Termout.org logo/LING


Update: February 24, 2023 The new version of Termout.org is now online, so this web site is now obsolete and will soon be dismantled.

Lista de candidatos sometidos a examen:
1) syntax (*)
(*) Términos presentes en el nuestro glosario de lingüística

1) Candidate: syntax


Is in goldstandard

1
paper CL_LiteraturayLingüísticatxt189 - : "The language ability of most children at age 6 is already developed. They have attained sophisticated control over their syntax, they possess a vocabulary of about 5000 words, and they have a phonological system that can adequately communicate their needs (Singer 1981 in Carrel, 1990:58 ). This cannot be assumed for students learning to read English. The issue, states Grabe, is not the relation of the reader to the text but the processing relations among various component skills in reading.

2
paper CO_ColombianAppliedLinguisticsJournaltxt19 - : Regarding the importance the mother tongue has in learning a foreign language Vygotsky (1978), highlights the essential role it plays. Following the same line, Hudelson (1994) states that it is vital considering the use of the mother tongue when making decisions about how written language works. In this respect, Rodari (1999:88) states that: "El niño usa el lenguaje construyendo su sistema lingüístico según la sintaxis y la gramática de su lengua materna". TRANSLATION: "The child uses the language, constructing his/her linguistic system according to the syntax and grammar of his/her mother tongue:"

3
paper CO_ColombianAppliedLinguisticsJournaltxt304 - : Bombast Bombardment and Dense Syntax versus Effective Communication and Language Teaching in ESL Settings: Nigerian English Examples

4
paper CO_ColombianAppliedLinguisticsJournaltxt296 - : The article that follows is titled Bombast Bombardment and Dense Syntax versus Effective Communication and Language Teaching in ESL Settings: Nigerian English Examples authored by Omowumi Olabode Steven Ekundayo . This manuscript reports on the sociolinguistic, historical, and idiosyncratic factors that influence some educated Nigerian English speakers’ linguistic habit of using use high-sounding expressions and complex syntactic structures. The article also explains the implications of such habit for teaching and learning English in English as a second language (ESL) settings.

5
paper CO_CuadernosdeLingüísticaHispánicatxt9 - : Seedhouse (2004, p. 145) identifies four different trajectories in which repair is accomplished». The speaker accounts for his own mistake and corrects it himself (self-initiated self-repaired); the speaker identifies the source of linguistic trouble, initiates repair and his counterpart completes it (self-initiated other repair); his counterpart notices the mistake, initiates repair and the speaker corrects it (other-initiated self-repair); and a situation where an interactant identifies the others mistake and corrects it (other-initiated other repair). Although repair could adopt the form of error correction - linguistic items measured as problematic in terms of syntax, pronunciation, appropriateness, morphology, among others - it can also expand on a wide range of actions: confirmation check or clarification request, for example . Any kind of action that attempts to clarify, correct, notice, confirm or check an utterance either by the speaker himself or his counterpart becomes a repair.

6
paper CO_FormayFuncióntxt27 - : FORD, C. E. & THOMPSON, S. A. (1996). Interactional units in Conversation. En E. Ochs, E. A. Schegloff & S. A. Thompson (Eds.) Interaction and Grammar (pp. 134-184). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. [ [40]Links ] HELASVUO, M-L. (2001). Emerging Syntax for Interaction: Noun Phrases and Clauses as a Syntactic Resource for Interaction . En M. Selting & E. Couper- Kuhlen (Eds.) Studies in Interactional Linguistics (pp. 25-50). Amsterdam: John Benjamins, 2001. [ [41]Links ]

7
paper CO_FormayFuncióntxt276 - : BETWEEN MORPHOLOGY AND SYNTAX: TOWARD THE CREATION OF VERBS WITH THE ACCUSATIVE PRONOUN «LA»

8
paper CO_FormayFuncióntxt260 - : Regarding syntax, the example 2c illustrates one of the main uses of pp in Munduruku: to be an adverbial nature adjunct . The basic constituent order in this language is subject-object-verb (SOV). In the example 2c, the subject and object arguments are, respectively, «wida» 'jaguar' and «ayacat» 'woman'. Arguments are not marked by case, and the order is the identification factor of these grammatical relations. Besides, the verb «o'=y-aoka» 'it killed her' has two pronominal indexes responsible for identifying these grammatical relations: «o' =» 'third person of processual verb' and «y-» 'third person direct object'. Thus, the lexical (or pronominal) arguments are identified in the verb.

9
paper CO_Lenguajetxt155 - : ^10La gramática de dependencias se fundamenta, principalmente, en los trabajos de ^[222]Tesnière (1959) “Éléments de syntaxe structurale”, y ^[223]Mel'čuk (1988) “Dependency Syntax: Theory and Practice” .

10
paper CO_Íkalatxt137 - : 8. Geckin, V., & Hazenadar, B. (2008). The morphology/ syntax interface in child L2 acquisition: evidence from verbal morphology . Current trends in child second language acquisition: A generative perspective. In B, Haznedar & E. Gavruseva (Eds.), 237-270. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. [ [43]Links ]

11
paper CO_Íkalatxt101 - : interpretation of non-past tense which is overtly marked. From the perspective of minimalist syntax, the position of TP is occupied by this null tense marker:

12
paper PE_Lexistxt4 - : 1976 "The origins of syntax in discourse: a case study of Tok Pisin relatives" . Language. 52, 631-66.

13
paper PE_Lexistxt9 - : El tercer capítulo se dedica al análisis del sintagma nominal, que reclama de partida su carácter nuclear dentro de la obra: "Together with the restructured verb phrase, the Afro-Yungueño noun phrase represents one of the most significant departures from patrimonial Spanish syntax, and provides some of the most compelling evidence linking the traditional Afro-Bolivian dialect with other Afro-Hispanic speech communities, and with Afro-Iberian creoles languages" (81 ) (tal vez esto último justifica el que, a partir de este momento, provisionalmente, el autor asume a veces conceptos tomados de la Criollística, como "post-creole continuum", p. 81, para referirse a los cambios entre la variedad más vernácula y las formas más próximas al español general de las tierras altas de Bolivia, problema que abordará definitivamente en la última sección del libro: 177-197).

14
paper PE_Lexistxt2 - : 1984 Parametric syntax: Case studies in Semitic and Romance Languages . Dordrecht: Foris.

15
paper PE_Lexistxt2 - : 2007 The syntax of objects: Agree and differential object marking . Tesis doctoral. Connecticut: University of Connecticut.

16
paper UY_ALFALtxt152 - : PRONOMINAL SYNTAX IN THE MAWETÍ-GUARANÍ LANGUAGES:ACTIVE VERBAL CLAUSES VERSUS EXISTENTIAL CLAUSES

17
paper UY_ALFALtxt54 - : [158]Bordelois, Ivonne. 1988. Causatives: From lexicon to syntax, Natural Language and Linguistic Theory 6: 57–94 .

18
paper UY_ALFALtxt54 - : [172]Marantz, Alec. 1997. No escape from syntax: Don’t try morphological analysis in the privacy of your own lexicon, en A . Dimitriadis, L. Siegel, C. Surek-Clark y A. Williams (eds.), Proceedings of the 21st Penn Linguistics Colloquium, Philadelphia, UPenn Working Papers in Linguistics: 201-225.

19
paper UY_ALFALtxt177 - : Quando uma pessoa medianamente inteligente e intelectualmente sincera lê um trabalho iluminador, sente o desejo de compartilhar a experiência pensante com colegas. Para mim, ler Syntactic Structures foi uma experiência pensante sensacional, um momento desses muito raros na vida. Foi em 1962 que esse livrinho chegou às minhas mãos, lá no Museu Nacional do Rio de Janeiro . Recursividade e transformações sintáticas já estavam lá. Certamente o fino livrinho azul da Mouton chegou às mãos de outras pessoas no Brasil. Algumas entenderam que estava ali uma nova visada sobre língua. Outras não entenderam. As que entenderam e amaram foram o marco introdutório, sem nome e sem oficializações ainda. Houve também as que entenderam e não amaram, porque entenderam que aquilo mexia com os alicerces do ensino escolar de línguas. Depois veio Aspects of the Theory of Syntax, o segundo passo no empreendimento de focalizar o cerne da capacidade humana de linguagem: a natureza gerativa da sintaxe . (Depoimento

20
paper UY_ALFALtxt48 - : [86]Laka, Itziar. 1990. Negation in Syntax: On the Nature of Functional Categories and Projections . Tesis doctoral, MIT.

21
paper UY_ALFALtxt43 - : [113]Chan, Brian Hok-Shing. 2003. Aspects of the syntax, production and pragmatic of code-switching: Cantonese and English, Nueva York, Peter Lang .

22
paper UY_ALFALtxt16 - : [53]Platzack, Christier. 1996. The initial hypothesis of syntax: a minimal perspectives on language acquisition and attrition'', en H . Clahsen, (ed.), Generative perspective on language acquisition: empirical findings, theoretical considerations, crosslinguistic comparisons,. Amsterdam, John Benjamins: 369-414.

23
paper UY_ALFALtxt53 - : [157]Rodríguez-Mondoñedo, Miguel. 2007. The syntax of objects: agree and differential object marking, Tesis de Doctorado, Universidad de Connecticut . Inédita.

