the presence/absence of a spatiotemporal argument. For Arche (2007), whose analysis also views ser and estar as the lexical exponents of the IL/SL distinction, ser and estar do not differ with respect to the spatiotemporal arguments they project (since both project spatiotemporal arguments) but rather on their lexical semantics: the linking nature of estar to a specific context is lexically encoded . For Maienborn (2003, 2005) the difference between ser and estar is only pragmatic while ser and estar have identical semantics. For Schmitt (1992, 1996, 2005) and Luján (1981), the difference lies in the aspectual properties of the predicates involving ser and estar. For Clements (2005) it is essential to consider not only the
Evaluando al candidato spatiotemporal:
3) spatial: 4 (*)
5) lexical: 3 (*)
8) discontiguity: 3
9) causal: 3 (*)
spatiotemporal
Lengua: eng
Frec: 28
Docs: 6
Nombre propio: / 28 = 0%
Coocurrencias con glosario: 3
Puntaje: 3.821 = (3 + (1+3.8073549220576) / (1+4.85798099512757)));
Candidato aceptado
Referencias bibliográficas encontradas sobre cada término
(Que existan referencias dedicadas a un término es también indicio de terminologicidad.)| spatiotemporal |
: Young, M. E. & Sutherland, S. (2009). The spatiotemporal distinctiveness of direct causation. Psychonomic Bulletin and Review, 16(4), 729-735. |