Update: February 24, 2023
The new version of
Termout.org is now online,
so this web site is now obsolete and will soon be dismantled.
|
Lista de candidatos sometidos a examen:
1)
subsection (*)
(*) Términos presentes en el nuestro glosario de lingüística
Is in goldstandard
1
paper CO_ColombianAppliedLinguisticsJournaltxt130 -
: [36]Table 4 provides additional information about the reading subsection and the reliability of the items that target the three main constructs tested in this exam: grammar, vocabulary, and reading comprehension . Unlike the results presented in [37]Table 3, these values indicate that the reading
subsection as a whole has a higher Cronbach's alpha than any of the three constructs. In this case, the component constructs and the way in which they are measured (as multiple choice items) are similar enough so that students' performance across all three areas is consistent and does not noticeably affect the global reliability score. Therefore, the number of items seems to be the more important factor: the larger number of items used to calculate the reliability of the reading
subsection as a whole is likely leading to a higher reliability estimate, whereas the smaller number of items used to calculate the reliability of each construct is producing lower reliability estimates.
Evaluando al candidato subsection:
1) reliability: 6
2) items: 5
3) reading: 4 (*)
subsection
Lengua: eng
Frec: 14
Docs: 4
Nombre propio: / 14 = 0%
Coocurrencias con glosario: 1
Puntaje: 2.019 = (1 + (1+4) / (1+3.90689059560852)));
Candidato aceptado
No se encontraron referencias bibliográficas sociadas al/ alos término(s)
(Que existan referencias dedicadas a un término es también indicio de
terminologicidad.)