24
paper VE_BoletindeLinguisticatxt68 - : 19. Marantz, Alec. 1997. No escape from syntax: Don’t try morphological analysis in the privacy of your own lexicon . En Alexis Dimitriadis, Laura Siegel, Clarissa Surek-Clark y Alexander Williams (eds.), Proceedings of the 21st Annual Penn Linguistics Colloquium.University Pennsylvania Working Papers in Linguistics 4, 2. 201-225. [ [41]Links ]

25
paper VE_BoletindeLinguisticatxt128 - : 34. Waltereit, Richard y Ulrich Detges. 2008. Syntactic change from within and from without syntax: A usage-based analysis . En Richard Waltereit y Ulrich Detges (eds.), The paradox of grammatical change: perspectives from Romance, 13-30. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins. [ [69]Links ]

26
paper VE_Letrastxt192 - : Syntax and pragmatics: two levels of analysis in the issue of the utterance in the spanish of Venezuela

27
paper VE_Letrastxt40 - : 11. Puurtinen, T. (1998) Syntax, readability and ideology in children's literature http://www .erudit.org/revue/meta/1998/v43/n4/003879ar.html. Consulta 02 de septiembre 2003. [ [43]Links ]

28
paper corpusLogostxt41 - : Lexically, evidentials may appear as verbs (Ex. 4), adverbs (Ex. 5), fixed expressions (Ex. 6), modals, etc. But if confirmations are in a natural language, it seems Schlick had only born in mind the language(s) he knew, for there are many languages in Asia and in the Americas that mark evidentiality via an obligatory morphosyntactic system. This means that no sooner does the thinker/speaker think up a statement than they (mentally or orally - to say the least) have got to express evidentials as a necessary and inseparable segment in syntax: they are grammaticalized (^[33]Hopper & Closs Traugott, 2008 ). This means that many world languages force their users in their speech communities to indicate the source of their belief (statement) as they utter any sentence whatsoever (as is the case in Aymara (spoken in Bolivia, Peru, by some in N Chile and NW Argentina), Tuyucan (in Colombia and Brazil), Bulgarian and many other languages). Grammatical evidentiality consists in the compulsory encoding

29
paper corpusRLAtxt167 - : ^[38]Bardovi-Harlig and Bofman (1989) examined the relationship between grammatical complexity, and overall accuracy in the written English of two groups of advanced adult foreign language learners divided according to their performance on a placement test (1989:20). The analysis of errors revealed that the two groups could be distinguished by the number of errors they produced, but the errors they produced showed the same distribution among error types (p. 23). The smallest difference between groups was shown in syntactic errors. The greatest differ ence between groups was their production of lexical-idiomatic errors, which was significant. The difference in morphological errors was only weakly significant. Both groups produced the greatest number of errors in grammatical morphemes, with fewer errors in lexical choice, and the smallest number of errors in syntax (1989:24 ).

30
paper corpusRLAtxt59 - : SEMANTICS, SYNTAX AND PHONETICS: PROSODIC STRATEGIES OF THE CONSTRUCTIONS WITH "UN ... QUE"

31
paper corpusRLAtxt65 - : Bates, E., Thal, D. y Marchman, V. 1991. "Symbols and syntax: A darwinian approach to language development" . En N. Krasnegor, D. Rumbaugh, M. Studdert-Kennedy y R. Schiefelbusch (Eds.) Biological and behavioral determinants of language development . Hillsdale , N.J. : Erlbaum. [ [30]Links ]

32
paper corpusRLAtxt110 - : The linguistic mainstream has typically modelled the way infants acquire knowledge of their native language based on input understood as strings of words, rather than strings of sounds. However, accurate representations of strings of words are certainly very difficult for prelinguistic infants to achieve, and yet without accurate identification of words or morpheme boundaries, syntax acquisition cannot proceed: without words, there simply can be no syntax (Hilferty, 2003 ).

33
paper corpusRLAtxt110 - : Aslin, R.N., Woodward, J.Z., LaMendola, N.P. & Bever, T.G. (1996). Models of word segmentation in fluent maternal speech to infants. In J. L. Morgan & K. Demuth (eds.), Signal to syntax: Bootstrapping from speech to grammar in early acquisition (pp . 115-134). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum. [ [31]Links ]

34
paper corpusRLAtxt110 - : Morgan, J.L., Shi, R. & Allopenna, P. (1996). Perceptual bases of rudimentary grammatical categories: toward a broader conceptualization of bootstrapping. In J. L. Morgan & K. Demuth (eds.), Signal to syntax: Bootstrapping from speech to grammar in early acquisition (pp . 262-293). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum. [ [59]Links ]

35
paper corpusSignostxt453 - : ^3Because RRG is a monostratal theory, syntax and semantics are directly linked without abstract syntactic representations or deep structures. In RRG, there is only one level of representation from the semantic representation of a clause or logical structure to the actual order of constituents. Thus, the theory poses a linking algorithm that contains a number of principles that “illustrate the workings of the syntax-semantics-pragmatics interface” (^[169]Van Valin, 2005: 128 ). One of the distinguishing properties of the RRG linking algorithm is the fact that it is bidirectional, that is, it connects the semantic and syntactic representations as well as the syntactic and semantic representations.

36
paper corpusSignostxt512 - : Marantz, A. (1997). No escape from syntax: Don’t try morphological analysis in the privacy of your own lexicon . En A. Dimitriadis, L. Siegel & C. Surek-Clark (Eds.), Proceedings of the 21st Penn Linguistics Colloquium (pp. 201-225). Philadelphia: UPenn Working Papers in Linguistics. [ [130]Links ]

37
paper corpusSignostxt319 - : Very generally, Arche (2007) argues that the difference between the lexical exponents of the IL and SL predicates, ser and estar, cannot be explained by adducing temporal, outer aspect and or inner aspect distinctions. Hence, her proposal departs radically from previous accounts of ser and estar that base their explanation on aspectual differences between the copulas. For her, Inner Aspect (Verkuyl, 1989), also known as ´Aktionsart´ or ´Situation Aspect´ (Smith, 1997) refers to the internal properties of events in sentences such as duration, culmination and delimitation. Arche (2007) proposes that eventualities are not lexically specified as states or achievements but rather receive their aspectual interpretation from their syntactic structure. The aspectual properties of eventualities derive from whether AspQMax (quantity) is projected into the syntax: the presence of this functional node makes an event be interpreted as telic while the absence of it results in an atelic interpretation .

38
paper corpusSignostxt319 - : We have seen that several researchers have tried to account for ser and estar based on syntactic, semantic and pragmatic approaches. This just shows how complex it is to characterize the behavior of the two Spanish copulas. Leaving aside the controversial topic of whether the relevant distinctions are encoded in the syntax, the semantics, the pragmatics of either, the copulas or the whole predication, most of the influential proposals seem to converge on the following general picture: Predicates with ser and estar give rise to different interpretations: ser predicates are generally (but not necessarily ) associated with properties that are perceived to last, to be permanent, to be inherent while estar predicates are commonly (but not always) associated with properties that are perceived as temporary, non-inherent and easy to change. Thus, most analyses agree that ser predicates are more relaxed than estar predicates in temporal terms. Importantly, ser is seen as disconnected from the

39
paper corpusSignostxt200 - : [2]vol.39 número62 [3]La formulación de preguntas para la comprensión de textos: Estudio experimental [4]Erteschik-Shir, Nomi & Rapoport, Tova (Eds.) (2005). The syntax of aspect: Deriving thematic and aspectual interpretation [5] índice de autores [6]índice de materia [7]búsqueda de artículos [8]Home Page [9]lista alfabética de revistas

40
paper corpusSignostxt505 - : Marantz, A. (1997). No escape from syntax: Don’t try morphological analysis in the privacy of your own lexicon . En A. Dimitriadis, L. Siegel, C. Surek-Clark & A. Williams (Eds.), Proceedings of the 21st Penn Linguistics Colloquium (pp. 201-225). Philadelphia: UPenn Working Papers in Linguistics. [ [138]Links ]

41
paper corpusSignostxt201 - : El volumen completo está dedicado a Ken Hale, cuya muerte en octubre de 2001 conmovió a un conjunto amplio de estudiosos alrededor del mundo. El texto se divide en tres partes. La primera, denominada From lexical roots to syntax contiene tres artículos. El primero de ellos es un artículo clásico de los profesores del MIT (Massachussets Institute of Technology), Ken Hale y Samuel Jay Keyser, quienes expandieron las bases de la gramática generativa a una teoría donde el papel del léxico y la estructura argumental cobran mayor relevancia. El capítulo, denominado Aspect and the syntax of argument structure es una síntesis del único libro publicado por ambos autores en el 2002, Prolegomenon to a theory of lexical argument structure (Hale & Keyser, 2002 ). El capítulo sienta las bases de la teoría de la estructura argumental e incluye las definiciones e implicaciones de los conceptos clave desarrollados en el marco de esta teoría, tales como la incorporación (merge), la selección argumental

42
paper corpusSignostxt601 - : However, the BICS/CALP dichotomy does not provide a full account of academic language. Instead, CALP arbitrates its own form and shape in each discipline. In other words, the knowledge structures of every academic discipline (mathematics, biology, history, etc.) display their specific language representations (^[30]Shanahan & Shanahan, 2008). Each field triggers particular language structures (not only lexicon) which mould a disciplinary language of its own. Equation, distribution and similarity are mathematical notions. Revolution, agreement or corroboration (fact-checking) have special significations in history. Each discipline constitutes its own properties and produces peculiar disciplinary genres (see ^[31]Biber, 1992; ^[32]Lorenzo, 2013). Peculiarities can be traced down to levels below the sentence. In history, the abundance of causal relations is accompanied by particular grammar and syntax structures: ambiguous use of conjunctions, nominalisations, implicit causal and temporal

43
paper corpusSignostxt510 - : From sublexical features to syntax: Resumption, relational nouns and part-whole nouns

Evaluando al candidato syntax:


2) syntactic: 10 (*)
3) errors: 8 (*)
5) acquisition: 7
6) grammatical: 7 (*)
7) linguistics: 7 (*)
8) linguistic: 6 (*)
11) repair: 6
13) predicates: 6 (*)
15) morphological: 5 (*)
18) speech: 5 (*)
19) grammar: 5 (*)
20) aspect: 5 (*)

syntax
Lengua: eng
Frec: 807
Docs: 421
Nombre propio: 8 / 807 = 0%
Coocurrencias con glosario: 10
Puntaje: 10.684 = (10 + (1+6.28540221886225) / (1+9.65821148275179)));
Rechazado: muy disperso;

