Termout.org logo/LING


Update: February 24, 2023 The new version of Termout.org is now online, so this web site is now obsolete and will soon be dismantled.

Lista de candidatos sometidos a examen:
1) third-person (*)
(*) Términos presentes en el nuestro glosario de lingüística

1) Candidate: third-person


Is in goldstandard

1
paper CO_Lenguajetxt181 - : First-person singular and third-person subject pronoun variation: The case of Mexican Spanish in the U .S. state of Georgia

2
paper CO_Lenguajetxt181 - : This pattern is generally thought to have a functional influence that has to do with referential tracking (^[152]Shin & Otheguy, 2009). As ^[153]Cameron (1994) explains, “expressed pronominal subjects compensate for the change of information state which occurs with a switch in subject reference” (pp. 40-41). In other words, overt SPs tend to be used in such contexts in order to facilitate interpretation of the antecedent. According to ^[154]Shin and Otheguy (2009), this is especially important for third-person referents for disambiguating between él and ella, as in the following example from their data:

3
paper CO_Lenguajetxt181 - : Third-person: Linguistic constraints

4
paper CO_Lenguajetxt181 - : Regarding variable SPE for third-person, the regression analysis revealed that two of the four factors were statistically significant: TMA and Switch reference (See [253]Table 7 ).

5
paper CO_Lenguajetxt181 - : Although the interaction between TMA and switch reference was not significant for 1sg as presented above, results for third-person pronouns from the interaction term TMA:switch reference did reveal a statistically significant effect (p < 0 .05). As seen in [256]Table 8, while the same/switch distinction is not substantial for present, preterit, and All Other TMAs, there is a stark contrast between same and switch for the Imperfect (% difference of 39%). Thus, overt SPs are much more likely to occur with verbs in the imperfect when there is also a switch in subject referent, consistent with previous studies that have examined this interaction (^[257]Cameron, 1994; ^[258]Shin, 2014)^[259]^10. Put another way, overt SPs are favored in switch reference contexts, especially for imperfects. In fact, 59% of switches in the imperfect are overt, making it one of the few variable contexts in which the production of overt SPs outweighs that of null SPs (59% overt vs. 41% null).

Evaluando al candidato third-person:


1) switch: 7 (*)
2) overt: 6
4) interaction: 3 (*)
5) shin: 3
8) contexts: 3
9) imperfect: 3 (*)

third-person
Lengua: eng
Frec: 46
Docs: 4
Nombre propio: 1 / 46 = 2%
Coocurrencias con glosario: 3
Puntaje: 3.870 = (3 + (1+4.70043971814109) / (1+5.55458885167764)));
Candidato aceptado

Referencias bibliográficas encontradas sobre cada término

(Que existan referencias dedicadas a un término es también indicio de terminologicidad.)
third-person
: [68]Li, Charles N. e Sandra A. Thompson. [69]1979. Third-person pronouns and zero-anaphora in Chinese discourse, em T. Givón (ed.), Syntax and semantics: discourse and syntax, vol. 12, Academic Press: 311-335.