Referencias bibliográficas encontradas sobre cada término

(Que existan referencias dedicadas a un término es también indicio de terminologicidad.)
syntax
: Chomsky, N. 1965. Aspects of the Theory of Syntax. Cambridge: MIT Press.
: ------; & Masullo, P. J. (1998). On Verbal Quantification in Spanish. En O. Fullana & F. Roca (Eds.), Studies on the Syntax of Central Romance Languages (pp. 9-63). Girona: Universidad de Girona.
: ------; (2006). Coordinated Adjectives and the Interpretation of Number Features. En L. Brugè (Ed.), Studies in Spanish Syntax (pp. 47-60). Venezia: Università Ca’ Foscari Venezia.
: 1. Aarts, B. ( 1997). English syntax and argumentation. Basingstoke, Hampshire: Macmillan.
: 10. Dahl, Östen. 1981. On the definition of the telic-atelic (bounded-nonbounded) distinction. En Philip Tedeschi y Annie Zaenen (eds.). Syntax and semantics.Vol. 14. Tense and aspect, 79-90. NewYork:Academic Press.
: 10. Radford, Andrew. 1997. Syntax. A minimalist introduction. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
: 12. Rizzi, Luigi. 1996. Residual Verb Second and the Wh-Criterion. En Adriana Belletti y Luigi Rizzi (Eds.), Parameters and functional heads: Essays in comparative syntax, 63-90. Dordrecht: Foris.
: 14. Cameron, R. (1998). A variable syntax of speech, gesture and sound effect: Direct quotations in Spanish. Language Variation and Change, 10, 43-83.
: 14. Givón, T. (2001). Syntax: A functional-typological introduction II. Ámsterdam: John Benjamins.
: 15. Hale, Kenneth y Samuel Jay Keyser. 2002. Aspect and the syntax of argument structure. En Nomi Erteschik-Shir y Tova Rapaport (eds.), The syntax of aspect. Deriving thematic and aspectual interpretation, 11-41. New York: Oxford University Press.
: 16. Givón, T. (1990). Syntax. A functional–typological introduction. Amsterdam: Benjamins.
: 17. Kayne, Richard. 1994. The antisymmetry of syntax. Cambridge, Massachusetts: MIT Press.
: 17. Keniston, H. (1937). The syntax of Castilian prose. The sixteenth century. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
: 18. Labov, William. 1972. The transformation of experience in narrative syntax. En William Labov (ed.), Language in the inner city: Studies in the Black English vernacular, 354-405. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania.
: 18. Lardière, Donna.1998. Dissociating syntax from morphology in a divergent end-state grammar. Second language Research 14. 359-375.
: 2. Camacho, José. 2002. Wh-Doubling: Implications for the syntax of wh-movement. Linguistic Inquiry 34, 1. 157-164.
: 2.Chomsky, Noam. 1965. Aspects of the theory of syntax. Cambridge, Massachusetts: The MIT Press.
: 20. Radford, Andrew. 1990. Syntactic theory and the acquisition of English syntax: The nature of early child grammars of English. Oxford: Basil Black well.
: 21. Radford, Andrew. 1997. Syntax. A minimalist introduction. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Real Academia Española. 1973. Esbozo de una nueva gramática de la lengua española. Madrid: Espasa Calpe.
: 21. Uriagereka, Juan. 1995. Aspects of the syntax of clitic placement in Western Romance. Linguistic Inquiry 26, 1. 79-123.
: 23. Levin, Beth y Malka Rappaport Hovav. 2002. The semantic determinants of argument expression: A view from the English resultative construction. En Jacqueline Guéron y Jacqueline Lecarme (eds.), The syntax of time, 477-494. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
: 24. Marantz, Alec. 1997. No escape from syntax: don´t try morphological analysis in the privacy of your own lexicon. UPenn Working Papers in Linguistics 4, 2. 201-225.
: 24. Zagona, Karen. 2002. The syntax of Spanish. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
: 24.Kany, Charles. 1945. American-Spanish syntax. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
: 28. Pustejovsky, James. 1991. The syntax of event structure. En Beth Levin y Samuel Pinker (eds.), Lexical and conceptual structure, 47-81. Oxford: Blackwell.
: 28. Rizzi, Luigi. 2000. Comparative syntax and language acquisition. London: Routledge.
: 3. Alo, M., & Mesthrie, R. (2008). Nigerian English: morphology and syntax. In R. Mesthrie, (Ed.), Varieties of English, Africa, South and Southeast Asia, (pp. 323-339). Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
: 30. Mandelblit, Nili. 2000. The grammatical parking of conceptual integration: From syntax to morphology. Cognitive Linguistics 11, 3/4. 197-251.
: 31. Talmy, Leonard. 1975. Semantics and syntax of motion. En John P. Kimball (ed.), Syntax and semantics, Vol 4, 181-238. New York: Academic Press.
: 32. Grice, P. (1975). Logic and conversation. En P. Cole y J. Morgan (coords.), Speech acts: Syntax and semantics (pp. 41-58). Nueva York: Academic Press.
: 36. Uriagereka, Juan. 1995. Aspects of the syntax of clitic placement in western Romance.Linguistic Inquiry 26. 79-123.
: 4. Burzio, Luigi. 1986. Italian syntax. A government-binding approach. Dordrecht: Reider.
: 4. Cinque, Guglielmo. 1995. Italian syntax and universal grammar. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
: 40. Spaulding, Robert. 1926. History and Syntax of progressive constructions in Spanish. Berkeley: University of California Press.
: 43. Van Valin, Robert y Randy LaPolla. 1997. Syntax. Structure, meaning, and function. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
: 48. Labov, W. (1972). The transformation of experience in narrative syntax. En W. Labov (coord.), Language in the inner city: Studies in the Black English vernacular (pp. 354-396). Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press.
: 49.Rao, Rajiv. 2008. Observations on the roles of prosody and syntax in the phonological phrasing of Barcelona Spanish. The Linguistic Journal, 3, 3. 85-131.
: 5. Givón, Talmy. 1979. From discourse to syntax: grammar as a processing strategy. En Talmy Givón (ed.), Syntax and semantics. Discourse and
: 5. Grice, H. P. (1975). Logic and conversation. En P. Cole y J. L. Morgan (Comps.), Syntax and semantics: Vol. 3. Speech Acts (pp. 41-58). Nueva York: Academic Press.
: 6. Bardel, C. y Falk, Y. (2007). The role of the second language in third language acquisition: The case of Germanic syntax. Second Language Research, 23(4), 459-484.
: 6. Bybee, Joan y Sandre Thompson. 1997. Three frequency effects in syntax. Berkeley Linguistics Society 23. 65-85.
: 6. Coene, Martine e Yves D’Hulst. 2003. Introduction: The syntax and semantics of noun phrases: Theoretical background. En Martine Coene e Yves D’Hulst (eds.), From NP to DP, 1-46. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins.
: 6.Givón, Talmy. 2001. Syntax. An introduction. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
: 7. Chomsky, N. (1965). Aspects of the theory of syntax. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
: 8. Grice, Herbert. 1975. Logic and conversation. En Peter Cole y Jerry Morgan, (eds.) Syntax and semantics, vol. 3, 41-58. New York: Academic Press.
: 8. Gruber, J. (1975). Lexical Structure in Syntax and Semantics. Amsterdam, North Holland.
: 8. Levi, J. N. (1978). The syntax and semantics of complex nominals. Nueva York: Academic Press.
: 9. Comrie, Bernard. 1989. Language universals and linguistic typology. Syntax and morphology. Oxford: Blackwell.
: 9. Givón, T. (2001). Syntax. An introduction (Vols. I y II). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
: 9. Hill, S., & Bradford, W. (2000). Bilingual grammar of English-Spanish syntax: a manual with exercises and key. Maryland, MD: University Press of America.
: Abusch, Dorit. 2004. On the temporal composition of infinitives, en J. Guéron y J. Lecarme (eds.), The syntax of time, Cambridge, MA, MIT Press: 27-53.
: Aijón Oliva, M. A. y Serrano, M. J. (2013). Style in Syntax. Investigating Variation in Spanish Pronoun System. Berna: Peter Lang.
: Altmann, G., Garnham, A. & Henstra, J. (1994). Effects of syntax in human sentence parsing: Evidence against a structure-based proposal mechanism. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory and Cognition, 20(1), 209-216.
: Anderson, Mona. 2005. Affectedness. En The Blackwell Companion to Syntax. Vol. 1. Eds., Martin Everaert y Henk van Riemsdijk. Malden: Blackwell Publishing, 121-141.
: Babcock, Sandra S. (1970), The syntax of Spanish reflexive verbs, La Haya / París, Mouton.
: Barbiers, Sjef. 1995. The syntax of interpretations, The Hague, Holland Academic Graphic.
: Belleti, A., Bennati E., & Sorace, A. (2007). Theoretical and Developmental Issues in the Syntax of Subjects: Evidence of Near-Native Italian. Natural Language & Linguistic Theory, 25, 657-689. doi: [134]https://doi.org/10.1007/s11049-007-9026-9
: Bennett, E. C. (1966), Syntax of Early Latin, II, Hildesheim, Zúrich-Nueva York: Georg Olms Verlagsbuchhandlung.
: Berent, Gerald P. (1996). "The Acquisition of English Syntax by Deaf Learners", en Ritchie, W. y Bhatia, T. (eds.). Handbook of Second Language Acquisition. San Diego, Academic Press, 469-506.
: Bernstein Ratner, N. (1996). From 'Signal to Syntax': But what is the nature of the signal? In J.L. Morgan & K. Demuth (eds.), Signal to syntax: Bootstrapping from speech to grammar in early acquisition (pp. 135-150). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
: Blau, Eileen K. (1982). The effect of syntax on readability for ESL students in Puerto Rico. TESOL Quarterly, 16 (4), 517-526.
: Bloomfield, L. (1930). Language . New York: Holt, Rinehart & Winston.Chomsky, N. (1965). Aspects of the theory of syntax . Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
: Blühdorn, H. (2008). Subordination and coordination in syntax, semantics and discourse: Evidence from the Study of connectives. En C. Fabricius-Hansen & W. Ramm (Eds.), Subordination versus Coordination in Sentence and Text (pp. 59-85). Ámsterdam: John Benjamins.
: Boeckx, C. (2008). Bare syntax. Oxford, New York: Oxford University Press.
: Borzi, C. (1997). Syntax, Semantik und Pragmatik der Konnektoren, entonces', así que' und (tal/...) que' (Diss.) Ludwig-Maximilians-Universitãt, München: Profidruck.
: Bosque, I. 2001. "Adjective position and the interpretation of indefinities". En Guitérrez-Rexach, J. y Silva-Villar, L. (eds.) Current issues in Spanish syntax and semantics. Nueva York: Mouton De Gruyter, pp. 17-37.
: Bosque, I. y Masullo, P. 1998. "On verbal quantification in Spanish". En Fullana, O. y Roca, F. (eds.) Studies on the syntax of central romance languages, Universidad de Gerona, pp. 9-63.
: Bowers, J. (1993). The syntax of predication. Linguistic Inquiry 24, 591-656.
: Bošković, Željko. 1997. The syntax of nonfinite complementation: An economy approach, Cambridge, MA, MIT Press.
: Braine, M. D. S., y O’Brien, D. P. (1998b). How to investigate mental logic and the syntax of thought. En M. D. S. Braine y D. P. O’Brien (Eds.), Mental Logic (pp. 45-61). Mahwah: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc. Publishers .
: Bresnan, J. 1973. "The syntax of the comparative clause construction in English", en Linguistic inquiry, 4, pp. 275-343.
: Brimo, D., Lund, E., y Sapp, A. (2018). Syntax and reading comprehension: a meta-analysis of different spoken-syntax assessments. International Journal of Language & Communication Disorders, 53(3), 431-445. doi: 10.1111/1460-6984.12362.
: Brown, Roger e Colin Fraser. 1964. The acquisition of syntax, Monographs of the Society for Research in Child Development, 29, 1: 43-79.
: Brown, Roger e Ursula Bellugi. 1964. Three processes in the child's acquisition of syntax, Harvard Educational Review, 34, 2: 133-151.
: Bruening, B. (2013). By Phrases in Passives and Nominals. Syntax, 16(1), 1-41. [234]https://doi.org/10.11111/j.1467-9612.2012.00171.x
: Burzio, Luigi. (1986). Italian Syntax. A Government-Binding Approach. Dordrecht: Reidel.
: COLE, P. (1975). Syntax and Semantics 3 Speech Acts. New York: Academic Press.
: Cameron, R. (1994). Switch Reference, Verb Class and Priming in a Variable Syntax. In Papers from the Regional Meeting of the Chicago Linguistic Society: Parasession on Variation in Linguistic Theory, 30, 27-45.
: Cameron, R. (1998), “A variable syntax of speech, gesture, and sound effect: Direct quotations in Spanish”, Language Variation and Change , 10:1, pp. 43-83.
: Carnap, R. (1934). Logische Syntax der Sprache. Viena: Springer.
: Carnie, Andrew. 2013. Syntax: A Generative Introduction. 3ra. ed. Oxford: Wiley-Blackwell.
: Carter-Thomas, S. (2005). Specialised syntax for specialised texts? An examination of the preferred syntactic patterns in 2 agnate scientific genres: Proceedings articles and conference presentations. Paper presented at Colloque GLAT Barcelone (2004). Barcelona, Spain, 3-18.
: Charters, A. (2005). The Second Language Acquisition of Mandarin Nominal Syntax. Tesis de Doctorado en Lingüística, Universidad de Auckland.
: Chien,Y. & Wexler, K. (1990). Childrens knowledge of locality conditions in binding as evidence for the modularity of syntax and pragmatics. Language Acquisition, 1(3), 225-295.
: Chomsky, Carol (1969). The Acquisition of Syntax in Children from 5 to 10. Cambridge, The M.I.T. Press.
: Chomsky, N. (1965). Aspects of the Theory of Syntax. Cambridge, ma: mit Press.
: Chomsky, Noam y Lasnik, Howard. (1993). The theory of principles and parameters. En J. Jacobs et al. (eds.) Syntax: An international handbook of contemporary research, vol. 1 (pp. 506-569). Berlín: Walter de Gruyter.
: Chomsky, Noam. (1965). Aspects of the Theory of Syntax. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press. [Trad. esp.: Aspectos de la teoría de la sintaxis. (1970). Madrid: Aguilar].
: Chomsky, Noam. (2000). Minimalist inquiries: The framework. En R. Martin et al. (eds.), Step by step. Essays on minimalist syntax in honor of Howard Lasnik (pp. 89-155). Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.
: Chomsky, Noam. 1965. Aspects of the Theory of Syntax. Cambridge, MA, MIT Press.
: Chu, C. C. (1996). Source and management: Two tiers of information structure. En T. F. Cheng y H. J. Zhang (Eds.), Proceedings of NACCL-7 and ICCL- 4, Volume 1: Pragmatics, Syntax and Semantics (pp. 37-53). Los Angeles: GSIL, University of Southern California.
: Cinque, G. (2004). Issues in adverbial syntax. Lingua, 114, 683-710.
: Clements, J. C. (2005). 'Ser' and 'estar' in the predicate adjective construction. In J. C. Clements & J. Yoon (eds.), Functional approaches to Spanish syntax: Lexical semantics, discourse, and transitivity (pp. 161-202). London: Palgrave-Macmillan.
: Collentine, J. (1995). The development of complex syntax and mood-selection abilities by intermediate-level learners of Spanish. Hispania, 78, 122-135.
: Comrie, B. (1976). The syntax of causatives constructions: cross language similarities and divergences. En M. Shibatani (ed.), The Grammar of Causative Constructions (pp. 259-312). Nueva York: Academic Press.
: Comrie, B. (1981). Language universals and linguistic typology: Morphology and syntax. Blackwell, University of Chicago Press.
: Cooper, W. & Paccia-Cooper, J. (1980). Syntax and speech. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
: Crain, S. & Thornton, R. (1998). Investigations in universal grammar: A guide to experiments on the acquisition of syntax and semantics. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
: Croft, W. (2009). Syntax is More Diverse, and Evolutionary Linguistics is already Here. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 32(5), 453-554.
: Cuando Chomsky en 1965 publica su libro Aspects of the theory of syntax, deja en claro esta escogencia, insistiendo en que su teoría se ocuparía de la competencia (competence) más no de la actuación (performance):
: Cutler, A. (1996). Prosody and the word boundary problem. In J.L. Morgan & K. Demuth (eds.), Signal to syntax: Bootstrapping from speech to grammar in early acquisition (pp. 87-99). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
: DU BOIS, J. (1985). Competing Motivations. En Haiman, J. (Ed.) Iconicity in Syntax (pp. 343-365). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
: DeLancey, S. (2001). Lectures on functional syntax. [121]http://pages.uoregon.edu/delancey/sb/fs.html
: Del Rey, S. (2017). (Anti-)Latinate Syntax in Renaissance Dialogue: Romance Translations of Erasmus’s Uxor Mempsigamos. Zeitschrift für romanische Philologie, 133(3), 673-708. https://doi.org/10.1515/zrp-2017-0034
: Demirdache, H. & Uribe-Etxebarria, M. (2000). The primitives of temporal relations. En R. Martin, D. Michaels & J. Uriagereka (Eds.), Step by step: essays on minimalist syntax in honor of Howard Lasnik (pp.157-186). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press .
: Denison, D. (1993). English historical syntax. London: Longman.
: Denison, D. (1993). English historical syntax: Verbal constructions (Longman Linguistics Library). Londres, Nueva York: Longman.
: Dietrich, Wolf. (en prensa). Word classes and word class switching in Guaraní Syntax, en: Bruno Estigarribia et al. (eds.), Guarani Linguistics in the 21st Century, Leiden, Brill.
: Dipper, S., Götze, M. & Skopeteas, S. (2007). Information Structure in Cross-Linguistic Corpora: Annotation Guidelines for Phonolog y, Morpholog y, Syntax, Semantics and Information Structure. ISIS Working Papers of the SFB Universitätsverlag Potsdam.
: Dixon, R. (1982). Where have all the adjectives gone? And other Essays in Semantics and Syntax. Mouton De Gruyter.
: Dixon, R. M .W. (2000). A typology of causatives: Form, syntax and meaning. En R.M.W. Dixon y A. Aikhenvald (Eds.), Changing Valency. Case Studies in transitivity (pp. 30-83). Reino Unido: Cambridge University Press.
: Dixon, R. M. W. (1982). Where have all the adjectives gone? En R. M. W. Dixon (Ed.), Where have all the adjectives gone? And other essays in Semantic and Syntax (pp. 1-62). Berlín: De Gruyter Mouton.
: Dixon, R. y Aikhenvald, A. (2000). A typology of causatives: form, syntax and meaning. En R. Dixon y A. Aikhenvald (eds.), Changing Valency: Case Studies in Transitivity (pp. 30-79). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
: Dryer, M. (2007). Word order. En T. Shopen (Ed.), Language Typology and Syntax Description. (Vol. 1, pp. 61-31). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
: Du Bois, J.W. (2014). Towards a dialogic syntax. Cognitive Linguistics, 25(3), 359-410. Doi: 10.1515/cog-2014-0024.
: Duranti, A. & Ochs, E. (1979). Left dislocation in Italian conversation. En T. Givón (Ed.), syntax and semantics 12. Discourse and syntax (pp. 337-416). New York: Academic Press.
: Dürscheid, C. (s.f.). Syntax: Grundlagen und Theorien. Göttingen: Vandenhoeck & Ruprecht.
: Ellis, N. C., & Sinclair, S. G. (1996). Working Memory in the Acquisition of Vocabulary and Syntax: Putting Language in Good Order. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 49A(1), 234-250. doi: 10.1080/713755604.
: Elson, B. & Pickett, V. (1964). An Introduction to Morphology and Syntax. Ciudad de México: Summer Institute of Linguistics.
: Empirical studies of second language syntax have fueled much of the debate regarding language transfer. Liu (2001) presents a brief account on the main research interests regarding cross-linguistic influence at the level of syntax in the seventies:
: Ernst, T. (2002). The syntax of adjuncts. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
: Erteschik-Shir, Nomi & Rapoport, Tova (Eds.) (2005). The syntax of aspect: Deriving thematic and aspectual interpretation. 309 pp. Oxford: Oxford University Press. ISBN: 0-19-928043-6.
: Faltz, L. (1977). Reflexivization: a study in universal syntax, Nueva York: Garland.
: Farmer, A. (1984). Modularity in Syntax. Cambridge: MIT Press.
: Fawcett, R. (2000). A theory of syntax for systemic functional linguistics. Amsterdam: Benjamins.
: Fernández Soriano, O. (1999). Two Types of Impersonal Sentences in Spanish: Locative and Dative Subjects. Syntax, 2, 101-140.
: Foley, W., & Van Valin, R. (1980). Role and reference grammar. En Moravcsik, E., & Wirth, J. R. (Eds.), Current approaches to syntax (pp. 329-352). Academic Press. [114]https://doi.org/10.1163/9789004373105_014
: Foley, W., & Van Valin, R. (1984). Functional syntax and universal grammar. Cambridge University Press.
: Frascarelli, M., & Jiménez-Fernández, A. L. (2019). Understanding Partiality in pro-Drop Languages: An Information-Structure Approach. Syntax, 22, 162-198. [137]https://doi.org/10.1111/synt.12184
: GIVON, T. (1984). Syntax. A Functional-Typological Introduction I. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
: GIVON, T. (Ed.). (1979) Discourse and Syntax. Syntax and Semantics, Vol.12 New York: Academy Press.
: GRICE, H. P., (1975). “Logic and conversation.” En Syntax and semantics 3: speech acts., P. Cole y J. L. Morgan, (ed.) (1975), New York, Academic Press, 41-59.
: Garatea Grau, Carlos (2008)“Variedades en competencia o el registro del español andino”. En Romanische Syntax im Wandel. Eds., Roland Schmidt-Riese, Elisabeth Stark y Eva Stoll. Tubinga: Narr, 643-661.
: García, E. (2009). The motivated syntax of arbitrary signs. Cognitive constraints on Spanish clitic clustering. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins.
: Giorgi, A. (2009). Toward A Syntax of the Subjunctive Mood. Lingua, 119(12), 1837-1858.
: Givon, T. (1984), Syntax. A functional-typological introduction, vol. 1, Ámsterdam / Filadelfia, John Benjamins.
: Givon, T. (2001). Syntax v. II. Ámsterdam: John Benjamins.
: Givón, T. (1982). Syntax. Amsterdam and Philadelphia: John Benjamin Publishing.
: Givón, T. (1984). Syntax. A functional typological introduction. Vol 1. Amsterdam: Benjamins.
: Givón, T. (2001). Syntax (vol. 1 & 2). Philadelphia: John Benjamins Publishing Company.
: Givón, T. (2001). Syntax. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins.
: Givón, T. (2001). Syntax: An Introduction. Amsterdam: John Benjamins Publishing Company .
: Givón, T. 2001. Syntax. An introduction, Vols. 1 y 2, Amsterdam, John Benjamins.
: Givón, Talmy (1979)“From Discourse to Syntax: Grammar as a Processing Strategy”. En Syntax and Semantics. Discourse and Syntax. Ed. Talmy Givón. New York: Academic Press, 81-112.
: Givón, Talmy 2001 Syntax. A functional-typological introduction. Vol. I. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins Publishing Company.
: Givón, Talmy. 1971. Historical syntax and synchronic morphology: an archaeologist's field trip, en Papers from the Regional Meetings of the Chicago Linguistic Society, 7:394- 415.
: Givón, Talmy. 1979. From discourse to syntax: Grammar as a processing strategy. In T. Givón (ed). Discourse and Syntax. New York: Academic Press, 81-112.
: Givón, Talmy. 1984. Syntax. A Functional-Typological Introduction . Vol. I. Amsterdam, Philadelphia, John Benjamin´s.
: Givón, Talmy. 1990. Syntax - A functional - typological introduction. V. II. Amsterdam, John Benjamins Publishing Co.
: Givón, Talmy. 2001. Syntax: an introduction. V. I-II. Amsterdam, John Benjamins.
: Goldberg, Adele. (2010). Verbs, constructions and semantic frames. En Edit Doron y Ivy Sichel (eds.), Syntax, Lexical Semantics and Event Structures (pp. 39-58). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
: Grewendorf, G. (2002). Minimalistische Syntax. Tübingen: UTB/Francke.
: Grice, H. (1975). Logic and Conversation. En P. Cole & J. Morgan (Eds.), Syntax and Semantics Vol. 3 (pp. 41-58). New York, Academic Press.
: Grice, L. (1975) "Logic and conversation", en Cole y Morgan (Eds.), Syntax and semantics, New York: Academic Press, 178-188.
: Grice, P. (1975) Logic and conversation. En: P. Cole & J. Morgan (eds), Syntax and Semantics v.3, Speech Acts (pp. 41 - 58). New York, USA: Academic Press.
: Grodzinsky, Y., & Friederici, A. D. (2006). Neuroimaging of Syntax and Syntactic Processing. Current Opinion in Neurobiology, 16, 240-246.
: Grosu, Alexander. (2004). The syntax-semantics of modal existential wh constructions. En Olga Miseska Tomic (Ed.), Balkan syntax and semantics (pp. 405-438). Amsterdam, Holanda: John Benjamins.
: Grümpel, C. (2002, Noviembre 11). The Acquisition of German Syntax by Spanish-Speaking Advanced Learners Based on an Underlying Subject Verb Object Order. Recuperado de [50]http://www.ucm.es/info/circulo/no11/gruempel.htm.
: Guy, Gregory Riordan. 1981. Linguistic variation in Brazilian Portuguese: aspects of the phonology, syntax, and language history, Tese de Doutorado, University of Pennsylvania, Pennysilvania. Inédita.
: Haiman, M. (1985). Natural syntax. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
: Hale, K. (1966). Kinship reflections in syntax: Some Australian languages. Word, 22, 318-324.
: Harley, H. (2009). The morphology of nominalizations and the syntax of vP. En M. Rathert & A. Giannankidou (Eds.), Quantification, Definiteness and Nominalization (pp. 320-342). Oxford: Oxford University Press,
: Harley, Heidy. 2005. "How do denominal verbs get their names? In Nomi Erte-schik-Shir and Tova Rapoport". En The Syntax of Aspect: Deriving Thematic and Aspectual Interpretation. Oxford: Oxford Scholarship Online.
: Harris, Alice C. y Lyle Campbell. 1995. Historical syntax in cross-linguistic perspective, Cambridge, Cambridge University Press.
: Haspelmath, M. (2013). Argument indexing: a conceptual framework for the syntax of bound person forms. En D. Bakker & M. Haspelmath (Eds.) Languages across boundaries: Studies in memory of Anna Siewierska (pp. 197-226). Berlin: De Gruyter Mouton.
: Haspelmath, Martin 2006 "Explaining alienability contrasts in adnominal possession: economy vs. Iconicity". Syntax of the World’s Languages 2, University of Lancaster.
: Hasting, A. S., Kotz, S. A. & Friederici, A. D. (2007). Setting the stage for automatic syntax processing: The mismatch negativity as an indicator of syntactic priming. Journal of Cognitive neuroscience, 19(3), 386-400.
: Haverkate, H. (2002). The Syntax, Semantics and Pragmatics of Spanish Mood (Pragmatics & Beyond New Series). John Benjamins Publishing.
: Hinzen, Wolfram. (2006). Mind design and minimal syntax. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
: Hoff-Ginsberg, E. (1986). Function and structure in maternal speech: Their relation to the child’s development of syntax. Developmental Psychology, 22(2), 155-163. [251]https://doi.org/10.1111/j.2517-6161.1968.tb00759.x
: Hooper, Joan Bybee. 1975. "On assertive predicates". En: J.P. Kimball (ed.), Syntax and Semantics 4. New York/London: Academic Press, pp. 91-124.
: Hopper, J. (1979). Aspect and foregrounding in discourse. En T. Givón (Ed.), Syntax and Semantics 12: Discourse and Syntax (pp. 213-241). Nueva York: Academic Press.
: Hopper, P. (1979). Aspect and foregrounding in discourse. Syntax and semantics, 12, 213-241. [119]https://doi.org/10.1163/9789004368897_010
: Hornstein, N. (2009). A Theory of Syntax. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
: Hovav, M. R., Doron, E., & Sichel, I. 2010. Lexical semantics, syntax, and event structure. New York: Oxford University Press Inc.
: Huttenlocher, Janellen, Marina Vasilyeva, Elina Cymerman y S. Levine. 2002. Language input and child syntax, Cognitive Psychology, 45: 337-374.
: In terms of linguistics, specialised texts constitute subsets of a certain language. Therefore, in order to define these texts, an analysis of the units pertaining to the different levels of language must be carried out: phonology, morphology, lexicon, syntax and discourse (Cabré, 1999).
: Jackendoff, R. (2002). English particle constructions, the lexicon, and the autonomy of syntax. En N. Dehé, R. Jackendoff, S. Urban, & A. McIntyre (Eds.), Verb-Particle Explorations (= Interface Explorations 1) (pp. 67-94). Berlin-New York: Mouton de Gruyter.
: Jackendoff, R. 1977. X' Syntax: A study in phrase structure, Cambridge (Mass): MIT Press.
: Jensen, Frede & Lathrop, Tom. 1973. The syntax of the old Spanish subjunctive. The Hague/ Paris: Mouton.
: Jones, B. (1996). Towards texting the syntax of punctuation. En Proceedings of the 16th International Conference on Computational Linguistics (COLING-96) (pp. 363-365). Copenhagen: COLING.
: Kabatek, J. (2008) “En primer lugar, agradecer - wie sich ‘ungrammatische’ Infinitive in die spanische Grammatik schleichen”. En E. Stark, R. Schmidt-Riese & E. Stoll (eds.), Romanische Syntax im Wandel (pp. 197-208). Tübingen: Gunter Narr Verlag.
: Kany, Charles (1951). American Spanish Syntax. 2a edición, Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.
: Kany, Charles E. (1945), American- Spanish Syntax, Chicago, Chicago University Press.
: Kany, Charles. 1951. American-Spanish syntax. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.
: Karttunen, Lauri. 1977. Syntax and semantics of questions, Linguistics and Philosophy, 1: 3-44.
: Kayne, R. (1994). The Antisymmetry of Syntax. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press .
: Kayne, R. 2005. Some notes on comparative syntax, with special reference to English and French, em G. Cinque e R. Kayne (orgs.), The Oxford Handbook of Compartative Syntax, Oxford, OUP: 3-69.
: Kayne, Richard. 1994. The Antisymmetry of Syntax. Cambridge: Massachusetts Institute of Technology.
: Keniston, H. (1937). The syntax of Castilian prose. The 16th Century. Chicago: Chicago University Press.
: Kennedy, C. (1999). Projecting the adjective. The syntax and semantics of gradability and comparison. Nueva York, USA: Garland Press.
: Kennedy, Christopher y Beth Levin. 2008. Measure of change: The adjectival core of degree achievements. En Adjectives and adverbs: Syntax, semantics, and discourse. Eds., Louise McNally y Chris Kennedy. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 156-182.
: Kihm, A. (2005). Noun class, gender, and the lexicon-syntax-morphology interfaces: A comparative study of Niger-Congo and Romance languages. En G. Cinque & R. Kayne (Eds.), Comparative Syntax (pp. 459-512). Oxford: Oxford University Press .
: Klein-Andreu, Flora. (1983) Grammar in Style: Spanish Adjective Placement. En: Klein- Andreu, F. (Ed). Discourse Perspectives on Syntax. New York: Academic Press. 43-79.
: Kos, M., Vosse, T., van Den Brink, D., Hagoort, P., et al. (2010). About edible restaurants: Conflicts between syntax and semantics as revealed by ERPs. Frontiers in Psychology, 1, 1-11.
: Kratzer, Angelika (2005), “Building resultatives”, en C. Maienborn y A. Wöllstein-Leisten (eds.), Event Arguments in Syntax, Semantics, and Discourse, Tubinga, Niemeyer, pp. 178-212.
: Kratzer, Angelika. 2004. Telicity and the Meaning of Objective Case. En The syntax of time. Eds., Jacqueline Guéron y Jacqueline Lecarme. Cambridge: Massachusetts Institute of Technology, 389-423.
: Kroeger, P (2008). Analyzing syntax. A lexical-functional approach. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
: Kuperberg, G. R. (2007). Neural mechanisms of language comprehension: Challenges to syntax. Brain Research, 1146, 23-49.
: LADD, D.R., (1979) . "Light and Shadow. A study of the syntax and semantics of sentence is English" , in WAUGH, LR- & VAN COETSEN, F. (EDS.), Contributions to Grammatical studies, Semantics and Syntax, Leiden: E. J. Brill.
: LERNER, G. H. (1991). On the Syntax of Sentences in Progress. En Language and Society, 20, 441-458.
: Labov, W. (1972). The Transformation of Experience in Narrative Syntax. En W. Labov (ed.), Language in the Inner City (pp. 354-396). Filadelfia: Pennsylvania University Press.
: Ladd, D.R. (1979). 'Light and Shadow: A study of the syntax and semantics of sentence in English', in Waugh, L.R. & Van Coetsen, F. (eds.), Contrihutions to grammatical studies semantics and syntax. Leiden: E. J. Brill.
: Lakoff, G. (1970). Irregularity in syntax. Nueva York: Rinehart and Winston.
: Lamb, S. M. (2000). Learning Syntax: A Neurocognitive Approach. Recuperado de [52]http://www.ruf.rice.edu/~lngbrain/syntax.doc.
: Landau, Idan. (2005). The locative syntax of experiencers. Be'er Sheva, Israel: Ms, Ben Gurion University.
: Landman, Fred y Susan Rothstein. 2010. "Incremental homogeneity and the semantics of aspectual for phrases". En Lexical Semantics, Syntax, and Event Structure. Eds., M. Rappaport Hovav, I. Sichel y E. Doron. Oxford: OUP.
: Langacker, R. (1985). Observations and Speculations on Subjectivity. En J. Haiman (Ed.), Iconicity in Syntax (pp. 109-150). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
: Liddell, S. K.(1980). American Sign Language syntax. The Hague: Mouton.
: Lieberman, P., Friedman, J., & Feldman, L. S. (1990). Syntax comprehension deficits in Parkinson’s disease. Journal of Nervous and Mental Disease.
: Littlefield, Heather. (2006). Syntax and Acquisition in the Prepositional Domain: Evidence from English for Fine-Grained Syntactic Categories. Tesis de Doctorado en Applied Linguistics. Boston, Estados Unidos: Boston University Press.
: Longobardi, G. (1994). Reference to kinds and proper names: a theory of N movement in syntax and Logical form. Linguistic Inquiry, 25(609-665), 56.
: Luraghi, S., y Parodi, C. (2008). Key terms in syntax and syntactic theory. Bloomsbury Publishing.
: López, L. (2009). A derivational syntax for information structure. Oxford: Oxford University Press .
: MALLINSON, G. R. & Blake, B. (1981). Language Typology: Cross-Linguistic Studies in Syntax. Amsterdam: North-Holland Publishing Company.
: MEL"CUK, I. (1979). Studies in Dependency Syntax. Ann Arbor: Karoma.
: MacKay, D. G. & James, L. E. 2001. "The binding problem for syntax, semantics, and prosody: H. M. ‘s selective sentences-reading deficits and theoretical syndrome approach". En Language and Cognitive Processes, 16, pp. 419-460.
: Marantz, A. (1997). No escape from syntax: Don’t try morphological analysis in the privacy of your own lexicon. En A. Dimitriadis (Eds.), Proceedings of the 21st Annual Penn Linguistics Colloquium. University of Pennsylvania Working Papers in Linguistics, 4(2), 201-225.
: Maratsos, M. y Chalkley, M. A. 1980. "The internal language of children's syntax: The nature and ontogenesis of syntactic categories". En K. Nelson (Ed.) Childrens' language . New York : Gardner .
: Martí-Girbau, N. (2010). The Syntax of Partitives. Tesis doctoral. Universidad Autónoma de Barcelona.
: Martínez, M. (2010). On L2 English Transfer Effects in L3 Syntax. Vigo International Journal of Applied Linguistics, 7, 75-98.
: Marín, R. (2010). Spanish adjectives within bounds. En P. Cabredo Hofherr & O. Matushansky (Eds.), Adjectives. Formal analyses in syntax and semantics (pp. 307-331). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
: Mateu, Jaume. 2002. Argument Structure: Relational construal at the syntax semantics interface. PhD Dissertation. Barcelona: Universitat Autonoma de Barcelona.
: McCloskey, J. & Hale, K. (1984). On the syntax of person-number inflection in modern Irish. Natural Language and Linguistic Theory, 1(4), 487-533.
: McDaniel, D. & Cairns, H. (1996). Eliciting judgments of grammaticality and reference. In D. McDaniel, C. McKee & H. Cairns (Eds.), Methods for assessing childrens syntax (pp. 233-254). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
: McNally, L. y Kennedy, C. (2008). Adjectives and adverbs. Syntax, semantics, and discourse. Oxford University Press.
: Mel'čuk, I. (1988). Dependency Syntax: Theory and Practice. Nueva York: State University of New York Press.
: Merrifield, W. (1967). Laboratory Manual for Morphology and Syntax. Ciudad de México: Summer Institute of Linguistics.
: Morgan, Jerry. 1978. "Two types of convention in indirect speech acts". En Peter Cole (ed.) Syntax and semantics. Vol 9: Pragmatics. Nueva York: Academic Press.
: Moro, A., Tettamanti, M., Perani, D., Donati, C., Cappa, S. F., & Fazio, F. (2001). Syntax and the brain: disentangling grammar by selective anomalies. Neuroimage , 13(1), 110-118.
: Munro, Pamela. 1976. Mojave syntax, New York/London, Garland.
: Méndez Vallejo, Dunia Catalina 2012 "On the syntax of the Focalizing ser (‘to be’) structure in the Spanish of Bucaramanga". En Colombian varieties of Spanish. Eds., R. File-Muriel y R. Orozco. Madrid/Frankfurt: Iberoamericana/Vervuert, 107-126.
: NOONAN, M. (1998). Non-structuralist Syntax. En M. Darnell, E. Moravcsik, F. Newmeyer, M. Noonan & K. Wheatley (Eds.), Functionalism and Formalism in Linguistics: General Papers (Vol. 1, pp. 11-31). Amsterdam/ Philadelphia: John Benjamins.
: Naigles, L. (1990). Children use syntax to learn verb meaning. Journal of Child Language, 17(2), 357-374. [278]https://doi.org/10.1017/S0305000900013817
: Naigles, L. R., & Terrazas, P. (1998). Motion-verb generalizations in English and Spanish: Influences of language and syntax. Psychological Science, 9(5), 363-369.
: Naigles, L., & Kako, E. T. (1993). First contact in verb acquisition: Defining a role for syntax. Cognitive Development, 64(6), 1665-1687. [280]https://doi.org/10.2307/1131462
: Napoli, Donna J. (1993). Syntax. Theory and problems. Nueva York & Oxford: Oxford University Press.
: Neidle, C., Kegl, J., MacLaughlin, D., Bahan, B., y Lee, R.G. (2000). The Syntax of American Sign Language: Functional Categories and Hierarchical Structures. MIT Press.
: Ni, W., Crain, S. & Shankweiler, D. (1996). Sidestepping garden paths: Assessing the contributions of syntax, semantics, and plausibility in resolving ambiguities. Language and Cognitive Processes, 11, 283-334.
: Nippold, M. A. (2000). Language development during the adolescent years: Aspects of pragmatics, syntax, and semantics. Topics in Language Disorders, 20(2), 15-28. doi: https://doi.org/10.1097/00011363-200020020-00004
: Nir, B. & Berman, R. (2010). "Complex syntax as a window on contrastive rhetoric". Journal of Pragmatics 42 (3), 744-765.
: O'Neill, T. (2011). The syntax of ne... que exceptives in French. UPenn Working Papers in Linguistics, 17, 175-184.
: On the passing of Chief Tony Anenih, an elder statesman and political godfather, ^[74]Obahiagbon (2018) clothes his condolences in complex syntax and loud words.
: O’Grady, W. (2005). Syntactic Carpentry: An Emergentist Approach to Syntax. Lawrence Elrbaum Associates.
: Padden, C. (1988). Interaction of morphology and syntax in American Sign Language. Garland Publishing.
: Perlmutter, D. M. (1971). Deep and surface structure constraints in syntax. Nueva York: Holt, Rinehart and Winston.
: Pesetsky, D. (1995), Zero syntax: experiencers and cascades, Cambridge, MIT Press.
: Pesetsky, David. 1995. Zero Syntax: Experiencers and cascades. Cambridge: Massachusetts Institute of Technology.
: Phillips, J. R. (1973). Syntax and vocabulary of mothers’ speech to young children: Age and sex comparisons. Child Development, 44(1), 182-185. [292]https://doi.org/10.2307/1127699
: Pickett, V. (1980). Beginning morphology and syntax. Ciudad de México: Summer Institute of Linguistics.
: Pinkster, H. (2015). Oxford Latin syntax. Volume 1: The simple clause. Oxford: University Press.
: Pollard, C. & Sag, I. A. (1987). Information-based Syntax and Semantics. Volume I: Fundamentals. Stanford: CSLI.
: Posner, R. (1985). Creolization as typological change. Some examples from Romance syntax. Diachronica. 2(2), (pp. 167-188).
: Prince, E. F. (1990). Syntax and discourse: A look at resumptive pronouns. En D. J. Costa (Ed.), Proceedings of the Sixteenth Annual Meeting of the Berkeley Linguistics Society (pp. 482-497). California: Berkeley Linguistic Society.
: Pustejovski, James. 1991. The syntax of event structure. Cognition. 41, 47-81.
: Pustejovsky, J. (1991). The syntax of event structure. En B. Levin & S. Pinker (Eds.), Lexical and Conceptual Structure (pp. 47-181). Oxford: Blackwell.
: Pustejovsky, James. 1991 "The Syntax of Event Structure". Cognition. 41, 47-81.
: Radford, A. (1997). Syntax: A minimalist introduction. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
: Ramchand, G. (2008). Verb meaning and the lexicon: A first phase syntax. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
: Raposo, Eduardo y Juan Uriagereka. 1995. "Two Types of Small Clauses (Toward a Syntax of Theme/ Rheme Relations)". En Small Clauses. Eds., Cardinaletti and M.T. Guasti. New York: Academic Press, 179-206.
: Rappaport Hovav, M., Doron, E. & Sichel, I. (2010). Introduction. In M. Rappaport Hovav, E. Doron & I. Sichel (Eds.), Lexical Semantics, Syntax, and Event Structure. New York: Oxford University Press Inc.
: Rappaport, M., Doron, E. & Siche, I. (2010). Lexical semantics, syntax, and event structure. London & New York: OUP.
: Rappaport, Malka & Levin, Beth, "Change of state verbs: implications for theories of argument projection", The syntax of aspect deriving thematic and aspectual interpretation, Nomi, Erteschik-Shir & Tova, Rapoport (Eds.), New York, Oxford University Press, 2005, 274-286.
: Riches, N., Loucas, T., Baird, G., Charman, T. & Simonov, E. (2010). Sentence repetition in adolescents with specific language impairment and autism: An investigation of complex syntax. International Journal of Language and Communication Disorders, 45, 47-60.
: Ritter, E. & Rosen, S. (1998). Delimiting events in syntax. En M. Butt & W. Geuder (Eds.), The projection of arguments (pp. 135-164). Stanford: CSLI Publications.
: Rizzi, L. (1982). Issues in Italian syntax. Dordrecht: Foris . doi: [189]https://doi.org/10.15 y/9783110883718
: Roberts, I. (2007). Diachronic syntax. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
: Rodrigues, Raymond J. (1981). A longitudinal study of bilingual English syntax. Aztlán, 12 (1), 75-87.
: Rodríguez-Mondoñedo, Miguel. 2007. The Syntax of Objects: Agree and Differential Object Marking, Tesis de doctorado, University of Connecticut, Mansfield. en línea. Disponible en: https://opencommons.uconn.edu/dissertations/AAI3276641/
: Ross, John Robert. (1967). Constraints on Variables in Syntax. Tesis doctoral. Cambridge, MA, Estados Unidos: MIT.
: Rowland, C., Chang, F., Ambridge, B., Pine, J., y Lieven, E. (2012). The development of abstract syntax: Evidence from structural priming and the lexical boost. Cognition 125(1), 49-63. Doi: 10.1016/j.cognition.2012.06.008.
: Roy, I. (2010). Deadjectival nominalization and the structure of the adjective. En A. Alexiadou & M. Rathert (Eds.), The syntax of nominalizations across languages and frameworks (pp. 129-158). Berlín: De Gruyter Mouton.
: Rozwadowska, Bozena. 1988. Thematic Restrictions on Derived Nominals in Thematic Relations. Syntax and semantics. 21, 147-165.
: Ruhland, R. & Geert, P. (1998). Jumping into syntax: Transitions in the development of closed class words. British Journal of Developmental Psychology, 16(1), 65-95 [en línea]. Disponible en: [122]https://doi.org/10.1111/j.2044-835X.1998.tb00750.x
: SHACHTER, P. (1977). Reference-related and Role-related Properties of Subjects. En Cole, P. & Sadock, J. M. (Eds.) Grammatical Relations, Syntax and Semantics, 8 (pp. 279-305). New York: Academic Press.
: Sanfelici, E. & Poletto, C. (2017). Relative clauses. En A. Dufter & E. Stark (Eds.), Manual of Romance Morphosyntax and Syntax. Berlín /Boston: Walter de Gruyter.
: Schmitt, C. (1996). Aspect and the syntax of noun phrases. PhD Dissertation. University of Maryland, USA.
: Schmitt, C. (2005). Semi-copulas: Event and aspectual composition. In P. Kemp-chinsky and R. Slabakova (eds.), The syntax, semantics and the acquisition of aspect (pp. 121-145). Springer: Kluwer.
: Schmitt, C., Holtheuer, C. & Miller, K. (2004). Acquisition of copulas ser and estar in Spanish: Learning lexico-semantics, syntax and discourse [online]. Retrieved from: [63]http://www.bu.edu/linguistics/APPLIED?BUCLD/supp.html
: Schuele, Melanie & Dykes, Julianna. 2005. Complex syntax acquisition: A longitudinal case study of a child with specific language impairment. Clinical Linguistics & Phonetics, 19, 295-318.
: Schwyzer, E., & Debrunner, A. (1950). Griechische Grammatik. 2, Syntax und syntaktische Stilistik: auf der Grundlage von Karl Brugmanns griechischer Grammatik. Munich: C. H. Beck Verlag.
: Searle, J. (1975). Indirect speech acts. En P. Cole & J. L. Morgan (Eds.), Syntax and Semantics, 3: Speech Acts (pp. 59-82). Nueva York: Academic Press.
: Selkirk, Elisabeth. 1984. Phonology and Syntax: the relation between sound and structure. Cambridge, Massachusetts, USA: The Massachusetts Institute of Technology Press.
: Shaul, David L. 1986. Topics in Nevome syntax, Berkeley, University of California Press.
: Shibatani, M. (1976). The grammar of causatives constructions: A conceptus. En M. Shibatani (ed.), Syntax and Semantics. The Grammar of Causative Constructions, 6 pp. 1-40). Nueva York: Academic Press.
: Shibatani, Masayoshi. 1976. Syntax and semantics, vol. IV: The grammar of causative constructions, New York, Academic Press.
: Siddiqi, D. (2009). Syntax within the word. Ámsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins.
: Smith, J. (2007). Methods in sociolinguistic research: syntax and morphology. En C. Llamas, L. Mullany, & P. Stockwell (Eds.), The Routledge companion to sociolinguistics. London: Routledge.
: Sorace, A. (2000). Differential effects of attrition in the L1 syntax of L2 near-native speakers. Somerville, MA: Cascadilla Press.
: Sorace, A. (2005). Selective optionality in language development. En L. Cornips, & K. P. Corrigan (Eds.), Syntax and Variation. Reconciling the Biological and the Social (pp. 55-80). Amsterdam: John Benjamins. doi: [199]https://doi.org/10.1075/cilt.265.04sor
: Stepanov, A., Fanselow, G., & Vogel, R. (Eds.). (2004). Minimality Effects in Syntax. Berlin: Walter de Gruyter GmbH & Co. KG.
: Strom, C. (1993). Retuara Syntax: Studies in the Languages of Colombia 3. Arlington: Summer Institute of Linguistics & University of Texas.
: Studler, R. (2014). "The Morphology, Syntax and Semantics of Definite Determiners in Swiss German". En P. Cabredo y A. Zribi-Hertz (Eds.). Crosslinguistic Studies on Noun Phrase Structure and Reference (pp. 143-171). Leiden/Boston: Brill.
: Suñer, Margarita. 1982. The Syntax and Semantics of Presentational Sentence-Types in Spanish. Georgetown University Press.
: Svenonius, P., & Kennedy, C. (2006). Northern Norwegian degree questions and the syntax of measurement. In, M. Frascarelli (Ed.) Phases of Interpretation (pp. 133-161). Berlin, Germany: De Gruyter.
: Sánchez Lancis, C. (2016). De la síntesis al análisis: Diacronía del quesuismo en español. En É. Buchi, J.-P. Chauveau & J.-M. Pierrel (Eds.), Actes du XXVIIe Congrès de linguistique et philologie romanes (pp. 15-20). Section 4: Syntax. Nancy, ATILF.
: Sánchez López, Cristina. (2007). The possessive dative and the syntax of affected arguments. Cuadernos de Lingüística del I. U. I. Ortega y Gasset, 14, 153-173.
: Tager-Flusberg, H. (1993). Putting words together: Morphology and syntax in the preschool years, in B. Gleason (Ed.), The development of language. Nueva York, USA: Macmillan.
: Tallerman, M. (2009). Understanding Syntax. London: Hodder Arnold.
: Talmy, Leonard (1976), “Semantic causative types”, en M. Shibatani (ed.), Syntax and Semantics 6: The grammar of causative constructions, Nueva York, Academic Press, pp. 43-116.
: Tesar, Bruce. 2000. On the roles of optimality and strict domination in language learning, em Joost Dekkers, Frank Van der Leeuw e Jeroen Van de Weijer (eds.), Optimality Theory: Phonology , Syntax, and Acquisition, New York, Oxford University Press: 592-620.
: Thal, Donna J., Laureen O’hanlon, Mary Clemmons y LaShon Frailin 1999 "Validity of a parent report measure of vocabulary and syntax for preschool children with language impairment". Journal of Speech, Language & Hearing Research. 42, 2, 482-496. [100]https://doi.org/10.1044/jslhr.4202.482.
: Tomasello, M. (2004). Syntax or semantics? Response to Lidz et al. Cognition, 93, 139-140.
: Traugott, E. (1972). The History of English Syntax. Nueva York: Holt, Rinehart and Winston.
: Travis, Lisa. 1999. The L-syntax/s-syntax boundary: evidence Austronesian. En Formal issues in Austronesian syntax. Eds., Ileana Paul, Vivianne Phillips y Lisa Travis. Dordrecht: Kluwer.
: VAN VALIN, R. D. Jr. & LaPolla, R. J. (1997). Syntax. Structure, Meaning and Function. Cambridge: Cambridge U. Press.
: Van Valin, R. (2005). Exploring the syntax and semantic interface. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press . [96]https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511610578
: Van Valin, R. D. Jr & LaPolla, R. J. (1997). Syntax, structure, meaning and function. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press .
: Van Valin, R. Jr. & Foley, W. (1980). Role and reference grammar. In, E. Moravcsik & J. Wirth (Eds.) Current Approaches to Syntax (pp. 329-352). New York, USA: Academic Press.
: Van Valin, R. y LaPolla, R. (1997). Syntax. Structure, meaning and function. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
: Verhagen, A. (1995). Subjectification, syntax, and communication. En S. Dieter & S. Wright (Eds.), Subjectivity and Subjectivisation: Linguistic Perspectives (pp.103-128). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
: Verhagen, A. (2005). Constructions of Intersubjectivity Discourse, Syntax, and Cognition. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
: Verspoor, M., Dirven, M. y Radden, G. (1999). Putting concepts together: Syntax. En R. Dirven y M. Verspoor (eds.), Cognitive Exploration of Language and Linguistics (pp. 87-115). Ámsterdam/Filadelfia: John Benjamins.
: Villanueva, A. M. (2011). Effects of the typological distance between languages and of the number of known languages on the acquisition of the syntax of Spanish as a foreign language. Núcleo, 23(28), 217-251.
: Vázquez Rozas, Victoria (2006) “Gustar”. En Functional approaches to Spanish syntax. Lexical semantics, discourse and transitivity. Eds., J. Clancy Clements y Jiyoung Yoon. Ámsterdam: John Benjamins , 80-114.
: Weber, D. J. (1980). Switch-Reference: Quechua. En P. Munro (ed.), Studies of switch reference. UCLA Papers in Syntax (vol. 8, pp. 48-64). Los Angeles: University of California.
: Weigert, L. (1907). Untersuchungen zur spanischen Syntax auf Grund der Werke des Cervantes. Berlín: Meyer & Müller.
: Winford, D. (2008). Atlantic creole syntax. En K. Kouwenberg & J. Singler (Eds.), The Handbook of Pidgin and Creole Studies (pp. 19-47). Hoboken, NJ: Wiley-Blackwell.
: Zagona, K. (2002). The Syntax of Spanish. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press .
: Zagona, Karen. 1988. Verb Phrase Syntax: A Parametric Study of English and Spanish. Dordrecht: Springer.
: Zagona, Karen. 2002. The Syntax of Spanish. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
: Zucchi, A. (1993). The language of propositions and events. Issues in the syntax and semantics of nominalization. Dordrecht: Kluwer.
: [103]Bentahila[104], Abdelâli y Davies, Eirlys. 1983. The syntax of Arabic-French code-switching, Lingua, 59:301-330.
: [103]García, Erica C. 2009. The motivated syntax of arbitrary signs: cognitive constraints on Spanish clitic clustering, Amsterdam / Philadelphia, Benjamins.
: [106]Chomsky, Noam. 1965. Aspects of the theory of syntax, Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
: [106]Givón, Talmy. 2001. Syntax: an introduction, vol. 1. Amsterdam: Benjamins.
: [108]Dixon, Robert. 2000. A typology of causatives: form, syntax and meaning, en R. Dixon y A. Aikhenvald (eds.), Changing valency. Case studies in transitivity, Cambridge, Cambridge University Press: 30-83.
: [109]Givón[110], Talmy. [111]2001a. Syntax. A functional-typological introduction, Vol. I, Amsterdam/Philadelphia, John Benjamins Publishing Company.
: [115]Kany, Charles E. 1963. American Spanish Syntax, Chicago & London, University of Chicago Press.
: [116]Chomsky, Noam. 1977. On Wh-Movement, em P. W. Culicover, T. Wasow e , A. Akmajian (eds.), Formal Syntax, New York: 71-132.
: [121]Du Bois, John. 1985. Competing motivations, em J. Haiman (ed.), Iconicity in syntax, Amsterdam/Philadelphia, John Benjamins: 343-65.
: [123]Comrie, Bernard. 1989. Language universals and linguistic typology. Syntax and morphology, Chicago, The University of Chicago Press.
: [124]Givón, Talmy. 1990. Syntax: a functional-typological introduction, Amsterdam, John Benjamins.
: [127]Cameron, Richard. [128]1998. A variable syntax of speech, gesture, and sound effect: Direct quotations in Spanish. Language Variation and Change 10. 43-83.
: [128]Givón[129], Talmy. 1984. Syntax, Vol. II, Amsterdam /Philadelphia, John Benjamins Publishing.
: [129]Haspelmath[130], Martin. 2013. Argument indexing: a conceptual framework for the syntax of bound person forms, en D. Bakker y M. Haspelmath (eds.), Languages across boundaries: Studies in memory of Anna Siewierska, Berlin, Mouton De Gruyter: 197-226.
: [131]Chomsky, Noam. 2000. Minimalist inquiries: The framework, en Roger Martin, David Michaels y Juan Uriagereka (eds.), Step by step: Essays on minimalist syntax in honor of Howard Lasnik, Cambridge, Mass., MIT press: 89-156.
: [134]Anagnostopoulou[135], Elena. 2006. Clitic doubling, en M. Everaert & H. van Riemsdijk (eds.). The Blackwell Companion to Syntax, en Vol. I. Oxford: Blackwell: 519-581.
: [136]Baker, Mark. 2008. The Syntax of Agreement and Concord, Cambrigde, Cambridge University Press.
: [137]Embick, David y Rolf Noyer. 2001. Movement operations after syntax, Linguistic Inquiry, 32 (4): 555-595.
: [139]Harris, Alice y Lyle Campbell. 1995. Historical syntax in cross-linguistic perspective, Cambridge, Cambridge University Press.
: [143]Koopman[144], Hilda. 1986. The genesis of Haitian: Implications of a comparison of some features of the syntax of Haitian, French and West African Languages, em P. Muysken e N. Smith (eds.), Substrata Versus Universals in Creole Genesis, Amsterdam/Philadelphia, John Benjamins: 231-258.
: [144]Verhagen[145], Arie. 1995. Subjectification, syntax and communication, em D. Stein e S. Wright (eds.), Subjectivity and subjectivisation: linguistic perspectives, Cambridge, Cambridge University Press: 103-128.
: [146]Verhagen[147], Arie. 2005. Constructions of intersubjectivity: Discourse, syntax and cognition, Oxford, Oxford University Press.
: [147]Ross, John. 1967. Constrains on variables in syntax, Cambridge, MIT Press.
: [148]Morimoto, Yuko. 2007. Grammar of ‘manner of motion’ verbs in English and Spanish: between lexicon and syntax, en N. Delbecque y B. Cornillie (eds.), On interpreting construction schemas: from action and motion to transitivity and causality, Berlín, Mouton de Gruyter: 287-305.
: [148]Song, Jay.2001. Linguistic typology: morphology and syntax, London, Longmans.
: [150]Giorgi, Alessandra y Giuseppe Longobardi.[151] 1991. The syntax of noun phrases: configurations, parameters and empty categories, Cambridge / New York, Cambridge University Press.
: [152]Manzini, Maria Rita. 1986. On italian si, em Hagit Borer (org.) Syntax and semantics: the syntax of pronominal clitic, New York, Academic Press: 241-262.
: [154]Ritter, Elizabeth. 1991. Two functional categories in noun phrases: evidence from Modern Hebrew, en Susan Rohstein (ed.), Syntax and semantics 25: Perspectives on Phrase Structure, New York, Academic Press: 37-62.
: [155]Lightfoot, David.[156] 1979. Principles of diachronic syntax, Cambridge, Cambridge University Press.
: [160]Jaeggli[161], Osvaldo. 1986. Three Issues in the Theory of Clitics: Case, Doubled NPs, and Extraction, en Hagit Borer (ed.) Syntax and Semantics 19.The Syntax of Pronominal Clitics, Orlando, Academic Press: 15-42.
: [160]Talmy, Len. 1975. Semantics and Syntax of Motion, en J. Kimball, Syntax and Semantics 4, Cambridge, CUP: 181-238.
: [165]Uriagereka, Juan. 1995. Aspects of the syntax of clitics placement in Western Romance, Linguistic Inquiry, 26(1): 79-123.
: [167]López[168], Luis. 2009. A Derivational Syntax for Information Structure. Oxford, Oxford University Press.
: [169]Ritter, Elizabeth. 1991. Two functional categories in Noun Phrases: evidence from modern Hebrew, en S. Rothstein (ed). Perspectives on phrase structure, Number 26, Syntax and Semantics, New York, Academic Press: 37-62.
: [173]Ernst, Thomas. [174]2000. The Syntax of Adjuncts, Cambridge, Cambridge University Press.
: [177]Pujalte, Mercedes y Andrés Saab. 2012, Syncretism as PF-repair: the case of SE insertion in Spanish, en Ma C. Cuervo y Y. Roberge (eds.), The end of argument structure?, Syntax and Semantics 38, Bingley, Emerald: 229-260.
: [178]Kayne, Richard. 1998. Overt vs. Covert Movements, Syntax 1, 128-191.
: [183]Laenzlinger, Christopher. 2002. A Feature-based Theory of Adverb Syntax. GG@G (Generative Grammar in Geneva) 3, 67-105.
: [194]Ambar[195], Manuela. 1998. Infinitives vs. participles, en J. Costa (ed.), Portuguese Syntax: New Comparative Studies, Oxford/ New York: Oxford University Press: 1-30.
: [201]-------. 1992. Agreement and Case in past participle clauses in Italian, Syntax and Semantics, 26: 21-44.
: [211]Embick, David. 1997. Voice and the interfaces of Syntax, Tese de Doutorado, University of Pennsylvania. Inédita.
: [213]Embick, David. 2004. Unaccusative Syntax and Verbal Alternation, em Artemis Alexiadou, Elena Anagnostopoulou e Martin Everaert (ed.), The Unaccusativity Puzzle, Oxford, Oxford University Press: 137-158.
: [219]Friedmann, Na’ama e Yosef Grodzinsky. 2000. Split inflection in neurolinguistics, em M. A. Friedemann e L. Rizzi (eds.), The acquisition of syntax, Harlow, Longman: 84-104.
: [232]Guy, Gregory. 1981. Linguistic variation in Brazilian Portuguese: aspects of phonology, syntax and language history, Tese de Doutorado, University of Pennsylvania. Inédita.
: [32]Chomsky, Noam. 2000. Minimalist inquiries: the framework, en R. Martin et al. (eds.), Step by Step: essays on minimalist syntax in honor of Howard Lasnik, Cambridge, Mass, MIT Press, 89-155.
: [63]Keniston, Hayward. 1937. The Syntax of Castilian Prose, Chicago, The University of Chicago.
: [66]___________ 2001. Syntax: an introduction, Vol. 1, Amsterdam/Philadelphia, John Benjamins.
: [68]Li, Charles N. e Sandra A. Thompson. [69]1979. Third-person pronouns and zero-anaphora in Chinese discourse, em T. Givón (ed.), Syntax and semantics: discourse and syntax, vol. 12, Academic Press: 311-335.
: [77]Ochs, Elinor. 1979. Planned and unplanned discourse, in T. Givón (ed.), Syntax and semantics, Vol.12, Discourse and Syntax, Academic Press, University of Southern California, Los Angeles.
: [99]Bolinger[100], Dwight. 1979. Pronouns in discourse, en T. Givón (ed.) Syntax and semantics, vol. 12, New York, Academic Press: 289-309.
: [99]Givón[100], Talmy.[101] 1984. Syntax: a functional-typological introduction, Amsterdam, John Benjamins.
: _(1980). Beginning Morphology and Syntax. Ciudad de México: Summer Institute of Linguistics.
: _____. [162]2004. Issues in adverbial syntax, Lingua 114, 683-710.
: ______. (1985). Syntax of the Phrase Types in Kanamari. En D. Fortune (Ed.), Porto Velho Workpapers, SIL Publications.
: ______. (2011). Auto- and entre- versus(?) se. Remarks on interaction and competition between word formation and syntax, en Nolda, A. y O. Teuber. (eds.): Syntax and Morphology Multidimensional, Berlín: Mouton de Gruyter, 239-258.
: ______. 1977. The case for case reopened, em P. Cole and P. Sadock, Syntax and semantics: grammatical relations, vol. 08, New York, Academic Press: 59-82.
: _______. (1990). Syntax. A Functional-Typological Introduction II. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
: ________. 2006a. Zero in syntax, ten in pragmatics or subjectification as syntactic cancellation en A. Athanasiodou, C. Canakis y B. Cornillie (eds.), Subjectification: Various paths to subjectivity, Berlin-New York, Mouton de Gruyter: 375-398.
: van Valin, R. & LaPolla, R. (1997). Syntax: Structure, meaning and function. London: Cambridge University Press.